Paris Attacks

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanEdge
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 381
  • Views Views 63K
Status
Not open for further replies.
Our duty - to sincerely convey the truth. Arguing with emotionally packaged falsehood will not diminish the truth of the Quran in the least, rather it will open the eyes of those who care to read for themselves.
Whaddaya expect me to say? Please baby, don't break my heart, oh oh.
Lol, seek the truth and be judged by Allah.
 
Well, you asked me a bunch of questions my friend, but in reality you did not answer the few I had...lol


Anyway, I was wondering this afternoon at work, on what you said about allowing a Caliphate to be establish once again.....and I asked my self....

How many Caliphates does Islam needs in order to figure out that an earthly Kingdom of God is impossible to achive while humans are at front directing!?

Look what Jesus said...

Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place.”Jo 18:36 NIV

How many more tousands of years do you guys need?

It was intresting to learn from you and Search about how you guys believe about the second coming of Jesus....and how relevant this may be in regards of a Caliphate or Jihad..or not

I also went to this web site in order to read more...I hope you aprove such....When I have to read something I avoid bias...and I go direct to the other side perspective to see how realy is...I hope you do the same!

.islamicperspectives.com/returnofjesus.htm

I think I understood everything..+ what you said and Search...but forgive me if I did not...

Well what all this have to do with Paris, Afheganistan, Iraq....Siria and everything that extremists do?

I would say everything!

Islam as a read, does not have a 100% fix position on what would be a perfect working Caliphate, it has no solid single base understanding....everyone believes diferent....

Some believe like Abz, that a Caliphate will happen before the 2nd coming of Jesus and Jesus will only be a suporter of a aready existing Caliphate I guess...

This position I believe is the position of the Jihads where some will use brutal force to make the Caliphate happen....their ultimatly goal...at least they have a direction...

How much of the Muslams believe this way?


Others like Search believe that it will happend only after Jesus return...but I am not sure, if this position is into the Caliphate ideia...also some like Search are not into violence jihad....

How many believe this way?


And third, as I understood....there is one more position, where the returning of Jesus is inrrelevant....and it may not even be Him, He is just a figure of expression...a simbol....

Also, It could be understood...that everything regarding Jesus is inrrelavant....I mean is not even going to happen....

So whats is what....nobody knows for sure! It reminds me a a biblical verse....

We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to our own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all. Isaiah 53:6

Man!!!!!! Cant you see how this verse makes so much sense!...

I ask my self, how can you dream at a human utopia????..And dream of a rightly Caliphate?.....A comandment for a caliphate in the current cenario, is a dream just as Markx was for comunists...humans will always be infinitly corrupted my friend...

I am sorry Abz....is right in front of you...but I will give to you "we are all free to dream!"

If I understood Search right....at leat it makes more sense the way she believes...

Also, what makes more sense...

You shall stabilish a Caliphate them the end will come..."by do way you are not done with this yet!"

or..

You shall preach to the end of earth end the end will come...."We are done already!"


A few people here said that there was 4 rigthly Caliphs..I would guess the by that statement you are also all Sunnis?....lol....you make me lol...

So can you achive a "right caliphate" with out Shia contribuing, or Sunnis plan to eliminating the Shia?

Oh thats why...you guys kill each other....

I am sorry all I see is failure on top of failure....

Honestly, its is hard to figure how Islam claims to have a unchaged word of God when they can not agree upon It! Just like Jews and Christians!

If it is unchanged should consequently be unanimous in all bases and teachings....

Now, this is my understanding so far..and I am sorry if I ofended anyone...its not my intention at all...

You probaly notice by my english that I am not American..sorry for this too....lol...I am from America but not from north....so I dont see things quite in a American way.....just saying...

At the same time, I would like to understand what is the issue......

Some times I hear the argument that Muslams are furious becouse of the invasion of Muslam lands....

I understand....but before it "belong" to muslams it actualy belonged to somebody else that belonged to somebody else....matter fact I believe the all belong to God and not us, we are just users....but whatever...

And is probaly logical.....If...If....you took land from someone weakier then you at some time ago...and you claimed to be God's will....How can you complain if somebody stronger than you show up and take if from you now? Is it that the will of God working again?...other wise could He not intervine and save from such as He always did in the OT in regards of Israel?

I mean....before Muslams...its probaly safe to say that the lands were house of Christians majorits...

What to say of all the battles the Egypt went trough to become a Muslam...or many others...its easy learn just google


I apologize for the Cruzaders....it was just that! Cruzaders!...following a popemancy! Nothing to do with the NT....or the OT for that matter...

Christians dont need an earthly kingdom right now...Jesus told us not to be illusive with such in this era....

We dont need todays Jerusalem for nothing...we dont need America, we Christians want the Jerusalem the come from above!..Its in Revelation! and we want to leave in peace until that day...

"What would matter to man to gain the whole world and loose his or her soul"

He also told us..

“Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. Mt 5:11-12 NIV

There are many other verses like this..but always with the same out come...We will be persecuted for the sake of His name....

“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. Jo 15:18 NIV


I totaly understand the complain over the lands of Palestine and Gaza...and etc...and I think its fair...

But Chriatians are dying all the time all over the world too and there no outcry....


The Israelis got kicked out from the land in the year 70 CE more or less by the Romans....I believe is safe to say....that would be hard to indentify who was in the land before them...

They got stronger and returned....by reading history it seems that this was a turning point for Islam as far as terrorist attacks goes...

Also I would like to make a comment regarding this...

One of the parts of the web site that I mention above, the Dr. goes on to say that Christians and Jews plan to destroy the mosque at the top of the mauntain...where the temple mount use to be I guess....

Lol.....I never heard such tale....and never heard a Christian fellow say such thing!...lol....

Maybe Popemancy goverments....Israel some how....but not true Christians....

It is true that in scriputure, the Temple have to be rebuilt....but also says that would be under no stress to anybody....meaning, in no way would inflict aflictions on Muslams or on anybody...
We believe such task will be achivied by the white horse...the ant Christ as the NT says....and for Christians is a matter of supernatural faith if I could say...and not by demostration of force.....


How the white horse will manage to do this making peacefull....is a good question!? But rest assure that Christian dont need, nither the temple or Jerusalem for nothing in this earthly era.....

Finalizing my long coment.....Its only logical to believe that, in order Muslams to set a new Caliphate, aperently you guys need to set the diferences with in Islam....as some branchs of Jews and Christians also did....

The west somehow achived a good degree of peace....we settle separatists, Irland calm down, toguether with England...Catholics left Evangelicals alone.....

Not perfect but....I cant complain!

