Moses and the Injil

[barney]

LOL @ Purests piccy

Jesus is a historical figure Philly, it's just the bit about him being God that is a bit of a grey area.

But I sign up to spaggettiism, consider me your first diciple.

Whats your Doctrine & Dogma? Cos I can feel I would be a Wholemeal-fastcook adventist.

 

[Philosopher]

ah.. alas.. you should start your own forum and eat your G-D to your heart's content

there she goes now...

This is idolatry!

 

[Curaezipirid]

Salam,

The question about how Moses knew of Jesus is important to everybody's redemption.

I am just about to make a post in the thread which I opened and is named only Jinn. It sort of explains, but it is a difficult comprehension, and needs to be categorised along with subject matter in reference to Jinn.

I had a Dream about Seth noticing that Moses and the Burning bush is in people's mind right at this time, and the day before I saw that this thread is here, and there was also a television programme with a homeless man asking a pop star about what the reference to flames in the bush in his song was about.

All the references asked about can be contextualised only by understanding that the time sequences in the minds of the Jinn are far different to the time sequences in the minds of men. Also that the shaytan figured that out before men, and take it to their advantage, but only by ignoring the full teaching of what level of accountiblity the Jinn are accepting in time.

I will come back into this post and leave a link after I make the other post


Salam alaykum

 

[Philosopher]

LOL @ Purests piccy

Jesus is a historical figure Philly, it's just the bit about him being God that is a bit of a grey area.

But I sign up to spaggettiism, consider me your first diciple.

Whats your Doctrine & Dogma? Cos I can feel I would be a Wholemeal-fastcook adventist.

No, Jesus is not a historical figure. I recommend you read some of Doherty's work. The "buy-bull" does not count.

 

[جوري]

This is idolatry!

you should really makeup your mind.. one minute you want sauce on her and the next, you no longer wish to idolize her? there are meds you know to help with this sort of bipolarity-- I think in your case it is more prudent to seek medical RX, than an object of adoration...

peace!

 

[barney]

Pete Dochaty? the drugged up frontsman of the Babyshambels? No ta.

When Philly said "sauce" its taken from the ancient Marinade-ic language "Source" which when you transcribe it into English many spaggetiists have postured that it refers to the Source where the pasta was grown.

In this case being Southern Italy. My wholemeal-adventist leigions are off to reclaim this land as i speak.

 

[Curaezipirid]

that link I mentioned has this :-

 

[Curaezipirid]

Wasnt directed at you Purest, the allagory isnt something someone with faith would understand. I was writing to philosopher and Agnostics/Athiests.

In a nutshell i mean I agree with his post, but some people can gain value in religion.

If an allegory is truly an allegory, only those with real Faith can understand it.

There are stories which for one person might be intoxicating, such as from 1001 Arabian nights, yet for another person might be terrifying. So for one person an allegory can be Haram, while for another it can be Halal and indeed necessary to be reading, only so as to sustain Faith in this modern world.

 

[Philosopher]

Pete Dochaty? the drugged up frontsman of the Babyshambels? No ta.

When Philly said "sauce" its taken from the ancient Marinade-ic language "Source" which when you transcribe it into English many spaggetiists have postured that it refers to the Source where the pasta was grown.

In this case being Southern Italy. My wholemeal-adventist leigions are off to reclaim this land as i speak.

We can fight over Jerusalem because that land was promised to us by the flying spaghetti monster (may sauce be upon him).

After all, the FSM was devoured and digested for our sins.

 

[Curaezipirid]

Whose Allegory means what here I wonder?

 

[Curaezipirid]

No, Jesus is not a historical figure. I recommend you read some of Doherty's work. The "buy-bull" does not count.

The history written by the Jew known to the Romans as Josephus is a true account.

It is usually discredited because it was written 30 years later then Jesus death is recorded, however the 30 year span is distincly within eyewitness account.

Denying it would be akin to demanding that we all ignore every part of writing about Mohammed made after his death.

 

[جوري]

Whose Allegory means what here I wonder?

I have always enjoyed the Allegory of human vanities... we can dedicate this post to it!

'Vanity of vanities, all is vanity'. The books symbolise human knowledge, the musical instruments (a recorder, part of a shawm, a lute) the pleasures of the senses. The Japanese sword and the shell, both collectors' rarities, symbolise wealth. The chronometer and expiring lamp allude to the transience and frailty of human life. All are dominated by the skull, the symbol of death.

national gallery

 

[barney]

Heck no way. Lets give Jerusalem a break. Its clear that the FSM meant Manchester. you just need to interpret it through a Scholor on the matter.

