Cognescenti
Account Disabled
- Messages
- 1,308
- Reaction score
- 110
Forcing Queen Rania to wear a veil would be am aesthetic crime against humanity...in my opinion.
Nobody is forcing her to wear veil.Forcing Queen Rania to wear a veil would be am aesthetic crime against humanity...in my opinion.
Nobody is forcing her to wear veil.
Maybe we should invite Queen Rania in this forum..... as she loves to talk about Muslims and Islam..
And people trust Western sources, go figure.
^^Lol, how would we go about doing that? Lets write her a letter![]()
i just hate it when these people try to modernise the religion to fit in![]()
What? You have lost me... what that suppose to mean?And the world is a better place for that.
Political views aside...she is the best looking Queen I have ever seen.
I realize this may seem trivial :smile:
she is still a fasiq and she is still married to a kaffir apostate and so she is not in any position to lecture us on islam.
Abu Abdullah
I hate to break it to you, but at one time Islam was more modern in every way than it is today. Actually, let me rephrase that. The way that muslims practice and interpret islam today, is centuries behind the way it was in the 12th century.
Muslims today that claim that people like Queen Rania are attempting to distort islam, are actually following a distortion. Islam originally was not as many practice it today. It was at the end of the 12th century that in order to control the islamic people, the leaders began to change things.
Sorry but could you translate that to english cause i don't get it.
a fasiq is someone who violates islamic law, a Kaffur or Kaffir is a person or people who are considered non-believers because they do not follow islam. and an apostate is someone who changes their religion from Islam.
However, Dawud
Why is the Queen a Fasiq? What has she done to violate islam? Also I was unaware the King of Jordan was an apostate, when did this happen? I know he attended an Islamic school prior to college, did he change while at college?
a fasiq is an open sinner, she parades herself in front of everyone without hijab, for that alone she is an open sinner.
her husband is a man who though he has the power rules by other laws than Shariah and is therefore in principle an apostate, he has also sided with the kuffar against the muslims, another act of apostasy and he has taken the kuffar as his awliyah (protectors, friends), another act of apostasy.
Assalaamu Alaykum,
Abu Abdullah
Abu Abdullah
I think this is where people believe the veil and hijab are oppressive. If a woman, such as Queen Rania doesnt want to wear this then why does she have to? From what I understand it is a choice and is not a sin if not worn, or at least that is how it is argued when it is said to be oppressive.
As far as her husband goes, I did not realize that not ruling a country by Shariah would make such a person an apostate, does this mean Ahmadinejad is an apostate too? From what I understand Iran is not a true Islamic State, or so some have said on this forum. Also who says he sided with the Kuffar? Not all Muslims side the same way, so how do you distinguish who is siding with the Kuffar and who is just doing the right thing? And if he did what is wrong with that if the intentions of some of the Muslims are not what Islam would advocate anyways? As far as the friends and/or protectors go, I was unaware Muslims couldnt not befriend the Kuffar, if this is true arent Muslims kind of isolating themselves? It is almost as if, if you are not a Muslim then you are target to a Muslim, when it really comes down to it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.