Trumble
IB Expert
- Messages
- 3,275
- Reaction score
- 389
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Buddhist
This is getting silly now.
Agreed. Your inability to understand what I am actually saying does make continuation rather pointless.
The explanation you are offering is not only incorrect but flies in the face of the information you're being given. You are saying that the UK and US agencies were uncertain, she is saying that the UK agencies saw no threat (her and her colleagues opinions).
I am saying that, whatever their opinion, doubt remained sufficient for them to want to cover their a$$. As there was evidence both ways, all of it was included in the report.
That is the agencies official opinion
No, it was her personal opinion. Produce a source confirming MI5 ever has an 'official' opinion on anything. They provide information on which other people can form opinions on which to base their actions.
"I did not know if there was a threat or not" <-- this is uncertain.
"I saw no threat" <-- this is NOT uncertain.
Do you see the difference? From your previous drivel I honestly doubt it.
I think any rational person would believe her recollection of her opinion than your recollection of her opinion.
Again, you are just demonstrating your lack of comprehension. Nobody is disputing what her opinion was; it's in black and white. READ MY POSTS!!
You wrote one line with a link, I think my reply was appropriate.
One line included in one paragraph, included in one post. Just like any other line in any other post, to read in context. Try doing so.