Pygoscelis
Account Disabled
- Messages
- 4,009
- Reaction score
- 358
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Atheism
You mean like the NHS in the UK? That thing is a mess. I have many Canadian friends and from what they tell me good luck getting tests done there.
I'm actually Canadian myslef (tis why i said prime minister above) and I have lived in the US and I would live in fear if moved back there again. I work as a plaintiff side lawyer working with insurance claims and I've seen just how horrible insurance companies can be. I will take government beurocracy waste (which is too much in Canada I agree) over profit driven insurance companies every time. In Canada I may have to wait a bit longer for an MRI (and no it isn't nearly as long as people in the USA like to tell other people in the USA it is - I got one for my knee within 3 weeks) but I won't have to take a second mortgage on my house if I have a sudden unexpected illness and the insurer does some creative legal meneuvers to exclude payment.
No problem with that treat it as alcohol but nothing harsher than marijuana
Marijuana is actually less harsh than alcohol in my opinion. Would you also be ok with legalizing prostitution? I support that because I want to get it above ground (away from the criminal element), regulated and taxed. It would make it safer for all involved and get some tax revenue now going uncollected (hookers don't pay taxes)
agree but it should go to a state by state vote whether they want to allow this ban
In the USA that makes sense as your criminal law is state by state (which personally baffles me). In Canada our criminal law is federal, so here such a ban would be national.
Not as set by Kyoto standards. In order for me to agree to Kyoto India and China has to be held to the same standards.
Somebody has to lead the way. If we're all waiting for the other guy to make the first move, nobody will move.
Can't do this one due to religious reasons(not mine). You infringe on that persons right to freedom of religion.
Religious freedom does (and should) have limits for the best interests of society. For example, I am against the ruling in Canada that allows Sikhs to carry kirpans, knives, when others would not be allowed to carry around weapons, cremonial or otherwise. I'm also against Jehova's Witneses denying their children blood transfusions. I say that is child abuse.
And in the case of dead people, whose religious freedoms are being considered? The deceased or their family? In either case, I say the benefit of saving lives with the transplants outweighs the religious convictions involved - similar to the jehovas witness case above.