So will the west sit while they get blamed for the Islamic division and get terrozided at same time?

That will hardly happen!

I believe the question to Muslams is:

Are you sure Surah Al-Anam 6:159 applies only to Jews and Christians?...lol

Are not Islam today subject to this very verse?????

Is it possible for Islam to settle their diferences?

I believe its the only way to stop terrorism....

Let me know if I am wrong....

God bless!
 
No point comparing me with "search" in order to find middle ground - better you read the Quran and Seerah for yourself,
I don't change my fundamental stances by basing them upon what the corrupt media or the media controlled zombies may say every season, i judge the strengt and validity of the words of the media and people around me based on Allah's words in the Quran and what He teaches.

Nor do i respect myself based upon how media mind controlled sheeple might perceive me, they'd disown me on the day of judgement and we'd be casting the blame at each other like a prickly grenade, just as they cast the chemicals in our brain around like a football on earth.
Interesting how, until this day, nobody other than the Muslims can show a way of life that can be defined and which they attempt to collectively adhere to.
No point throwing falsehhod at me in order to try and get me to dodge and dance like an idiot, because falsehod doesn't hold any weight on the balance even against a grain's weight of truth. It is better that we come together upon the teuth with sincerity and humility, or that we part ways.

Kamathal asshaytaani idh qaala li al insaan ukfur,
falamma kafara qaala innee baree un minka innee akhaaf Allaha rabbal 'aalameen.


It is better that we respect ourselves by what Allah has shown us to be respectable, even those who are currently infidels know it to be the most truthful and elevated way. Don't walk around like a poof or tart, or even the kuffar will snigg&r at you.

Nahnu qawmun a'azanaAllahu bil Islam.
In ibtaghytana al 'izzata min dooni al Islaam,
Azallana Allah.



Cameron and a few of their cronies from the international crime syndicate are now parroting Bush's and Blair's deceptions about how their unlawful and murderous corporate forays are going to make you safe, you'll know soon InshaAllah the extent of the mess that they're and have been getting you into:

Former MI5 chief demolishes Blair's defence of the Iraq war

Tony Blair's evidence to the Chilcot Inquiry that toppling Saddam Hussein helped make Britain safe from terrorists was dramatically undermined by the former head of MI5 yesterday.
Giving evidence to the same inquiry, Eliza Manningham-Buller revealed that there was such a surge of warnings of home-grown terrorist threats after the invasion of Iraq that MI5 asked for – and got – a 100 per cent increase in its budget. Baroness Manningham-Buller, who was director general of MI5 in 2002-07, told the Chilcot panel that MI5 started receiving a "substantially" higher volume of reports that young British Muslims being drawn to al-Qa'ida.

She told the inquiry: "Our involvement in Iraq radicalised, for want of a better word, a whole generation of young people – a few among a generation – who saw our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan as being an attack on Islam."

She added: "Arguably we gave Osama bin Laden his Iraqi jihad so that he was able to move into Iraq in a way that he was not before."Her words are in stark contrast to the claim that Mr Blair made in front of the same inquiry on 29 January. The former prime minister told Sir John Chilcot: "If I am asked whether I believe we are safer, more secure, that Iraq is better, that our own security is better, with Saddam and his two sons out of office and out of power, I believe indeed we are."
It was better to deal with this threat, to remove him from office, and I do genuinely believe that the world is safer as a result."But the evidence presented by Lady Manningham-Buller does not just call Mr Blair's credibility into question, it also throws down a challenge to the coalition Government, warned Lord Carlile of Berriew, a Liberal Democrat peer who has acted since 2005 as the independent reviewer of anti-terror laws. He told The Independent: "It's certainly the case that the threat and number of home-grown terrorists – and 'not home-grown' terrorists coming into the UK – increased after the Iraq war.

"This makes life difficult both for the old government, who have criticisms to answer, and for the current Government. It makes their review of current terrorism law a delicate exercise because there is no evidence of any significant reduction in the threat. We are where we were."

Sir Menzies Campbell, former leader of the Liberal Democrats, added: "I should be astonished if Mr Blair were to return to give further evidence, but questions will remain as to what it was which prompted him to disregard the reservations of officials and their advice. If only Britain had been as well served by its politicians as it was by Eliza Manningham-Buller then we would never have got ourselves into the illegal mess of Iraq."
Lord West, who was counter-terrorism minister in the Home Office under Gordon Brown, told the BBC that he had "no doubt" that the Iraq war increased the threat of terrorism in the UK, which hit the government like a "bow wave" in 2003.
Ken Livingstone, who was Mayor of London at the time of the 7 July bombings, said: "Eliza Manningham-Buller's evidence is a dam*ing indictment of a foreign policy that not only significantly enhanced the risk of terrorist attacks in London but gave al-Qa'ida the opening to operate in Iraq too."Before 2003, MI5's concern had been the possibility that foreign terrorists would infiltrate the UK. Afterwards, she said: "We realised that the focus was not foreigners. The rising and increasing threat was a threat from British citizens and that was a very different scenario to stopping people coming in. It was what has now become called home-grown."
She added: "We were pretty well swamped – that's possibly an exaggeration – but we were very overburdened with intelligence on a broad scale that was pretty well more than we could cope with in terms of plots, leads to plots and things that we needed to pursue."
By 2003 I found it necessary to ask the Prime Minister for a doubling of our budget. This is unheard of, but he and the Treasury and the Chancellor accepted that because I was able to demonstrate the scale of the problem."The Chilcot panel published a previously classified document which showed that the former MI5 boss was not simply being wise after the event. A year before British troops went into Iraq, she sent the Home Office a memo which – though phrased in official language – demolished the idea that Saddam Hussein's regime represented a credible terrorist threat to the UK.
In a memo to John Gieve, Permanent Secretary to the Home Office, in March 2002, Lady Manningham-Buller told him that Saddam was not likely to use chemical or biological weapons unless "he felt the survival of his regime was in doubt".

The memo went on: "We assess that Iraqi capability to mount attacks in the UK is currently limited."Lady Manningham-Buller also hinted at tension between Mr Blair's office and MI5 over the dossier that the Prime Minister presented to Parliament in September 2002, to prepare public opinion for the likelihood of war."We were asked to put in some low-grade, small intelligence to it and we refused because we didn't think it was reliable," she said.Evidence: What he said – and what she saidFalse claims of links between al-Qa'ida and Saddam Hussein

Tony Blair claimed on 21 Jan 2003:"There is some intelligence evidence about loose links between al-Qa'ida and various people in Iraq... It would not be correct to say there is no evidence whatever of linkages between al-Qa'ida and Iraq."

