Beware of shia - list of their lies

If anybody would like to hear it from the horses mouth then click on the youtube channel exposing the religion of Shiaism. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDV...G_lVOKlndmRiiA

AntiMajosProduction - YouTube A straight to the point examination of the idolatrous religion of 12er Raafidism (Zanaadiqah, Mushrikoon, Sabaite-Majoosite-Safavid Anjaas) Our aim as a Musl......

These are the most authentic narrations, so that no Shi’ee can argue that these can be interpreted to mean anything other than tahreef, or to reject them as weak.

In Al-Kafi, we read:

1-
علي بن الحكم ، عن هشام بن سالم ، عن أبي عبد الله ( عليه السلام ) قال إن القرآن الذي جاء به جبرئيل ( عليه السلام ) إلى محمد ( صلى الله عليه وآله ) سبعة عشر ألف آية .
Ali bin Al-Hakam from Hisham bin Salim from Abi Abdullah (alaih al-salam), he said, “The Qur’an that Jibreel (as) brought down to Mohammad (salalahu alaihi wa salam) has seventeen thousand verses(17000).”

Grading:
1.Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Muwaththaq (Reliable).Mir’aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 12, pg. 525
2. Al-Majlisi I (Al-Majlisi’s Father) said this hadeeth is Sahih (Authentic). RawDah Al-Muttaqoon, vol. 10, pg. 21.
3. Hoor Al-`Aamilee said this hadeeth is Sahih (Authentic). Al-Fuwaa’id Al-Toosiyyah, topic # 96, pg. 483

Comment:Esteemed Shia scholar Al-Majlisi argued that it is authentic and that it is a clear narration that suggest tahreef. He also argued that it is silly to believe that this narration suggests some sort of tafseer or anything other than tahreef.

2-
أبو علي الأشعري عن محمد بن عبد الجبار عن صفوان عن إسحاق بن عمار عن أبي بصير عن أبي جعفر عليه السلام، قال: نزل القرآن أربعة أرباع، ربع فينا وربع في عدونا وربع أمثال وربع فرائض وأحكام.
Abu Ali Al-Asha’ari from Mohammad bin Abduljabbar from Safwan from Ishaq bin Ammar from Abi Al-Baseer from Abi Ja’afar (alaih al-salam), he said, “The Qur’an was revealed in four portions, a fourth about us, a fourth about our enemies, a fourth are parables, and a fourth are laws.”

Comment:It goes without saying that the Qur’an is not split into these categories, especially since there is nothing in the Qur’an regarding the enemies of Ahlulbayt at all.

3-Ali bin Ibrahim from his father from Ibn Abi Umair from Umar bin Uthayna from Buraid bin Mu’awiyah, he said: Abu Ja’afar recited, “O’ you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messengerand those in authority amongst you,” [Surat Al-Nisa’a: 59] He then said, “How can he order to obedience but not in disagreement? He said this to those that were ordered, those that were told tobey Allah and obey His Messenger.”

Comment:This is a clear verse in which the Imam rejects a verse found in the Qur’an because of its content. He adds a few words in order to make it seem “more logical,” while in the process suggesting that the Book has been tampered with. This narration has an additional support from Tafseer al-Qummi.

4-
علي بن إبراهيم عن أبيه عن ابن أبي عمير عن عمر بن أذينة عن بريد بن معاوية، قال: تلا أبو جعفر عليه السلام: أطيعوا الله وأطيعوا الرسول وأولي الأمر منكم فإن خفتم تنازعا في الأمر فردوه إلى الله وإلى الرسول وإلى أولي الأمر منكم، ثم قال: كيف يأمر بطاعتهم ويرخص في منازعتهم، إنما قال ذلك للمأمورين الذين قيل لهم: أطيعوا الله وأطيعوا الرسول.
Ali bin Ibrahim from his father from Hammad bin Eisa from Ibrahim bin Omar Al-Yamani from Abi Abdullah (alaihi alsalam), he said (Ibrahim), “I asked him about the meaning of, “Two just men among you.” [Surat Al-Ma’idah: 95]. He said, “The just is the Messenger (salalahu alaihi wa salam), his family, and the Imam after him,” He then said, “This was a mistake from a scribe.”

Comment:The narration attributed to the Imam suggests that the two witnesses that the verse talks about doesn’t refer to any two regular witnesses, but refers to the members of Ahlulbayt. The dual nature of the dialogue, according to the narration, is a “mistake” from the scribe. We have included apostrophes around the word mistake intentionally, since the narration hints that this was done intentionally in order to take rights away from Ahlulbayt.

