Re: The testimony of Kevin Padian in Kitzmiller v. Dover
It's well worth a read, as is a lot of the testimony on both sides. The cross-examinations are probably the most enlightening though, particularly Behe's. He is forced to admit firstly that he can only classify Intelligent Design as a scientific theory if you redefine what a scientific theory is, and then Rothschild (plaintiff's attorney) pulls his master-stroke but getting him to admit that the same changed definition would include astrology as well! Behe puts up a creditable rearguard action after that, but the battle for ID as science is already lost, as of course is the case.
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
Behe puts up a creditable rearguard action after that, but the battle for ID as science is already lost, as of course is the case.
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Bookmarks