I don't see DNA similarity or fossil record as being false evidence. Just because there is a lot of similarity between the DNA of apes and humans it does not neccessarily indicate to me their decent from a common ancestor, but I am not dismissing that it could have happened. I personally believe that it is more likely that Allah actively created the species through a process akin to what we know of as evolution as opposed to His physically molding a male and female of each species out of clay, but then again even those "creation events" could have happened in that way. The problem that I have with evolution per se is the development of new species of magnitude greater complexities than the supposed "common ancestor" without the active involvement of a Creator. However, I admit that the existence or the involvement of this Creator most probably can never be scientifically proven because Allah exists in a higher level or dimension that is beyond our human perception.Why do you dismiss certain scenarios as unlikely when you would be quite happy to accept that God could have created us from clay and left false evidence pointing to evolution within the DNA of humans and apes?
Last edited: