Before Islam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nabooly
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 78
  • Views Views 11K
What the final Prophet taught was Islam. The term 'muslims' and 'Islam' were not around when christianity first kicked off.
Not to throw the whole discussion off topic, but please remember that line if you are ever tempted to disprove the Trinity by saying that the term 'trinity' isn't ever found in the Bible.
 
Did Jesus go around calling himself a christian? and Moses go around calling himself a Jew? Did Abraham father of all monotheism call himself a Jew? That is a sincere question!

cheers!
 
So you say that in Arabia there was islam and were muslims before times of Muhammed?
And how is it possible that people before Muhammed times havent noticed islam? Pagans, Romans, Greeks, Philistines, Persians did notice Jews and judaism (see loads of historical textes, writings, merchant papers etc). Romans A.D did notice existence of christianity (books of Tacitus, Joseph Flavius) but somehow they didnt notice the other monotheistic faith which called to submission to one God.
For me it is so hard to understand.I think that proving to non muslims the existence of islam and muslims before Muhammad times is no easier than explaining the Trinity to muslims.
Aaron, the argument is that they would have noticed Islam, but would not have called it that. The view is that whenever the teachings of Moses or Jesus or anyone other person that Islam recognizes as a prophet were followed, that they were in fact following Islam, though perhaps by another name. So, to the extent that the Sanhedrian want to get rid of Jesus, it was because the Sanhedrian by that time was no longer practicing the religion taught by Moses (I imagine you agree with me that they weren't) and were in opposition to that which Jesus was teaching (I imagine you agree with me that they opposed Jesus' teaching). Muslims term that teaching of Jesus to be Islam, while you and I term it to be the good news of the Kingdom of God. Muslims would (I think) agree with that latter statement and claim that that is what Islam, but that what you and I receive today no longer is that same message that Jesus taught. So, we call the message of the disciples Christianity, but Muslims (looking back) call the message of Jesus and any other their prophets Islam.

My argument with Islam is their view that the message it proclaims ever existed before Muhammad at all. I don't believe it did. Thus, I don't believe that it could have been proclaimed by any of those that they consider prophets before Muhammad.



Did Jesus go around calling himself a christian? and Moses go around calling himself a Jew? Did Abraham father of all monotheism call himself a Jew? That is a sincere question!

cheers!
No, Jesus did not call himself a Christian. But his disciples did call themselves first followers of "The Way" and then eventually adopted the term Christian.
No, Abraham did not call himself a Jew. He merely saw himself as a follower of God.
With regard to Moses, I don't know. He might have, but I think it more likely that he saw himself as a Hebrew, which for all intents and purposes at that time was saying the same thing.



Prophet Isa (commonly known as Jesus), Prophet Musa (moses), Prophet Ibrahim (abraham), Prophet Nuh (noah) all preached the same thing: Peace and justice amongst all and submission to God.

So, here is my big question on all of this. How, if the messages of Prophet Isa, Prophet Musa, Prophet Ibrahim, and Prophet Nuh have all been either lost or corrupted so that no one could find them to follow them today, how can we compare them to say that they were all the same?

It seems to me that this is a statement of faith (based on one's interpretation of the Qur'an and hadith) not fact (based on actual comparing of those beliefs and teachings).


If I produce a document that reports their teachings, you simply tell me that it is corrupted or in error. But you don't produce any evidence of their teachings, only that Muhammad says that Angel Jibreel says that God says that they all said the same thing as now Muhammad is saying.
 
Last edited:
What?? there was NO religion before islam. Adam (asw) was the FIRST person, and prophet on earth, meaning islam has been sisnce the beginning of time. Allah (saw) created adam as the first muslim EVER, and we all have to follow him by being a muslim. There was NO religion before islam. jazakkallah
 
Hi all,

What is happening here is that the arabic word "Islam" as a label for a religion is what is confusing many here. "Islam", contrary to popular belief, does not mean "peace" - it means "submission to God".

A Muslim is a "person who submits to God."

Does anyone argue that the Prophets of the past did not submit to the Will of God?

As mentioned above, the fundamentals of theology do not change - worship One God, there are Angels, He begets not nor is He begotten, there is a satan with minions trying to mislead mankind from this path, and so forth.

What can change are the day to day, here on earth type of laws - for example, the children of adam and eve had originally participated in incest initially, but once the need for this was no longer needed, it was legislated out as forbidden. Does yesterday's "Islam" have to be identical to "today's" Islam for it to have been Islam? Not at all.