5-
محمد بن يحيى عن أحمد بن محمد عن ابن فضال عن الرضا عليه السلام: فأنزل
عليه سكينته على رسوله وأيده بجنود لم تروها، قلت: هكذا نقرؤها وهكذا تنزيلها.
Mohammad bin Yahya from Ahmad bin Mohammad from Ibn Fadhal from Al-Redha (alaihi alsalam): “And Allah sent down His tranquilityupon His Messengerand supported him with soldiers you did not see.” [Al-Tawba: 175] He said, “This is how we read it and this is how it was revealed.

Comment:The Imam is suggesting that words: upon his Messenger – were removed in order to give the verse more flexibility and to have it possibly refer to Abu Bakr. However, the Imam suggests that the original Qur’an was did not allow such confusion to occur, which caused the nawasib to tamper with it.

- - - Updated - - -

6-
عدة من أصحابنا عن أحمد بن محمد عن أحمد بن محمد بن أبي نصر عن ثعلبة بن ميمون عن زرارة، قال: سألت أبا جعفر عليه سلام عن قول الله عز وجل: وكان رسولا نبيا، ما الرسول وما النبي؟ قال: النبي الذي يرى في منامه ويسمع صوت ولا يعاين الملك والرسول الذي يسمع الصوت ويرى في المنام ويعاين الملك، قلت: الإمام ما منزلته؟ قال: يسمع الصوت ولا يرى ولا يعاين الملك، ثم تلا هذه الآية: وما أرسلنا من قبلك من رسول ولا نبي ولا محدث.
A group of our companions from Ahmad bin Mohammad from Ahmad bin Mohammad bin Abi Nasr from Tha’laba bin Maymoon from Zurarah, he said, “I asked Abu Ja’afar about the words of Allah (azza wa jal):“And he was a messenger and a prophet.” What is a messenger and what is a prophet? He said, “A prophet sees in his sleep and hears sounds, but does not face the angels, while the messenger hears a sound, sees in dreams, and spots angels,” I (Zurarah) said, “What is the status of the Imam?” He said, “He hears a sound, he doesn’t see and doesn’t meet angels,” he then recited, “And we did not send before you any messenger or prophetor one who is spoken to.” [Al-Hajj: 52]

Comment:Like the previous narrations, the Imam recites the Qur’an differently. In this narration, we find that those appointed by Allah includes “those who are spoken to,” which refers to the Imams. However, this was supposedly dropped by the enemies of Ahlulbayt.
Al-Majlisi, after authenticating this report, points out that these words were from the Qur’an but were dropped from Uthman’s compilation.

7-A similar narration can be found in other books, like Basa’ir Al-Darajaat by Al-Saffar:
حدثنا أحمد بن محمد عن أحمد بن محمد بن أبي نصر عن تغلب (في رواية: ثعلبة) عن زرارة قال سألت أبا جعفر عليه السلام عن قول الله عز وجل وكان رسولا نبيا قلت ما هو الرسول من النبي قال النبي هو الذي يرى في منامه ويسمع الصوت ولا يعاين الملك والرسول يعاين الملك ويكلمه قلت فالامام ما منزلته قال يسمع الصوت ولا يرى ولا يعاين ثم تلا وما أرسلنا من قبلك من رسول ولا نبي ولا محدث .
Ahmad bin Mohammad told us from Ahmad bin Mohammad bin Abi Nasr from Taghlab (in a narration Tha’laba) from Zurarah, he said, “I asked Aba Ja’afar (alaih al-salam) about Allah’s (azza wa jal) words, “And he was a messenger and a prophet.” I asked, “What is the difference between a messenger and a prophet?” He said, “A prophet is he who sees in his sleep and hears a sound, but spots no angels, while the messengers do face angels and speak to them.” I said, “What about the Imam, what is his status?” He said, “He hears but does not see or face them, then he recited, “And we did not send before you any messenger or prophetor one who is spoken to.” [Al-Hajj: 52]

8-
حدثنا أحمد بن محمد عن الحسين سعيد عن فضالة عن الحرث البصري قال اتانا الحكم بن عيينة قال إن علي بن الحسين قال إن علم على كله في آية واحدة قال فخرج حمران بن أعين ليسئله فوجد علي بن الحسين قد قبض فقال لأبي جعفر عليه السلام ان الحكم بن عيينة حدثنا ان علي بن الحسين قال إن علم علي عليه السلام كله في آية واحدة قال أبو جعفر عليه السلام وما تدرى ما هو قال قلت لا قال هو قول الله تبارك وتعالى وما أرسلنا من قبلك من رسول ولا نبي ولا محدث .
Ahmad bin Mohammad from Al-Hussain (the son of) Sa’eed from Fidhala from Al-Harth Al-Basri (Al-Harith bin Al-Mugheera Al-Nasri), he said: Al-Hakam bin Uyayna said: Ali bin Al-Hussain said, “The knowledge of Ali can all be found in one verse,” He said, “So Himran bin A’ayan came out to ask him and found Ali bin Al-Hussain dead. He told Abi Ja’afar (alaih al-salam): Al-Hakam bin Uyayna told us that Ali bin Al-Hussain said, “The knowedge of Ali (alaih al-salam) can all be found in one verse,” Abu Ja’afar (alaih al-salam) said, “Don’t you know what it is?!” He said, “No.” He (Abu Ja’afar) said, “And we did not send before you any messenger or prophetor one who is spoken to.” [Al-Hajj: 52]

Comment:This last narration is significant because it provides a completely different route, which strengthens the previous narrations, which suggest tampering occurring in this verse.

- - - Updated - - -

9-As for Tafseer Al-Qummi (p. 81) (for those that believe in the reliability of the book), we quote the following tradition:
حدثني أبي عن الحسين بن خالد انه قره أبو الحسن الرضا عليه السلام :ألم الله لا إله إلا هو الحي القيوم لا تأخذه سنة ولا نوم له ما في السماوات وما في الأرض وما بينهما وما تحت الثرى عالم الغيب والشهادة الرحمن الرحيم من ذا الذي يشفع عنده الا باذنه يعلم ما بين أيديهم وما خلفهم ) قال ” ما بين أيديهم ” فأمور الأنبياء وما كان ” وما خلفهم ” اي ما لم يكن بعد ، قوله ” الا بما شاء ” اي بما يوحى إليهم ( ولا يؤده حفظهما ) اي لا يثقل عليه حفظ ما في السماوات وما في الأرض وقوله ( لا إكراه في الدين ) اي لا يكره أحد على دينه الا بعد ان قد تبين له الرشد من الغي ( فمن يكفر بالطاغوت ) وهم الذين غصبوا آل محمد حقهم ( فقد استمسك بالعروة الوثقى ) يعني الولاية ( لا انفصام لها ) اي حبل لا انقطاع له يعني أمير المؤمنين والأئمة بعده عليهم السلام ( الله ولي الذين آمنوا ) وهم الذين اتبعوا آل محمد عليهم السلام ( يخرجهم من الظلمات إلى النور والذين كفروا أولياؤهم الطاغوت ) هم الظالمون آل محمد والذين اتبعوا من غصبهم ( يخرجونهم من النور إلى الظلمات أولئك أصحاب النار هم فيها خالدون والحمد لله رب العالمين ) كذا نزلت.
My father narrated from Al-Hussain bin Khalid that Abu Al-Hasan Al-Redha read,“Alif Laam Meem, Allah – there is no deity except Him, the Ever-Living, the Self-Sustaining. Neither drowsiness overtakes Him nor sleep.To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth and whatever is under the dust. The knower of the unseen the Most Gracious Most Merciful.Who is it that can intercede with Him except by His permission? He knows what is before them and what will be after them.” [Al-Baqara: 255] He said, “What is before them, means: the matters of the prophets, and what will be after them, means: what still is yet to happen.”And as for Him saying, “Except for what He wills, it means: what He reveals to them,” and as for Him saying, “Their preservation tires Him not, it means: preserving that which is on the heavens and earth does not tire Him.” And ask for him saying, “There shall be no compulsion in religion[Al-Baqara: 256], it means: that there is no compulsion after truth has been revealed from misguidance.So whoever disbelieves in taghut, [Al-Baqara: 256], are those that usurped the rights of the family of Mohammad.The most trustworthy handhold[Al-Baqara: 256], means, the wilayat.With no break in it[Al-Baqara: 256], which is a rope that doesn’t end, which is Ameer Al-Mu’mineen and the Imams after him (alaih al-salam).Allah is the Ally of those who believe[Al-Baqara: 257], who are the followers of the family of Mohammad (alaihim al-salam),He brings them out from the darkness into the light. And those who disbelieve – their allies are taghut,[Al-Baqara: 257], they are the oppressors of the family of Mohammad and those that followed their oppressors, “They take them out of the light into the darknesses, those are the companions of the Fire; they will abide eternally therein.” [Al-Baqara: 257], this is how it was revealed.

