AP Talley: Obama clinches nomination

  • Thread starter Thread starter MTAFFI
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 96
  • Views Views 10K
true - that's a good one.
but do you think that clinton would hesitate to invade pakistan?
on the other hand, obama would talk to the iranians and clinton would not.
 
Hello. Just for general clarity, Obama did not say he would "invade" Pakistan.

He would use limited military strikes against clear alqueda targets based on actionable intelligence if the Pakistani govt didn't act (just like the missle strikes over the passed few months).

So the invasion talk is unfounded.

Thanks.
 
The Times headline is inflammatory and incorrect. If you read the article its clear he means limited strikes on alqueda bases, not prolonged intrusion and holding of land.
 
Gator said:
The Times headline is inflammatory and incorrect. If you read the article its clear he means limited strikes on alqueda bases, not prolonged intrusion and holding of land.
Click to expand...

Man it says it EVERYWHERE, and HE said it himself, he is planning to invade pakistan and he already said that.
All he wants is peace! But PEACE wit him means WAR wit as many places as you can
 
Gator said:
Hello. Just for general clarity, Obama did not say he would "invade" Pakistan.

He would use limited military strikes against clear alqueda targets based on actionable intelligence if the Pakistani govt didn't act (just like the missle strikes over the passed few months).

So the invasion talk is unfounded.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

point taken.
 
Obama was the best candidate out there. McCain wants to stay in Iraq for up to 100 years and Clinton is a woman. Obama is the best by far. And everyone in America supports Israel, y ru freaking out bout Obama. Hes not the Only one. If ur so passionate about that then y live in America-go somewhere else. As long as u live in AMerica, theres gonna be a lot of issues u dont agree with. In America ur never gonna see a Muslim president with a big beard that follows the sharia law. If ur waiting for that then ur retarded.
 
well i would agree that obama is the best of the mainstream candidates.
(=democrat & republican)
and i agree - you're never gonna get a real alternative.
 
Barack Obama should not pick Hillary Clinton as his vice-presidential nominee, former president Jimmy Carter has told the Guardian. "I think it would be the worst mistake that could be made," Carter said, adding: "That would just accumulate the negative aspects of both candidates." The former president, who formally endorsed the Illinois senator late on Tuesday, cited opinion polls showing 50% of US voters with a negative view of Senator Clinton. In terms that might discomfort the Obama camp, he said: "If you take that 50% who just don't want to vote for Clinton and add it to whatever element there might be who don't think Obama is white enough or old enough or experienced enough or because he's got a middle name that sounds Arab, you could have the worst of both worlds.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/05/barackobama.hillaryclinton2

Comments:
Personally, I think the former NATO commander, Wesley Clark, or the daughter of former US president JFK, Caroline Kennedy – would be the best choices for Barack Obama – though I am not so sure if those two names would be acceptable to the Jewish Lobby (AIPAC & ADL).
 
I'm sensing bad vibes from Obama. Perhaps because his tone doesn't seems right related to the war. He is the only one who said so far that he will nuke Iran and attack pakistan. So he wants to get out Iraq and start new costs of war in another places. Seems like he is gonna win, so I hope he doesn't do that. Hilary was more soft than Obama. Imo, Ron Paul was the best as far as reducing the cost of war is concerned and spending American tax payers money on American people, but he seems too radical and never stood a chance to become president.
 
Chuck said:
Imo, she wasn't bashing US; she was bashing Obama from the looks of it. She can clear this herself though.
Click to expand...

pg 4 post 47

also I guess I should clarify, TrueMuslim was bashing US "politics" more than just the US anyways
 
truemuslim,
all the mainstream (final) candidates suck. they all take money from the same interests. it is just that some such louder than others.
 
I heard that latinos are not likely to vote for a afro-american and that McCain is popular among them. It may change a lot I guess. Besides, in USA there are many white voters who wont vote for afro-american. The problem with McCain is that he has similar ideas as G.W Bush and Americans want a change in politics badly.
 
Aaron85 said:
I heard that latinos are not likely to vote for a afro-american and that McCain is popular among them. It may change a lot I guess. Besides, in USA there are many white voters who wont vote for afro-american. The problem with McCain is that he has similar ideas as G.W Bush and Americans want a change in politics badly.
Click to expand...

The question is what form of "change" do they supposedly want? If they are buying into Obama's flowery speeches about free medical care, jobs for everyone, and a miracle form of energy to replace oil for this generation they are in for a major disappointment.
 
Keltoi said:
The question is what form of "change" do they supposedly want? If they are buying into Obama's flowery speeches about free medical care, jobs for everyone, and a miracle form of energy to replace oil for this generation they are in for a major disappointment.
Click to expand...

Look, they can't be any worse than what that waste of space bush is! Republicans have screwed up your enconomy, or do you have blinkers on and can't see/say anything negative about them as you're a supporter??
 
Last edited:
Aaron85 said:
I heard that latinos are not likely to vote for a afro-american and that McCain is popular among them. It may change a lot I guess. Besides, in USA there are many white voters who wont vote for afro-american. The problem with McCain is that he has similar ideas as G.W Bush and Americans want a change in politics badly.
Click to expand...

He won't get in and if he does, it's a third term for bush. I hope the cretinous yanks don't vote again for republicans unless they are glutton (how apt) for punishment!
 
AvarAllahNoor said:
Look, they can't be any worse than what that waste of space bush is! Republicans have screwed up your enconomy, or do you have blinkers on and can't see/say anything negative about them as you're a supporter??
Click to expand...

Its just that democrats are ussually too socialist for americans, and I doubt if they had good plan for U.S economy.
 
Keltoi said:
The question is what form of "change" do they supposedly want? If they are buying into Obama's flowery speeches about free medical care, jobs for everyone, and a miracle form of energy to replace oil for this generation they are in for a major disappointment.
Click to expand...
:sl:
I'm sure its better to buy into that than Republican speeches about wars on terrorism, tax cuts and the non-existance of global warming...
:w:
 
AvarAllahNoor said:
Look, they can't be any worse than what that waste of space bush is! Republicans have screwed up your enconomy, or do you have blinkers on and can't see/say anything negative about them as you're a supporter??
Click to expand...
Imo, Obama will come out as a big disappoint too, so who they gonna vote after this? When both Rep and Dems are disappointments who people gonna vote next. They might vote again for a Rep again lol, this is really stupid cycle going on.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top