I do think that God would send a prophet to establish a way of life for mankind, that is the whole purpose of religion is it not? What I do not believe is that God has sent anyone to Earth right now that has the ability to justly institute the law of God. I also do not believe that religion is compulsory. A law based on religious beliefs and enforced by a "government" would make religion compulsory, so then what would be the purpose of religion if you were forced to abide by it? If God wanted everyone to worship one religion, have one set of values and live strictly by them he would simply have made it that way would he not? But he gave man free will, he did this so we could choose to follow him, to worship him, and to live by his laws. Man laws are made to ensure the safety and order of our environment, Gods laws are to ensure ones rights to heaven, it is mans choice to follow Gods Laws, it is not mans job to enforce Gods law. If the Turks want to live free of oppression and free to speak their minds and live their lives worshipping how they wish that is their choice. This does not make them any less of a Muslim than anyone else, they choose to worship as a Muslim, they may not choose to live under someone who would tell them how to practice their faith. If their faith is good enough they will practice it correctly without anyone forcing them.
Let me clarify somethings for you.
1) There "will" be no laws if not for religion. Why? you may ask. Have you ever considered the possibility what you regard 'laws' set by a government can also be interpreted as a religion too? For example, if you construct a society, would you consider having a death penalty? is it right or is it wrong? Who in this diverse world has the ability to discern if a murderer should live or if he should die. Once you lay down your belief as the law, you clearly define it as religion. Even more so, if you make a group of people accept your beliefs it becomes organized religion.
Simply put, a government cannot function with out a foundation. And these foundations are taken from a diversity of religions. In essence its just a pick and choose of different cultures.
2) In response to "Man laws are made to ensure the safety and order of our environment" I suggest you rephrase that, simple put, sounds wrong.
Let me explain, if the laws were to passed due to the opinions of a select few, then, like I mentioned above, you can conclude that they are enforcing their religion onto others.
Simply put, you cannot establish a functional society without morals, they had to have come from somewhere, and that in the simplest terms is my belief.
This is all good and great but we are speaking about an islamic government here. People can worship Islam and follow Islam to the T without a government forcing them to, and many do everyday. Your own Quran says that religion is not compulsory, so if it is not why is there a need for an Islamic government? Man simply does not have the authority to assert and regulate Gods law. It is up to man to follow Gods law, if you dont then you will be judged for it. Only God can appoint the one who will fully institute and establish his law and power. That being will come on the day of reckoning, he does not exist in our society today, therefore your Islamic law is no more than a theory on how things should work, until the Lord decides your countries ruled by Shariah law will fail as they all have thus far. ALL politics are corrupt, religion is pure, you cannot combine the two. If you put clean water in dirty water, the water will never be clean again unless the dirty water is removed. (Dirty = Politics, Clean = religion)
But one cannot survive without the other. If no political system exists, man is free to do as he wills and what he wills is not always good. I'll be honest with you, it is up to the person to discern which political system works for them and it is
my belief that Islamic sharia is the one that accepts equality. I haven't seen a proper example in the present day and age, and I most probably wont.