10-From Qurb Al-Isnad by Al-Himyari:
محمد بن عيسى قال : حدثنا إبراهيم بن عبد الحميد ، في سنة ثمان وتسعين ومائة في مسجد الحرام ، قال : دخلت على أبي عبد الله عليه السلام فأخرج إلي مصحفا . قال : فتصفحته فوقع بصري على موضع منه فإذا فيه مكتوب : هذه جهنم التي كنتما بها تكذبان فاصليا فيها لا تموتان فيها ولا تحييان . يعني الأولين.
Mohammad bin Eisa said: Ibrahim bin Abd Al-Hameed told us in the year one hundred and ninety-eight in Al-Masjid Al-Haram, he said, “I entered upon Abi Abdullah and he brought out a mus-haf,” I went through it and found in it, “This is the Hellfire that you two have used to deny; burn their in without life nor death,” meaning: the two first (caliphs). [Ya-Seen: 64]

Comment:The resemblance between the wording and style of these words and verse 64 from Surat Ya-Seen is uncanny. Most importantly, we find that this was found in the mus-haf of the Imam. Those that compiled narrations of tahreef, like Al-Nuri Al-Tabrasi, quoted this as proof to suggest that the Qur’an has been tampered with.

In addition to these reports, there are hundreds of narrations that can only be found in the book of Al-Sayyari. However, as Al-Khoei has stated, there is a consensus among Rijal scholars that he is a weak narrator.

Ironically, in this day and age, there are those that defend Al-Sayyari like Ayatollah Mohammad Al-Sanad who followed Al-Nuri Al-Tabrisi in his opinion. They both argued that Al-Sayyari was relied upon in his narrations by Al-Kulayni, Al-Barqi, Ibrahim bin Mohamad bin Abdullah, Al-Hasan bin Ali bin Ibrahim, Sa’ad bin Abdullah Al-Ash’ari, and many others, and therefore, should not be seen as a weak narrator. Al-Sanad also argued that Al-Sayyari was weakened because people didn’t like his narrations and could not grasp them. See p. 342-349 from Al-Ijtihad wal Taqleed fi Ilm Al-Rijal by Al-Sanad for details on why he believes that this man is reliable.

- - - Updated - - -

Regardless, whether one accepts Al-Sayyari or not, it is not all too strange that the narrations of tahreef have been seen as mutawatir according to Al-Majlisi and others, for as we have proven above, there are a good deal of authentic narrations that support this blasphemy.
(i).Nematullah Jazairi States:
وأخبارنا متواترة بوقوع التحريف والسقط منه، بحيث لا يسعنا إنكاره، والعجب العجيب من الصدوق وأمين الإسلام الطبرسي والمرتضى في بعض كتبه كيف أنكروه وزعموا أن ما أنزله الله تعالى هو هذا المكتوب، مع ان فيه رد متواتر الأخبار
“And our traditions thattahrif and fallout (of verses) happened in the Quran are mutawatir, so we can’t deny them. And strange, strange how is that Saduq, Ameen of Islam at-Tabarsi and al-Murtada in some of their books rejected it, and claimed that what was revealed by Allah, that is this (what) is recorded (in present Quran), in this (stance) is rejection of MUTAWATTIR narrations”. (Nurul Anwar fi sharhil Sahifa as-Sajadiyah, p 43 by Nematullah Jazairi).
(ii). Baqir Majlisi in his “Miratul uqul” said:
و الأخبار من طريق الخاصة و العامة في النقص و التغيير متواترة، و العقل يحكم بأنه إذ كان القرآن متفرقا منتشرا عند الناس، و تصدي غير المعصوم لجمعه يمتنع عادة أن يكون جمعه كاملا موافقا للواقع، لكن لا ريب في أن الناس مكلفون بالعمل بما في المصاحف و تلاوته حتى يظهر القائم عليه السلام، و هذا معلوم متواتر من طريق أهل البيت عليهم السلام و أكثر أخبار هذا الباب مما يدل على النقص و التغيير و سيأتي كثير منها في الأبواب‏
” and traditions from the ways of the elite (i.e Shia) and the public (i.e Sunnah) regardingomission and change are Mutawattir(numerous),and logic dectates that if the Quran was seperated and spread amongst people, then if a fallible has tried to collect it, then it is highly unlikely that its collection would be complete and in compliance with reality. However, there is no doubt that people are obliged to work with what is included in the Mushafs and to read it until Al-Qayem appears, and this is known through numerous traditions (mutawatir) from the way of Ahlul Bayt and most traditions relating to this topic point to omission and change, and many of it will be related in the chapters…( Miratul uqul 3/31)
Comment:Baqir Majlisi’s view was further clarified by Ayatullah Kamal Haydari.

