A few questions about evolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Argamemnon
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 44
  • Views Views 9K
Yes. And you did an amazing amount of evolving over a period of just 9 months.;D

he evolved from two pre-programmed cells into something human no? and needed a host?

you confuse people with the terms, evolution doesn't equal to speciation!

:w:
 
τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;1382467 said:


he evolved from two pre-programmed cells into something human no? and needed a host?

you confuse people with the terms, evolution doesn't equal to speciation!

:w:

Yeah, I'm not saying he evolved into a different species. I'm just saying look at the incredible amount of change that went on over nine months.
 
Yeah, I'm not saying he evolved into a different species. I'm just saying look at the incredible amount of change that went on over nine months.


sounds good to me.. sob7an Allah it is an amazing thing indeed..

16:13 to top in surah

16_13-1.png

Muhsin Khan
And whatsoever He has created for you on this earth of varying colours [and qualities from vegetation and fruits, etc. (botanical life) and from animal (zoological life)]. Verily! In this is a sign for people who remember.



24_45-1.png

Pickthall
Allah hath created every animal of water. Of them is (a kind) that goeth upon its belly and (a kind) that goeth upon two legs and (a kind) that goeth upon four. Allah createth what He will. Lo! Allah is Able to do all things.
 
Yes. And you did an amazing amount of evolving over a period of just 9 months.;D

So please explain this to me? How are we still evolving? Sorry, I am clueless when it comes to science.

I'm just saying look at the incredible amount of change that went on over nine months.

:X

@ τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ

That picture is hilarious. XD
 
I have another question I want to add to the list :
evolution assume that humans are derived from monkeys, or have the same monkey-like ancestor in common with monkeys.
You know, monkey males AND females have both a lot of hair on their body (males and females have the same quantity of hair on their skin). Now why human males have more hair than human females : are men more primitive than women ? that's absurd. What conditions made women evolve in a different way than men ?

Dihydrotestosterone
 
Mutations could be "beneficial", depends on how you define benefit. The most thrown around card is that of sickle cell trait and how it helps people in African to clear malarial infections faster than those who have either normal RBC or sickle celled RBC. But keep in mind that sickle cell trait patients can undergo crises as well in certain hypoxic conditions where people with normal RBC would not .....
 
So please explain this to me? How are we still evolving? Sorry, I am clueless when it comes to science.




That picture is hilarious. XD

Yes, we are still evolving. Our jaws are getting smaller as we no longer have to hunt and scavange food but go to a shop and buy, which explains our wisdom teeth. If we are still around in 10 thousand years our wisdom teeth will have disapeared. Our heads are growing, which probably explains why child birth is so dramatic! noone knows what we will look like in hundreds of thousands of years, but it's pretty likely we'll look substantially different
 
Dihydrotestosterone

What out dihydrotesterone-- do you just want to throw out words? lol.. here is one you can use dysdiadokinesia (funny stuff)
Mutations could be "beneficial", depends on how you define benefit. The most thrown around card is that of sickle cell trait and how it helps people in African to clear malarial infections faster than those who have either normal RBC or sickle celled RBC. But keep in mind that sickle cell trait patients can undergo crises as well in certain hypoxic conditions where people with normal RBC would not .....

There is nothing 'beneficial' at all about mutations (sometimes) silent mutations confer neither positivity nor negativity. However, having sickle cell trait is a misery all its own.. they can have isosthenuria or a crisis that is equivalent of sickle cell disease at high altitude amongst other problems!

Yes, we are still evolving. Our jaws are getting smaller as we no longer have to hunt and scavange food but go to a shop and buy, which explains our wisdom teeth. If we are still around in 10 thousand years our wisdom teeth will have disapeared. Our heads are growing, which probably explains why child birth is so dramatic! noone knows what we will look like in hundreds of thousands of years, but it's pretty likely we'll look substantially differen

what about our wisdom teeth? and you've given birth before to know all about its trauma? There are four types of pelvis outlets Gyneacoid Pelvis, Android Pelvis, The Anthropoid Pelvis and The Platypelloid Pelvis.. that would explain the 'trauma' in some childbirth not 'evolution'

atheists are so smart.. thank God for their presence to enlighten the world!

but alas we can catch up with all those aliens that have been plaguing us in a few thousand years with their bigger heads and smaller jaw line..

Alien_head-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;1382419 said:
yes-- but you have to travel to the island of Dr. Moreau for that immediate gratification..

hahaha lol funny stuff ... crack headed evolutionists.
 
So you are saying that God created a separate species of dogs and cats? When did he do that? Nothing personal, but domestic dogs are modified wolves. Molecular genetic evidence has shown that. In fact, as I mentioned above, dogs are a good example of how the selection of genes over a few centuries can actually result in an astonishing amount of evolutionary change. The diverse variety from tiny Yorkies to St. Bernards to poodles to chinese pugs shows how dramatic evolutionary change can occur over a short time period.
You asked about bringing forth an intermediate species between a cat and a dog. No one is saying that a cat descended from a dog or vice versa. But dogs and cats share an ancestor which certainly looked nothing like a dog or a cat. Every one of the millions of species of animals shares an ancestor with every other one.
I don't want to get into a big evolution debate, but the argument that there is no species between a cat and a dog just fundamentally mistates what evolution is all about.
The theory of evolution is all about humans evolving from an omeba,
and I guess that includes animals along the way.
I think you are just spouting your beliefs (in red).
Show me some fossils of all of these millions of species which no longer exist.
Re: the dogs, for example, maybe there were separate species created.
 
The theory of evolution is all about humans evolving from an omeba,
and I guess that includes animals along the way.
I think you are just spouting your beliefs (in red).
Show me some fossils of all of these millions of species which no longer exist.
Re: the dogs, for example, maybe there were separate species created.

Go spend some time in a museum. There are thousands of these fossils that show "species" that no longer exist. I don't know how obvious it has to be. Have you read any textbooks that discuss evolution or are you just not happy with the idea of evolution?

Here is a link you might find interesting.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/science/23angier.html?_r=1&src=dayp
 
Greetings and peace be with you τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;

24_45-1.png

Pickthall
Allah hath created every animal of water. Of them is (a kind) that goeth upon its belly and (a kind) that goeth upon two legs and (a kind) that goeth upon four. Allah createth what He will. Lo! Allah is Able to do all things.
[/SIZE][/COLOR][/FONT

Our scriptures say that species have been created according to their kind, and science comes up with an alternative explanation. Who is going to have to change their explanation, scriptures or science?

We can call evolution a theory, but can we call scriptures a theory?

Scriptures come from God, there is no more to be said.

In the spirit of searching for a proper explanation

Eric
 
Greetings and peace be with you τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;



Our scriptures say that species have been created according to their kind, and science comes up with an alternative explanation. Who is going to have to change their explanation, scriptures or science?

We can call evolution a theory, but can we call scriptures a theory?

Scriptures come from God, there is no more to be said.

In the spirit of searching for a proper explanation

Eric
The verse doesn't say how, it just says Allah has created them.
 
Do a search on ... "bombadier beetle"

Proof it couldn't possibly evolved from anything into anything, etc.
 
they did not provide any evidence of those "sequential" steps.

The essential point is that a possible explanation is provided in evolutionary terms as, to the dismay of creationists, it usually is. Evidence may prove a little hard to come by; there are probably millions of insect species alive today that have yet to be catalogued, let alone those now long extinct.
 
Can anyone explain to me how evolution works? Like an overview. Some websites are rather confusing...
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top