Grace Seeker, why must people now accept Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)? The same reason that the people of the Moses had to accept Jesus - because he was sent to call the people back to the truth when they had gone astray.

And because man had proven incapable of preserving God's message and scriptures, God promised to protect the final message for all peoples for the rest of time, hence the memorization of the Scripture by the masses, literate and illiterate, as well as its having been written down, as well as the protection of its explanation and interpretation by the scholars of the past.
 
Aaron, the argument is that they would have noticed Islam, but would not have called it that. The view is that whenever the teachings of Moses or Jesus or anyone other person that Islam recognizes as a prophet were followed, that they were in fact following Islam, though perhaps by another name. So, to the extent that the Sanhedrian want to get rid of Jesus, it was because the Sanhedrian by that time was no longer practicing the religion taught by Moses (I imagine you agree with me that they weren't) and were in opposition to that which Jesus was teaching (I imagine you agree with me that they opposed Jesus' teaching). Muslims term that teaching of Jesus to be Islam, while you and I term it to be the good news of the Kingdom of God. Muslims would (I think) agree with that latter statement and claim that that is what Islam, but that what you and I receive today no longer is that same message that Jesus taught. So, we call the message of the disciples Christianity, but Muslims (looking back) call the message of Jesus and any other their prophets Islam.

My argument with Islam is their view that the message it proclaims ever existed before Muhammad at all. I don't believe it did. Thus, I don't believe that it could have been proclaimed by any of those that they consider prophets before Muhammad.



No, Jesus did not call himself a Christian. But his disciples did call themselves first followers of "The Way" and then eventually adopted the term Christian.
No, Abraham did not call himself a Jew. He merely saw himself as a follower of God.
With regard to Moses, I don't know. He might have, but I think it more likely that he saw himself as a Hebrew, which for all intents and purposes at that time was saying the same thing.





So, here is my big question on all of this. How, if the messages of Prophet Isa, Prophet Musa, Prophet Ibrahim, and Prophet Nuh have all been either lost or corrupted so that no one could find them to follow them today, how can we compare them to say that they were all the same?

It seems to me that this is a statement of faith (based on one's interpretation of the Qur'an and hadith) not fact (based on actual comparing of those beliefs and teachings).


If I produce a document that reports their teachings, you simply tell me that it is corrupted or in error. But you don't produce any evidence of their teachings, only that Muhammad says that Angel Jibreel says that God says that they all said the same thing as now Muhammad is saying.

Grace Seeker, what do you think of Dr. Bart Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus" book?
 
Grace Seeker, why must people now accept Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)? The same reason that the people of the Moses had to accept Jesus - because he was sent to call the people back to the truth when they had gone astray.

From a Christian point of view, Jesus wasn't calling people back to the truth. Jesus never said that the teachings of Moses were wrong. (BTW, nor did Paul.) What he offered was a brand new covenant with God that did not require keeping a set of laws, but based on trust in God's grace and his righteousness versus our own.

Thus, Christians would hold that if Jews (or anyone for that matter) choose to and are able to actually keep the original covenant, that this is a perfectly acceptable. However, we doubt that anyone is actually capable of that, so suggest that one enters into this new covenant. And given as we don't believe the message with regard to either the old covenant or the new covenant to be corrupted (even if not perfectly preserved) so as to render it invalid, there is no need for another messenger. There is no other truth to call people back to, as you claim Muhammad has done. The problem that Jesus identified with people going astray is not that they lost the message, but simply that they failed to observe the message that they had. Muhammad bringing a new message doesn't help with this, as I observe that Muslims are no better at observing fully submitting to Allah than Jews were at fully submitting to Yahweh, for that matter than Christians are at fully submitting to God in Jesus Christ. But again, for Christians, the standard and means for salvation isn't our righteousness, but God's. And I'm sure that you will agree with me that God is indeed a holy God.


What is happening here is that the arabic word "Islam" as a label for a religion is what is confusing many here. "Islam", contrary to popular belief, does not mean "peace" - it means "submission to God".

A Muslim is a "person who submits to God."

So if, as I believe, the truth of what God wants us to do is not found in the teachings of the Qur'an and the hadiths of Muhammad, but in the teachings of Jesus and rest of the canonical scriptures of the Bible, then in using the arabic world "Islam" as a lable for those who are truly submitting to God, it would be more appropriate for me to speak of Christians as practicing Islam than to speak of Muslims by that term. It would surely confuse people, but given my beliefs those who best submit themselves to the will of God follow the Bible not the Qur'an.