(iii).Shia scholar Muhammad al-Lucknawi wrote in “Darbat Haydari” 2/78:
[The claim that no corruption took place in the Qur’an is apparently corrupt,because the narrations showing this corruption have reachedTawatur.]
(iv).Shia scholar `Abdullah Shubbar said in “Masabih al-Anwar fi Hall Mushkilat al-Akhbar” 2/294-295:
[Most of what is in our hands today is the Qur’an that was revealed upon the Prophet (as) and many parts of it have been removed,as proven by the great amount of narrations that are almost Mutawatir, and we have clarified this in our book: Muniyah al-Muhasileen fi Haqiyat Tareeq al-Mujtahideen.]
(v).Shia scholar al-`Allamah Muhammad Salih al-Mazandarani in his “Sharhul Usul al-Kafi” ( 11/88), while he was discussing hadith from “al-Kafi” where stated that there were 17 000 verses in Quran, said:
كان الزائد على ذلك مما في الحديث سقط بالتحريف وإسقاط بعض القرآن وتحريفه ثبت من طرقنا بالتواتر معنى
“Addition on that (number of verses in present Quran) which (mentioned) in hadith omitted by tahrif. And omission of some (part) of Quran and tahrif of it is establishedfrom our ways by (ahadeeth) TAWATUR al-manawi”.
(vi).Shia scholar Sultan Muhammad al-Janabidhi says in “Tafsir Bayan al-Sa`adah fi Maqamat al-`Ibadah” pg.19:
[Know (O reader) that aplentiful amount of narrations from the pure Imams state that additions and deletions and corruption and change have taken place in it, in a way that leaves no doubt.]
(vii).Shia scholar Muhammad Mahdi al-Naraqi said in “Minhaj al-Ahkam” under the chapter “Hujjiyat Zawahir al-Kitab”:
[Deletion has taken place in the Qur’an, meaning: Parts of it have been removed, even if we do not know specifically where it is, as shown by themany un-contradicted narrations and proofs.]

- - - Updated - - -

(viii).Esteemed Shia scholar al-Sayyid `Alī Khān al-Madanī (d. 1120), quotes someShī`īscholars who denied the belief in the distortion in hisRiyāđ al-Sālikīn, and then concludes theShī`īopinion with:
وقال بعض المتأخرين من أصحابنا إسقاط بعض القرآن وتحريفه ثبت من طرقنا بالتواتر معنى كما يظهر لمن تأمل في كتب الأحاديث من أولها إلى آخرها ودلت الأخبار على وجود مصحف غير هذا المشهور بين الناس وهو موجود عند أهله والظاهر إنا مأمورين بقراءة ما في هذا القرآن ولا يجوز لنا الزيادة على ما فيه بما ورد في بعض الروايات أنه اسقط منه
“Some of our latter-day associates said: ‘The omission of some of the Qur’ān, and its distortion, is proven from our chainsthat are mass-transmitted in meaning [bi al-tawātur ma`nan],as it is obvious to the one who refers to our collections of narrations from their beginning to end. And the reports prove the existence of a copy (of the Qur’ān) other than this famous one among the people, and it is present with those it belongs to. However, it is obvious that we have been commanded to recite whatever is in this Qur’ān, and it is not permissible for us to add to it what has been reported to have been deleted from it in some narrations.”(Riyāđ al-Sālikīn fī Sharĥ Şaĥīfat Sayyid al-Sājidīn, of al-Sayyid `Alī Khān al-Madanī (d. 1120), page 392)
The Shia belief that narrations reaching Tawatur from the Imams state that the Qur’an was corrupted, this belief has been reported by many Shia scholars, one of their scholars called al-Noori al-Tabrasi has collected a huge amount of these narrations, their scholar Muhammad Hadi Ma`rifah wrote in “Siyanat al-Qur’an” pg.239:
[What al-Noori had collected from narrations of corruption,are more than a thousand and one hundred (1122) to be exact.]
It is Ahlul-Sunnah who were chosen by Allah(swt) to preserve the Quran and its recitation.
The Imami Shia of our time use many deceptive strategies in order to defend their beliefs, from these strategies is to accuse their opponents of defects that they themselves have. This tactic serves no purpose other than wasting time, it is an easy quick escape for them.
Here’s some quick examples to illustrate what we meant:
-The Shia are accused of adding an innovated expression to the text of the call to prayer “`Aliyyan Waliyullah”. They counter by saying that it is Ahlul-Sunnah who added the innovation of “al-Salat Khayrun min al-Nawm” to prayer, although we Ahlul-Sunnah can prove our case from authentic narrations and whereas the Shias cannot.
-The Shia are accused of believing in the corruption of the Qur’an, their books are full of narrations accusing the companions of deleting verses in favor of `Ali (ra) or narrations accusing them of changing the position of verses to corrupt the general meaning of the Qur’an. They counter by finding Sunni narrations about abrogation or different recitations and accuse the Muslims of believing in Tahreef.
-The Shia are accused of not placing any effort in preserving the Qur’an or its recitation or sciences. They counter by saying that it was they who preserved and collected the Qur’an, and that the most popular chain of transmission of Qur’an is a Shia one.
We’ll stop at this last example because this is the subject we would like to discuss. As we all know, the Qur’an is Mutawatir, meaning mass transmitted, meaning there were thousands of companions reciting the Qur’an and thousands upon thousands of followers learning it and teaching it to their children. At this point one might question: “If so many people are reciting it, why then do we have a smaller number of chains for the Qur’an?” The answer is that these chains are documented by the specialists and the expert reciters, to preserve in a scientific and authentic way the exact recitation and pronunciation of the words, they’re not meant to preserve the text of the Qur’an but to preserve the way it was recited by our ancestors, and when we say “ancestors” we mean the best reciters of their time and not just any random Arab.
It is a popular fact that the Qur’an is collected, preserved and spread by Ahlul-Sunnah, so what’s the problem then?
The problem is that the Shia have a counter argument, whenever we tell them that Sunnis preserved the Qur’an, they say NO, it was the Imami Shia! They even claim that, the Qur’an which is being printed in Saudi is the recitation of Hafs, from`Asim, from al-Sulamy, from `Ali ibn abi Talib and they’re all Shia, not one of them is Sunni. Also Sunnies know that `Asim and Hafs are Shia which is why they accuse them of being liars! We challenge the Sunnies to provide us with one chain that they themselves preserved!
This sort of thing has been posted on Shia forums and we’ve even seen one of their own (Shia) moderators refute it as it made no sense to him, we’ll quote his refutation to the misconception of some ignorant Shias:

