Afghan convert 'may be released'

If anyone converts to another religion from Islam, they should be killed.
This view of islam then can be compared to a trap. A person could look for God in islam and if he does not find God, he is stuck and cannot continue his quest to find God.
If someone has found God, he would not leave. Why would he? Clearly this man did not choose to turn his back on God, he was still searching, and found God in christianity. It may seem wrong to a muslim because you feel you have found God in islam, but that is you. It wasn't right for him. It isn't right for everybody, just as muslims feel christianity isn't right for them.
 
Malsidabym, Christian believe his choice is right , we believe it is wrong, it is a normal thing, everybody has his/her own opinions.

"Wait , because we are waiting with you " :)
 
as far as I can see, Mohammed a.s meant to kill the ones who convert from Islam to another religion and then start fight against muslims on battles. I dont think Mohammed a.s would kill a person just bc he changed his religion for his own individual reasons.

Peace
 
Since people seem to be ignoring the explanation I have given for apostasy, I'll paste it again into this thread:


However, from the Islamic perspective, a number of points must be observed with regard to apostasy:
1. Islam has never compelled anyone to accept the religion. Anyone who becomes a Muslim does so purely through objective study of the religion. As Allah has informed us in the Qur'an:

2:256 There is no compulsion in religion.
10:99 So would you (O Muhammad) then compel people to become believers?


Likewise, Islam encourages its followers to reflect and contempate upon the universe around us and to ponder over the beauty of the Qur'anic message:

47:24 Do they not ponder over the Qur'an or are their hearts locked up?

51:20-21. And on earth are signs for those endowed with inner-certainty; and [likewise there are signs] in yourselves, do you not observe?

29:20 Say: "Travel through the earth and see how Allah did originate creation; so will Allah produce a later creation: for Allah has power over all things.


Thus, Islam requires that one's faith be constructed upon logical investigation and study of the universe in which we live. Through logical contemplation, one realizes the supreme authority of the Creator and the veracity of Muhammad's (saws) claim to prophethood. Thus we find that, in the history of Islam, no knowledgeable Muslim has ever left Islam. The only cases we find of former Muslims are people who were never practicing Muslims in the first place, nor did they ever have a good understanding of Islam. Yet on the other hand, the list of educated converts to Islam is immense, and it includes educated leaders such as priests, rabbis and atheists.

2. Those who have left Islam have historically fallen under three categories: those who left having never properly understood the religion often due to social circumstances, those who faked a conversion into Islam in order to undermine the Islamic community from within, and those who left to support opposing forces in battle against the Muslims. Because of the first category, Islam requires that the person who has chosen to forsake the religion be consulted with in order that his doubts may be clarified to him if there is any specific issue of confusion, or so that he may learn the proper Islamic teachings that he may otherwise have not been exposed to. As for the second and third category, this was the original reason behind the Prophet's statement on apostasy. The Qur'an records (3:72) that the Jews of Madinah decided to initiate the practice of pretending to accept Islam and then publically declare their rejection of it, so as to destroy the confidence of the newly-converted Muslims. Thus, the Prophet Muhammad (saws) ruled that a punishment should be announced so that those who decide to accept Islam do so because of a firm conviction not in order to harm the Muslim community from within.

3. Coming to the actual law of apostasy, the Prophet Muhammad (saws) did say, in the above historical context, "Whoever replaces his religion, execute him" (Bukhari, Abu Dawud) but how exactly do we understand this statement and does it conflict with the principles of freedom? The Prophet Muhammad pbuh himself clarified this statement in another hadith narrated in Sahih Muslim where he mentioned that the one who was to be fought against was the one who "abandons his religion and the muslim community. It should be noted that every country has maintained punishments, including execution, for treason and rebellion against the state (See Mozley and Whitley's Law Dictionary, under "Treason and Treason Felony," pp. 368-369). Islam is not just a set of beliefs, it is a complete system of life which includes a Muslim's allegiance to the Islamic state. Thus, a rejection against that would be akin to treason. Rebellion against God is more serious than rebellion against one's country. However, one who personally abandons the faith and leaves the country would not be hunted down and assasinated, nor would one who remains inside the state conforming to outward laws be tracked down and executed. The notion of establishing inquistion courts to determine peoples' faith, as done in the Spanish Inquisition, is something contrary to Islamic law. As illustrated by the historical context in which it was mandated, the death penalty is mainly for those who collaborate with enemy forces in order to aid them in their attacks against the Islamic state or for those who seek to promote civil unrest and rebellion from within the Islamic state. When someone publically announces their rejection of Islam within an Islamic state it is basically a challenge to the Islamic government, since such an individual can keep it to themselves like the personal affair it is made out to be.

