Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

[wilberhum]

bush and his monkey gang needs to accept reality.

You know experts say that these wars (afghan, iraq, and syria/iran/libya on the list) are initial stages of WWIII. I think its envitable and we will see it coming soon.

Hitler started WWII and Hitler 2 (Bush) started WWIII (still in its infancy)

Oh no not another one who distorts to make there point.
Ya, It is all Bush's fault. (Hitler 2) Da
Poor little Iran. They just want peace.
Say, if you buy that, I have a bridge I would like to sell you.

 

[tears4husain]

I totally agree, but I also believe that WWIII will be against Islam as it already is. My question is will we stand for it as muslims? these are our brothers and sisters over there getting killed.and we do nothing but seek refuge in america when its there soldiers with our blood on their hands with no remorse. We have the right to arm our selves against the aggressors. Iran, Iraq, Arabia and so on we have the right to stand for what we believe and not bow down to the real terrorist and murderers. We're over here paying taxes to kill our brothers and sisters our wealth is spent to inforce the killings and not in the way of Allah (s.w.t.) when we migrate to the land of disbelief.

 

[wilberhum]

If it is a war against Islam, how did you get in? Da Did you read that in the News?

 

[tears4husain]

what do you mean? I think you get a kick out of debating with people regardless if you win or lose.

 

[wilberhum]

what do you mean? I think you get a kick out of debating with people regardless if you win or lose.

What do I mean? Reread it. I think it is quite clear.
I debate to express my opinion and hopefully get an intelligent response. A different opinion from an intelligent person can quite offend help one form a new opinion. It is an amazing way to learn.
But what I usually find is people that define everything as black or white and ignore the 98 shades of gray. That and the totally unintelligent statements like “It is a war against Islam”; everything bad is caused by the US.
I do have some fun when people make really stupid statements like “Iran is peaceful”.
But I don’t do it to win.
Well maybe I do. Every time I see new intelligent things, I gain knowledge and to me that is winning.

 

[Keltoi]

World War is probably not going to run the normal historical course. The major powers have too much destructive power in their hands. If there was a world war now, it would probably be fought in some "neutral" territory, that way the home countries will probably escape destruction. Of course the poor nations caught in the middle will be totally decimated. Whether these countries are eastern European, middle eastern, etc, who knows.

 

[Woodrow]

We can look at the bright side a nuclear war will not be a long drawn out war. Should last 15 to 20 minutes and then in a few thousand years our descendants can come out of their caves and fight WW4 with sticks and rocks.

A nuclear war will have no winners. There can be no conquest through the use of nukes. To conquer you have to have something left you can invade and colonize.

 

[Chiteng]

I totally agree, but I also believe that WWIII will be against Islam as it already is. My question is will we stand for it as muslims? these are our brothers and sisters over there getting killed.and we do nothing but seek refuge in america when its there soldiers with our blood on their hands with no remorse. We have the right to arm our selves against the aggressors. Iran, Iraq, Arabia and so on we have the right to stand for what we believe and not bow down to the real terrorist and murderers. We're over here paying taxes to kill our brothers and sisters our wealth is spent to inforce the killings and not in the way of Allah (s.w.t.) when we migrate to the land of disbelief.

Then leave

 

[islamirama]

We can look at the bright side a nuclear war will not be a long drawn out war. Should last 15 to 20 minutes and then in a few thousand years our descendants can come out of their caves and fight WW4 with sticks and rocks.

A nuclear war will have no winners. There can be no conquest through the use of nukes. To conquer you have to have something left you can invade and colonize.

Einstien said that WWIII will be with nukes and the next war will be with sticks. I think we'll see WWIII with nukes and a good way to cut the population from 5billion to very very small amount, Perhaps in the thousands.

 

[ACC]

lol....this is rich..no really. How exactly does someone go about "faking" every Al-Qaeda video released since 9-11? Not to mention the tape with Osama Bin Laden taking credit and praising the "martrys". Perhaps a "true" Muslim wouldn't go down the path of 9-11, I hope that is true. However, the truth is that self-proclaimed Muslims hijacked planes, slit the throats of stewardesses and pilots in front of passengers, and crashed into buildings, with the exception of Flight 93. I understand you don't want to believe a self-proclaimed Muslim would do this, but intentionally playing dumb isn't the answer.

I think it is important to remember that the soviet union had news agency and supporters that pointed to the US media as controlled by the government and full of lies. As did the nazis, and other horrible ideologies. The funny thing is that these exact same media sources were more controlled and full of lies than any other media source. The same will be proven of the 'unbiased' media sources that claim osama did not commit heinous acts or that the taliban was a good organization. In the end, the truth always triumphs, as it will again here. Some people can’t accept the fact that there are people that do horrible things in the name of something they believe in. That is their issue.

I know there will be many links to 'unbiased' news sources. I can provide as many to support my claim. It is a game of tit for tat.

 

[ACC]

bush and his monkey gang needs to accept reality.

You know experts say that these wars (afghan, iraq, and syria/iran/libya on the list) are initial stages of WWIII. I think its envitable and we will see it coming soon.

Hitler started WWII and Hitler 2 (Bush) started WWIII (still in its infancy)

The name calling reminds me of what the communists and other failed ideas used to do. If there is to be WWIII, it will be because the USA has decided to defend its way of life from people that do not believe that I should be able to choose what to believe in.