Grace Seeker, what do you think of Dr. Bart Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus" book?
Sorry, I'm not familiar with it.
 
So ancient Jews were muslims? All or just some of Jews were muslims? And if this is true, so what is judaism, and when it appeared?
Some of the Islamic teachings were practiced by the ancient jews and Christians.

If Jews were muslims so what were doing Jews in pre-islamic Arabia? :uuh: Does it mean that Jews and muslims (Jews?) were living together in pre-islamic Arabia and other parts of the world?
They were not muslims they were christians or Jews but some of what they practiced were what we now call Islamic teachings

Im sorry but muslims' explanation in this topic is like this- "It's true, because we believe in it. And our belief is true."
Well yes basically.

GraceSeeker said:
So, here is my big question on all of this. How, if the messages of Prophet Isa, Prophet Musa, Prophet Ibrahim, and Prophet Nuh have all been either lost or corrupted so that no one could find them to follow them today, how can we compare them to say that they were all the same?
Their main message, submitting to God, is all the same. The teachings and what is practiced (today) have been corrupted

It seems to me that this is a statement of faith (based on one's interpretation of the Qur'an and hadith) not fact (based on actual comparing of those beliefs and teachings).

If I produce a document that reports their teachings, you simply tell me that it is corrupted or in error. But you don't produce any evidence of their teachings, only that Muhammad says that Angel Jibreel says that God says that they all said the same thing as now Muhammad is saying.


Look at it this way: Allah sent many messengers all saying the same thing (that's why Christianity, Judaism and Islam are all very similar). However, because of corruption other messengers were sent i.e Abraham. Same thing happend cus people are stupid and so God sent muhammad [saw] to the people as a final chance for mankind.
 
Last edited:
From a Christian point of view, Jesus wasn't calling people back to the truth. Jesus never said that the teachings of Moses were wrong. (BTW, nor did Paul.) What he offered was a brand new covenant with God that did not require keeping a set of laws, but based on trust in God's grace and his righteousness versus our own.

Thus, Christians would hold that if Jews (or anyone for that matter) choose to and are able to actually keep the original covenant, that this is a perfectly acceptable. However, we doubt that anyone is actually capable of that, so suggest that one enters into this new covenant. And given as we don't believe the message with regard to either the old covenant or the new covenant to be corrupted (even if not perfectly preserved) so as to render it invalid, there is no need for another messenger. There is no other truth to call people back to, as you claim Muhammad has done. The problem that Jesus identified with people going astray is not that they lost the message, but simply that they failed to observe the message that they had. Muhammad bringing a new message doesn't help with this, as I observe that Muslims are no better at observing fully submitting to Allah than Jews were at fully submitting to Yahweh, for that matter than Christians are at fully submitting to God in Jesus Christ. But again, for Christians, the standard and means for salvation isn't our righteousness, but God's. And I'm sure that you will agree with me that God is indeed a holy God.




So if, as I believe, the truth of what God wants us to do is not found in the teachings of the Qur'an and the hadiths of Muhammad, but in the teachings of Jesus and rest of the canonical scriptures of the Bible, then in using the arabic world "Islam" as a lable for those who are truly submitting to God, it would be more appropriate for me to speak of Christians as practicing Islam than to speak of Muslims by that term. It would surely confuse people, but given my beliefs those who best submit themselves to the will of God follow the Bible not the Qur'an.



Sorry, I'm not familiar with it.

Well, before I respond, I should probably first get some clarification on your base theology, as I know there are different flavors of belief on the nature of Jesus (peace be upon him) within what is loosely termed as Christianity.

Given what you've said:

1. What is the purpose of being created?
2. What is the purpose of life?
3. What happens after death?
4. Where does Jesus fit into all this? Who is he?
 
Well, before I respond, I should probably first get some clarification on your base theology, as I know there are different flavors of belief on the nature of Jesus (peace be upon him) within what is loosely termed as Christianity.

Given what you've said:

1. What is the purpose of being created?
2. What is the purpose of life?
3. What happens after death?
4. Where does Jesus fit into all this? Who is he?

My base theology can be pretty well summarized by the historic ecumenical creeds of the Christian faith.

I believe that God is the maker of heaven and earth. I believe that God is spirit, being neither male nor female, but that God created us in his (sorry, for the anthropomorphizing, but I cannot bring myself to call God "it" which is the only other pronoun I have available to me in English)...but that God created us in his own image. And his desire was and is to live in perfect fellowship with us. I believe that this fellowship has been broken by sin which all of us are guilty of, for we all fall short of God's glory. I believe that in spite of our corporate and personal sinfulness God still desires to have us joined to him and sent us prophets to direct us back to walk in his ways. Yet, even with such guidance none of us is still perfect or holy as God is holy and he still desires that we have this type of righteousness in our lives. On our own power such righteousness is unattainable. So God has acted to confer his righteousness to us. Rather than merely wooing people to himself, God took the initiative to come to us, to show us and offer us a way back to himself. God came to live and dwell among us, even going so far as to manifest himself in the flesh and dwell among us. God did this in the person of Jesus who was not just a human being but God incarnate (in the flesh) among us. I believe that Jesus in his one person thus had two natures being both 100% human and 100% divine. (Yes, I know that 100 + 100 = 200, and with mere humans this would be impossible, but with God nothing is impossible.) I also believe that God being God and omnipresent was entirely manifest in the person of Jesus and yet was not absent from any other place in which may also always be found. I believe that Jesus, being human, was tempted as we are, but that he did not succumb to any temptation and lived a sinless life. I believe that he offered this sinless life as an atonement (payment) for the sins of all humanity. I believe that offering took place on the cross and that there God gave up his life for us humans. (I do not blame people who find this too difficult to believe, but I do believe it to be true.) I believe that Jesus was resurrected from the dead and by this resurrection shows to us the power that God has over not only life but also death. I believe that the sin I spoke of earlier that all humans have in their lives creates within us a type of spiritual death. I believe that only God is able to resurrect us to spiritual life from that death. I believe that those who trust God to do this will find that God is trustworthy and does do this, and that God does this by sharing his own Holy Spirit with us. (By the way, I do not believe this is a different God, and certainly not a creature created by God, it is just a sharing of God's self with us.) Thus, not in our own power, but in God's power, those who place their faith in God's work of salvation will find themselves united to God and able to experience full fellowship with him as he originally intended for us to have with him when he created humankind. Our lives being joined to God's we find new life in him that never ends. Thus, though I know that my earthly life will come to an end, I believe that my spiritual life having been resurrected from spiritual death will never die and that God will give life to me in it (in some type of spiritual body that is still a mystery to me) in order that I might spend eternity with him as he created me to do.



Now, that is a lot in one place. And I know that there are elements of these beliefs that you may not be able to accept, but you asked what I believed and rather than answering a set of questions that don't really seem to get at the core of those beliefs I offer this in their place.
 
Their main message, submitting to God, is all the same. The teachings and what is practiced (today) have been corrupted


Look at it this way: Allah sent many messengers all saying the same thing (that's why Christianity, Judaism and Islam are all very similar). However, because of corruption other messengers were sent i.e Abraham. Same thing happend cus people are stupid and so God sent muhammad [saw] to the people as a final chance for mankind.

I understand what you are saying, but you didn't really answer my question:
Given that you believe you have no record of the actual messages articulated by each of those preceeding messengers, and at best today only corrupted renderings of their original messages remain, how can you be sure enough of what their message was to with any degree of confidence claim that they all had the same message, that their messages were the same a Muhammad's or, for that matter, say anything accurately about their message at all?
 
"Grace Seeker" how would god be a human and a god when he is the one who created humans??? We muslims did not change the REAL book of god, yet the jews, christians and other religions did, if you try to change a owrd in the torah or bible nothing will happen, you can say whatever you like, but if you try to change the words in the Quraan, Allah will surely punish you.
 
Now, that is a lot in one place. And I know that there are elements of these beliefs that you may not be able to accept, but you asked what I believed and rather than answering a set of questions that don't really seem to get at the core of those beliefs I offer this in their place.

So if I were to answer my own questions, they would be:

1. The purpose of creation was to live in fellowship with God.
2. The purpose of life is...?
3. After death, those who accept Jesus will return to the fellowship and those who do not will...?
4. Jesus was God incarnate in the flesh.

Please correct me if I've misunderstood any of the points.
 
I understand what you are saying, but you didn't really answer my question:
Given that you believe you have no record of the actual messages articulated by each of those preceeding messengers, and at best today only corrupted renderings of their original messages remain, how can you be sure enough of what their message was to with any degree of confidence claim that they all had the same message, that their messages were the same a Muhammad's or, for that matter, say anything accurately about their message at all?

