Exactly my point, why call prayer ridiculous, stupid etc, as Opethian did,
While I may not call them stupid, although the mind is easily influenced even by placibo effects, i do see that people tend to ignore or justify why or why not prayers/wishes are "granted".
when you accept that there's a chance it could be true?
I dont accept that there is a likely chance that it is true based on the evidence.
There is a chance that this entire existence is actually the dream of a plastic bucket... there is a chance... but there is no evidence of this....
And even if there was no chance, still dont you think you should respect others' beliefs?
I have actually seen another debate about respecting another religion recently in another forum. Im curious what do you mean by this? I personally wont prevent you from your beliefs. But respect? Please explain what you mean specifically by this.
And the fact that you repeated one of Opethians' quotes regarding prayer being ridiculous to conclude one of your above posts shows that you agree with him, but don't you think this is illogical (because it could be true) and disrepectful?
Once again we could be the dream of a bucket... and please lets begin with what do you mean by respect and why should we respect a belief.
Secondly, now that we've agreed upon the above point, this must mean that you also agree that it's a matter of personal faith, in which case the matter is settled: There's no definate answer, everyone must choose his/her belief and everyone else should respect that. Is this not the conclusion based on the premises we have agreed upon? Is it logical to disrespect someone else and say they're wrong and stupid, when you accept that they could be right?
We havent agreed on the point above. And its also a matter of reality. So no this is not the conclusion we have agreed upon. I wont call you stupid in a insulting way but i will say that you are wrong. You also havent answered our questions about prayer.
Why do you think you can influence god?
Why does god not regrow limbs?
Why do you or others go to doctors when prayer works?
Why do other faiths have "healing through prayer"? Doesnt this contradict your own beliefs?
There is no evidence for magical healing? I am surprised by your argument considering your affirmation of the first point I mentioned, for one could easily respond by saying "there's no evidence against magical healing"?
IM sorry what point did i/we affirm?
We are looking at reality. In general when someone makes a positive claim evidence if needed. Noone has provided any evidence that there is any magic to prayers. We provide evience you dont.
Given the idea that your prayers work because your god exists seems to fail in light of that other religions claim the same thing and have just as many "miracles"
This is the whole point, you cannot prove for or against, so why are you so certain of your position? I thought you already affirmed this in your first statement anyway?
Prove no, as stated before. But we can show what is likely and what isnt. It is not likely that prayer has any magical powers. As a matter of the evidence it is extremely unlikely. Now if you would like to do a prayer experiement please sincerly pray for someone that has horrible vision and ask for there eyes to be healed. Lets see how long it takes someone to go from horrible near sighted to 20/20 vision.
The evidence available shows confirmation bias - To which evidence are you referring specifically, and what do you mean by "confirmation bias"?
People forget, ignore, or justify why the 1000s of prayers/wishes that they make that dont come true. They only tend to remember the ones that did.
No, no one has regrown a lost limb as a result of prayer, but if they did then wouldn't the test be over?
Most likely. god really should do this it would help its credibility. Of course which god would be the next question.
Everybody would accept that God existed and everybody would worship Him, there's be no point left in creating us? Why don't God just come down right now and everybody see him, that way everyone would believe in Him, there'd be no point left.
[/QUOTE]
Which god?
I doubt everyone would still worship god. The popular ones all seem pretty petty, selfish and arrogant.
There is pleanty of "point" to life. Did jesus, mohamd or noah have a point to their life after they knew god existed?
This is the problem, in order for you to accept prayer you want PROOF
no we want evidence.
, in order to reject it EVIDENCE is sufficient.
no we just want evidence for prayer working.
Likewise there is no evidence that prayer doesn't invoke a supernatural power.
There is no evidence of a supernatural power. There is no evidence that we are the dream of a pink flying picnik basket. There is no evidence that i am god. There is no evidence that prayer has any magical effect.
And with your line of thinking ..
there is no evidence that i am not god. There is no evidence that you are not a murderer. there is no evidence that we are not the dream of a pink picnic basket.
If you're going to respond by saying that prayers aren't answered sometimes, then I say that prayers are answered sometimes, bringing us back to the same point, you cant prove for or against.
Actually that brings us back to confirmation bias. And i would say prayers are never answered although on a rare ocasion people will delude themselves and think chance was a gods answer.
You still havent answered my question as to why you think you can influence god.
We are not trying to prove but show the likelyhood. And please answer our questions.
Regarding the psychological effects, that's interesting. Because it shows that prayer has some good effects even if God doesn't exist so why are atheists so sternly against people praying? From a logical point of view one SHOULD pray because it benefits, wouldn't you agree?(looking at prayer as an action in and of its ownself that is)
Im not against people praying, but i will call BS when people say it has magical effects. And logically we should all pray to the pink picnic basket for our wishes to become true.
And I've spoken about the two but just to summarise. There's no proof for or against, that you agreed to.
I will agree there is no proof of anything. period. So drop this concept and get back to a more clear discussion. Why do you seem to not comment on evidence? Is it because there is no evidence for prayer having magical powers?
You claimed that the evidence is against prayer being true, therefore the likelyhood is that it's not true. I showed that this is false...
No you havent. You have constantly used by argument though.
, and in reality evidence against prayer is simply bias arguments, like saying there's no evidence prayer calls on the supernatural, even though the opposite could easily be used as evidence.
We are not defending negatives. You should no the flaw in your logic.
We are saying that if prayer has a magical effect you should have evidence of this. There is none. However there is tons of evidence that healing has natural means. There is tons of evidence that healing has a natural explanation.
And if you examine the arguments you can think of against prayer, you'll find they can be reversed into arguments for prayer, and in such a case the evidence is 50:50, so one has the right to choose.
No the evidence is not 50:50. Although you always have the right to choose you can still choose wrong. There is evidence that "healing" occurs natually and no evidence that magic is envolved.
And in reality I don't think this should be so much a discussion about evidence as it should be of opinion.
Because if I bring you evidence for healing through prayer, as individuals in this thread have done , it can be interpreted in two ways: It is healing through prayer, or it isnt. Neither can be proven and as such the choice is on the individual.
Looking at this discussion scientifily it is about evidence. It seems you like to jump from proof to evidence selectivly. If we are trying to show if prayer works magically then we need evidence. And as stated before we are not concerned about proof but what is likely and what is supported.