Foreign Office spokesman claimed on 29 Jan 2003:"We believe that there have been, and still are, some al-Qa'ida operatives in parts of Iraq controlled by Baghdad. It is hard to imagine that they are there without the knowledge and acquiescence of the Iraqi government."Eliza Manningham-Buller, former head of MI5, yesterday:"There was no credible intelligence to suggest that connection and that was the judgment, I might say, of the CIA."Hand-picking flimsy 'intelligence'

Blair, to the Commons 24 Sept 2002:"It [the intelligence service] concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes; and that he is actively trying to acquire nuclear weapons capability..."

Blair, to the Commons 25 Feb 2003:"The intelligence is clear: He [Saddam] continues to believe his WMD programme is essential both for internal repression and for external aggression. The biological agents we believe Iraq can produce include anthrax, botulinum, toxin, aflatoxin and ricin. All eventually result in excruciatingly painful death.

"Manningham-Buller, yesterday:"The nature of intelligence – it is a source of information, it is rarely complete, it needs to be assessed, it is fragmentary... We were asked to put in some low-grade, small intelligence to it [the September 2002 dossier] and we refused because we didn't think it was reliable."
Iraq posed no risk to Britain
Blair, to the Commons 10 April 2002:"Saddam Hussein is developing weapons of mass destruction, and we cannot leave him doing so unchecked. He is a threat to his own people and to the region and, if allowed to develop these weapons, a threat to us also."Manningham-Buller, yesterday:"We regarded the direct threat from Iraq as low... we didn't believe he had the capability to do anything in the UK."Ministers were told that invading Iraq would increase the threat of terrorism to Britain

Blair, farewell speech at the Labour conference, 26 September 2006:"This terrorism isn't our fault. We didn't cause it. It's not the consequence of foreign policy."Manningham-Buller, yesterday:"It was communicated through the JIC assessments, to which I fed in... I believe they [senior ministers] did read them. If they read them, they can have had no doubt."The Iraq war made Britain a more dangerous place and allowed al-Qa'ida to gain a hold in IraqBlair, 29 Jan 2010:"If I am asked whether I believe we are safer, more secure, that Iraq is better, that our own security is better, I believe we are. The world is safer as a result."

Manningham-Buller, yesterday:
"Our involvement in Iraq radicalised a generation of young people who saw our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan as an attack on Islam. We [MI5] were pretty well swamped... with intelligence on a broad scale that was pretty well more than we could cope with in terms of plots, leads to plots and things that we needed to pursue."We gave Osama bin Laden his Iraqi jihad so that he was able to move into Iraq in a way that he was not before.

The post-Iraq plots7/7 bombers - 2005
The bombs detonated on London Underground trains and a bus in July 2005 killed 52 members of the public and injured around 700. Three of the four suicide bombers had been born in Yorkshire; the fourth, born in Jamaica, came to the UK aged five. In his video, one bomber said: "Your democratically elected governments continuously perpetuate atrocities."

London Haymarket/Glasgow Airport attacks – 2007
Bilal Abdulla, a doctor, and Kafeel Ahmed, a PhD engineering student, tried and failed to set off bombs outside a

London nightclub on 29 June. The following day they drove a jeep filled with gas canisters into Glasgow Airport. Abdulla's trial heard his involvement was "because of events in Iraq".

Liquid bomb plot – 2006
A terror plot was exposed in which liquid bombs were to be smuggled on to airliners. Many of the men made 'suicide' videos citing British foreign policy. Umar Islam said in his video: "If you think you can go into our land and do what you are doing in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine and... think it will not come back on to your doorstep, you have another thing coming."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...s-blairs-defence-of-the-iraq-war-2031289.html

But Then It Was Too Late

"What no one seemed to notice," said a colleague of mine, a philologist, "was the ever widening gap, after 1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with*knowing*one is governing."

What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it."This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter.

"You will understand me when I say that my Middle High German was my life. It was all I cared about. I was a scholar, a specialist. Then, suddenly, I was plunged into all the new activity, as the university was drawn into the new situation; meetings, conferences, interviews, ceremonies, and, above all, papers to be filled out, reports, bibliographies, lists, questionnaires. And on top of that were the demands in the community, the things in which one had to, was ‘expected to’ participate that had not been there or had not been important before. It was all rigmarole, of course, but it consumed all one’s energies, coming on top of the work one really wanted to do. You can see how easy it was, then, not to think about fundamental things. One had no time.""Those," I said, "are the words of my friend the baker. ‘One had no time to think. There was so much going on.’"

"Your friend the baker was right," said my colleague. "The dictatorship, and the whole process of its coming into being, was above all*diverting. It provided an excuse not to think for people who did not want to think anyway. I do not speak of your ‘little men,’ your baker and so on; I speak of my colleagues and myself, learned men, mind you. Most of us did not want to think about fundamental things and never had. There was no need to. Nazism gave us some dreadful, fundamental things to think about—we were decent people—and kept us so busy with continuous changes and ‘crises’ and so fascinated, yes, fascinated, by the machinations of the ‘national enemies,’ without and within, that we had no time to think about these dreadful things that were growing, little by little, all around us. Unconsciously, I suppose, we were grateful. Who wants to think?

"To live in this process is absolutely not to be able to notice it—please try to believe me—unless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us had ever had occasion to develop. Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, ‘regretted,’ that, unless one were detached from the whole process from the beginning, unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these ‘little measures’ that no ‘patriotic German’ could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing. One day it is over his head.


.....


You will notice clearly how eloquently the brother describes the events and if you have a pondering mind, you'll wonder why the bush and buddy administrations clamped down on the ability of the tv media to get open interviews and air them while at the same time giving you skewed and totally false interpretations of his words, "oh he hates you for your freedoms that we give you" lol.

Look at the "scary" things he says:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjXGOluWSR0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqQwnqjA-6w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9Rwo-Oicj8
 
Last edited:
Muslims worldwide are against extremists and terrorists. Full Stop. Period. Dot. However, whether the extremists and terrorists are out of the folds of Islam, is not the judgment domain of the Muslim layperson but Islamic scholars. So, calling an extremist or terrorist a "brother" is not actually endorsing the extremists' position.

Why can't we all just call each other "brother" and "sister"? Why can't we recognize ourselves as one family in humanity? :)
 
:) well that would depend on the depth of his knowledge, his sincerity, and his intention.

Amr ibn Al-As reported:
The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said,
“If a judge makes a ruling, striving sincerely in understanding and applying the correct reasoning*(ijtihad)*and he is correct, then he will have two rewards. If a judge makes a ruling, striving sincerely in understanding and applying the correct reasoning*(ijtihad)and he is mistaken, then he will have one reward.”