There are quite a few similarities between Islam, Judaism and Christianity (from physical, such as clothing or even facial hair and mental attributes such as tranquility and mind-set). I can not take this as mere coincidence, rather for me it is clarification. Certain core beliefs are the same in all religions namely submission (though the actions are different) to God and keeping justice with the people.


p.s; I have no problem with people following their respective religion - in fact, as long as they are honest and sincere with their practices I will respect them more so than those of who follow the same path I do (who don't)

P.p.s; I understand and readily accept that religion is a form of control. I also believe that fundamentally humans require control else we'd all be committing harmful (physical and mental) acts not only to others but to ourselves.
 
so according to you jesus was a muslim....i find that very difficult , in fact impossible to believe..however you are free to believe whatever you choose..

Why would it be hard to believe that Jesus submitted himself to Almighty God alone?

I mean, even if you accept that the Gospel accounts are accurate, then surely Jesus had a great amount of submission. The Bible teaches people to submit to God!

I have to respectfully disagree..based on not only my scripture, but jewish scripture which supports christian scripture...jesus was emmanual.."god with us"..and jesus did infact state that he and the father were one..and told his disciples that when they look upon him they look upon the father..I know I know..I yield to civility and choose to agree to disagree..have a good life..peace to you

But did not Jesus submit? How many times did he say, not my will?

Why the change with Muhammad (pbuh)? While having new prophets might be of value for rearticulating the message, for renewed emphasis and reminder, and for spreading the message to more and more people, if one was still following the commands of the previous prophets, then wouldn't that be enough? Why would one have to recognize Muhammad now?

Well you would have to ask whether the following prophets who are not sent to you is right, I mean, it is almost the same as me opening a present that is not for me. One would have to recognised Muhammad because to reject someone is like rejecting the One who sent him. I mean you've read, I'm sure, the sayings attributed to Jesus about who welcomes you welcomes me and who welcomes me welcomes the father, or something to that effect.

A Muslim does not only have to recognised Muhammad, by recognise I take it we mean accept, a Muslim would also have to recognise all the Prophets before, whilst realising that their message is not for now.

Still i haven't found one single proof of existence of islam before Muhammed's times.

And I'm still to find any proof of the existence of Jesus before the 4th Century. :heated:

That is almost how silly your point is. Looking for a word is not the same as looking for what the word is talking about. I can look for the word Jesus but wont find it in the New Testament, does not mean that the New Testament does not speak of Jesus, because it does, it just means that the language is different from English.

Similarly, not identically though, Islam was present, no one has said the word was present, but the meaning of the word, submission to the will of the One God and abstaining from worship of idols. That was definetly present before Muhammad's prophethood.

So you say that in Arabia there was islam and were muslims before times of Muhammed?
And how is it possible that people before Muhammed times havent noticed islam? Pagans, Romans, Greeks, Philistines, Persians did notice Jews and judaism (see loads of historical textes, writings, merchant papers etc). Romans A.D did notice existence of christianity (books of Tacitus, Joseph Flavius) but somehow they didnt notice the other monotheistic faith which called to submission to one God.

What did you mean other? Do you mean that Christianity and Judaism were/are monotheistic? Well if they were then it is possible that they were conforming to the meaning of the word Islam, which is submission to God alone.

And so there were people who worshiped one god alone the right way.

OK and how is it possible that Jews didnt notice the existence of the other monotheistic faith among (or near) them? Or you claim that ancient Jews were muslims? But if so, so why they observed jewish festivals like Hanuka or Shabat? How you can explain the ancient long tradition and history of the Jews.

Could it be because that is what they were ordered to do? That was part of their submission to God alone!

If jewish rabbis could notice existence of Jesus' sect, so how is it possible that they didnt notice the existence of non-judaism monotheistic teachings among them during the thousand years of their tradition?

Why do you think it would have to be non-judaism? What makes you think that they couldnt be ordered by Moses to do things which we have come to identify with Judaism?

Furthermore what makes you think that the sects might not have died out?

And if ancient Jews were muslims so who are Jews :) ?

Why would it have to be one or the other? Was Jesus a Jew? If he was a Jew how could he be a Christian? If he was not a Christian, which I guess is what most believe since most think Christian means 'Christ like', then why are you not Jew?

These are all labels, there was not a rule which said you have to call yourself Muslim.

Im sorry, but it still makes no sense to me.

