A fictitious account dedicated to my violated sisters in Kashmir.

[Suomipoika]

That's exactly what i've been saying the whole time.

What? When? Where did you say that media spreads tolerance instead of having nasty double standards, because even in the next part of your post you go on and complain about the claimed double standards.

I think you don't understand why i spoke like i did, i was showing the double standards of the media. Then i portrayed it the way they do, NOT to say that a whole group of people are evil - but to portray to you how the media is so powerful in portraying Islaam as something evil just because of the actions of a minority.

Do you understand what i'm trying to say now? I'm not saying ALL hindus are evil, infact you should know by our previous discussions that i've said that not all are. [I usually even tell people to look at the religious scripture, not the actual 'followers'.] I just wanted to make it clear to you that this is exactly what is happening within Kashmir, and how the people there also misquote Islaam (to portray it as evil) and use their religion to push people into harming innocents.

I understand you were trying to point the double standards of media, I was just pointing out it doesnt appear the way you believe it does, which you seem to have missed. Media isnt so powerful at all portraying all muslims as evil. Infact, I dont think they are trying to do it. If they were, how do you explain the following, its from one of the first threads I posted in here. Even in the most islamophobic country in "west", almost 80% of people have no problem living next to muslims.

http://www.islamicboard.com/world-affairs/36938-canadians-least-biased-against-muslims.html

I've explained this above, inshaa Allaah (God willing.)

Do you then condemn the use of the perpetrators religion in the story you posted?

 

[- Qatada -]

What? When? Where did you say that media spreads tolerance instead of having nasty double standards, because even in the next part of your post you go on and complain about the claimed double standards.

I think i misunderstood your post, so that's my fault sorry.

I understand you were trying to point the double standards of media, I was just pointing out it doesnt appear the way you believe it does, which you seem to have missed. Media isnt so powerful at all portraying all muslims as evil. Infact, I dont think they are trying to do it. If they were, how do you explain the following, its from one of the first threads I posted in here. Even in the most islamophobic country in "west", almost 80% of people have no problem living next to muslims.

http://www.islamicboard.com/world-affairs/36938-canadians-least-biased-against-muslims.html

That's kool, thanks for the info and the positive response.

Do you then condemn the use of the perpetrators religion in the story you posted?

I don't know the intent of the author, if he's saying this because he's using the same tactics as the hindus who are fighting against Muslims in Kashmir (i.e. them claiming that the muslims as a whole are evil), then he may have the right to do so. However, i don't know his intention so i can't say.

But me personally, if his religion justifies what he did - then i don't agree with it. If it's not part of his religion, then i would just say that the perpertrator is evil and not the actual religion.



Regards.