Source: Sahih Bukhari 6919, Sahih Muslim 1716
Grade:*Muttafaqun Alayhi*(authenticity agreed upon) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslimعَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ

صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ*إِذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ فَلَهُ أَجْرَانِ وَإِذَا*حَكَمَ*فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَخْطَأَ فَلَهُ أَجْرٌ6919 صحيح البخاري كتاب الاعتصام بالكتاب والسنة باب أجر الحاكم إذا اجتهد فأصاب أو أخطأ1716 صحيح مسلم كتاب الأقضية باب بيان أجر الحاكم إذا اجتهد فأصاب أو أخطأ

Have you given up on the idea of virgins already? must be sound incredible to you wherever you live that virgins could exist even on planet earth......

So... to be clear... as this question comes up a lot in conversations between non-muslims... is the 72 virgins thing legit and taken in any way seriously by Islam or is that just something islamophobes use to insult Muslims with?
 
Last edited:
So... to be clear... as this question comes up a lot in conversations between non-muslims... is the 72 virgins thing legit and taken in any way seriously by Islam or is that just something islamophobes use to insult Muslims with?

I haven't as of yet found a reliable source mentioning it, i did however happen to notice that verse 72 of chapter 55 mentions the virgin maidens of paradise, now whether it's really 72, or someone accidentally read it as 72 when reading - God knows best.
To the poser of the question, i'd say: "it could be 72, 144, or even 720, why halve or quarter it if your intention is good mate :)
 
Why can't we all just call each other "brother" and "sister"? Why can't we recognize ourselves as one family in humanity? :)

We can.
When we are all united upon the truth and are willing to humbly submit to the true authority in our differences.
Otherwise you'd be saying oh it's all the same, follow whatever you want to follow, do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law, whether you believe in one God, or loads, or none, believe in the Prophets, or some, or call them all liars, whether you like to follow the law of kennedy, or nixon, or reagan, or clinton, or obama, or hitler, or the pope, or blair, or thatcher or campbell, or mussolini, or hasina, or khaleda, or ershad, or uncle tom or sally soccermom, whether you form a group in china and a group in russia, and a group in europe and a group in north america and a group in south america, and a group in india, and a group in okinawa, and a group in my little village in bangladesh which is connected to the european continent and china and russia, and connected to the isles called britain and the isles called australia and the isles called america via water - it is all the same. The debri in the van allen belt and the poison in the oceans is too worrisome to think about, and even if we try to get together and discuss it and then fall into disagreement, the law of the jungle will prevail anyway.
But know that if you wish to resort to strength over intellect - that Allah is exalted in power and able to excercise His will.
 
Last edited:
:bism:

So... to be clear... as this question comes up a lot in conversations between non-muslims... is the 72 virgins thing legit and taken in any way seriously by Islam or is that just something islamophobes use to insult Muslims with?

I'd say both:

In a prophetic tradition, it is relayed that a true martyr (not our modern-day terrorist/extremist) will be given maidens of Paradise alongside other rewards like being able to intercede for 70 of his relatives, forgiveness of sins, safety from the fear that will overtake peoples on Judgment Day, protection from punishment in the grave, et cetera.

Similar to how we as Americans honor and pay tribute to our army men when they lose their lives fighting for our country and our people. In that same way, God also chooses to honor heroes that sacrifice themselves in appointed honorable cause for God's sake.

Now, consider, if a person who wasn't an army man went out in another country and killed people, would he be honored? No.

That is why my present sheikh (Islamic teacher) (may Allah bless him) always reminds all Muslims and non-Muslims of the prophetic tradition wherein a "matryr" will appear before God, and God will ask him what he did for God to merit Paradise, and he will say I died for You. And God will say that you lie and that person will be thrown into hell-fire. That prophetic tradition is what my sheikh (may Allah bless him) has repeatedly said describes the so-called wannabe "matryrs" (that is, terrorists/extremists) of today who kill out of vengeance, hatred, diseased hearts, greed, or ego and not for God.

Also, there's a very excellent treatise called Jihad, Terrorism, and Suicide Perspective, which debunks the rashness and stupidity of anyone believing that modern-day extremists or terrorists are waging jihad; they're not. Instead, they are killing innocent people and in the process displeasing God, and I can only hope there's divine swift retribution of the evil they're perpetrating in this life, and I'm not concerned about the next world (for God will definitely repay them for their evil bloodlust).

Islamophobes definitely use the specific aforementioned prophetic tradition to insult Muslims, but Islam is taken holistically and not in parts; the Islamophobes take parts and forget the rest like the extremists/terrorists of the world who are just as idiotically motivated; actually, both groups, extremists'/terrorists' approach and Islamophobes' approach to Islam is very similar wherein it's a cut-and-paste DIY job. Of course, both ignore Islam's actual position on the matter, and also ignore the proofs that scholars worldwide by consensus use to say that they are wrong and misguided and misinformed.
 
Why can't we all just call each other "brother" and "sister"? Why can't we recognize ourselves as one family in humanity? :)
There is brotherhood in faith, there is brotherhood in nationality, there is brotherhood in humanity.

You cannot be my brother in faith because you are not Muslim. You cannot be my brother in nationality because you are not Indonesian. But just like me, you are a human too. So, we are brother in humanity.

But unfortunately there are religious people, not only Muslims, who believe that the only brotherhood is in faith. I think you know about it Pygo because maybe you have ever experienced which some people see you as enemy just because you are not in their faith.
 

That's great!

When we are all united upon the truth and are willing to humbly submit to the true authority in our differences.

Oh. Not so great then. You are saying we can't live and let live in peace as a family of humanity unless we all bow to you and your way of thinking? So even if we in the west managed to convince all of our governments and other people here to stop interfering in Muslim lands, you'd still want to come and dominate us and make us bow to your ways? That would kind of justify said western inteference in your lands, would it not?

But know that if you wish to resort to strength over intellect - that Allah is exalted in power and able to excercise His will.

Strength over intellect? Are you so egotistical that you proclaim your way to be the only intellectual way? Or am I misreading?
 
In a prophetic tradition, it is relayed that a true martyr (not our modern-day terrorist/extremist) will be given maidens of Paradise alongside other rewards

So human beings and sexuality really are promised as booty and reward and this is still believed in today? We see something similar in the Christian Bible, but I don't think many Christians still look at those passages and see women as a reward. Does the opposite also hold true? Do women who are true martyrs get hunks of Paradise alongside other rewards?
 
