Adam & Eve:How did the population increase from them?

[islamirama]

I think this truly elaborates the intelligence of your objection. :skeleton:

it truly highlights the stupidity of humans who make up theories of such silliness and then believe in them.

 

[MustafaMc]

Originally Posted by MustafaMc
Muslims believe that ALL life (life forms, species) was created by Allah.

Evolution does not address how life was created. It still seems that you have no understanding of evolution. No wonder you reject it. :rollseyes

I dismiss as unscientific the claim that all existing and extinct species are descended from a "common ancestor" (assumed to be a simple unicellular primal being) through the process of random mutation and natural selection without a Higher Power directing the process. If I missed some fundamental part of the theory, please fill me in but do so in a simple manner - as it seems that I am a bit slow to catch on.

100 million years ago there were dinosaurs but no elephants. Today we have elephants but no dinosaurs. Did god “drop in” and take away all the dinosaurs and later dropped back in and deliver elephants? :skeleton:

Allah creates and destroys as He sees fit. Quran 14:19-20 Do you not see that Allah has based the creation of the heavens and the earth on Truth? That He can destroy you if He wills and bring into being a new creation? That is not at all difficult for Allah.

 

[MustafaMc]

There is one parent and the later generations change over time to. Adam a.s. was created 90 ft and since his creation, we have been shrinking to the present height we are now. It is called bottleneck effect and occurs when you mate within your family(mankind) time after time.

Good point, brother. This points to the "creative" effect of mutations that evolutionists lean on to create new and improved species. As a geneticist and plant breeder I know that nearly all mutations make the individual LESS NOT MORE fit.

Please, tell me, wilberhum, how many genetic improvements were made in any species exposed to the mutating effects of radiation released at Hiroshima and Cherobyl.

 

[wilberhum]

it truly highlights the stupidity of humans who make up theories of such silliness and then believe in them.

How did they make up endless peaces of evidence? :skeleton:

 

[wilberhum]

MustafaMc

I dismiss as unscientific the claim that all existing and extinct species are descended from a "common ancestor" (assumed to be a simple unicellular primal being) through the process of random mutation and natural selection without a Higher Power directing the process. If I missed some fundamental part of the theory, please fill me in but do so in a simple manner - as it seems that I am a bit slow to catch on.

So you like the "and god dropped by theory". Interesting. :skeleton:

 

[Hashim_507]

Atheists dont have scriptures to prove their point; only arguement without evidance puts them on the headline. The believers have the answers for those arguement atheist have hard with in this life; but afterlife is too late. I am not scaring nobody but Adam and Eve exist; their children multiply by them merrying each other. Today everybody forgot there family linage on from Adam; but nobody forget Adam and Eve. Since scientist cant find records on Adam childrens; the record could have been lost but the holy scriptures such as Quran are not lost.

 

[Trumble]

The evolution of evolvement is based a theory that all living creations crawled out the ocean where they were mico organism and over the centuries they kept evolving to their present state. That is only a theory and has never been proven, in fact it has been disproven by many already, and yet it is taught in schools as if its a fact.

Yet again it is not taught as 'fact', it is taught as the best scientific theory we have. As, incidently, are the theories of gravitation, electromagnetism etc, etc which are also 'only' theories. You can never prove scientific theories, only disprove them.

This particular one has never been disproven. Some people have suggested that some evidence indicates it may be incorrect to some degree or another, that is all. Were the theory proven wrong, it would be instantly rejected by science... it is accepted, and taught, because the vast body of evidence suggests it is at least substantially correct.

Atheists dont have scriptures to prove their point; only arguement without evidance puts them on the headline.

Scriptures prove nothing without the assumption that they are necessarily true. As science cannot make such assumptions, scriptures must remain outside the scientific process. Your comment that the evolutionist position (and 'evolutionist' does not equate with 'atheist') is "argument without evidence" is simply nonsense. There is plenty of evidence; the only debatable point is how conclusive or otherwise it may be.

 

[islamirama]

The thread was about adam and eve and how the population increased. The answer has been provided. The very fact that such a question was asked confirms that we are talking in relation to religion and not science for science believes in monkeys to humans. So if anyone wishes to discuss evolution then i suggest opening another thread as this thread has served its purpose.

 

[Woodrow]

The thread was about adam and eve and how the population increased. The answer has been provided. The very fact that such a question was asked confirms that we are talking in relation to religion and not science for science believes in monkeys to humans. So if anyone wishes to discuss evolution then i suggest opening another thread as this thread has served its purpose.

Agreed



:threadclo