4. From Islamic history, we can gain a better understanding of how this law has been implemented. Although the Prophet Muhammad (saws) threatened the death penalty in response to the attempts against the Muslim community, no such executions took place in his time (Imam Shawkani, Nayl Al-Awtar, vol. 7, p. 192) even though there is a report that a bedouin renounced Islam and left Madinah unharmed in his time (Fath Al-Bari vol. 4, p.77 and vol. 13 p. 170; Sahih Muslim biSharh An-Nawawi, vol. 9, p. 391). Thus, we find that context plays an important role in determining how to deal with apostates. The case of one who enlists nations to fight against the Islamic state is more serious, for example. That is why the scholars of the Hanafi school of thought felt that the punishment only applies to the male apostate and not the female apostate because the latter is unable to wage war against the Islamic state. If someone simply has some doubts concerning Islam, then those doubts can be clarified.

So an Islamic state is certainly justified in punishing those who betray the state, committing treason and support enemy forces. As for anyone else, if they do not publically declare their rejection of Islam, the state has no interest in pursuing them; if their case does become public, however, then they should be reasoned with and educated concerning the religion so that they have the opportunity to learn the concepts they may not have understood properly and they can be encouraged to repent.​
 
Ansar, thank you for your posting :) May Allah swt reward you :)
 
Christian missionaries are trying to win more converts in Afghanistan and also in Iraq.
 
Hello Snakelegs,
when you say "a number of posts" - you mean ALL posts. they're all gone.
what rules did they violate? and surely not every single one was in violation of forum rules????????
Some were off-topic, some were hateful, some were in response to those that were off-topic and hateful. It was easiest to remove them all.

Hello Christian_dove,
In Norway, we haven't separated the church and the state.... There is an ongoing discussion if we should do so, but it hasn't happened yet.
Although Christianity still has a strong influence on the government in Norway, it still is becoming increasingly secular over the years, so the Church still has lost considerable power.

Hello Malsidabym,
This view of islam then can be compared to a trap. A person could look for God in islam and if he does not find God, he is stuck and cannot continue his quest to find God.
Not true at all. If a person personally changes his religious conviction and views, the Islamic state has no interest in prying into the hearts of its citizens. Likewise, if someone choose to leave the state and live elsewhere, the Islamic state has no interest in hunting them down. The process of setting up an inquisition does not occur in Islam. The penalty is for those who publically rebel against the state promoting civil unrest.

:sl: Abrar,
Christian missionaries are trying to win more converts in Afghanistan and also in Iraq.
Yep. Immediately following the wars, there were waves of missionaries moving in to take advantage of the plight of the people; they tend to be more succesful amongst the impoverished, ill and uneducated.

Regards
 
that's what I said, his change won't cause any doubts in a true Muslim :)
 
How do Muslims reconcile the fact that they do not allow non-Islamic religious recruiting in their countries, yet set up Mosques and try to recruit in non-Islamic countries?

Is it something along the lines of "It's ok for us to deny non-Muslims what we demand from non-Muslims because we're right and they are wrong"?

Ansar,
His question asks (i think) why this isn't allowed in current muslim countries, not the "ideal" that you imagine may someday be implimented. And it is a valid question, too, b/c whether or not these muslim countries follow exact instructions of the quoran and ahadith (meaning "whether or not you think they deserve to be called pure Islamic states"), they are still governed and inhabited by mostly muslims. So, his question stands: why the double standard?
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top