Is the same planned for Iran by America?

^ i meant the main dominating power of america, the ones who call the shots, they dont like muslims. Bush and crew, hope you understand now :)
 
The USA doesnt want an Islamic State to establish anywhere in the middle east, they are afraid it will work so well that it will swoop the west with a surge of converts to Islam.
Bush has started his crusades or was that thrown in for some tasteless humour, whichever, by now America already has too much blood on its hands, in today's world you can find many willing to share your guilt.
 
the attacks will most prolly be like the Osirak attacks.and there will be a rebellion against the Islamic system in Iran;a change like that of Turkey.
 
NobleMuslimUK said:
The USA doesnt want an Islamic State to establish anywhere in the middle east, they are afraid it will work so well that it will swoop the west with a surge of converts to Islam.
Bush has started his crusades or was that thrown in for some tasteless humour, whichever, by now America already has too much blood on its hands, in today's world you can find many willing to share your guilt.
Click to expand...

You are correct about one thing. The U.S. doesn't want an Islamic state in the Middle East. Primarily because every so-called "Islamic state" funds and supports terrorist groups and doesn't exactly have a good track record with basic human rights, especially the rights of women. The claim you mentioned about the West being terrified of some "successful" Islam state and the supposed millions of converts that will bring, is a pipedream.

As for using the word "crusade", that has been discussed at length in other threads. It comes down to a misunderstanding of the English language, but not by him for a change. Americans and others use the word "crusade" in relation to certain struggles intended to achieve some worthy goal. Not unlike the defense of the word "jihad" many put forward on this forum.
 
Keltoi said:
You are correct about one thing. The U.S. doesn't want an Islamic state in the Middle East. Primarily because every so-called "Islamic state" funds and supports terrorist groups and doesn't exactly have a good track record with basic human rights, especially the rights of women. The claim you mentioned about the West being terrified of some "successful" Islam state and the supposed millions of converts that will bring, is a pipedream.

As for using the word "crusade", that has been discussed at length in other threads. It comes down to a misunderstanding of the English language, but not by him for a change. Americans and others use the word "crusade" in relation to certain struggles intended to achieve some worthy goal. Not unlike the defense of the word "jihad" many put forward on this forum.
Click to expand...

I already mentioned, there hasnt been an Islamic state for a while, the kind that flourished into Empires, thats what the US is afraid of, the west is governing its country under, unjust biased and corrupt ideals. Islam doesnt allow for billionaire leaders to lead people, seems if you work for the government you are well off, not a fair way of distributing wealth, especially when there are people suffering around the world in poverty including in the US.
 
NobleMuslimUK said:
I already mentioned, there hasnt been an Islamic state for a while, the kind that flourished into Empires, thats what the US is afraid of, the west is governing its country under, unjust biased and corrupt ideals. Islam doesnt allow for billionaire leaders to lead people, seems if you work for the government you are well off, not a fair way of distributing wealth, especially when there are people suffering around the world in poverty including in the US.
Click to expand...

That is just it, Americans by a large majority do not believe in the redistribution of wealth. Someone in "poverty" in the U.S. will usually still have cell phones and DVD players.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top