But unfortunately there are religious people, not only Muslims, who believe that the only brotherhood is in faith. I think you know about it Pygo because maybe you have ever experienced which some people see you as enemy just because you are not in their faith.

True, you need only look a few posts upstream to see it. And it isn't unique to Islam. It is part of the prejudice and tribalism and us vs them thinking that sadly comes with being human.
 
That's great!

Glad you saw sense

Oh. Not so great then. You are saying we can't live and let live in peace as a family of humanity unless we all bow to you and your way of thinking? So even if we in the west managed to convince all of our governments and other people here to stop interfering in Muslim lands, you'd still want to come and dominate us and make us bow to your ways? That would kind of justify said western inteference in your lands, would it not?

Oh.....appears you were just pretending....
Pygo we've had this conversation a few years back and you said something almost identical, when given a clear answer you faded away and didn't come back to the thread until the topic had morphed.
I clearly told you that it is the way of the Creator of the heavens and the earth, my Lord and your Lord, my sustainer and your sustainer. And i explained how i myself have to discipline myself and disregard whimsical tendencies in order to walk straight upon it. I can see that by painting it falsely as "mine" you can attempt to mirror it with "yours", it is however nonsensical to do so because it would result in global anarchy.

The psychology is described without ambiguity here:

And they were not divided until after the knowledge came unto them, through rivalry among themselves; and had it not been for a Word that had already gone forth from thy Lord for an appointed term, it surely had been judged between them. And those who were made to inherit the Scripture after them are verily in hopeless doubt concerning it.
Quran 42:14




Time is of the essence - repent and walk aright.



Strength over intellect? Are you so egotistical that you proclaim your way to be the only intellectual way? Or am I misreading?

Again, me me me....sigh.
it's God's guidance, and He has a lot more intellect than you, me and everyone else combined.


Say: If there had been (other) gods with Him, as they say,- behold, they would certainly have sought out a way to the Lord of the Throne!
Quran 17:42


Can you not see the truth, sense and harmony of what is being presented?
 
Last edited:
:bism:

Critics of Islam have look at the concept of "Houris" (translated as "maidens" though they are not human and are said to be unlike anything we can imagine in this world because our imagination is in limits) and criticized the sensual nature of Paradise.

So, first, before I address your question, I'd like to further clarify the matter:

Not only martyrs but also ordinary everyday men who practice constant istighfar (asking forgiveness from God) are given Houris too and also any men who have worked for Paradise by following the proscriptions in Islam at the cost of their nafs (ego). However, there's a prophetic tradition that I noted above promises specifically Houris to martyrs alongside other rewards (which notably Islamophobes use against Muslims as a form of "insult").

In Islam, as you may note, men and women are forbidden to engage in any premarital intimacy with the opposite gender before marriage. Islamic scholars note that one of the differences between angels and human beings is the nafs (ego). Islamic scholars say that if God had not put nafs inside of man, none of us would care about eating or engaging in physical intimacy with the opposite sex as we'd only be busy with God's remembrance. So, any person who succeeds in God's remembrance despite the obstacle that nafs and dominates the nafs in this world is given an awesome reward in the next world (and one of the rewards God has relayed is Houris for men). Also, Paradise, despite its sensual pleasures, like eating tasty foods and other physical pleasures, is filled with God's remembrance and adoration and in fact that remembrance and adoration is omnipresent in all heavenly activities.

Well, as to what women get in Paradise, again, Islamic scholars say that females are honored too. And any person in Paradise gets whatever they want - so, it could be anything that in this instance the female martyr wants, and what God can give can't be said to be limited by humans as divine honor has no beginning nor end. For example, a prophetic tradition relays that there was a farmer and he loved to cultivate land. So, he asks God to give him land to cultivate in Paradise. For that farmer, that was what he wished, and so God grants him that wish. So, anything is possible, and no one can limit what is possible, given that for God anything is possible.

That said, I have not come across any prophetic tradition noting what females get; and so all we know is that females get what will equally make them happy. And I should note that your question is very male, and perhaps even coming from the notion that believing females would want perhaps the same things as men? To be perfectly honest, I don't believe that's the case; and in fact perhaps getting the same thing as men would get would be oppressive as what women want and men want are different even in dunya (this world). For example, believing men, due the aforesaid nafs (ego), might have the desires for many women in dunya (this world) even if they refrain from acting on that nafs' (ego's) desire. However, despite the nafs (ego) present in believing women, I'm fairly confident they only desire to be loved by one man, Mr. Right a.k.a. their Prince Charming, if you will, not by many "hunks."

Now, let's reverse and play a hypothetical scenario: You tell me, imagine, God can grant you any wish in Paradise? You want a car, say. So, you ask God for a car in Heaven. But is that car honor for you in Heaven?

My sheikh (Islamic teacher) (may Allah bless him) taught that while Houris and other rewards are given to people of Paradise, it is not real honor for mankind to ask God for that, but that God gives human beings those things because of their sacrifices made in dunya (this world). My sheikh (Islamic teacher) (may Allah bless him) used to say that mankind should instead ask for God himself and God's endless pleasure as that is real honor.

There are levels in Paradises; and man acquires what he wants but this is according to his intentions in dunya (this world), and if he intended to get rewards and booty in Paradise, then that's what he will get.

However, there is the other type of man, that recognizes real honor is not to get these rewards and booty but be with the Owner of All and Author of All Rewards and Booty. That type of man, to give him rewards and booty in Paradise, is to throw him in prison because that man was not in love with the "things" of the world and is also not in love with the "things" of Paradise. Instead, the man is in love with the Owner of Paradise. So, the only honor for this type of man is then to be given the honor to be with God all the time and it is this type of man endlessly favored and honored by God.

Is what I've written above believed to be true to today? Of course.

So human beings and sexuality really are promised as booty and reward and this is still believed in today? We see something similar in the Christian Bible, but I don't think many Christians still look at those passages and see women as a reward. Does the opposite also hold true? Do women who are true martyrs get hunks of Paradise alongside other rewards?
 
Pygo we've had this conversation a few years back and you said something almost identical, when given a clear answer you faded away and didn't come back to the thread until the topic had morphed.
I clearly told you that it is the way of the Creator of the heavens and the earth, my Lord and your Lord, my sustainer and your sustainer. And i explained how i myself have to discipline myself and disregard whimsical tendencies in order to walk straight upon it. I can see that by painting it falsely as "mine" you can attempt to mirror it with "yours", it is however nonsensical to do so because it would result in global anarchy.

