It doesn't fully explain it but it's not incorrect either. It is very complex and I'd be lying if I said I or anyone else could explain everything about it.
We are only human, there are things we are yet to know or may never know.
Can you explain on a cellular and molecular level how your God creates such creatures? I very much doubt it but you still believe he does right, so is this not double standards?
Having the intelligence to understand how something works doesn't mean we therefore have the ability to replicate it, these are two different things.
We have limits to our abilities both mentally and physically even with the aid of technology.
We cannot simply turn around and say therefore that a God must have done it with some sort of magical ability and infinite knowledge because that in itself is an even bigger mystery than the one you are trying to answer it with.
This is called the 'God of Gaps' argument and it's a logic fallacy, I can give you more info on this if you wish or you could Google it.
Right, so in short, you are suggesting that we cannot explain how things around us were created.
And in reality this is the truth. Science has no explanation today as to how the first cell could have formed together, and which was created first: DNA or Protein? The code for each protein is contained in the DNA/RNA system. However, proteins are required in order to manufacture DNA. So which came first: proteins or DNA? The ONLY explanation is that they were created together.
For evolutionists, the chicken or egg dilemma goes even deeper. (
Request Rejected)
Some people confuse RNA with DNA saying first RNA was created and DNA is a better form of RNA. But is a deception. RNA is formed from DNA by a process called transcription. This uses enzymes like RNA polymerases. RNA is central to protein synthesis.
I'm sorry for going into technicalities because this is really not the place to write these stuff, my personal approach is generally based on 'common-sense' because I know finding the way to God is (and technically should be) possible for everyone alive on the earth and I don't think everyone will have access to such information in their life span of 50 to 60 years.
You see, saying that
who God is and how endless his knowledge and wisdom is, is another mystery -- is very irrelevant. Even the smallest cell is far much more complex than all the computers and all the technology we have today.
Please consider this:
IF we know, that things cannot have come from nothingness (because they are way too complex for that) then we do know someone is responsible for creating these. Now if the one responsible for these is someone who is out of our comprehension, is entirely a different topic, this doesn't negate Him from being the maker of these things.. I mean we do know He is there because we see the things He created. Are you suggesting that we don't believe in God only because we cannot comprehend who He is?
I don't think we have to be philosophical about it. Do you think the Stonehenge was there because.. nobody made it? (
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Stonehenge2007_07_30.jpg) or because of climatic changes it was produced (
http://images.nationalgeographic.co.../247/cache/stonehenge-above_24772_600x450.jpg )?
This is really amazing, because no one ever argues that. They say someone has made it. How complex is it the thing that we are talking about? ZERO. No complexity at all. But common-sense would make you realize no someone has made it. Now we don't know did it.. does that make you think that
since we don't know who did it, we'll reject its creation all together?
Take it a step further, if someone tells you that the Eiffel tower was there because there was a huge reserve of iron at that place and after millions of years, the Eiffel tower (
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/Base_of_Eiffel_Tower_at_Night.jpg) was created because of the climatic and environmental changes.
Any sane person would call it.. absurd. Of course its absurd.
I don't know who made the Eiffel tower and how they made it.. I don't plan on Googling it, does that direct me to thinking "Oh well, lets just call it evolution." No body made it because I don't know that person, or cannot comprehend how they did it.
The DNA (created naturally) is billions of times more complex than any of the things man has ever created. But they are all still convinced so firmly that it has evolved.
Please reflect on the excerpt from the book:
It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica— an incredible 384 volumes" worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves!
Yet in their actual size—which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick—a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and "there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written" ( Evolution: A Theory in Crisis , 1996, p. 334).
And this is why I say that I am really amazed at people who find it difficult to understand that
Allah is the one who created everything that's in the heavens and the earth and everything between these.
