George Galloway - Hizbollah Is Not A Terrorist Organization

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lamaggad
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 71
  • Views Views 10K
where do u come from?

Poland.

can you please paste some article?? about it.





argentina_2.jpg


argentina_3.jpg


argentina_4.jpg



On November 9, Argentina 's special prosecution, which has been investigating the terrorist attack at the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires for the past 11 years, announced for the first time that there was solid evidence that the perpetrator of the attack was a 21-year-old Hezbollah operative. In a TV interview, Alberto Nisman, head of the investigation team, stated that it was Hussein Ibrahim Berro who had perpetrated the suicide bombing attack. According to Nisman, Hussein Berro was probably able to infiltrate into Argentina through Paraguay or Brazil . The possibility of Iranian involvement in the terrorist attack is being investigated as well.


It should be mentioned that in the first half of the 1990s, Hezbollah perpetrated two terrorist attacks in Argentina : the first was perpetrated against the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires (March 1992), leading to the deaths of 29 people; the second, and deadlier, was perpetrated against the Jewish community center (July 1994), as a result of which 85 civilians were killed and some 230 were wounded. The Argentine inquiry into the terrorist attack on the Jewish community center proceeded sluggishly and at times inadequately. During the years-long investigation, two judges who conducted the investigation and the trial were dismissed. Moreover, Carlos Menem, Argentina 's president in the 1990s, was accused of disrupting and delaying investigation procedures.


In late 2002, Argentina 's State Intelligence Service (SIDE) issued a detailed report, which was leaked to the media at the time. The report identified Iran (including leader Khamenei and former Intelligence Minister Ali Fallahian) and Hezbollah as being directly responsible for the terrorist attack at the Jewish community center. 1 In the wake of the report, international arrest warrants were issued against four Iranian diplomats suspected of involvement in the terrorist attack. The prosecution's present announcement is perceived as a meaningful development in the investigation of the terrorist attack. It is important because it provides a judicial reinforcement to the conclusion (that was reached by the Argentine intelligence services as well) that it was Iran , through Hezbollah, that stood behind the planning and perpetration of that act of terrorism.


Hezbollah spokesmen, on their part, were quick to deny the Argentine prosecutor's conclusions, claiming them to be part of the Israeli propaganda against Hezbollah, designed to portray it as a terrorist organization. They raised a ( false ) claim that Ibrahim Berro died a shahid's death in the confrontation between Israel and the “Islamic resistance” (i.e., Hezbollah). They also raised a fallacious claim that his body was still being held by Israel “along with the bodies of ten other resistance fighters” (Reuters, November 10).


According to our information, Ibrahim Hussein Berro, Hezbollah's suicide bomber in Argentina , belonged to the Shiite Berro clan; he was a member of the clan's branch residing in the Lebanon Valley (Bekaa), in the Baalbek region. Ibrahim's brother, Assad Berro, was killed in a suicide bombing attack against Israel (1989) in the village of Qleaa . Two additional brothers of Ibrahim immigrated to the US : Hassan (in 1985) and Abbas Berro (in 1996). It should be noted that the Berro clan also has an offshoot in the village of Kafr Kila in South Lebanon . Some of the Berro clan members are prominent drug dealers who collaborate with Hezbollah.


ibrahin_arg.jpg


Ibrahim Hussein Berro, the suicide bomber from Argentina

In conclusion, the announcement of the Argentine prosecution reveals once more the nature of Hezbollah as an international terrorist organization that stood, among other things, behind two deadly suicide bombing attacks on the Israeli Embassy and the Jewish community center in Argentina . 2 This organization, which has on more than one occasion served as a “terrorist contractor” by the Iranian regime, continues to maintain a global terrorist-operative infrastructure that relies on a dormant network of operatives as well as arms and ammunition deposited in various locations. This infrastructure could be used once again, in our assessment, to perpetrate terrorist attacks worldwide (including abducting Israeli civilians) in short notice after receiving an order from the organization's leadership in Lebanon and from Iran .
BTW i have never voted for Bush, neither Blair, as i am not american nor british citizen. But when british or american soldier do a war crime, i condemn it, and you are too scared maybe to say that Hesbullah act like war criminals and bunch of cowards.
 
Check this out... http://www.lamaggad.net/galloway.htm

George Galloway has spoken out in support of Lebanon, saying he believes Hezb Allah is justified in defending Lebanon against Israeli attacks. The Respect MP also lambasted media coverage of the war and said the UN resolution means nothing.

George Galloway even says -- bush, blair and israel are DEFEATED by Hezb Allah.

he perfectly describes the exact situation in Lebanon unlike the lies that israel and the western media spread.
:sl:

I agree. Hizbullah is a reistance movement.

George Galloway is the man and he tells it like it is. Many people are rubbed the wrong way because of his honesty and directness. He doesn't sugarcoat things...
 