Taqiyya (dissimulation):


In a narration, Shia falsely attribute to the 8th Shia Imam, Ali bin Musa, he said:

“ The one who is not wari (pious) has no religion and the one who does not practiceTaqiyyahhas no Iman ( deep faith).”So he was asked, "O grandson of the Messenger, until when (is one required to practice Taqiyyah)?" He replied,“Until a certain day (i.e. the day Imam Mahdi appears). Whoever does not practice Taqiyyah before the appearance of Imam Mahdi,is notone of us.”
(Kashf al-Ghummah Al-Ardabili, pg. 341).

"Nine tenths (90%) of religion (Shiism)is Taqiyya (dissimulation), hence one who does not dissimulate has no religion."
(Al-Kafi vol.9 p.110)

"He who conceals his religion has saved it, and he who makes it public has destroyed it."
"A believer who does not practice Taqiyya is like a body without a head."
(Tafseer al-Askari)

"Mix with them (i.e. non-Shia) externally, but oppose them internally."
(Al-Kafi vol.9 p.116)

"Taqiyya is necessary and the one who abandons it is excluded from the religion (of the Shia)."
(Ehsan-ul-Fatawa Fi Shaeah-e-Aqa'id, p. 26)

"The most beloved thing on the surface of Earth is Taqiyya."
(Usul Kafi, Part 2. Kitab Imaan wal Kufr, Bab Taqiyyah, Line 12, Riwayah 4, page 217, New Iranian Edition)

"The Imam has mentioned that Taqiyya is the coolness of his eyes."
(Usul Kafi, Part 2, Kitab Imaan wal Kufr, line1, Riwayah 14, page 217, new Iranian Edition].

Concerning the verse, "Verily the most noble of you in Allah's sight is Atqakom (the most God-fearing)", the Shia mis-interpret the word "Atqakom" by falsely claiming that it means:"whose deeds are done by Taqiyya."
(Al-I'tiqadat)

It is interesting to contrast this with Allah's statement in the Holy Qur'an:

"Surely those who hide from people the clear proofs and guidance, which we clarified in the Book (Qur'an), will be cursed by Allah ...."

(2:159)

Prophet Mohammad (s.a.a.w.s.) said:

"Whoever is asked for knowledge and conceals it will have a bridle of fire around his neck on the Day of Judgment."