I think denying that Jesus existed is a bit tinfoil, the Romans were pretty sure that he was some sort of political activist. I'll try and read Dochatys work after i've finished with all these hadiths i'm ploughing through, thanks for the reference.

Nice pic BTW, life is indeed transitory. It should be lived to the full.
I live it to the full by spamming endless forums at 3AM arguing about intangable concepts and playing XBOX 360.

 

[جوري]

with all these hadiths i'm ploughing through, thanks for the reference.

Nice pic BTW, life is indeed transitory. It should be lived to the full.
I live it to the full by spamming endless forums at 3AM arguing about intangable concepts and playing XBOX 360.

Indeed, and I believe it was 3li ibn Abi talib RA who said,(though I am not certain it was he)-- "Live life as if you were going to live forever, and prepare for the hereafter as if you were to die tomorrow" Gandhi later took that and put a spin on it--

that is why it is a bewilderment to me, for someone to live it not striking a balance... and seeking fulfillment on every level... (science, history, religion, travel, Art, philosophy) I for a long time lived as an "agnostic"-- and felt an incredible void.... more "restless" than anything really, I don't know how to ignore religion....
life to me is a miracle, I think therein lies the difference really. Some people see it as is, and some can't conceive of all of this-- and I happen to belong to the later group!
Everything is remarkable to me and can only point the arrow in one direction....

peace!

 

[Philosopher]

Heck no way. Lets give Jerusalem a break. Its clear that the FSM meant Manchester. you just need to interpret it through a Scholor on the matter.

I think denying that Jesus existed is a bit tinfoil, the Romans were pretty sure that he was some sort of political activist. I'll try and read Dochatys work after i've finished with all these hadiths i'm ploughing through, thanks for the reference.

Nice pic BTW, life is indeed transitory. It should be lived to the full.
I live it to the full by spamming endless forums at 3AM arguing about intangable concepts and playing XBOX 360.

There is no use studying over fairy tales. We have only one life and we should live it to the fullest.

 

[Curaezipirid]

We can fight over Jerusalem because that land was promised to us by the flying spaghetti monster (may sauce be upon him).

After all, the FSM was devoured and digested for our sins.

Whose Allegory means what here I wonder?

The history written by the Jew known to the Romans as Josephus is a true account.

It is usually discredited because it was written 30 years later then Jesus death is recorded, however the 30 year span is distincly within eyewitness account.

Denying it would be akin to demanding that we all ignore every part of writing about Mohammed made after his death.

I have always enjoyed the Allegory of human vanities... we can dedicate this post to it!

'Vanity of vanities, all is vanity'. The books symbolise human knowledge, the musical instruments (a recorder, part of a shawm, a lute) the pleasures of the senses. The Japanese sword and the shell, both collectors' rarities, symbolise wealth. The chronometer and expiring lamp allude to the transience and frailty of human life. All are dominated by the skull, the symbol of death.

national gallery

Heck no way. Lets give Jerusalem a break. Its clear that the FSM meant Manchester. you just need to interpret it through a Scholor on the matter.

I think denying that Jesus existed is a bit tinfoil, the Romans were pretty sure that he was some sort of political activist. I'll try and read Dochatys work after i've finished with all these hadiths i'm ploughing through, thanks for the reference.

Nice pic BTW, life is indeed transitory. It should be lived to the full.
I live it to the full by spamming endless forums at 3AM arguing about intangable concepts and playing XBOX 360.

Indeed, and I believe it was 3li ibn Abi talib RA who said,(though I am not certain it was he)-- "Live life as if you were going to live forever, and prepare for the hereafter as if you were to die tomorrow" Gandhi later took that and put a spin on it--

that is why it is a bewilderment to me, for someone to live it not striking a balance... and seeking fulfillment on every level... (science, history, religion, travel, Art, philosophy) I for a long time lived as an "agnostic"-- and felt an incredible void.... more "restless" than anything really, I don't know how to ignore religion....
life to me is a miracle, I think therein lies the difference really. Some people see it as is, and some can't conceive of all of this-- and I happen to belong to the later group!
Everything is remarkable to me and can only point the arrow in one direction....

peace!

There is no use studying over fairy tales. We have only one life and we should live it to the fullest.

If an allegory is truly an allegory, only those with real Faith can understand it.

There are stories which for one person might be intoxicating, such as from 1001 Arabian nights, yet for another person might be terrifying. So for one person an allegory can be Haram, while for another it can be Halal and indeed necessary to be reading, only so as to sustain Faith in this modern world.

I don't get it, but