Girl kills mom in religious row

  • Thread starter Thread starter Umu 'Isa
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 104
  • Views Views 12K
Browsing through old threads, i came across this one. I was curious to see what was the outcome although not surprised as to what will happen.

So this psycho girl stabs both her parents, killing her mother in cold blood and because she supposedly wanted to convert to Islam and they won't let her. When in fact she had a kuffar boyfriend, which is haram, and she wanted to live that kuffar lifestyle for herself as well. As can be expected, her kuffar defense team ran with plan of blaming the father for killing the mother and stabbing himself and the kuffar jury and the kuffar system freed her of all charges and lets her walk free. smh

Inshallah the mother is shaheed and this kuffar will burn in hell forever with her kuffar boyfriend who probably already dumped her ugly behind and moved onto the next girl.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...k=a91f8f8eaeda129bf06b0d5d35b0531e-1478453892
 
Last edited:
kritikvernunft said:
Prosecutor Michael Byrne, SC, said the evidence pointed to Ms Hussain as the killer.

Barrister Dennis Lynch, for Ms Hussain, said the only real evidence against his client was from her father and if the jury did not believe him they had to acquit.
Click to expand...

What else do you expect the prosecutor to say, the girl is guilty? As for the evidence, do you honestly think these kuffars don't mess with the evidence? how innocents sitting in jails because of planted "evidence"?

It comes down to her word against and the "evidence" that can be tainted and changed to support one party over the other. If the parents were "moderate" Muslims and the girl wanted to "join" the isis then the evidence should change to make the parents innocent and her guilty, all depends on whatever side kuffars want to support...
 
islamirama said:
What else do you expect the prosecutor to say, the girl is guilty?
Click to expand...
The prosecutor clearly says that he believes that the girl is guilty, but Ms Hussain's lawyer successfully argued that the prosecutor cannot prove this.

Furthermore, pretty much everybody believes that Ms Hussain is guilty. It does not matter, however. In the case of her lawyer, it is his obligation to argue that his client, the defendant, Ms. Hussain is not guilty, even if he also believes that she is. Furthermore, the defendant, Ms. Hussain, must always be given the opportunity to be represented by a lawyer. If she cannot afford one, she will get one for free.

The case of a daughter trying to kill or killing both her parents, is too unusual. They don't know what to do with it. So, the result is understandable.
 
:bism: (In the Name of God, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful)

:sl: (Peace be upon you)

kritikvernunft said:
The prosecutor clearly says that he believes that the girl is guilty, but Ms Hussain's lawyer successfully argued that the prosecutor cannot prove this.

Furthermore, pretty much everybody believes that Ms Hussain is guilty. It does not matter, however. In the case of her lawyer, it is his obligation to argue that his client, the defendant, Ms. Hussain is not guilty, even if he also believes that she is. Furthermore, the defendant, Ms. Hussain, must always be given the opportunity to be represented by a lawyer. If she cannot afford one, she will get one for free.

The case of a daughter trying to kill or killing both her parents, is too unusual. They don't know what to do with it. So, the result is understandable.
Click to expand...

I don't think that's the reason; if the lawyer was smart, and I'm assuming the girl's lawyer was, she would play on the prejudices of the jury against Islam and also invite a soft corner for her wanting to convert to Christianity. For example, O.J. Simpson's lawyer successfully preyed on the prejudices and sentiments of almost all-minority race jury, which comprised then of 9 black jurors and 2 Hispanics and with the 1 white person. I think many people think that lawyering is about justice; it rarely is. It's about actually who's the better lawyer and how to spin the facts to your benefit.

Spiritually, however, we know that despite the jury's verdict, God knows all the facts; and there is no escape from that fact on Judgment Day because justice not served here does not mean justice denied in the hereafter - actually, quite the opposite.

:wa: (And peace be upon you)
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top