Deploy troops in Iran...!

  • Thread starter Thread starter England
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 533
  • Views Views 58K
Status
Not open for further replies.
The U.s,Israel and its allies are wanting a big war with Iran. Its clear majority of them have history of wars and uccupation from there past and present. U.S and Israel are being hypocritical trying to disarm Iran from building weapons. Iran does not have history of wars like U.S or U.K and, also Iran never use nuke bombs on innocent civilians.
 
Keltoi said:
So why would you support going into Mugabe's territory?
Click to expand...

Erm is it not obvious....? Or Sudan for that matter, I believe it's arabian mlitias killing Africans, but we don't want to stop that do we.....
 
Hashim_507 said:
The U.s,Israel and its allies are wanting a big war with Iran. Its clear majority of them have history of wars and uccupation from there past and present. U.S and Israel are being hypocritical trying to disarm Iran from building weapons. Iran does not have history of wars like U.S or U.K and, also Iran never use nuke bombs on innocent civilians.
Click to expand...

Iran doesn't have a history of wars? Might want to look at a history book again.
 
News just in....

Iran's government says it will reduce cooperation with United Nations nuclear inspectors in response to new sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said separately that the sanctions were illegal and Iran would not stop its nuclear work "even for one second".

The sanctions block Iranian arms exports and freeze assets of anyone involved in nuclear and missile work.

Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons, insisting its work is peaceful.


:p
 
AvarAllahNoor said:
News just in....

Iran's government says it will reduce cooperation with United Nations nuclear inspectors in response to new sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said separately that the sanctions were illegal and Iran would not stop its nuclear work "even for one second".

The sanctions block Iranian arms exports and freeze assets of anyone involved in nuclear and missile work.

Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons, insisting its work is peaceful.


:p
Click to expand...

If the nuclear technology they seek was intended for peaceful purposes, that would be easy enough to prove. Allow inspections by the IAEA and continue with the peaceful pursuit of nuclear power.
 
Keltoi said:
Iran doesn't have a history of wars? Might want to look at a history book again.
Click to expand...

I am sure i read the history book well; as for 2007 the U.S and Israel have alot of war compaigns plans. Also i am sure U.K have notorious for there past and present colonization. Did you ever witness Iran bombing innocent civilians for no reason? Look now the u.s is leading for bombing innocent civilians and also its allies.
 
Keltoi said:
If the nuclear technology they seek was intended for peaceful purposes, that would be easy enough to prove. Allow inspections by the IAEA and continue with the peaceful pursuit of nuclear power.
Click to expand...

Why should they prove anything? I don't like hypocrisy, neither do they.

BTW - You ignored my Mugabe and Sudan post......? :D
 
what ever the case do we need another war in the m.east? And if it is going 2 b nations like the u.s and britain doing, why dont they look at themselves first. Can u really tell me that the u.s doesnt have one of the most curupt guvernment? And the u.k? Why shuld they be fighters of justice, they dont evan have that in their own lands!!!!
 
Hashim_507 said:
I am sure i read the history book well; as for 2007 the U.S and Israel have alot of war compaigns plans. Also i am sure U.K have notorious for there past and present colonization. Did you ever witness Iran bombing innocent civilians for no reason? Look now the u.s is leading for bombing innocent civilians and also its allies.
Click to expand...

I can't quite understand what you are trying to say, but characterizing Iran as somehow being morally superior to the U.S. or the U.K. is your right, still doesn't deal with the situation we find ourselves in now, just throws out a red herring.
 
SATalha said:
what ever the case do we need another war in the m.east? And if it is going 2 b nations like the u.s and britain doing, why dont they look at themselves first. Can u really tell me that the u.s doesnt have one of the most curupt guvernment? And the u.k? Why shuld they be fighters of justice, they dont evan have that in their own lands!!!!
Click to expand...

Any conflict with Iran isn't going to be about "justice", it will be about Iran pushing the status quo to the point where violence is inevitable.
 
SATalha said:
what ever the case do we need another war in the m.east? And if it is going 2 b nations like the u.s and britain doing, why dont they look at themselves first. Can u really tell me that the u.s doesnt have one of the most curupt guvernment? And the u.k? Why shuld they be fighters of justice, they dont evan have that in their own lands!!!!
Click to expand...

true say...arrgh...what is UK doing? soon we will have WAR here (UK)...won't we?..i mean their messing with too many countries...and one day someone will backfire bad. Iran is strong...:raging:
 
Keltoi said:
I didn't ignore anything, I asked you why you would support action against Mugabe.
Click to expand...

Well I did think it was self explanatory, but obviously not....

My concern is for the people of Zimbabwe and the dictatorship it's under. But then no oil for us and you is there. Forget Sudan too, why go and help those that need it when we can target other countries that don't want invading.
 
deen_2007 said:
true say...arrgh...what is UK doing? soon we will have WAR here (UK)...won't we?..i mean their messing with too many countries...and one day someone will backfire bad. Iran is strong...:raging:
Click to expand...

Iran is strong?:rollseyes Yeah, so strong its war with Iraq ended in a stalemate with millions of deaths.
 
I only know the general outline from the BBC World news interview with Gaddafi. Libya agreed to stop terrorist actions against the west and in return US and UK would provide financial aid and technology for i believe it was their power industry. Some of the money was forthcoming but the technology wasn't. I was astonished at the interview, having spent years believing Gaddafi to be a loony of the first order he was actually rather reasonable and I ended up nodding in agreement. My apologies if I have misunderstood the terms of the agreement but my point was if we make agreements we should stick to them as a good example for future negotiations.
 
I do believe that if the sanctions block Iranian arms exports and freeze assets of anyone involved in nuclear and missile work, that Iran will turn into another North Korea? Am I right?

They seem to be doing fine. Sure there is poverty here and there, but illegal imports and exports are always there to feed the country.

I do believe that nothing will happen about the nuclear weapons, Iran will continue with its plans to acquire more nuclear power.

As for those British folks in Iran, nothing will happen. They will be kept as hostages. [That is just my prediction, don't twist and mold it into anything else]
 
AvarAllahNoor said:
Well I did think it was self explanatory, but obviously not....

My concern is for the people of Zimbabwe and the dictatorship it's under. But then no oil for us and you is there. Forget Sudan too, why go and help those that need it when we can target other countries that don't want invading.
Click to expand...

Forget the oil, that is a red herring and not even based in reality.

The reasons for lack of action in Rwanda, Sudan, and elsewhere comes down to what happened in Mogadishu. Ideally the U.N. should be taking responsibility for strictly humanitarian efforts. Unfortunately, the corruption in the U.N. has damaged its effectiveness. Hopefully the new secretary-general will take the humanitarian role of the U.N. more seriously.
 
Keltoi said:
Iran is strong?:rollseyes Yeah, so strong its war with Iraq ended in a stalemate with millions of deaths.
Click to expand...

Well technically Ieaq should have won, because it was the US backing them. They can't even do that right. hehe
 
AvarAllahNoor said:
Well technically Ieaq should have won, because it was the US backing them. They can't even do that right. hehe
Click to expand...

More lack of history. The U.S. backed both parties in the Iran/Iran War. If Iraq was starting to get the advantage, the U.S. would give aid to Iran, and vice versa. The interest of the United States was to keep the war going. Bad policy? Maybe, but the U.S. was far from Iraq's honest ally in that conflict.
 
iam sick of seeing that red-neck president yabbering on about freedom, liberty and justice. The man cant evan spell the words let alone uphold them. Iran will be a more dificult opönant, trust me they have been prepering 4 this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top