(Abu Dawood and Tirmizi)

EXAMPLES of the CONTENTS of AlKafi :

[1] Chapter: The Imams have knowledge of All that was given to the angels and the prophets. ( AlKafi vol.1 p.255 )

[2] Chapter: The Imams know when they will die, and they only die by their choice. ( AlKafi vol.1 p.258 )

[3] Chapter: The Imams have knowledge of the past and future; and nothing is hidden from them. ( AlKafi vol.1 p.260 )

COMMENT: No doubt that these words are clear Kufr (Disbelief) and Shirk (Polytheism), because the knowledge of the unseen is only for Allah alone .. These words with no doubt contradict what Allah said in Surah Luqmaan "Verily, Allah With Him (Alone) is the knowledge of the Hour, He sends down the rain, and knows that which is in the wombs. No person knows what he will earn tomorrow, and no person knows in what land he will die. Verily, Allah is All-Knower, All-Aware (of things)" [Quran 31:34]

[4] "Obedience to `Ali is true humility and disobedience to him is disbelief in Allah" ( AlKafi vol.10 p.54 )

[5] "Whoever sets up another Imam besides `Ali and delays `Ali's caliphate is a polytheist" ( AlKafi vol.10 p.55 )

COMMENT: These words declare all AhlSunnah as kufaar (Disbelievers) and Mushrikeen (Polytheists), because we -AhlSunnah- do not believe in the Shia Imamate of `Ali ( which is believing that `Ali is Infallible,..etc ) also We -AhlSunnah- believe that Abubakr (r) is the first caliphate, Omar (r) the second and Othman (r) the third, thus, We delay `Ali's caliphate to be the 4th after Abubakr,Omar and Othman, thus, Shia declare in their most reliable book that AhlSunnah are Kufaar and Mushrikeen !!!

[6] The false verse "And We made `Ali your in-law" has been added to Surah Al-InShirah . ( AlKafi p.289 )

[7] Alkileeni reported that Jabir asked AbuJa`far p.b.u.h : "Why `Ali ibn Aby Talib was named Amir-ul-Mumineen?" AbuJa`far replied : "Allah named him so, and He revealed in His Book " And (remember) when your Lord brought forth from the Children of Adam, from their loins, their seed and made them testify as to themselves (saying): Am I not your Lord, Muhammad my messenger and `Ali Amir-ul-Mumineen ?..." ( AlKafi vol.1 p.412 )

COMMENT: We all know that "Muhammad my messenger and `Ali Amir-ul-Mumineen" is not part of the Quranic verse [Quran 7:172], but as you just read, AlKileeni narrated in his book AlKafi that the Infallible Imam -according to Shia- ( AbuJa`far ) said that the verse [Quran 7:172] was revealed by Allah with "Muhammad my messenger and `Ali Amir-ul-Mumineen", This is a serious claim by Shia that the Quran was changed and corrupted !!! This is a serious "Tahreef" of the Holy Quran ... and please continue reading :

[8] "Abu Baseer reported that he said to Imam Ja'far, "O Abu Abdullah(Imam Ja'far as-Sadiq) What is Mus-haf Fatimah?" He replied "It is a Qur'an containing three times what is found in your copy of the Qur'an; yet by Allah, it does not contain even a single letter from your Qur'an. ( AlKafi vol.1 p.457 )

After, We have read some examples of what AlKafi ( The MOST reliable Shia Book ) contains, I am sure that many of you will say to themselves "If the MOST reliable book to Shia contains such extreme kufr (Disbelief) and shirk (Polytheism) that it alone is sufficient to push anyone who believes in it into the Hellfire for eternity, Then -you may say- what about the other Shia books !!?", The other Shia books are even WORSE !!!

Take for example their Tafseer Books !!! The Books that should have put to explain Allah's words !!! The Shia Scholars filled it with filthy interpretations that may and will make you feel sick !!!
The most known Tafseer books are 1.Tafseer AlQumy 2.Tafseer Al-Ayashi 3.Tafseer AlBurhan by Albahraani ( a Well known Shia Scholar ) !!!

I will quote few things from Tafseer AlAyashi and Tafseer AlBurhan, and from the Shia Hadith encyclopedia called ( Bihaar Al-Anwaar ) which is -by Allah- a filthy and satanic work of one of the MOST reliable and respected Shia Scholars ever existed, whom they call ( Sheikh al-Islam alHujah Mula Muhamad baqir alMajlisi ) !!!! may Allah take revenge on them all ... ameen .. Now, lets start reading, and I will try not to COMMENT, I will leave YOU comment on the following quotations by YOURSELF :

* "It was narrated that [ Imam ] Abu Abdullah said : No infant is born but a certain Satan is in his presence. If Allah knew that he would be of our Shiia, He protects him from that Satan, if he wouldn't be of our Shiia, Satan sticks his finger in his anus, thus becomes a catamite, If it was [ the infant ] a female, he sticks his finger in her vagina, thus becomes a -----. Allah then afterwards clear what He desire or affirm, for with Him is the book of Knowledge."
Tafseer al-Ayyashi, p. 218
Bihaar al-Anwaar, vol.2 p. 1319
Tafseer al-Burhaan, vol. 2, p. 300

