Now we will see all of these texts of the above two verses and one hadeeth. The clear meaning is that Allah has made halaal for us the sea food /fish etc. As you know oceans have abundant fish and it is not in deep water so it is very easily available. Also our minds /hearts want to eat fish not snakes or worms or sea pigs. Those things are not abundant, are just very rare. For a sea pig one has to go very deep and even then may not find it. So the questions are useless and only cause complication. The verses and hadeeth are very clear, telling us that while we are not in ihram, we can eat the fresh sea fish/fresh meat from the sea both at rest and during journey.
Everything is halaal from sea in need. But when the fresh meat of so many fish is available then why should a faqeeh need worms or snakes etc from a sea. In case he or you want them then hunt them, no restrictions.
Ideally, that would be case and people would only eat fish. But practically, that is not the case. There are several places on earth where people eat crabs, prawn and many other sea creatures. The Fuqaha study all the relevant Ayaat and Ahadeeth and derive the rulings from them. They explain the Deen to us, they do not create their own rulings as commonly misunderstood by many people.
Respected readers, please read the full translation of this verse 5;2:
(5:2) Believers! Neither desecrate the symbols of (devotion to) Allah,5 nor the holy month, nor the animals of offering, nor the animals wearing collars indicating they are for sacrifice, nor ill-treat those who have set out for the Holy House seeking from their Lord His bounty and good pleasure.6 But once you are free from Pilgrimage obligations, you are free to hunt.7 Do not let your wrath against the people who have barred you from the Holy Mosque move you to commit undue transgressions;8 rather, help one another in acts of righteousness and piety, and do not help one another in sin and transgression. Fear Allah. Surely Allah is severe in retribution.
Exp.note 7
7. Ihram is also one of the symbols of God and violation of any of the prohibitions which should be observed in that state is an act of sacrilege. The prohibition of hunting while in the state of ihram is mentioned in connection with the desecration of the symbols of God. When ihram is over, the prohibitions become void, and one is permitted to hunt.
See, the problem here is you are relying on a translator's note to understand the context.
I don't say your explanation is wrong. What we say is, the translator or a Tafsir scholar has the knowledge of the Qur'an and he can explain the context and details. But the level of Faqeeh is much higher than that, because a Faqeeh studies all other branches of Deen.
Being a mufassir is not sufficient for a person to be able to derive Shar'i rulings from Qur'an. He has to understand the Ahadeeth, the Seerah, actions of the Sahabah and how they understood the concept and several other aspects of Deen.
Another simpler translation of the same verse is:
(5;2) O you who have believed, do not violate the rites of Allah or [the sanctity of] the sacred month or [neglect the marking of] the sacrificial animals and garlanding [them] or [violate the safety of] those coming to the Sacred House seeking bounty from their Lord and [His] approval. But when you come out of ihram, then [you may] hunt. And do not let the hatred of a people for having obstructed you from al-Masjid al-Haram lead you to transgress. And cooperate in righteousness and piety, but do not cooperate in sin and aggression. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is severe in penalty.
You can clearly see that here Allah allowed the Muslims to hunt when they are not in ihram. So the prohibition from hunting was in ihram and freedom is given for hunting out of ihram. Is there any complication in understanding this verse??
But the sorrowful thing is that a small part of an aayat is separated from the rest of the verse and a wrong meaning is given to it just to make confusion in understanding the verse!!!
We do not rely on translations of the verses to find out the rulings. Translations are also done by human beings. They are not authoritative and they sometimes interpolate and make mistakes. The [you may] part above is not there in Arabic, that is interpolation by the translator to help you understand the context.
I don't say he is wrong. Once again, instead of relying on translators (and there are more than a dozen out there, who would you follow?), we rely on the complete explanation given in simplified form by the Fuqaha.
I don't know whether you are getting the point. There are levels of Islamic scholarship. A translator can even be a non-Muslim. Many non-Muslims have translated the Qur'an. A
mufassir understands and explains the Qur'an. A
muhaddith is a Hadith scholar. A
mu'arrikh is a scholar of history. They are all limited to their own field of knowledge. But a
Faqeeh studies all branches of Deen. That is the reason why he is followed.
Since I started making prayer (since childhood), I have been reading “Subhanak Allahumma wa bi hamdika, wa tabarakas- muka wa ta’ala jadduka, wa la ilaha ghayruk”
and I never forget it. This is because my parents taught me like this. If the Prophet (Allah's Peace and Blessings be upon him) opened salaat with this praising of Allah then why shouldn’t we??? From where do the fuqaha bring the explanation. Do they have special connection with Allah?? No! Not at all!
Alhamdulillah, those who are mindful of their prayers, they will not forget anything. But whole world is not ideal. There are Muslims who are new to Islam, and there are Muslims who follow only the basics. There are Muslims who are lazy.
Everything is not as simple as you might assume. The rulings have to be found for each and every aspect of Deen. Reciting the
thana at the start of the prayer is a Sunnah. But if someone forgets it or leaves it, what does he have to do? It is not found anywhere in the Hadith. This is where the Fuqaha explain the ruling based on the Qur'an and Sunnah. Of course, they do not simply bring it out of thin air. They explain everything in the light of Qur'an and Sunnah.
I have clearly read that the Prophet (Allah's Peace and Blessings be upon him) used to emphasize tathleeth (to wash every part three times) and to start from the right side i.e. first wash right arm and then left, first right foot and then left. The same principle He gave for taking bath.
Yes, that is right, but all the above quoted Ahadeeth are Sahih and what the Sahabah are narrating is the truth. Nobody can deny that.
What makes you say that washing 3 times is Sunnah? Because you are already well-versed in the ruling. But when a person simply reads the Ahadith, he will not be able to understand the underlying principles in categorizing Fardh, Sunnah and Mustahab. He has to learn from scholars who will teach him in the light of Qur'an and Sunnah.
Everything goes back to Qur'an and Sunnah, nobody denies that. All the 4 madhahib are based on Qur'an and Sunnah. People misunderstand what a madhhab is. It is a set of principles, guidelines, a methodology, that is used by scholars to find out the Shar'i rulings from the Qur'an and Sunnah.