The psychology is described without ambiguity here:

And they were not divided until after the knowledge came unto them, through rivalry among themselves; and had it not been for a Word that had already gone forth from thy Lord for an appointed term, it surely had been judged between them. And those who were made to inherit the Scripture after them are verily in hopeless doubt concerning it.
Quran 42:14

You say you give a clear answer but then you give me such airy language. Do you or do you not take the intention of dominating and/or destroying others and other ways of life? And if you do, then does that not justify people who hold such other ways of life dear to dominate and/or destroy you and your way of life before you do it to them? If so, then why do you complain about western aggression so often? You appear to justify it.

Can you not see the truth, sense and harmony of what is being presented?

No. I really can't. And that does not make me dishonest, senseless or disharmonious. Nor does it make me or anyone else who disagrees with you unintelligent.

And yes, I say you, and not God, because from my point of view this is coming from you, and not God, since your God is a creation of your mind. And not only that, but what you say of you God and what he wants is very different than what other people say of their God(s) and what he/she/it/they want, including other people who call themselves Muslims, even in this very thread. To me, all of these Gods are creations of your minds, and you are all speaking your minds and your views in the context of theology.

That is fine with me, and I don't seek to offend anybody or dominate/destroy them or their beliefs, so long as they don't seek to dominate or destroy me or mine. Some religious people seem to be able to handle that and co-exist peacefully. You don't appear to be one of them. I would like to be wrong about that. Am I?
 
Last edited:
You say you give a clear answer but then you give me such airy language. Do you or do you not take the intention of dominating and/or destroying others and other ways of life? And if you do, then does that not justify people who hold such other ways of life dear to dominate and/or destroy you and your way of life before you do it to them? If so, then why do you complain about western aggression so often? You appear to justify it.



No. I really can't. And that does not make me dishonest, senseless or disharmonious. Nor does it make me or anyone else who disagrees with you unintelligent.

And yes, I say you, and not God, because from my point of view this is coming from you, and not God, since your God is a creation of your mind. And not only that, but what you say of you God and what he wants is very different than what other people say of their God(s) and what he/she/it/they want, including other people who call themselves Muslims, even in this very thread. To me, all of these Gods are creations of your minds, and you are all speaking your minds and your views in the context of theology.

That is fine with me, and I don't seek to offend anybody or dominate/destroy them or their beliefs, so long as they don't seek to dominate or destroy me or mine. Some religious people seem to be able to handle that and co-exist peacefully. You don't appear to be one of them. I would like to be wrong about that. Am I?
I agree with most of what you said....except that God is something from our imagination...Lol...

God exists my friend....There is doubt in my heart...but we all need to seek by our selfs in order to find it.....

As far as I know you are on track! Keep looking! Rev. 3:20!

God bless!
 
:bism:

Critics of Islam have look at the concept of "Houris" (translated as "maidens" though they are not human and are said to be unlike anything we can imagine in this world because our imagination is in limits) and criticized the sensual nature of Paradise.

So, first, before I address your question, I'd like to further clarify the matter:

Not only martyrs but also ordinary everyday men who practice constant istighfar (asking forgiveness from God) are given Houris too and also any men who have worked for Paradise by following the proscriptions in Islam at the cost of their nafs (ego). However, there's a prophetic tradition that I noted above promises specifically Houris to martyrs alongside other rewards (which notably Islamophobes use against Muslims as a form of "insult").

Better to describe what is true rather than what those who ungratefully and unlawfully show infidelity to God say that is wrong, as it appears that they occupy a large portion of the forefront of one's mind.


In Islam, as you may note, men and women are forbidden to engage in any premarital intimacy with the opposite gender before marriage. Islamic scholars note that one of the differences between angels and human beings is the nafs (ego). Islamic scholars say that if God had not put nafs inside of man, none of us would care about eating or engaging in physical intimacy with the opposite sex as we'd only be busy with God's remembrance. So, any person who succeeds in God's remembrance despite the obstacle that nafs and dominates the nafs in this world is given an awesome reward in the next world (and one of the rewards God has relayed is Houris for men). Also, Paradise, despite its sensual pleasures, like eating tasty foods and other physical pleasures, is filled with God's remembrance and adoration and in fact that remembrance and adoration is omnipresent in all heavenly activities.

Paradise is the eternal reward after passing of the worldly tests, retirement from work with a high stipend and full benefits in this world is the reward after the worldly test, unlike getting a high paid job after studying hard whilst others play and get drunk. However, by the time most people are retiring from work in this world, they're too old to really get to enjoy it as a 25 year old would.


Well, as to what women get in Paradise, again, Islamic scholars say that females are honored too. And any person in Paradise gets whatever they want - so, it could be anything that in this instance the female martyr wants, and what God can give can't be said to be limited by humans as divine honor has no beginning nor end. For example, a prophetic tradition relays that there was a farmer and he loved to cultivate land. So, he asks God to give him land to cultivate in Paradise. For that farmer, that was what he wished, and so God grants him that wish. So, anything is possible, and no one can limit what is possible, given that for God anything is possible.

Whereas humans do not know, God knows best exactly what humans will get, some of it has been described in worldly terms for the human mind to comprehend, however God has explained to us that the rewards are what no eye has seen and no mind can perceive.
There is absolutely no need to hypothesize and conjecture about orgies when no such information has been provided.

(1) Abu Huraira reported Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying that: Allah the Exalted and Glorious, said: I have prepared for My pious servants which no eye has ever seen, and no ear has ever heard, and no human heart has ever perceived but it is testified by the Book of Allah. He then recited:" No soul knows what comfort has been concealed from them, as a reward for what they did". (xxxii. 17) (Book #040, Hadith #6780)

(2) Abu Huraira reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, said: I have prepared for My pious servants which no eye (has ever) seen, no ear has (ever) heard and no human heart has ever perceived those bounties leaving apart (those bounties) about which Allah has informed you. (Book #040, Hadith #6781)

(3) Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said that Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, said: I have prepared for My pious servants which the eye has seen not, and the ear has heard not and no human heart has ever perceived such bounties leaving aside those about which Allah has informed you. He then recited:" No soul knows what comfort has been hidden for thein". (Book #040, Hadith #6782)
Muslim

http://www.ahlalhdeeth.com/vbe/showthread.php?t=9720


That said, I have not come across any prophetic tradition noting what females get; and so all we know is that females get what will equally make them happy. And I should note that your question is very male, and perhaps even coming from the notion that believing females would want perhaps the same things as men? To be perfectly honest, I don't believe that's the case; and in fact perhaps getting the same thing as men would get would be oppressive as what women want and men want are different even in dunya (this world). For example, believing men, due the aforesaid nafs (ego), might have the desires for many women in dunya (this world) even if they refrain from acting on that nafs' (ego's) desire. However, despite the nafs (ego) present in believing women, I'm fairly confident they only desire to be loved by one man, Mr. Right a.k.a. their Prince Charming, if you will, not by many "hunks."

It doesn't mean that if a man or woman did have perverted inclinations or satanic waswas in this world, that God would create the same in paradise, therefore the reasoning provided doesn't hold to scrutiny. Again, i say: God knows best.

Now, let's reverse and play a hypothetical scenario: You tell me, imagine, God can grant you any wish in Paradise? You want a car, say. So, you ask God for a car in Heaven. But is that car honor for you in Heaven?



Someone might want to race their friends, then they might ask for skills according to their skills in dunya.
Talking about such is safer than talking about orgies of which there is absolutely no knowledge.

My sheikh (Islamic teacher) (may Allah bless him) taught that while Houris and other rewards are given to people of Paradise, it is not real honor for mankind to ask God for that, but that God gives human beings those things because of their sacrifices made in dunya (this world). My sheikh (Islamic teacher) (may Allah bless him) used to say that mankind should instead ask for God himself and God's endless pleasure as that is real honor.

There are levels in Paradises; and man acquires what he wants but this is according to his intentions in dunya (this world), and if he intended to get rewards and booty in Paradise, then that's what he will get.

However, there is the other type of man, that recognizes real honor is not to get these rewards and booty but be with the Owner of All and Author of All Rewards and Booty. That type of man, to give him rewards and booty in Paradise, is to throw him in prison because that man was not in love with the "things" of the world and is also not in love with the "things" of Paradise. Instead, the man is in love with the Owner of Paradise. So, the only honor for this type of man is then to be given the honor to be with God all the time and it is this type of man endlessly favored and honored by God.

Did your sheikh ever tell you to do your best to provide sources where possible? Especially on issues of contention?
Sort of like providing a hadith with a link, or a verse with a link, a sultuaan, rather than just claiming kadha wa kadha.

Verily, those who dispute about the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allah, without any authority having come to them, there is nothing else in their breasts except pride [to accept you (Muhammad SAW) as a Messenger of Allah and to obey you]. They will never have it (i.e. Prophethood which Allah has bestowed upon you). So seek refuge in Allah (O Muhammad SAW from the arrogants). Verily, it is He Who is the All- Hearer, the All-Seer.
Quran 40:56

I can provide you with sheikhs telling you that it is ok to go and pray to graves of saints, or that writing numbers on amulets and charming people with them is fine, but the words of such sheikhs would hold no weight unless there was a Quranic source or other clear reasoning,


However, the phenomena is not new, just that some prefer to use their intellect to reason the unerring basis of the Quran rather than dump all their false reasonings on the backs of so called scholars who mislead many and themselves go astray.

Whoever Obeys a Scholar or a Ruler by Prohibiting What Allah Has Permitted or Permitting What Allah Has Prohibited Has Taken Them as Partners Beside Allah

Ibn `Abbas (ra) said: "Stones are about to rain down upon you from the sky: I say to you: "Allah's Messenger**said..." and you reply: "But Abu Bakr and `Umar said...?"*

http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/creed/abdulwahab/KT1-chap-36.htm


Is what I've written above believed to be true to today? Of course.

By whom? sources please.



[pygoscelis;2863257]You say you give a clear answer but then you give me such airy language. Do you or do you not take the intention of dominating and/or destroying others and other ways of life? And if you do, then does that not justify people who hold such other ways of life dear to dominate and/or destroy you and your way of life before you do it to them? If so, then why do you complain about western aggression so often? You appear to justify it.
[/quote]

Please explain which part was airy,
The next part appeared more rhetorical than question, as is to be expected from one who spends years on an islamic forum asking the same questions while in dispute, telling Muslims how the unlawful acts against them are justified, and how Muslims would be liked more by straying liberals if they accept that homosexuality and infidelity are ok.
...however, since you prose it as a question and this is a forum, i shall reply in detail regarding what i personally believe,
Regarding "dominating and/or destroying others and other ways of life", i believe that we will all succeed in this life and in eternity if we all submit to God and accept the laws as enshrined by God in the Quran and other guidance that it points to, upon the foundation of the Quran, however, i believe that God gave all people (citizens of planet earth) a choice and that He allows us to make that choice, to stray further or to slowly come around to the truth via trial and error and that ultimately He will judge us completely and perfectly after we return to Him and are raised for the detailed, final and perfect judgement - as long as the oppression and wrongdoing doesn't reach the level where the righteous have reached their thresold of capability and longsuffering and are calling upon Him from all over the earth in anguish to intervene and judge in truth.
God has made many challenges in the Quran to the doubters and deniers to show a better way that His Prophet may follow it, however, they consistently resorted to malicious personal attacks, slander and confused mockery and hateful treatment when they inevitably failed. The same happened with Pharaoh at the time of Moses, God allowed them to build a very sophisticated civilization which was the envy of the earth at the time, however, the oppression upon which that civilization was running was causing deeply moving prayers and invocations to go up against it, God looks into the matter carefully and sends a Messenger to test them, they inevitably fail in any intellectual argument against the stuttering hebrew born of slaves whom they hold to be below themselves and despise, and resort to the worst kinds of oppression in response - then God judges in truth.
What did Moses ask of them?
Believe in the Lord of the worlds.
Thwy lost the debate and turned to hate and unbearable oppression,
What does Moses say next?
Send forth with me Bani Israil.
They refuse and continue in the oppression.
God judges Pharaoh and his soldiers and allows bani Israil to go and establish themselves, God also respites the confused people of Egypt despite them not having accepted the guidance - even though the records of Yusuf existed amongst them from aforetime
Then the children of Israil begin to stray and God keeps guiding them through Messengers and Prophets, to the extent where they begin killing those sent to them in good faith, God removes from them the kingdom of heaven on earth after the test of the Messiah.
After leaving them in a confused state for over half a century, and while their minds are again thirsting for guidance, while the caesars and the greeks have come up with different models, He sends His Messenger with guidance and the final revelation which the people slowly begin to accept, there are differences of opinion later but always a way of easily uniting upon it, it plays along, sonetimes stumbling, until 1924, when some people had built a kingdom based on the antithesis which is usury and atheism (sometimes-crypto though often bold) and it reaches to the extent that they kill each other en mass in "wars to end all wars" and proclaim the united nations where all fiefdoms shall co-exist and all differences will be settled at the table of dialogue in new york. Those with the ability to inflict most death are given the seats of power on the security council, then the ones with the most weapons decide to continue with undeclared and proxy wars and show the world the undeclared war of vietnam and nicaragua, then help neighbours to weaken and annihilate each other with support and fake green lights, until nations are on their knees, then thwy declare war on their puppet ally, after that's over and millions of children dead, they use the U.N itself to do their spying, and use the intel to totally invade the nation weakened by their alliance, their wars, and their sanctions, while the world sees no more than a few protesting whimpers from the United Nations that was branded and pitched as the supreme table of dialogue in a new era of post-war international peace.
America played jack the atheist lad and failed before the world in all it's promises of a peaceful anarchistic secular world of justice and dignity for all.

