hola,
your backgrounds don't matter... it's only perpetuating the argument ad hominem begun by cognescenti et al. the facts matter... the facts i presented from extremely trustworthy sources (uscis) say that the undocumented workers in this country are here mostly because of very close family ties, such as the soldier who was begging the government not to deport his wife.
the evidence i presented (oecd) also says that undocumented immigrants reduce remmitances and reduce the structural unemployment. these are facts, empiracle observation and sound analysis from qualified experts, not stereotypes or reasoning from the seat of ones pants.
the facts clearly indicate that they are an economic beneft, not a drain, and that they are here for more substantial reasons than the desire to work for slave wages.
those issues dispelled, if this were really about 'the law' why does this movement so heavily support the vigilante border militias who extrajudicially hold people, have been kicked out of california for weapons violations and have been specifically condemned and been asked to disband by the President? where are these law crusaders on this issue?
furthermore, nobody has addressed my observation that if this were geniunely about border security arguments about dual language and 'integration' wouldn't be so prominent as they target a culture rather than a class of immigrants. spanish and other cultural aspects are just as central to a 'legal' immigrant family as an 'illegal' one, and recognizing both languages in the united states benefits citizens as much as illegal immigrants.
yet it remains one of the most hotly contested aspects of the so called illegal immigrant crisis. to me this merely demonstrates an ethnic agenda cloaked in legalism.
i'm not going to sacrifice the truth so that i can pander to prejudice because already bigoted people think i'm lazy and theiving. the masters degree in business and bachelors with dual majors in economics and biochemistry hanging on my wall from columbia university prove to me such accusations lack merit on their face. nor am i going to allow you to pretend that only latinos take my position, the entire democratic party agrees that the best answer is a path to legal citizenship, rather than mass deportation, based upon the economic and social realities i presented. the party that was elected by a majority in 2006 to control congress proposes a path to citizenship. why then should i back down because the half the lost out will continue to think i'm lazy and theiving?
lol the funniest thing is i'm criolla, not mestizo, and half french. most people think i'm italian, because all mexicans are brown and don't have names like 'annette.' i've had to hold my tongue through countless dinner parties with my husband's absurd politician friends while they rave on and on about hordes of illegals taking over the united states.
que Dios te bendiga
your backgrounds don't matter... it's only perpetuating the argument ad hominem begun by cognescenti et al. the facts matter... the facts i presented from extremely trustworthy sources (uscis) say that the undocumented workers in this country are here mostly because of very close family ties, such as the soldier who was begging the government not to deport his wife.
the evidence i presented (oecd) also says that undocumented immigrants reduce remmitances and reduce the structural unemployment. these are facts, empiracle observation and sound analysis from qualified experts, not stereotypes or reasoning from the seat of ones pants.
the facts clearly indicate that they are an economic beneft, not a drain, and that they are here for more substantial reasons than the desire to work for slave wages.
those issues dispelled, if this were really about 'the law' why does this movement so heavily support the vigilante border militias who extrajudicially hold people, have been kicked out of california for weapons violations and have been specifically condemned and been asked to disband by the President? where are these law crusaders on this issue?
furthermore, nobody has addressed my observation that if this were geniunely about border security arguments about dual language and 'integration' wouldn't be so prominent as they target a culture rather than a class of immigrants. spanish and other cultural aspects are just as central to a 'legal' immigrant family as an 'illegal' one, and recognizing both languages in the united states benefits citizens as much as illegal immigrants.
yet it remains one of the most hotly contested aspects of the so called illegal immigrant crisis. to me this merely demonstrates an ethnic agenda cloaked in legalism.
i'm not going to sacrifice the truth so that i can pander to prejudice because already bigoted people think i'm lazy and theiving. the masters degree in business and bachelors with dual majors in economics and biochemistry hanging on my wall from columbia university prove to me such accusations lack merit on their face. nor am i going to allow you to pretend that only latinos take my position, the entire democratic party agrees that the best answer is a path to legal citizenship, rather than mass deportation, based upon the economic and social realities i presented. the party that was elected by a majority in 2006 to control congress proposes a path to citizenship. why then should i back down because the half the lost out will continue to think i'm lazy and theiving?
lol the funniest thing is i'm criolla, not mestizo, and half french. most people think i'm italian, because all mexicans are brown and don't have names like 'annette.' i've had to hold my tongue through countless dinner parties with my husband's absurd politician friends while they rave on and on about hordes of illegals taking over the united states.
que Dios te bendiga