Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

We can look at the bright side a nuclear war will not be a long drawn out war. Should last 15 to 20 minutes and then in a few thousand years our descendants can come out of their caves and fight WW4 with sticks and rocks.

A nuclear war will have no winners. There can be no conquest through the use of nukes. To conquer you have to have something left you can invade and colonize.

That is what a war between two global nuclear powers would be like. A regional nuclear exchange would be bad for the region, but it is not going to end life on Earth....still, it woudl be a bad idea :smile:
 
Re: Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

Good point. The USA has contingency plans for war with Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Africa, etc. Any smart nation should prepare for any possible scenario, while paying special attention to the highest risk factors.

Yes. The plan for the invasion of Mexico is only two pages. :statisfie There are probably 5 or more different plans for an attack on Iran..ranging from taking out a few Iranian missile sites and ships to a response to Iranian WMD attack.

One also has to consider that the information was released on purpose to make the Iranians twitchy and to drive a wedge betwen Iranian factions. I think that is what is really going on.
 
Last edited:
Yes. The plan for the invasion of Mexico is only two pages. :statisfie There are probably 5 or more different plans for an attack on Iran..ranging from taking out a few Iranian missile sites and ships to a response to Iranian WMD attack.

One also has to consider that the information was released on purpose to make the Iranians twitchy and to drive a wedge betwen Iranian factions. I think that is what is really going on.

Two pages? One in English and one translated to Spanish for the undocumented workers :smile: ?
 
Salaam/ peace ;
Bush Directive for a "Catastrophic Emergency" in America:




[FONT=&quot]Building a Justification for Waging War on Iran? [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]By Prof. Michel Chossudovsky[/FONT]



The US media consensus is that "the United States faces its greatest threat of a terrorist assault since the September 11 attacks" (USA Today, 12 February 2006)

The American Homeland is threatened by " Islamic terrorists", allegedly supported by Tehran and Damascus.



http://www.informationclearinghouse.infoarticle17917.htm


"Allaah burdens not a person beyond his scope" [al-Baqarah 2:286]

"And everything they have done is noted in (their) Records (of deeds)."


(al-Qamar 54:52)


"For to us will be their return; then it will be for us to call them to account." (Holy Quran 88:25-26)

 
Salaam/ peace ;
Bush Directive for a "Catastrophic Emergency" in America:




[FONT=&quot]Building a Justification for Waging War on Iran? [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]By Prof. Michel Chossudovsky[/FONT]



The US media consensus is that "the United States faces its greatest threat of a terrorist assault since the September 11 attacks" (USA Today, 12 February 2006)

The American Homeland is threatened by " Islamic terrorists", allegedly supported by Tehran and Damascus.



http://www.informationclearinghouse.infoarticle17917.htm


"Allaah burdens not a person beyond his scope" [al-Baqarah 2:286]

"And everything they have done is noted in (their) Records (of deeds)."


(al-Qamar 54:52)


"For to us will be their return; then it will be for us to call them to account." (Holy Quran 88:25-26)


'informationclearinghouse' is not even worth a reading.

Ya know, if I would post now some stuff out of a webpage of Apostates of Islam, I would be banned.
This shows me agains the unbalance of this forum to promote peace.


my 2 cents
 
'informationclearinghouse' is not even worth a reading.

Ya know, if I would post now some stuff out of a webpage of Apostates of Islam, I would be banned.
This shows me agains the unbalance of this forum to promote peace.


my 2 cents

post something from "apostes of islam"? do you like totally suck at logic or something?

you compare political sites (informationclearinghouse) with political sites (FOX, CNN, Washingtonpost)

You compare anti-islam sites with anti-other faith sites.

duh...
 
post something from "apostes of islam"? do you like totally suck at logic or something?

you compare political sites (informationclearinghouse) with political sites (FOX, CNN, Washingtonpost)

You compare anti-islam sites with anti-other faith sites.

duh...


oh, I guess you got the message but perfers to play the ignorant.

For for those who don't get it: informationclearinghouse is also so reliable and trustful than apostates of islam.

Get it now ? :rollseyes
 
oh, I guess you got the message but perfers to play the ignorant.

For for those who don't get it: informationclearinghouse is also so reliable and trustful than apostates of islam.

Get it now ? :rollseyes

it's unreliable cause it disses the bush lies but guess what, It is more reliable than your CNN and FOX propaganda.
 
it's unreliable cause it disses the bush lies but guess what, It is more reliable than your CNN and FOX propaganda.

Sure !!
e015-1.gif
 
Reporters Blow Whistle on FOX News - http://www.youtube.com/v/fzu9M6dUCac

MORE FOX News Whistleblowers Fess Up - http://www.youtube.com/v/VuYDRrmIH2w

FOX may be a very biased news source but the information clearing house blatantly distorts facts, supports conspiracies as well as being a biased news source (moreso than fox, which would be apparent to you if you used half your brain) Information Clearing house and all its counterparts and affiliates is no more than internet garbage. It is your choice to read it but it only makes you look foolish when you quote it
 
Re: Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

:sl:

I can tell you must be a very tolerant person.

Kind reminder: Stay on topic

I have had any number of posts sent to the ethereal cornfield with less direct criticism of another poster. You folks can send me to the cornfield as well because it is your site, but either the pretense of impartiality should be removed or kindly refrain, as a moderator, from direct insults about my "tolerance".

Black, white, brown..who cares? Gay, vegan, Jew, Mormon, Druid, Muslim? I really could not care less.

On the other hand, if you are talking about statements that could (given the proper context) represent treason in a time of war....then I am intolerant. Here is what our good bud from Detroit actually said:


Originally Posted by tears4husain
I totally agree, but I also believe that WWIII will be against Islam as it already is. My question is will we stand for it as muslims? these are our brothers and sisters over there getting killed.and we do nothing but seek refuge in america when its there soldiers with our blood on their hands with no remorse. We have the right to arm our selves against the aggressors. Iran, Iraq, Arabia and so on we have the right to stand for what we believe and not bow down to the real terrorist and murderers. We're over here paying taxes to kill our brothers and sisters our wealth is spent to inforce the killings and not in the way of Allah (s.w.t.) when we migrate to the land of disbelief.


The poor, conflicted author decries his comfortable life in the US while his "brothers and sisters" suffer. I merely offered a simple solution to his dissonance. Get the Hell out.

BTW, for anyone interested, here is the FBI office in Detroit: (313) 965-2323
 
I'll give this thread about a day to get back to the topic (which was originally about Iran would you believe) and for people to calm down and stop mudslinging.
 
did anyone see the national geographic special about the Hostage crisis in Iran the other night? That program (in my opinion) gave a lot of incite as to why US and Iranian relations are so strained even to this day
 
Why? Iran is under threat of attack only because its lunatic president speaks openly from time to time that Israel must be wiped out from the Earth.

um have you been listening to your lunatic president lately? Iran is under thread becuase some moron claims that he is buidling nukes and not nuclear technology for energy only (something he has right to under UN laws).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top