When was the Bible corrupted?

To make it somewhat clearer to you - if any document (for argument's sake), contain truth and lies, it does not invalidate the whole document. The parts that are true, remain true - it cannot change that into a lie. It is very basic, and I assume you will accept this basic logic.

.

your logic is:

1-the NT wriring contains allegation that Jesus was crucified(based on a Hearsay&zero eyetwitnesses testimonies)

2-Tacitus alledged that Jesus was crucified (based on a CHRISTIAN hearsay,zero eyetwitnesses testimonies,zero source he quote outside the christian hearsay propaganda)

conclusion: Jesus was crucified.



(This lack of eye witnesses to the Passion and the audience with Pilate leads historians to conclude that the details of these events are later additions.) Brown 1993, vol. 1, p. 711-12; Funk 1998, p. 152-3
 
To make it somewhat clearer to you - if any document (for argument's sake), contain truth and lies, it does not invalidate the whole document. The parts that are true, remain true - it cannot change that into a lie. It is very basic, and I assume you will accept this basic logic.

.

well,If you respect logic,

what would be your basic logical answer to the following question?

if the biblical record can be proved fallible in areas of fact that can be verified,How it is to be trusted in areas where it cannot be tested eg;(Resurrection etc..)?
 
^^^ thanks akhi for getting on top of this I don't have the time for an essay this morning.. jazaka Allah khyran... id3eeli rabena yeghethni, wa yo3eni inharda law sam7at... wasalaam 3lykoum wra7mat Allah wabrakato
 
^^^ thanks akhi for getting on top of this I don't have the time for an essay this morning.. jazaka Allah khyran... id3eeli rabena yeghethni, wa yo3eni inharda law sam7at... wasalaam 3lykoum wra7mat Allah wabrakato

May Allah yeghethik, yebarek feeky,yenawar tarikek,yerzokik be hosn elsohbah men el saleheen methlek, we yazeedek elm wa nor wa hoda.

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم يا مَنْ تُحَلُّ بِهِ عُقَدُ المكارة، وَيا مَنْ يُفْثَأُ بِهِ حَدُّ الشَّدائِدِ .. وَيا مَنْ يُلْتَمَسُ مِنْهُ الَمخْرَجُ اِلى رَوْحِ الْفَرَجِ، ذَلَّتْ لِقُدْرَتِكَ الصِّعابُ، وَتَسَبَّبَتْ بِلُطْفِكَ الأسباب، وَجَرى بِقُدْرَتِكَ الْقَضاءُ، وَمَضَتْ عَلى إرادتك الأشياء، فَهِيَ بِمَشِيَّتِكَ دُونَ قَوْلِكَ مُؤْتَمِرَةٌ، وَبِإِرادَتِكَ دُونَ نَهْيِكَ مُنْزَجِرَةٌ .. اَنْتَ الْمَدْعُوُّ لِلْمُهِمّاتِ، واَنْتَ الْمَفْزَعُ في المُلِمّاتِ، لا يَنْدَفِعُ مِنْها اِلاّ ما دَفَعْتَ، وَلا يَنْكَشِفُ مِنْها اِلاّ ما كَشَفْتَ، وَقَدْ نَزَلَ بي يا رَبِّ ما قَدْ تَكأَّدَني ثِقْلُهُ، وَاَلَمَّ بي ما قَدْ بَهَظَني حَمْلُهُ، وَبِقُدْرَتِكَ أوردته عَلَيَّ، وَبِسُلْطانِكَ وَجَّهْتَهُ اِلَيَّ، فَلا مُصْدِرَ لِما اَوْرَدْتَ، وَلا صارِفَ لِما وَجَّهْتَ، وَلا فاتِحَ لِما أغلقت، وَلا مُغْلِقَ لِما فَتَحْتَ، وَلا مُيَسِّرَ لِما عَسَّرْتَ، وَلا ناصِرَ لِمَنْ خَذَلْتَ .. فَصَلِّ عَلى مُحَمَّد وآلِهِ، وَاْفْتَحْ لي يا رَبِّ بابَ الْفَرَجِ بِطَولِكَ، وَاكْسِرْ عَنّي سُلْطانَ الْهَمِّ بِحَوْلِكَ، وَاَنِلْني حُسْنَ النَّظَرِ فيـما شَكَوْتُ، وَاَذِقْني حَلاوَةَ الصُّنْعِ فيـما سَاَلْتُ ، وَهَبْ لي مِنْ لَدُنْكَ رَحْمةً وَفَرجاً هَنيئاً، وَاجْعَلْ لي مِنْ عِنْدِكَ مَخْرَجاً وَحِيّاً ( اى سريعا )، وَلا تَشْغَلْني بِالاِْهتِمامِ عَنْ تَعاهُدِ فُرُوضِكَ، وَاسْتِعْمالِ سُنَّتِكَ فَقَدْ ضِقْتُ لِما نَزَلَ بي يا رَبِّ ذَرْعاً، وامْتَلأتُ بِحَمْلِ ما حَدَثَ عَليَّ هَمّاً، واَنْتَ الْقادِرُ عَلى كَشْفِ ما مُنيتُ بِهِ، وَدَفْعِ ما وَقَعْتُ فيهِ، فاَفْعَلْ بي ذلِكَ وَاِنْ لَمْ اَسْتَوْجِبْهُ مِنْكَ.. يا ذَا الْعَرْشِ الْعَظيمِ، وَذَا الْمَنِّ الْكَريمِ، فَاَنْتَ قادِرٌ يا اَرْحَمَ الرّاحِمينَ، آمينَ رَبَّ الْعالَمينَ .
 
Salaam/peace ,


- see the Talmud.


I would love to see proof from Talmud that Jesus (p) died to make all sinless. Pl. mention verse .




Consider why the people of the Old Testament (Abraham included) had to sacrifice animals. Does it mean anything to you?


Muslims all over the world remember the sacrfise of Abrahma (p) each yr. They are going to celebrate the ocsasion on the Dec this yr.

Pl. let me know how Christians celebrate this event .



Jesus died for your sins, and was raised from the dead - thereby washing you from all sin


--I was told in other thread that ur all sins did not wash at all . Because of death of Jesus (p) , past sins because of Adam’s (p) fault has been forgiven or something like that ...confusing matter.......but surely u are not sinless because of Jesus (p).




If ur all sins are forgiven , does it mean u can commit any crime & it won’t be considered as a sin ???? Or All Christians have reserved seats in heaven ????


And if you want to wait till the last day to find out if you are right or wrong, I would suggest is not a good idea. What if you are wrong? You can know now –



I meant dispute between Muslims & Christians about if Jesus (p ) died or not , if Quran is the final holy book or not etc .

Individually we surely will search for the Truth ……we will read other holy books for comparison purposes .
 
If a historian did not personally witness extraordinary claim (Resurrection from the dead),and didn't quote eyewitnesses as his source..

How on earth one could safely accept such specific point in his writing!??

why don't you accept the passion,resurrection narratives of Krishna,Osiris as truth,as long as it was mentioned in history books by some historians?

You are holding on to grass straws. You are now doubting at least two of the greatest historians and even "opponents" of Jesus, because of faulty logic and assuming that eyewitness accounts were not used.

Try and think clearly now - If a historian (very reputable I might add) claims something happened - which in fact did not happen. Do you think that would damage his reputation? Do you think, as he would have nothing to gain from it, he would report it and open himself to ridicule? Your arguments are flawed.

Would really like to see your sources re resurrection of Krishna mentioned as fact by a few respectable historians, and maybe also mentioned by any of his "detractors". Go for it.
 
not only ,till this moment we have a never-ending dispute between Christians and non-Christians regarding everything about Jesus,(Deity-crucifiction-resurrection etc),but also there was a fierce dispute between early christians regarding the same issues...till the Pauline group won the conflict by calling those who oppose their agenda as heretics and killing them,burning their Gospels....
Let us try and stick to the point - Jesus' crucifixion. Please provide your reputable, recognised sources outside of Islam to substantiate your claim that Jesus did not die on the cross (I know JWitnesses called it a stake, but that is not the issue, is it?) Looking forward to your reply.
 
Thats totally not true !..

If the Jews ever concede that He was crucified ,that would be the greatest proof for their claim that he was a false messiah....
cause the Old Testament messiah if there is anything ,he never be expected to do is to be crucified...

Is there a Jesus Narrative In The Talmud?

http://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/jesusnarr.html

and if such narrative is really about Jesus and is historically true,would you accept what the The Talmud claims about Mary and how she got pregnant ?
I don't think so
Ah no!! They did not have to concede it. The Jews never questioned that. Ask the Jews.

And again you are wrong- the prophets speak of Him dying for the sins of the world. Isa 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. See also Zec 13:7 and many others.

Again, let us stick to the issue at hand - Jesus' crucifixion. Note the quote from the Baraila (Talmud):
"On the eve of the Passover Yeshu (meaning Jesus) was hanged because he practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy"
 
salaam/peace;



and if such narrative is really about Jesus and is historically true,would you accept what the The Talmud claims about Mary and how she got pregnant ?


good question

ans is ????....yakkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

also what about the charges Jews brought against Jesus (p) ??

If really hanging occured regarding Talmud, then was the charge justified or that was false???
 
Let us try and stick to the point - Jesus' crucifixion. Please provide your reputable, recognised sources outside of Islam to substantiate your claim that Jesus did not die on the cross (I know JWitnesses called it a stake, but that is not the issue, is it?) Looking forward to your reply.


1-The biggest proof for what I said is the Gospels which were at odds with the Pauline concepts,that mentions nothing at all regarding the so called crucifiction,resurrection of Jesus....eg,the Gospel of Thomas which I mentioned in my previous posts...



2-still need a work that represents early christian groups who didn't believe in the crucifiction?

Take a look at

The Apocalypse of Peter

Like some of Gnostic writings, this one also doubts the Crucifixion story which places Jesus on the cross.

(And he (Jesus said to Peter) said to me again, "Lift up your hands and listen to what the priests and the people are saying"

And I listened to the priests as they sat with the scribes. The multitudes were shouting with their voice.

When he heard these things from me he said to me "prick up your ears and listen to the things they are

saying." And I listened again, "As you sit, they are praising you". And when I said these things, the Savior said "I have told you that these people are blind and deaf. Now then, listen to the things which they are telling you in a mystery, and guard them, Do not tell them to the sons of this age. For they shall blaspheme you in these ages since they are ignorant of you, but they will praise you in knowledge"

"For many will accept our teaching in the beginning. And they will turn from them again by the will of the Father of their error, because they have done what he wanted. And he will reveal them in his judgment, i.e the servants of the Word. But those who became mingled with these shall become their prisoners, since they are without perception. And they praise the men of propagation of falsehood, those who will come after you. And they will cleave to the name of a dead man, thinking that they will become pure. But they will become greatly defiled and they will fall into a name of error, and into the hand of an evil, cunning man and a manifold dogma, and they will be ruled without law."

"For some of them will blaspheme the truth and proclaim evil teaching. And they will say evil things against each other. Some will be named: those who stand in the strength of the archons, of a man and a naked woman who is manifold and subject to much suffering. And those who say these things will ask about dreams. And if they say that a dream came from a demon worthy of their error, then they shall be given perdition instead of incorruption."…… When he said those things, I saw him seemingly being seized by them. And I said "What do I see, O Lord, that it is you yourself whom they take, and that you are grasping me? Or who is this one, glad and laughing on the tree? And is it another one whose feet and hands they are striking?"

The Savior said to me, "He whom you saw on the tree, glad and laughing, this is the living Jesus. But this one into whose hands and feet they drive the nails is his fleshly part, which is the substitute being put to shame, the one who came into being in his likeness. But look at him and me."

But I, when I had looked, said "Lord, no one is looking at you. Let us flee this place."

But he said to me, "I have told you, "Leave the blind alone!". And you see how they do not know what they are saying. For the son of their glory instead of my servant, they have put to shame."

And I saw someone about to approach us resembling him, even him who was laughing on the tree. And he was filled with a Holy Spirit, and he is the Savior. And there was a great, ineffable light around them, and the multitude of ineffable and invisible angels blessing them. And when I looked at him, the one who gives praise was revealed.

And he said to me, "Be strong, for you are the one to whom these mysteries have been given, to know them through revelation, that he whom they crucified is the first-born, and the home of demons, and the stony vessel, in which they dwell, of Elohim, of the cross, which is under the Law. But he who stands near him is the living Savior, the first in him, whom they seized and released, who stands joyfully looking those who did him violence, while they are divided among themselves. Therefore he laughs at their lack of perception, knowing that they are born blind. So then the one susceptible to suffering shall come, since the body is the substitute. But what they released was my incorporeal body. But I am the intellectual Spirit filled with radiant light)

from
http://wesley.nnu.edu/biblical_studies/noncanon/apoc/fgapcpt.htm

would you Accuse the writer and his sect as heretics ,liars?

If so then,the burden is on your shoulder to

1-to prove the so called Canonical NT writings to be inerrant,inspired.

2-show us the proof that the oral traditions from which the early christian sects that denied the crucifiction,is less authentic than the hearsay accounts of the so called canonical gospels?
 
Last edited:
Salaam/peace ,





I would love to see proof from Talmud that Jesus (p) died to make all sinless. Pl. mention verse .


We are talking about his crucifixion. See note on Talmud on other response




Muslims all over the world remember the sacrfise of Abrahma (p) each yr. They are going to celebrate the ocsasion on the Dec this yr.

Pl. let me know how Christians celebrate this event .


We do not follow civil and ceremonial law of Moses - we follow moral laws. But on the question of what sacrifices were supposed to do, you may want to look at the following:
Lev 7:37 This is the law of the burnt offering, of the meat offering, and of the sin offering, and of the trespass offering, and of the consecrations, and of the sacrifice of the peace offerings;
Lev 7:38 Which the LORD commanded Moses in mount Sinai, in the day that he commanded the children of Israel to offer their oblations unto the LORD, in the wilderness of Sinai.



--I was told in other thread that ur all sins did not wash at all . Because of death of Jesus (p) , past sins because of Adam’s (p) fault has been forgiven or something like that ...confusing matter.......but surely u are not sinless because of Jesus (p).

Yes, I agree that there may be confusion. It is clear that none of us are without sin 1Jo 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. Job 9:2 I know it is so of a truth: but how should man be just with God?

That is really the source of our thankfulness to God, that we as sinful people can accept the sacrifice of Jesus without deserving it. I know that I cannot stand before a holy God and offer my poor efforts as justification to enter His presence. If I am honest, I will know that I am a sinner. Therefore I must repent and accept the amazing offer/sacrifice that One who is without sin, has made for me, personally. After accepting Christ, your nature changes and you do not want to sin (because you have this need to live a holy life and love Jesus). We will still sin, because the flesh (our old nature) wars against the Spirit (the new nature).

Yes, sin came in because of Adam - hence we live in a sinful world and have a sinful nature. We are by nature sinners and have to be changed. Proof to me (although some may disagree) is that we do not teach children to be naughty, we have to teach them the right way- and Muslims do a wonderful job in the cases I know personally



If ur all sins are forgiven , does it mean u can commit any crime & it won’t be considered as a sin ???? Or All Christians have reserved seats in heaven ????
If a person wilfully and with impunity sin after he has accepted Christ, one may very seriously question whether he has accepted Christ in truth, and received the holy Spirit.Heb 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins. Yes, Christians who has accepted Christ and live a life as proof thereof, can be sure of their salvation. But to just claim Christianity means less than nothing

I meant dispute between Muslims & Christians about if Jesus (p ) died or not , if Quran is the final holy book or not etc .
Intellectual discourse will very seldom, if at all, make you Christian. Jesus promises that He will "knock" on the door of your heart. You decide whether you let Him in or not
Individually we surely will search for the Truth ……we will read other holy books for comparison purposes .
I have a philosopher friend who is forever searching for the "truth". You will know when you have the truth. Joh 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. Do not use the Koran or Bible as a book of information. Ask that God be revealed to you. Cry to Him. He is a rewarder of those that seriously look for Him
 
Ah no!! They did not have to concede it. The Jews never questioned that. Ask the Jews.

Again, let us stick to the issue at hand - Jesus' crucifixion. Note the quote from the Baraila (Talmud):
"On the eve of the Passover Yeshu (meaning Jesus) was hanged because he practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy"

You still insist that the Yeshu of the (Talmud) is Jesus ,though the link I gave you refute that ,then it is ok:

I invite you to

Note the the quote from the (Talmud): Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a (*****): "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b it is stated that in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.

Holy Quran (5:156). And because of their disbelief (the Jews) and their uttering against Mary a grave false charge..

If you believe the second claim to be true,you would neccesarily believe the first too...
 
Last edited:
And again you are wrong- the prophets speak of Him dying for the sins of the world. Isa 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. See also Zec 13:7 and many others.

Again, let us stick to the issue at hand - Jesus' crucifixion.QUOTE]


It would be a joy for me to discuss Isa:53 and to prove:

1-The passage is a prophecy,to begin with.

2-Jesus fulfilled it in its all details,in a unique way that none ever did it.


I think we need new thread to discuss it...
 
Last edited:
And again you are wrong- the prophets speak of Him dying for the sins of the world. Isa 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. See also Zec 13:7 and many others.

Again, let us stick to the issue at hand - Jesus' crucifixion.QUOTE]


It would be a joy for me to discuss Isa:53 and to prove:

1-The passage is a prophecy,to begin with.

2-Jesus fulfilled it in its all details,in a unique way that none ever did it.


I think we need new thread to discuss it...

I totally agree with both points and then no need to discuss
 
and the following Old Testament veses ,
Do they mean anything to you?

Ezekiel 18:21-30
"To do righteousness and justice [is] more acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice."

Proverbs 21:3
"For I (God) desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings."


Micah 7:18
"Who [is] a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth [in] mercy."



Proverbs 16:6
"If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."

Psalm 78:38-39
"Nevertheless, He (God), [being] full of compassion, forgave [their] iniquity, and destroyed [them] not: yea, many a time turned He His anger away, and did not stir up all his wrath. For He remembered that they [were but] flesh; a wind that passeth away, and cometh not again."


Hosea 6:6
"Wherewith shall I come before the LORD, [and] bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, [or] with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn [for] my transgression, the fruit of my body [for] the sin of my soul? He hath shewed thee, O man, what [is] good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?"

Micah 6:6-8
"To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts? Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; [it is] iniquity, even the solemn meeting. Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear [them]. And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood. Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil; Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow. Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool."
Sorry, the point being ?
 
as a spectator to this debate and generally uninterested to be ensnared in its midst, I don't see where you have showed Muslim woman proof especially from the 'outside of christianity'.. frankly there is no historical evidence of Jesus short of the bible, of which, you can't even get two versions to agree!

If Jesus died for our sins, then we are sinless and felicitous in this state of anticlimax.. if the Man God died for our sins, then let's all bathe in sin of which we are undoubtedly forgiven by a self-immolating God!

peace!


Purest Ambrosia,

If in saying "you can't even get two versions [of the Bible] two agree", you are referring to differences in various English translations like the KJV with the RSV or the NIV, why do you keep mentioning it. Because you speak more than one langauge, you know very well that this is a specious argument, having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually fallacious because all translations of any document from one language to another must be different, if they completely agreed with each other there would not be two different translations but one. No two English translations of the Qu'ran are in agreement either simply because they have different translators. The existence of multiple English translations of the Bible that disagree with each other proves nothing other than that it has been translated by more than one person.

If you mean something more than just a reference to the varities of English translations, perhaps you could clarify what you mean by different versions a little more.


As far as the suggestion that since Jesus died for our sins that we should take it as license to go and sin all we want, I think you are aware that this is not the actually teaching of Christianity -- not that some couldn't try to pervert its message to say such things. In fact, that some in the past have perverted the Christian message attempting to adapt it to promote gnosticism and various other forms of non-Christian beliefs is the origin of some of those books that others in this thread have objected to the Christian church purging itself of.


Which brings me to another thought unrelated to your comments but those of others. If it is commendable for Islam to purge itself of a copy of the Qur'an that has just the slightest error of copying in it, why do people so object to Chrsitianity purging itself of teachings that were completely incongrous with the Christian faith?
 
not only ,till this moment we have a never-ending dispute between Christians and non-Christians regarding everything about Jesus,(Deity-crucifiction-resurrection etc),but also there was a fierce dispute between early christians regarding the same issues...till the Pauline group won the conflict by calling those who oppose their agenda as heretics and killing them,burning their Gospels....


Can you show me where this dispute occurred? When I read the Christian records, the Bible and the writings of the early church fathers, I don't see this being in dispute at all. But, then, you could argue that they are all the result of the Pauline's party victory on this matter. So, you are going to have to direct me to the other sources because I don't know of them.
 
your logic is:

1-the NT wriring contains allegation that Jesus was crucified(based on a Hearsay&zero eyetwitnesses testimonies)

2-Tacitus alledged that Jesus was crucified (based on a CHRISTIAN hearsay,zero eyetwitnesses testimonies,zero source he quote outside the christian hearsay propaganda)

conclusion: Jesus was crucified.



(This lack of eye witnesses to the Passion and the audience with Pilate leads historians to conclude that the details of these events are later additions.) Brown 1993, vol. 1, p. 711-12; Funk 1998, p. 152-3

This thread isn't about the Qur'an, but do you not realize that one could speak of the Qur'an in the same terms. No one else was present when Jibrael was supposed to have given the Qur'an to Muhammad (pbuh). We don't know that Muhammad got it right, heck we don't even have any outside testimony to Muhammad having even heard an angel speaking to him other than Muhammad himself. Yes, there is an element of accepting what someone has said to be true as true in producing the sacred scriptures of both of our religions. However for the stories with regard to Jesus' crucifixion to be complete fabrications requires a larger conspiracy than I find possible to consider credible.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top