Amnesty International has accused Hezbollah of acts amounting to war crimes in the conflict with Israel.
It says the Lebanese militant group deliberately targeted civilians with rockets in the 34-day war - a "serious violation of humanitarian law".
Amnesty has already accused Israel of committing war crimes by targeting Lebanon's civilian infrastructure and is urging a UN inquiry into violations.
How is "deliberately targeted civilians " a joke. If you have some "Inside Information" , you should release it to Amnesty International. Or is it Amnesty International that you think is a joke?
How is "deliberately targeted civilians " a joke. If you have some "Inside Information" , you should release it to Amnesty International. Or is it Amnesty International that you think is a joke?
ur the joker, ur the joke, the whole dam system is a joke.
israel deliberately destroys a whole city including the civilians and then this comes up, lol someone go shoot the man who reported this
-
My tears testify that i have a heart
yet i feel me and shaytan never part
-
If the definition of war crime in this instance is the intentional targeting of civilians, then obviously Hezbollah is guilty of war crimes. The fact that Israel does something doesn't make it right does it? Unless there is a double standard, both sides should be held accountable for their actions.
If the definition of war crime in this instance is the intentional targeting of civilians, then obviously Hezbollah is guilty of war crimes. The fact that Israel does something doesn't make it right does it? Unless there is a double standard, both sides should be held accountable for their actions.
no no, the fact that israel INNITIATED IT does make it right (and dont even bother bringing in the kidnapping, that justifies nothing becoz israel kidnapped for more !!)
it was self defence on the side of hezbullah and aggression on the side of israel !!!
-
My tears testify that i have a heart
yet i feel me and shaytan never part
-
If the definition of war crime in this instance is the intentional targeting of civilians, then obviously Hezbollah is guilty of war crimes. The fact that Israel does something doesn't make it right does it? Unless there is a double standard, both sides should be held accountable for their actions.
In that case The US are the worst offenders I mean they're the only country that I know of that have nuked people in the past.
About 1,000 Lebanese, mainly civilians, died in the fighting, while 161 Israelis, mainly soldiers, were killed.
Also these one
Thus, Hezbollah's primary violation of international law, and massive missile attacks launched from behind the civilian population, are relegated to secondary status, while Israel's response to these deadly attacks is incredulously elevated to the main focus of Amnesty's analysis. In addition, despite the acceptance that military weapons hidden in civilian areas are subject to attack, Amnesty claims that "the pattern and scope of the attacks . . . [make Israel's] justification ring hollow" without offering a credible military alternative. Based on the organization's understanding of international law, Hezbollah could have continuously fired from Mosques, schools, and apartment buildings with immunity from any Israeli response.
It fair to says that both sides are broke and violated the international law,but which side did it more?
In that case The US are the worst offenders I mean they're the only country that I know of that have nuked people in the past.
Is this thread about the present or the past? Is it about who is gurilty in the latest conflict or is it about who is quilty in every conflict the world has ever seen?
Is this thread about the present or the past? Is it about who is gurilty in the latest conflict or is it about who is quilty in every conflict the world has ever seen?
the past explains the reasoning behind hezbullahs warcrimes, its not to be ignored!
-
My tears testify that i have a heart
yet i feel me and shaytan never part
-
the past explains the reasoning behind hezbullahs warcrimes, its not to be ignored!
By definition, there is no such thing as a justifiable warcrime, it is a deliberate violation of the rules of war. The "reasoning" is irrelevant except as an attempt to justify the unjustifiable.
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
.
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks