Terorism

[SilentObserver]

Well I don't know about other countries but Russia used terrorism as an excuse to attack Chechnya. The Russians blew up 3 buildings early in the morning when everyone was sleeping and killed 300 people. Obviously afterwards they accused the Chechens and the Russian population was in a rage and ready to go back to war to Chechnya. That's how Russia uses terrorism as an excuse. I mean if Putin says: Hey guys let's go attack Chechnya and take their oil everyone is going to say no cause they don't want to die for oil but if Putin just blows something up, kills a few people and says: Look those Chechens are terrorists and savages if we don't stop them now they will continue doing this then obviously everyone will go out to war for revenge. For me, personally, terrorism doesn't exist it's just an excuse to blame someone else and start a war on them.

Unless you post a source, others will only view this as an anti-russian propaganda lie. Proof of the russians blowing up three of their own buildings and blaming chechens.

 

[Chechen]

Unless you post a source, others will only view this as an anti-russian propaganda lie. Proof of the russians blowing up three of their own buildings and blaming chechens.

Well there's a book called : Blowing up Russia: Terror from Within. It was written by Alexander Litvinenko an ex FSB agent who was poisoned not long ago. In that book he talks about how Putin and the FSB are responsible for the explosions of the 3 buildings.

 

[Keltoi]

Well there's a book called : Blowing up Russia: Terror from Within. It was written by Alexander Litvinenko an ex FSB agent who was poisoned not long ago. In that book he talks about how Putin and the FSB are responsible for the explosions of the 3 buildings.

Litvinenko also suggested he had a videotape of Putin having sex with a man. While I don't know whether his claims are true or not, citing his book as evidence is hardly enough for a claim that dramatic.

 

[Chechen]

Litvinenko also suggested he had a videotape of Putin having sex with a man. While I don't know whether his claims are true or not, citing his book as evidence is hardly enough for a claim that dramatic.

Uh well I think Litvinenko would know better than anyone because he actually worked in the FSB and had access to that sort of information and once he left the FSB he started giving out information about everything that happened in the FSB. That's why Putin decided to get rid of him. But you don't have to believe it. No one ever asked you to. You can just continue believing that evil Chechen terrorists, extremists, islamists, racists, rapists etc had nothing better to do on a Friday night so they just decided to blow up 3 Russian buildings to start another war in their country cause the first one only had just finished.

 

[Keltoi]

Uh well I think Litvinenko would know better than anyone because he actually worked in the FSB and had access to that sort of information and once he left the FSB he started giving out information about everything that happened in the FSB. That's why Putin decided to get rid of him. But you don't have to believe it. No one ever asked you to. You can just continue believing that evil Chechen terrorists, extremists, islamists, racists, rapists etc had nothing better to do on a Friday night so they just decided to blow up 3 Russian buildings to start another war in their country cause the first one only had just finished.

I can believe that Litvinenko isn't the most reliable source for info and still believe that Russia has made many mistakes and committed many atrocities in Chechnya. They aren't mutually exclusive. However, when these conspiracy theories about a country blowing up its own infrastructure to start a war begin to circulate, I tend to take it with a grain of salt until given reliable evidence to the contrary, and Litvenenko isn't reliable in my view.

 

[Chechnya]

I can believe that Litvinenko isn't the most reliable source for info and still believe that Russia has made many mistakes and committed many atrocities in Chechnya. They aren't mutually exclusive. However, when these conspiracy theories about a country blowing up its own infrastructure to start a war begin to circulate, I tend to take it with a grain of salt until given reliable evidence to the contrary, and Litvenenko isn't reliable in my view

.

how about the fact that russian fsb agents were caught by local police planting bombs in another apartment?

this not seem slightly dodgy to you? look for news coverage at the time and you will find this story covered by most media orgs - fsb agents were actually caught by local police in the act.

im not normally a fan of conspiracy theories but the apartment bombings arent a conspiracy any more - none of the russian story makes sense.

 

[Warthog]

.

how about the fact that russian fsb agents were caught by local police planting bombs in another apartment?

this not seem slightly dodgy to you? look for news coverage at the time and you will find this story covered by most media orgs - fsb agents were actually caught by local police in the act.

im not normally a fan of conspiracy theories but the apartment bombings arent a conspiracy any more - none of the russian story makes sense.

Each time you make one of these claims, you need to post your source. Or as someone said earlier, it won't be taken seriously. You can't expect us to take your word as a reliable source for world affairs.

look for news coverage at the time

No, you see the way it works is that you make the statement, you provide the source.