US Army Trains Soldiers to Shoot Women and Children!!!

[wilberhum]

ı dont claim that saddam was good....
but ım sure that even saddam was better than usa in ıraq...
during saddam regime saddam was the killer,but now it isnt obvious who kills who...but it is obvious to ones who think wisely,all the ways of killers ın ıraq reach one place...usa.....but no one dares to say this bluntly

So I guess that answered your question. "say me the number of killed muslims IN IRAQ before usa came ıraq"

Peace Wilber

 

[InToTheRain]

And yes "Youtube" where any idot can say anything they want. What a great source of news. If you check youtube close enough you can find out where the flying sourcers landed. :giggling: :giggling: :giggling:

It was taken from your beloved CNN, from a show called Cross fire ON CNN.

 

[wilberhum]

It was taken from your beloved CNN, from a show called Cross fire ON CNN.

Well then it can't be reliable can it? :?

Oh lets see.
If I like it, it’s reliable.:thumbs_up

If I don't like it, it isn't reliable. :thumbs_do

I’m beginning to understand your logic. :skeleton:

 

[KAding]

please give me the number of killed muslims by muslims?
before usa came ıraq,and after usa came ıraq...

Saddam was pretty deadly as well though. Probably not quite as deadly as it is now, but his killing was over a long sustained period. Millions died under his rule, either due to civil war or thanks to the wars of aggression he started. Just because it wasn't reported much then doesn't mean it didn't happen. It only strengthens my belief in the apparent bias that Muslims don't report/talk much about the violent death of other Muslims as long as it not the Zionist or Americans doing the killing.

HRW:
It is difficult to contemplate, after the many horrors of the last century, that a government could get away with murdering a quarter of a million people. A quarter of a million Iraqis taken from their homes, driven to remote sites, and executed. A quarter of a million Iraqis who simply “disappeared,” without even the courtesy of notice to their families, let alone a trial and judgment. An average of 10,000 people a year for the two-and-a-half decades of the dictator's rule. That unthinkable tally is Saddam Hussein's legacy.

The mass graves being unearthed today in Iraq bespeak the horrors of his rule. Among the occupants of these graves are 100,000 Kurdish men and boys machine-gunned to death during the 1988 Anfal genocide; 30,000 Shiites and Kurds slaughtered after the 1991 uprising; other Shiites killed during the 1980s because of their perceived sympathy for Iran; so-called Marsh Arabs, killed as the Iraqi government drained the marshes and destroyed a culture that had thrived for centuries; and many individual Iraqis of all faiths and ethnicities who were singled out, their lives ended, for real or perceived opposition to the regime.

Iran Iraq War: Estimated Muslims killing Muslims at about 1 million in 8 years

Thats a lot of dead Muslims there.

Go through the source WnbSlveOfAllah gave us:
http://www.iraqbodycount.net/database/

Tell me who is doing the killing there? The Americans or the 'resistance fighters'/'insurgents'/'terrorists'?

In fact, let me quote their latest analysis:
http://www.iraqbodycount.net/press/pr15.php

Coalition-caused deaths.
Coalition forces, principally US as well as some UK, were identified to have killed at least 536 Iraqi civilians in year four (excluding a major incident in Najaf in January which is still under investigation by IBC). This compares with 370 in year three. If 536 seems insignificant in light of the overall total, consider for a moment what it would mean if in your country there were, on average, three incidents a week in which a foreign army killed civilians, including the killing of a 5-yr-old girl and entire families with their children. Would this army be a stabilising influence?

536 out of a total of 26540 dead civilians from March 2006 to March 2007. Suicide and car bombings alone have killed almost 6000 people in the last year. Yes, thats right 2% of all the killings is caused by Coalition fire. And this is from an anti-occupation website.

At a certain point you will have to accept the responsibility of those actually doing most of the killing. The US opened the can of worms, but the worms were already at each others throats for many centuries.

 

[wilberhum]

Doesn't making the recruits chant this seem in the least bit wrong?

Well if you really believe it.
If that is what we teach, why do we put those that do it in prision?
It dosn't make sence does it?

 

[KAding]

I believe what he says. Soldiers can sing pretty disgusting marching songs sometimes. And the Burqa with a bazooka sounds pretty believable too.

Doing a quick search on google directs you to the following comment on a blog (unrelated to this case). The full lyrics of this marching song appear to be something like:

left right left right left right kill!!! left right left right you know we will!!! I went to the market() where all the ladies shop(troops repeat) pulled out my machette(sic)() and began to chop!!!(troops repeat)

2nd vrs repeat and sub I went to the playground() where all the kiddies play(troops repeat) pulled out my uzi() and began to spray!!!()
3rd vrs repeat and sub I went to the pool() where all the kiddies swam() pulled out my m-16 and made like it was nam!!!() left right left righ left right kill!! left right left right you know we will!!

http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2006/06/jodies-and-hypocrits.html

 

[wilberhum]

Fair enough, it could have been made up.
lol..
I'm still going to answer this though.

It's cos it's AMERICAN kids that get killed...since when do Iraqi kids matter? kay:

I sure some feel that way. I sure some don't care when Muslims die.

But then there is the other 99%. eace:

 

[wilberhum]

From:
Debate for my Muslim friends #59

Originally Posted by ISLAMASWEENEY
What i meant was that Saddam Hussein is not just a mARTYR BUT A MASSIVE HUGE HERO FOR THE JOB HE DID IN STABALISING IRAQ

I thought this was an interesting post.

 

[InToTheRain]

Well then it can't be reliable can it? :?

Oh lets see.
If I like it, it’s reliable.:thumbs_up

If I don't like it, it isn't reliable. :thumbs_do

I’m beginning to understand your logic. :skeleton:

Have actually seen the Link? its a debate between CNN and John Stuart, this is an excepton and it's about the reliability of CNN, although it ain't supposed to be but John forces the Issue on them and CNN representatives are at a loss for words coz they know their BS better then others I guess.

Any one who only relies on CNN for news is Blind, you have gotto go to other sources. I too used to watch CNN but they neve gave the complete picture so you gotta complete it yourself or at least try to.

 

[wilberhum]

Have actually seen the Link? its a debate between CNN and John Stuart, this is an excepton and it's about the reliability of CNN, although it ain't supposed to be but John forces the Issue on them and CNN representatives are at a loss for words coz they know their BS better then others I guess.

Any one who only relies on CNN for news is Blind, you have gotto go to other sources. I too used to watch CNN but they neve gave the complete picture so you gotta complete it yourself or at least try to.

Any one who only relies on any single source for news is Blind.
That's why I daily visit Al Jazeera, BBC, CNN and of cource "The Seattle PI".
About once a week I read news source from India, Japan, and Australia.

What is truly amazing is I seldom see conflicting reports.

Your bias BS just does not fly any better than pigs.

 

[InToTheRain]

What is truly amazing is I seldom see conflicting reports.

LOL, so you have found sources which give the same subjective view. So if it agrees with CNN it's true else it's false. I see your logic

 

[wilberhum]

LOL, so you have found sources which give the same subjective view. So if it agrees with CNN it's true else it's false. I see your logic

Right Al Jazeera and CNN are both Zionist controlled. :?

You look worse with every post.

Instead of your silly accusations, why don't you bring an example from any international news agency? :thumbs_up

That does not include westophobia.com either.

 

[Amadeus85]

ı dont claim that saddam was good....
but ım sure that even saddam was better than usa in ıraq...
during saddam regime saddam was the killer,but now it isnt obvious who kills who...but it is obvious to ones who think wisely,all the ways of killers ın ıraq reach one place...usa.....but no one dares to say this bluntly

Saddam was good because only shiia's were killed. Now also sunnis die, so american occupation is evil. :muddlehea

 

[InToTheRain]

Right Al Jazeera and CNN are both Zionist controlled. :?

not sure but I sure do know CNN controls you

Instead of your silly accusations, why don't you bring an example from any international news agency? :thumbs_up

If we are talking about the Deserter who is accusing the army of teaching injustice and the killing of civiallians then I believe him, for what reason should I doubt the article? Since the unjustified invasion of Iraq there has been nothing to improve the situation, The US army has used Chemical weapons on civiallians when the Hypocrites have supposedly went to stop the use of WMD.

Half truths and double standards equate to BS in my book.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1642831,00.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4417024.stm

They used chemical weapons on civillians indiscriminately, if you see the links I gave previously (the hidden massacre at fallujah YouTube) it is all true and the links above confirm it.

 

[beespreeteam]

Saddam was good because only shiia's were killed. Now also sunnis die, so american occupation is evil. :muddlehea

Err

muslims didn't like saddam, and they shoudnt, but it was better than it is now. That's the simple message.

Also, when you train soldiers to shoot burqa'd ladies with bazookas on their shoulders, all you're doing is reducing their sensitivity to killing women. How many burqa'd out women would be holding bazooka's fighting? I doubt theirs many...

And stop quoting randoms/retards. If you want me to start quoting stuff from the 'white national front', of whom there are many, I could do that...

 

[Cognescenti]

This idiot (the word is completely apt) enlists in the Army and then resents when they try to teach him how to use a weapon????

Did he think he was in truck driver's school? What does he think an "army" is for? That is so stupifyingly stupid as to raise doubts about his ability to form cogent thoughts on other matters. He has now been taken to the bosom of a bunch of kook peaceniks who would do anything to undercut the credibility of the US military. That does not help. I am not sure I believe one thing here. I am not even sure he was in the Army.

Then there is the bit about "Conscientous Objector"???? How can you be a Conscientous Objector in an all volunteer Army?

It is one thing to draft a Quaker (whcih did happen in WWII), but this guy is just an immature dumbass who realized he didn't want to play amry anymore and concocted an "exit strategy"

Note there is NO attempt by the "author" to even seek an opposing statement or verify the story. Absolute bovine excrement.

 

[Keltoi]

Just a sidenote, the U.S. found out pretty quick that some people have no qualms about using women on the battlefield during that little holiday in Somalia. Those special forces soldiers were forced to kill hundreds of people, and many of them were women. They weren't carrying RPGs, they were used as human shields for the charging men behind them. So let us not pretend women can't be a threat, especially when the enemy knows many are likely to hesitate when the choice presents itself.

As for the supposed marching song, I wouldn't be surprised if such a song existed in some form, especially in the Marine Corps, but I don't know for certain. In any event, nobody with half a brain cell would actually believe U.S. troops are trained to "kill women and children".

 

[beespreeteam]

Regardless, you'll get owned:

http://beespree.com/WorldAffairs/Abu_Ghraib_whistleblowers_ordeal/

 

[Joe98]

……..all you're doing is reducing their sensitivity to killing women.

No, killing somebody dressed like a woman

How many burqa'd out women would be holding bazooka's fighting?

How can anybody tell whether the person is male or female????

 

[guyabano]

Instead of your silly accusations, why don't you bring an example from any international news agency? :thumbs_up

Simple, because he cannot find any news there which fuel his hatred.

This story about US soldiers trained to shoot Woman and children is simply ridiculous. I'm not always agreeing what US Army do, but I'm pretty sure, they don't do things like that.