- - - Updated - - -

* "It was narrated that [ Imam ] Abu Abdullah said : When it is the Judgement Day, Iblis will be brought forward in 70 chains and 70 cables. The FIRST [Abu Bakr] sees ZUFAR [Omar] in 120 chains and 120 cables [double of Satan], Iblis then say : Who is that , that Allah doubled his punishment and it was I who mislead all of these people? And an answer comes, This is ZUFAR [Omar] . Iblis then asks: Why specifically this punishment? The answer comes: Because of his wrong doing to Ali peace be upon him. Satan ZUFAR [Omar] then tells Satan Iblis " It was you who ordered me to do so" Iblis then replies : Why hast thou disobeyed your Lord and Obeyed me????"
Tafseer al-Ayashi, p. 224
Tafseer al- Burhan, vol. 3, p. 310
Bihaar al-Anwaar, vol. 8, p. 220

* "Alhussain Bin Ali Bin Yakteen narrated, i asked [ Imam ] Alhassan Bin Ali about the man doing it to the woman in her anus, he said [ Imam ] Alhassan it was made lawful in a verse of the Book of Allah, when Prophet Lut said : " Here are my dughters, they are purer for you" [Quran 11:78], and he knew it was not the vagina they sought but the anus"
Tafseer al-Ayyashi, p. 157
Bihaar al-Anwar, vol. 21, p. 98
Tafseer al-Burhaan, vol. 2, p. 230

COMMENT: I KNOW I have promised that I will not comment , but -by Allah- I couldnt stand it even though I have read it before, SEE how filthy those Shia are !? In this fabricated Hadith attributed to their Infallible Imam, it is clear that in Shiia's Religion, the act of sodomy is permissible according to their interpretation to the said verse and otheverses as well in this regard. What a sick mentality !!!

* "It was narrated that [ Imam ] Ja`far Ibn Muhamad p.b.u.h said : The prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h used to put his face between the breasts of [ his daughter ] Fatima before going to sleep"
Bihaar al-Anwar, vol. 43, p. 78

* "Ali Ibn Abi Talib said that he once slept with the prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h and his wife Ayesha in one bed, and under one cover, then the prophet woke up to pray, and left them together [ Ali and Ayesha ] in the same bed, under the same cover"
Bihaar al-Anwar vol. 40, p. 2

COMMENT: AstagfiruAllah !!!! EVEN Ali and Fatimah and the family of the prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h whom Shia claim they love and follow, were not excluded from the Shia's filth ... -by Allah- while I am writting these fabricated narrations that Shia filled their books with, my heart is feeling sick .. "O Allah, FORGIVE Me for typing this" I only conduct What Shia Scholars put in their books TO EXPOSE them to every muslim, every true muslim TO get angry FOR the sake of Allah on this apostate group ( Shia ), please dear brothers and sisters forgive me for making you read such filth about our beloved prophet peace be upon him and his family, but, It is TIME we FACE it and take s stance against it ....

Finally, I remind all MUSLIMS with the accurate Hadith "the prophet said : May Allah curse those who insult my companions", also I remind you to be CAREFULL when dealing with Shia, don't be tricked by their "Taqiyah", They smile in our faces but their hearts burn with hatred for us. Dear muslims, our duty toward those Mushrikeen "Shia" is to fight them with ALL what We can get reach of .. We MUST Expose them, and uncover their black face, LOOK at what they fill their Tafseer !!! and Hadith !!! Books with ... May Allah GUIDE them to his pure true path -or- destroy them and take revenge on them All ..

I zero in on those reverts who are often deceived by shia.

- - - Updated - - -

يظهر في آخر الزمان قوم يسمون الرافضه يرفضون الاسلام
Translation:Towards the end of time a nation called the ‘Rafidah’ (a type of Shi’ah) will appear, they will reject and abandon Islam.

The narration in question is recorded in Musnad Ahmad on the authority of Sayyiduna ‘Ali (radiyallahu ‘anhu) with a weak chain.

(Musnad Ahmad, vol. 1 pg. 103. Majma’uz Zawaid, vol. 10 pg. 22)
However the above narration is supported and strengthened by the following weak narration:
Sayyiduna ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (radiyallahu ‘anhuma) reports that Nabi (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said:

Towards the end of time a nation called the ‘Rafidah’ (a type of Shi’ah) will appear, they will reject and abandon Islam. So fight them for verily they are polytheists.

(Musnadul Harith; Bughyatul Bahith, Hadith: 1043, under the chapter‘Those who swear the Sahabah’, Musnad Abu Ya’la, Hadith: 2586, Majma’uz Zawaid, vol. 10 pg. 22 and Mukhtasar Ithafus Sadah Al Maharah, Hadith: 4104)