Wikipedia Needs Editors with The TRUTH

  • Thread starter Thread starter oiboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 18
  • Views Views 3K
O

oiboy

New member
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
To my dismay Wikipedia's NPOV (Neutral Point of View) status has NOT been followed. It has turned into a hate mongering cess-pool of pro-Zionist propoganda. If any of you can help, with edits w/sources it would be great.

The articles I propose we FIX are:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Palestine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli...inian_conflict

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Summer_Rains

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Defense_Forces

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qana_shelling

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossad

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenin_massacre


Any constructive help would be great. If you are an admin on Wikipedia all the better. The more people involved on this little project the better.

Thanks,
 
It has turned into a hate mongering cess-pool of pro-Zionist propoganda.
Click to expand...
I get the distenct feeling that you want to turn into a hate mongering cess-pool of anti-Zionist propoganda.
I read a cupple and they seamed balanced.
 
Who is qualified to edit such posts?

If the information from Wikopedia is written by a bunch of amateurs I will no longer use it as a source of information.
 
searchingsoul said:
I think I'll go and edit a few posts.
Click to expand...

I have edited a few wikipedia post. One on Dr Zakir Naik, where he's misqoted sometime and is taken out of context, I corrected the information directly from his website, guess what couple of day's later it has been edited back to the original. Someone does not wan't the truth.

Also I added a few on so called Ali Sina, a devout anti-muslim. A added a section on a "fairy tale christianity" (no offense, not my words his words), with direct quote from him with reference to the relevant section. Guess what it has also been taken out, living only his propganda on Islam.

Wikipedia is more or less full of crap,and I aint bothered to really read from these websites. Maybe Next time if you decide you should save a few of you editing in "M-Words" so if it gets edited it out you can copy and paste it back.
 
What wikipedia has is the nuetral point of view, your just so out there biased to see it.
Click to expand...

They don't like neutral, to them, "neutral" means "Big Bad Zionist Propaganda War Machine." They'll understand, one day.
 
lavikor201 said:
What wikipedia has is the nuetral point of view, your just so out there biased to see it.
Click to expand...

Would yuou agree that if one is going to cite someone they should cite the correctly in context?
I have corrected mis-information with clear reference and it all got edited out.

I have provided a nuetral point of view, and cited this people with correctly referenced, but it gets edited out.

Anyway, my lecturers will laugh at your suggestion.

LOL lavikor.;D
 
Skillganon said:
Would yuou agree that if one is going to cite someone they should cite the correctly in context?
I have corrected mis-information with clear reference and it all got edited out.

I have provided a nuetral point of view, and cited this people with correctly referenced, but it gets edited out.

Anyway, my lecturers will laugh at your suggestion.

LOL lavikor.;D
Click to expand...

I'm glad I can provide humor into your schedule, of eating, sleeping, and bashing israel and jews.
 
lavikor201 said:
I'm glad I can provide humor into your schedule, of eating, sleeping, and bashing israel and jews.
Click to expand...

LOL. Lavikor, be in peace.

anyway, I really don't read Wikipedia very much nor get my info on what happening in Israel from wikipedia. I haven't read one article from it. I do read articles from Jews and americans and british authors to name a few.

What I was refering to in those case and actually not on the wikipedia artices provided in this opening thread, but some wikipedia articles that I talked about on one of my post here.
i.e. Zakir Naik and Ali Sina.

Anyway peace.
 
I'm glad I can provide humor into your schedule, of eating, sleeping, and bashing israel and jews.
Click to expand...

;D Funniest thing I've heard - EVER! Many users on this site have that diet and they think its healthy. :offended:
 
yea one day i didnt realize that anyone can just edit or write something and i did on some topic and just wrote fart over and over and the next day it was there, so seriously, you cant take that site so seriously anymore
 
yea one day i didnt realize that anyone can just edit or write something and i did on some topic and just wrote fart over and over and the next day it was there, so seriously, you cant take that site so seriously anymore
Click to expand...

:uuh: :uuh:

Wow! I once wrote an article in the Street Gangs section, I showed it off to my friends; it was about how I and a close friend started a gang and ran closely with the Triads.

It got deleted. :D
 
Crystal4Peace said:
yea one day i didnt realize that anyone can just edit or write something and i did on some topic and just wrote fart over and over and the next day it was there, so seriously, you cant take that site so seriously anymore
Click to expand...

As I said, Wrote and added a few section with clear reference directly from he source.
It was not even my words I provided proper quotes within it's proper context.
It got deleted. It full of "bush crap".
 
Wikipedia is what it claims to be, a file of what has been written. I find it only usefull to find what has been said then use that as a starting point to find facts.

It is not much different then a google search. Type in any subject into google and you will be stuck with sorting out what is real, not just what is on the internet.

I made the error of posting wiki quotes as facts on one or two posts. Funny part was the person I was contradicting used wiki to find the exact opposite of what I had posted. Same source, opposite words.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top