I agree. Hizbullah is a reistance movement. It is also a terrorist orginization.
:sl:
Yeah, kind of like the IRA. But Israel's reaction was completely unjustified. During the Troubles, we did not invade Ireland and destroy its infrastructure even when the IRA tried to kill our politicians.
:w:
 
:sl:

I agree. Hizbullah is a reistance movement.

George Galloway is the man and he tells it like it is. Many people are rubbed the wrong way because of his honesty and directness. He doesn't sugarcoat things...

You say that a group which purposely attack civilians is a just resistance group.In this kind of moments i see that we come from very different civilizations and cultures. And i am very happy because of that.
BTW doesnt Quaran tells that attacking civilians is haram? So Hesbullah seems to act against teaching of Quaran.
 
Skąd znasz polski kolego?


I worked with alot of Polish people so basically they taught me a bit :D They've tricked me a couple of times too, telling me to go upto a girl and say "spier*****, di boulji (not sure how to spell that one)"

Lucky I didn't get slapped :rollseyes :X
 
I don't know what George Galloway is to British citizens, but we Americans were given a good glimpse into his character when he was asked to testify in front of a Senate committee on U.N. corruption. There was plenty of evidence that he took money from the Saddam regime. He dodged every question put to him by cloaking his guilt in left-wing causes and changing the subject. He is a joke here, and I'm sure most British people see him as a joke too..or at least I hope so.


Actually, the most common perception of that particular incident is that Galloway rather wiped the floor with the Senate committee, mainly because each change of subject was to one the committee found particularly uncomfortable. I happen to agree, although generally speaking I loath the man; even as a card carrying leftie I think he is an embarrassment to card-carrying lefties. He is an odd mixture of two parts profundity to three parts idiot, with a dash of clown thrown in.
 
:sl:
Yeah, kind of like the IRA. But Israel's reaction was completely unjustified. During the Troubles, we did not invade Ireland and destroy its infrastructure even when the IRA tried to kill our politicians.
:w:

My only objection is "completely unjustified". I think there is more that a little justification when you blow up busses full of kids.

Both sides are guilty of atrocities and human right violations..
 
Actually, the most common perception of that particular incident is that Galloway rather wiped the floor with the Senate committee, mainly because each change of subject was to one the committee found particularly uncomfortable. I happen to agree, although generally speaking I loath the man; even as a card carrying leftie I think he is an embarrassment to card-carrying lefties. He is an odd mixture of two parts profundity to three parts idiot, with a dash of clown thrown in.

I'm not sure if that is the most common perception, perhaps amongst the leftist and anti-American crowd. It sure wasn't my perception when I watched the whole affair. You can take sound bytes of one of his monologues and come away with that conclusion I suppose, but it was obvious he was very uncomfortable dealing with the subject at hand.
 
My only objection is "completely unjustified". I think there is more that a little justification when you blow up busses full of kids.

Both sides are guilty of atrocities and human right violations..
:sl:
Maybe I should have said 'Israel's overreaction' which would have been clearer. Of course Israel should react when its soil (please don't start that awfully pointless debate over whose soil it is, I'm only saying this out of convenience) and its people are under attack. But they shouldn't have levelled everything and destroyed the whole country. If Israel bombed civilians in Palestine, they also have a right to defend themselves, just not by bombing innocent people.
:w:
 
Actually, the most common perception of that particular incident is that Galloway rather wiped the floor with the Senate committee, mainly because each change of subject was to one the committee found particularly uncomfortable. I happen to agree, although generally speaking I loath the man; even as a card carrying leftie I think he is an embarrassment to card-carrying lefties. He is an odd mixture of two parts profundity to three parts idiot, with a dash of clown thrown in.

I agree. Though, by virtue of the kooky ideas he supports, he seems to be stuck in a 1930 time warp, he is undoubtedly quick on his feet and gave the Senate Committee a boxing lesson. Unfortunately, a well turned phrase does not a cogent argument make.
 
I worked with alot of Polish people so basically they taught me a bit :D They've tricked me a couple of times too, telling me to go upto a girl and say "spier*****, di boulji (not sure how to spell that one)"

Lucky I didn't get slapped :rollseyes :X

Hahahaha :D :D :D I see that you are a good student. You probably mean- daj buzi, which means "kiss me" :D
 
:sl:
Maybe I should have said 'Israel's overreaction' which would have been clearer. Of course Israel should react when its soil (please don't start that awfully pointless debate over whose soil it is, I'm only saying this out of convenience) and its people are under attack. But they shouldn't have levelled everything and destroyed the whole country. If Israel bombed civilians in Palestine, they also have a right to defend themselves, just not by bombing innocent people.
:w:

No interest in another "awfully pointless debate'.
I just attack onesided statements because:
Both sides are guilty of atrocities and human right violations.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top