Re: Why the "flat earth theory" is wrong ?
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
- - - Updated - - -
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
Re: Why the "flat earth theory" is wrong ?
format_quote Originally Posted by Supernova
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
- - - Updated - - -
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
Erics book is scientific proof? Tell me you are joking.
İf you want proof...then look around you...do your own observations...look at stars...or satellite dishes...make your own calculations and you will see the Earth is round....if you cannot do that, let me know and İ will help you with your calculations.
- - - Updated - - -
format_quote Originally Posted by Supernova
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
- - - Updated - - -
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
Erics book is scientific proof? Tell me you are joking.
İf you want proof...then look around you...do your own observations...look at stars...or satellite dishes...make your own calculations and you will see the Earth is round....if you cannot do that, let me know and İ will help you with your calculations.
Re: Why the "flat earth theory" is wrong ?
format_quote Originally Posted by Supernova
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
- - - Updated - - -
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
do you think that earth is the only celestial body amongst the billions that follow orbits and spiralling orbits that is flat?
Why can't rockets fly underneath and get us some pictures.
Also, did you know that the upper floors of the burj khalifah tower have a different iftar time from the ground level?
Scroll to 5 minutes if you wish.
Give vsauce a like if you wish too.
High quality presentations so far.
Hopefully this isn't another psychological hack by the American government to get people on side via warped stimulus generalisation through division of opinion based on no valid argument. I think yous have already had that ploy demonstrated beyond doubt.
Sura az-Zumar 5: He makes the Night overlap (yukawwir) the Day, and the Day overlap the Night.
The term “yukawwir” (overlap), comes from the origin “kurah” meaning: sphere......
C) al-Razi (may Allah forgive him) eluded to the roundness of the earth in his tafseer. He said while talking about the earth: when a sphere is huge, each section of it appears to be like a flat surface.
"Folding" (takwir) in this sense refers to folding or wrapping a turban round the head. You say "a kawr of the turban" when referring to the part of it which is wrapped around the head. So the reference to the spherical shape of the earth is very clear in sha' Allah.
021:033
"And He is the One who created (khalaqa) the night and the day and the sun and the moon, each in a 'falakin' 'yasbahun'"
If you put the word يسبحون (=yasbaHoon) into Google translate, it will give "swimming".
The root of this word is سبح (sabaHa). Put this in any online Arabic-English translator and it will give "swim" or "float".
Hope that's proof enough.
In my earlier post, I said yasbaHoon referred to the planets - in fact, on closer inspection of the Quranic verses concerned (21.33 and 36.40) it actually refers to the sun and moon, but some commentators say it also includes other heavenly bodies.
Furthermore, 'falak' not only refers to the sky but also carries the meaning of a to and fro motion, a state of commotion, circuit, cricling etc. 'Yasbahun' can simply mean to roll onwards, perform a daily course etc.
Here are some some models of the swimming to and fro opinions:
These observations fit logically with the spherical earth opinion too - and i am unable to deny this logic - and therefore wholeheartedly accept that the earth os spherical.
Those who've looked at how magnetic attraction, repulsion, and timely shielding work in magnetic energy devices (search "muammar free magnetic energy demonstration delft") (although the timing of "sarkozy muammar threat financial security mankind" is alarming) (vasile karpen's pile ) https://www.greenoptimistic.com/karpen-pile/ should find it easier to grasp.
Description of the earth and universe - IslamQA
Q. 1. Should we believe the images of earth from space? They are Round in shape and like a ball as per the satellite images. 2. How Quran and Hadith describe about earth? I heard that earth is like a plate (flat dish on which food is served). A. That which can be seen with the eye, and upon which one can gain...
Re: Why the "flat earth theory" is wrong ?
In my honoust opinion, a muslim should be someone who only lives by the truth, who is trustworthy, who is honoust....who can be a good example for his surroundings.
Saying that you do not believe that the Earth is round is rejecting an overwhelming amount of evidences for it and therefore rejecting the truth.
undeniable proof for it are the observations of the stars, sun and moon, how satellites work, constellations, flight times, etc, etc.
So, a good honoust muslim should not believe in a flat earth.
- - - Updated - - -
In my honoust opinion, a muslim should be someone who only lives by the truth, who is trustworthy, who is honoust....who can be a good example for his surroundings.
Saying that you do not believe that the Earth is round is rejecting an overwhelming amount of evidences for it and therefore rejecting the truth.
undeniable proof for it are the observations of the stars, sun and moon, how satellites work, constellations, flight times, etc, etc.
So, a good honoust muslim should not believe in a flat earth.
Re: Why the "flat earth theory" is wrong ?
Greetings,
format_quote Originally Posted by Bushwackk
If one is truly concerned about the shape of this planet, one should become an astronaut to verify for his or herself
Or just go on a plane journey. The curve of the Earth is clearly visible at altitude.
Since the internet makes access to information so easy, you might expect crackpot ideas like flat earth to disappear. It's very surprising that so many people appear to believe it in the 21st century. I suppose in the vast amount of information available people are finding it hard to separate what's true from what's false.
Re: Why the "flat earth theory" is wrong ?
format_quote Originally Posted by czgibson
Greetings,
Or just go on a plane journey. The curve of the Earth is clearly visible at altitude.
Since the internet makes access to information so easy, you might expect crackpot ideas like flat earth to disappear. It's very surprising that so many people appear to believe it in the 21st century. I suppose in the vast amount of information available people are finding it hard to separate what's true from what's false.
Peace
It was only visible via concorde, and that is now retired.
Re: Why the "flat earth theory" is wrong ?
I've noticed it from economy class on planes, can't say for certain that it's not an atmospheric phenomenom or convex windows that trick the mind or eyes (and that's possible too), but the overwhelming amount of evidence (some of which i have poted above) pointing to a spherical earth has me convinced that the earth is indeed spherical.
Even yet, if anybody has lost acquaintances or loved ones who have fallen off an edge, please do inform us. I am willing to listen and reconsider - and will certainly accept what i sincerely believe to be true.
Re: Why the "flat earth theory" is wrong ?
format_quote Originally Posted by Supernova
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
- - - Updated - - -
I am a flat earther and that never convince me at all - infact most of the things he says is based on the assumption that the earth is already a globe !!! which is deceiving the entire purpose of the research.
If you want Scientific proof read a book by Eric Dubay who uses their (Nasa and the globalists) own calculations to prove their own theories wrong.
Just look at the earth behind your astronaut and tell us whether it is round or flat
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts.
Sign Up
Bookmarks