AsalamuAlaykum Warahmatullah/Peace and mercy be upon those who follow gidance,
Q Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq ?
A Because they had weapons of mass destruction.
Q But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.
A That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.
Q And that's why we invaded Iraq ?
A Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.
Q But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find weapons of mass destruction, did we?
A That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry,
we'll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.
Q Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?
A To use them in a war, silly.
Q I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned
to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons
when we went to war with them?
A Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those
weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend
themselves.
Q That doesn't make sense. Why would they choose to die if they
had all those big weapons with which they could have fought
back?
A It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.
Q I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those
weapons our government said they did.
A Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those
weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.
Q And what was that?
A Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam
Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to
invade another country.
Q Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade
his country?
A Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.
Q Kind of like what they do in China ?
A Don't go comparing China to Iraq . China is a good economic
competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in
sweatshops and help make US corporations richer.
Q So if a country lets its people are exploited for American
corporate gain, it's a good country, even if that country
tortures people?
A Right.
Q Why were people in Iraq being tortured?
A For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government.
People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison
and tortured.
Q Isn't that exactly what happens in China ?
A I told you, China is different.
Q What's the difference between China and Iraq ?
A Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while
China is Communist.
Q Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?
A No, just Cuban Communists are bad.
Q How are the Cuban Communists bad?
A Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in
Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.
Q Like in Iraq ?
A Exactly.
Q And like in China , too?
A I told you, China 's a good economic competitor. Cuba , on the
other hand, is not.
Q How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?
A Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, the US government
passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or
do any business with Cuba until they stopped being Communists and
started being capitalists like us.
Q But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba ,
and started doing business with them, wouldn't that help the
Cubans become capitalists?
A Don't be smart.
Q I didn't think I was being one.
A Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.
Q Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?
A I told you, stop saying bad things about China . Anyway, Saddam
Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he's not really
a legitimate leader anyway.
Q What's a military coup?
A That's when a military general takes over the government of a
country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in
the United States.
Q Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?
A You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but
Pakistan is our friend.
Q Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?
A I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.
Q Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by
forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an
illegitimate leader?
A Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he
helped us invade Afghanistan .
Q Why did we invade Afghanistan ?
A Because of what they did to us on September 11th.
Q What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?
A Well, on September 11th, nineteen men - fifteen of them Saudi
Arabians - hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into
buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans.
Q So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?
A Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the
oppressive rule of the Taliban.
Q Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off
people's heads and hands?
A Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off
people's heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.
Q Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million
dollars back in May of 2001?
A Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good
job fighting drugs.
Q Fighting drugs?
A Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from
growing opium poppies.
Q How did they do such a good job?
A Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the
Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.
Q So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for
growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads
and hands off for other reasons?
A Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off
people's hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut
off people's hands for stealing bread.
Q Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi
Arabia ?
A That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical
patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas
whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the
penalty for women who did not comply.
Q Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?
A No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body
covering.
Q What's the difference?
A The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a
modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body
except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is
an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a
woman's body except for her eyes and fingers.
Q It sounds like the same thing with a different name.
A Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The
Saudis are our friends.
Q But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th
were from Saudi Arabia .
A Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.
Q Who trained them?
A A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.
Q Was he from Afghanistan ?
A Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a
very bad man.
Q I seem to recall he was our friend once.
A Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet
invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.
Q Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald
Reagan talked about?
A There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or
thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us.
We call them Russians now.
Q So the Soviets - I mean, the Russians - are now our friends?
A Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years
after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to
support our invasion of Iraq , so we're mad at them now. We're
also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn't help
us invade Iraq either.
Q So the French and Germans are evil, too?
A Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename
French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.
Q Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do
what we want them to do?
A No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.
Q But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s?
A Well, yeah. For a while.
Q Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?
A Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran , which made
him our friend, temporarily.
Q Why did that make him our friend?
A Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.
Q Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?
A Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we
looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.
Q So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically
becomes our friend?
A Most of the time, yes.
Q And anyone who fights against one of our friends is
automatically an enemy?
A Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations
can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all
the better.
Q Why?
A Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good
for America Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who
opposes war is a godless un-American Communist. Do you
understand now why we attacked Iraq?
Q I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?
A Yes.
Q But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq ?
A Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and
tells him what to do.
Q So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq
because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?
A Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your
eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.
Good night, dad....!
"Whoever lives amongst you will see much differing, so adhere to my Sunnah" Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه و سلم)
Re: A dialogue between an American father and his son
Nice .
Thanks for sharing.
Should I seek a source of law other than God, when it is He Who has sent down unto you the Book (Qur'an) fully explained? And those whom We have given them the Book know that it has been sent down from the Lord with truth, so be not of those in doubt.
Re: A dialogue between an American father and his son
format_quote Originally Posted by krypton6
The taliban part is not true, but the rest is good.
Why?Can you explain me brother?!
Peace!
He is Allah - the Creator, the Maker, the Giver of Form. To Him belong the Most Beautiful Names. Everything in the heavens and Earth glorifies Him. He is the Almighty, the All-Wise.
(Qur'an, 59:24)
Re: A dialogue between an American father and his son
format_quote Originally Posted by Dr.Trax
Why?Can you explain me brother?!
Peace!
The opression of woman for example was not as it is being told.
Their society was very poor, and most families were poor so the taliban chose between who should go to school and who could have the most succes in the world, they chose boys! If they had enough money girls would have also bin in school but since no aids came in, the taliban had nothing to rule their country with and therfore they had to chose between who they would let study.
The woman clothes was a bit to much, but it was for the good of the society, raping and such under the taliban did not exist because of this.
The hand chopping is used in rare cases, where a person has stolen udner many occasions while being rich himself. If a man was caught stealing under the taliban, the court would find out if he had any family to provide food for, if he had any job and if he was poor. If the man had no family to provide food for, had a job, was not poor then his hand would have bin chopped off! But if the man had a family to provide food for, had no job, and was poor then he would under no circumanstances have had his hand cut off!
Woman were not executed through stoning if they did not wear the burca, a woman that did not were the hijab could be jailed in a womans prison over night, but under no circumanstances was a woman executed for showing her body parts or hair. Typically the husband of the wife would be so angry that he would punish her when she got out of prison, which is 100% wrong, but once the woman was found greatly harmed, or possibly dead guess what would happend to the husband? The man would be taken to the islamic court and he would be sentenced to a punishment all after what he did to his wife.
He would get a sentence that he diserved, but I can assure you that they would take the mans sittuation into considerration and only give him what he diserved.
Execution through stoning was extremly rare, and when it took place it was not a sentence, it was the family of the sentenced that would do it without the court even knowing anything about it.
The taliban execution was a bullet in the head, and not stoning, stoning was a method used by barbaric family mebers, who ofcourse were also sentenced for what they had done to the person that they may have killed.
All this killing, raping, nudity, homosexuality, and stealing were all very very very rare under the taliban, so you should not think of it as if it was something that took place often, it was VERY rare!
Though there is much that I do not know, but my point is that you should just know that what the west is saying about the taliban, al-Qaida and any other group that they hate is not always the truth! The taliban have done alot of stuff wrong, and they were simply too tough and strict! The ottomans were not even this strict!
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
But true too
.
its waz kwl
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks