Keltoi
IB Legend
- Messages
- 5,061
- Reaction score
- 463
I would love to pass judgement, but I don't have enough knowledge about the conflict in Darfur. I have not witnessed any massacres.
It's not hard for me to believe that the West has an agenda in oil-rich Sudan. It's funny how the West publicize some wars and leave others forgotten.
Also, the West could have meddled in Sudan's internal affairs and encouraged the people of Darfur to rebel against their government (which is what I think probably happened). When the people rebel against their leader, what is the leader supposed to do but punish them? I believe in democracy but I think that it is wrong to rebel against you leader. What do you think Tony Blair would do if his 10 Dow St was being attacked by 500+ armed people? Just stay put and surrender?
It's not hard to believe that the West destroys countries. We have seen it time and time again. If it weren't for the West we would have a chaliph, but they destroyed the Ottomon Empire.
Also, this whole Arabs against Africans thing is ridiculous because ALL Sudanis are Africans.
Just a minor point, but the Ottoman Empire was already in decline when it chose the wrong side during WWI. A question though, are you suggesting that the genocide in Darfur is the fault of the U.S? Perhaps I misread your post.