 

[ACC]

I totally agree, but I also believe that WWIII will be against Islam as it already is. My question is will we stand for it as muslims? these are our brothers and sisters over there getting killed.and we do nothing but seek refuge in america when its there soldiers with our blood on their hands with no remorse. We have the right to arm our selves against the aggressors. Iran, Iraq, Arabia and so on we have the right to stand for what we believe and not bow down to the real terrorist and murderers. We're over here paying taxes to kill our brothers and sisters our wealth is spent to inforce the killings and not in the way of Allah (s.w.t.) when we migrate to the land of disbelief.

I agree that these countries and regimes have the right to stand and fight for what they believe in, as does the USA and other countries. In the end, it is a matter of who can impose its will on the other more effectively.

 

[islamirama]

The name calling reminds me of what the communists and other failed ideas used to do. If there is to be WWIII, it will be because the USA has decided to defend its way of life from people that do not believe that I should be able to choose what to believe in.

It has nothing to do with name calling, remember "curious george" the little monkey that was curious about everything in those childhood books?

well, US george is anything but curious, he is dumb like a monkey, looks like a monkey, and yells like a monkey.

Anyways, WWIII has already started. we are in the initial stages where 2-3 countries are first conquered then eventually the whole world gets involved. Hilter did the same thing and now bushroot is doing the same thing. Blow stuff up in his own land and blame a group of people and then wage a worldwidw war on them, finding excuses and making up faulty intelligence reports to bomb nations and invade them. Only thin he is protecting is the interests of his oil buddies an US or american way of life.

 

[ACC]

It has nothing to do with name calling, remember "curious george" the little monkey that was curious about everything in those childhood books?

well, US george is anything but curious, he is dumb like a monkey, looks like a monkey, and yells like a monkey.

Anyways, WWIII has already started. we are in the initial stages where 2-3 countries are first conquered then eventually the whole world gets involved. Hilter did the same thing and now bushroot is doing the same thing. Blow stuff up in his own land and blame a group of people and then wage a worldwidw war on them, finding excuses and making up faulty intelligence reports to bomb nations and invade them. Only thin he is protecting is the interests of his oil buddies an US or american way of life.

The name calling appears childish and unnecessary. I stated earlier, this is what was done in the past by ideologies that were proven false.

Any belief that the 9/11 attacks were a conspiracy can’t be reconciled with reality in my opinion.

 

[islamirama]

The name calling appears childish and unnecessary. I stated earlier, this is what was done in the past by ideologies that were proven false.

Any belief that the 9/11 attacks were a conspiracy can’t be reconciled with reality in my opinion.

you're entitled to your opinion as i am to mine, and i anyone who blindly believes their gov't is the biggest fool ever.

 

[Cognescenti]

Re: Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

I may be confused. But, where have I read or heard anything that the US was planning any military action towards Iran? Perhaps we are all being a bit presumptive about this.

No kidding. Indeed, the public pronouncements of the US Government are that diplomacy is the planned course.

 

[ACC]

you're entitled to your opinion as i am to mine, and i anyone who blindly believes their gov't is the biggest fool ever.

Name calling seem to be your preferred method. To each his own. Agreeing with them does not automatically mean someone is blibdly following them.

Sincerely,

The biggest fool ever.

 

[Cognescenti]

Re: Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

Salaam/peace

<cut & paste>...<cut & paste>....<cut & paste>....<cut & paste>

US Now Ready to Attack Iran

Dan Plesch -- New Statesman (Britain)



http://www.newstatesman.com/200702190014

American military operations for a major conventional war with Iran could be implemented any day....<cut & paste>


]

Good one! .."American military operations for a major conventional war with Iran could be implemented any day".....did you look at the date on that article...it's from February It appears the New Statesman has Rasputin on their payroll.



Guys and gals. You need to distinguish between a contingency plan for a military operation and the order to do it. The US had a contingency plan for nuclear attack on the Soviet Union for 45 years.

Of course, it could happen :smile:

 

[Cognescenti]

Re: Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

I totally agree, but I also believe that WWIII will be against Islam as it already is. My question is will we stand for it as muslims? these are our brothers and sisters over there getting killed.and we do nothing but seek refuge in america when its there soldiers with our blood on their hands with no remorse. We have the right to arm our selves against the aggressors. Iran, Iraq, Arabia and so on we have the right to stand for what we believe and not bow down to the real terrorist and murderers. We're over here paying taxes to kill our brothers and sisters our wealth is spent to inforce the killings and not in the way of Allah (s.w.t.) when we migrate to the land of disbelief.

As they say...don't let the door hit you on the way out.

 

[ACC]

Good one! .."American military operations for a major conventional war with Iran could be implemented any day".....did you look at the date on that article...it's from February It appears the New Statesman has Rasputin on their payroll.



Guys and gals. You need to distinguish between a contingency plan for a military operation and the order to do it. The US had a contingency plan for nuclear attack on the Soviet Union for 45 years.

Of course, it could happen :smile:

Good point. The USA has contingency plans for war with Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Africa, etc. Any smart nation should prepare for any possible scenario, while paying special attention to the highest risk factors.