So you can see that the results are basically in, that opprossion has become manifest, that truth has become manifest, that people with a thinking mind should have looked at it all and come to their senses by now, that God has taken a front position, demanded that we all submit to Him and given us an additional short respite just out of additional grace, and that that respite is almost done.

Besides all of that which is proven for this world, there is the resurrectuon after death, judgement and eternal life with no gray areas. Only those who accepted God and His Messengers, and submitted to God and His rules will succeed, whereas those who ungratefully rejected God will receive a just and fitting punishment for their adding to the pool of falsehood and oppression.


No. I really can't. And that does not make me dishonest, senseless or disharmonious. Nor does it make me or anyone else who disagrees with you unintelligent.

Then explain to me a way to make it all work peacefully and harmoniously in this worldly life alone - rather than spending years upon years arguing with me about how i'm always wrong.
The usurers already came to the understanding that we'd soon have world government quite a few decades ago, but they also proved that the usury model is not only unsustainable, but that it is the source of oppression and corruption.
I am not God, The One who created this universe, Who shaped you, Feeds you, judges us on earth usually collectively, and will ressurect you again and judge you individually and thoroughly is God,
i explained to you that anyone who disagrees with God is UNintelligent, and you are proving that by your method of argument when you resort to claiming that i am trying to dominate you or belittle you when i present to you the guidance of your Creator in good faith which will elevate people from their humiliation - when you can no longer show us any reasonable models that will actually work or are working, and the psychology of your method has been installed in my malware definitions database so it doesn't come to me as an overwhelming surprise:

But the chiefs of those who disbelieved among his people said: "He is no more than a human being like you, he seeks to make himself superior to you. Had Allah willed, He surely could have sent down angels; never did we hear such a thing among our fathers of old.
Quran 23:24

56.*And indeed We showed him [Fir'aun (Pharaoh)] all Our Signs and Evidences, but he denied and refused.

57.*He [Fir'aun (Pharaoh)] said: "Have you come to drive us out of our land with your magic, O Musa (Moses)?

58.*"Then verily, we can produce magic the like thereof; so appoint a meeting between us and you, which neither we, nor you shall fail to keep, in an open wide place where both shall have a just and equal chance (and beholders could witness the competition)."59.*[Musa (Moses)] said: "Your appointed meeting is the day of the festival, and let the people assemble when the sun has risen (forenoon)."60.*So Fir'aun (Pharaoh) withdrew, devised his plot and then came back.61.*Musa (Moses) said to them: "Woe unto you! Invent not a lie against Allah, lest He should destroy you completely by a torment. And surely, he who invents a lie (against Allah) will fail miserably."62.*Then they debated with one another what they must do, and they kept their talk secret.

63.*They said: "Verily! These are two magicians.
Their object is to drive you out from your land with magic, and overcome your chiefs and nobles.

64.*"So devise your plot, and then assemble in line. And whoever overcomes this day will be indeed successful."65.*They said:"O Musa (Moses)! Either you throw first or we be the first to throw?"66.*[Musa (Moses)] said: "Nay, throw you (first)!" Then behold, their ropes and their sticks, by their magic, appeared to him as though they moved fast.67.*So Musa (Moses) conceived a fear in himself.68.*We (Allah) said: "Fear not! Surely, you will have the upper hand.69.*"And throw that which is in your right hand! It will swallow up that which they have made. That which they have made is only a magician's trick, and the magician will never be successful, no matter whatever amount (of skill) he may attain."

From Quran Chapter 20, TaHa


And yes, I say you, and not God, because from my point of view this is coming from you, and not God, since your God is a creation of your mind. And not only that, but what you say of you God and what he wants is very different than what other people say of their God(s) and what he/she/it/they want, including other people who call themselves Muslims, even in this very thread. To me, all of these Gods are creations of your minds, and you are all speaking your minds and your views in the context of theology.

you've seen many signs and changed the topic or even resorted to getting red faced (web type) and asking how it's on topic when i've offered you proof, You claim to live in Canada right? Now i don't claim to have the authority of God or of making Him do what i want, but i can ask and He listens and can respond and command the angels if He sees fit, how about it snows non-stop in canada, the U.K and other kafir majority countries, especially those allied in the unlawful murders of Muslims and unlawful manipulation of their governments, right up until boxing day to the extent that you can no longer venture outside? I am capable of doublethink in that i can accept the fact of Qadr (divine decree) and simultaneous oppression of man as being unlawful as an unexplainable fact. However can you claim that there is no God, yet blame God, and accuse one of sorcery at the same time?
And would you prefer to believe in sorcery over the guidance of God?

That is fine with me, and I don't seek to offend anybody or dominate/destroy them or their beliefs, so long as they don't seek to dominate or destroy me or mine. Some religious people seem to be able to handle that and co-exist peacefully. You don't appear to be one of them. I would like to be wrong about that. Am I?
[/quote]

Maybe it's because you don't currently coexist peacefully, and that your leaders deceive you into thinking that you do co-exist peacefully while they regularly slander Islam and treat Muslims in an undignified manner and perpetrate or provoke false flags in order to keep your eye off the ball whilst the lamestream media clouds your reality.
 
Last edited:
So Abz,

Is the above your longwinded way of saying no? You don't seek to dominate others and destroy their ways? If so, then we've made a lot of progress with you since I first met you and you were calling for the extermination of homosexuals. Live and let live is your new way? That's marvelous. Cheers to you, my friend.
 
:bism:

:sl:

@ Abz, oh, I don't know what you're trying to imply here; but I have to say I don't like your tone, especially because you deride Islamic scholars and Islamic scholarship. You know, Abz, the beauty of free choice? I don't have to do anything you ask. Oh, and I won't.

:wa:

:bism:

So Abz,

Is the above your longwinded way of saying no? You don't seek to dominate others and destroy their ways? If so, then we've made a lot of progress with you since I first met you and you were calling for the extermination of homosexuals. Live and let live is your new way? That's marvelous. Cheers to you, my friend.

Hi!

I'd sooner believe in flying alligators than Abz adopting this philosophy any time soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top