If it doesn't make sense to you that Jesus submitted to God and that Moses submitted to God alone and that Abraham done the same then I guess I'll understand why you wouldn't grasp the issue of not focusing on a name but the meaning. It's ok :)

Well, I understand the concept of all believers were "Muslims". It doesn't mean there were people running around calling themselves Muslims in ancient times or even during the Roman Empire. It simply means that all people who worshipped the God of Abraham were Muslim, even if they didn't call themselves that. Would Moses have called himself a Muslim? Of course not, as the word didn't exist.

Just explaining that I understand the concept.

Yep, noone is saying you gotta believe it, but at least you understand it. :happy:

So ancient Jews were muslims? All or just some of Jews were muslims? And if this is true, so what is judaism, and when it appeared? If Jews were muslims so what were doing Jews in pre-islamic Arabia? :uuh: Does it mean that Jews and muslims (Jews?) were living together in pre-islamic Arabia and other parts of the world?
Im sorry but muslims' explanation in this topic is like this- "It's true, because we believe in it. And our belief is true."

Are all Christians Christ like? Maybe that'll explain it to you whether all Jews were Submitting to God.

For you to understand what Judaism is maybe you should look at the origin of the word.

Well Aaron, non Muslims like Keltoi and myself before Islam seem to understand the concept fine, Islam = submission to God alone.. Muslim = someone who does Islam, people before Muhammad submitted to God alone so technically fit the definition of a person who submitted to God alone, aka a Muslim, if you don't believe that there were people who submitted to God alone then I don't get what you believe Jesus and the Patriarchs done.

So ancient Jews were muslims? All or just some of Jews were muslims? And if this is true, so what is judaism, and when it appeared? If Jews were muslims so what were doing Jews in pre-islamic Arabia? :uuh: Does it mean that Jews and muslims (Jews?) were living together in pre-islamic Arabia and other parts of the world?
Im sorry but muslims' explanation in this topic is like this- "It's true, because we believe in it. And our belief is true."

Are all Christians Christ like? Maybe that'll explain it to you whether all Jews were Submitting to God.

For you to understand what Judaism is maybe you should look at the origin of the word.

Well Aaron, non Muslims like Keltoi and myself before Islam seem to understand the concept fine, Islam = submission to God alone.. Muslim = someone who does Islam, people before Muhammad submitted to God alone so technically fit the definition of a person who submitted to God alone, aka a Muslim, if you don't believe that there were people who submitted to God alone then I don't get what you believe Jesus and the Patriarchs done.

It seems that people, non muslim, understand this alright, and seems like the thread is flourishing.

Eesa
 
Well, before I respond, I should probably first get some clarification on your base theology, as I know there are different flavors of belief on the nature of Jesus (peace be upon him) within what is loosely termed as Christianity.

Given what you've said:

1. What is the purpose of being created?
2. What is the purpose of life?
3. What happens after death?
4. Where does Jesus fit into all this? Who is he?

I will answer your questions:

1. To see if the shaitan will really guide us to his path.
2. to submit to your true god
3. Allah may punish those who do bad IN THE GRAVE, then on judgement day, you may go to hell or heavan according to what you did in your life on earth.
4. Jesus (Isa) is a prophet whose soul was brought up by Allah when they tried to kill him. And on judgement day he WILL come back and slaughter Dajjal (anti- christ)

allahu akbar
2.
 
I will answer your questions:

1. To see if the shaitan will really guide us to his path.
2. to submit to your true god
3. Allah may punish those who do bad IN THE GRAVE, then on judgement day, you may go to hell or heavan according to what you did in your life on earth.
4. Jesus (Isa) is a prophet whose soul was brought up by Allah when they tried to kill him. And on judgement day he WILL come back and slaughter Dajjal (anti- christ)

allahu akbar
2.

Actually, I wasn't asking Muslims, and answer #1 is very grossly wrong :D The purpose for which you were created was to worship Allah subhaana wa ta'aala (see adh-dhaariyaat:56).

This life is a test of fulfilling that purpose :D
 
Actually, I wasn't asking Muslims, and answer #1 is very grossly wrong :D The purpose for which you were created was to worship Allah subhaana wa ta'aala (see adh-dhaariyaat:56).

This life is a test of fulfilling that purpose :D
yes but the shaitan said to allah (swt) that he can guide all of us to the bad path, and so allah made all of us, judgement day, and brought down the quran... i am not exactly sure about this yet. so dont be mad
 
thank you, may allah open the door to heaven to all. I don't know that much about how it all started, but the rest, i do.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top