Are there any wikipedians or anyone understands wikipedia?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anwarica
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 48
  • Views Views 9K
Isambard said:
Alot of it has already been debunked on other sites. That and the curiously bits of missing info confirming Qur'anic divinity is missing *cough* injeel
Click to expand...

NONE OF IT HAS BEEN debunked.. will take more than the nonsense generator to challenge the divinity or the science of the Quran!
Go ahead and bring your proof in lieu of bunk of no meaning. The Quran communicates its own divinity irrespective of *cough* other books...
really look forward to your apocryphal interpretation of millennium old text. Which makes even your ego seem so trivial!
 
Science101 said:
I have no interest in proving the Quran, either way. I'm only interested in helping Anwarica. And if there is something else coming from this discussion, it's along the lines of prophet Muhammad possibly being more of a scientist than most probably realized, scientists often have good insight. From what I know about him he was a very intelligent man. More so than even you might be giving him credit for.
Click to expand...

I don't know what you by that?... sort of offensive to speak of credit or noncredit I issue to إمام الهدى و سيد المرسلين سيدنا محمد Mohammed (p)
I just think if you are going to engage in a project to make your point, assert it with some proof.. otherwise there is really no reason to engage in a topic that is understandably outside your sphere of expertise. In other stay on track with no digression, if you are to engage in a digression make sure you have your bases covered....What do you think?

peace!
 
I'd like to thank everyone who helped me :thumbs_up

Also suggest having a new thread about the debunked Islamic topics that Isambard referred to .. what do you think? :)
 
Anwarica said:
I'd like to thank everyone who helped me :thumbs_up

Also suggest having a new thread about the debunked Islamic topics that Isambard referred to .. what do you think? :)
Click to expand...

been covered here extensively.. they all get their 'debunking' from the same site anyway... but take us for chumps-- and wish to 're-educate' us!
I think they should use the 'search' feature, and if they have a sincere question. I.e one of them actually bothered read and had a question then can they pose it if it hasn't already been answered... that of course is never how it works out.
I have questions all the time and I direct them to scholars.. a few months ago I was confused about a verse in suret Ad dukhan, I read about it looked for an exegesis then asked a scholar.
The day one of them does that, is when hell freezes over and all the devils go ice skating...
fasten your seat belt and prepare to be bored witless...
:w:
 
Anwarica said:
I'd like to thank everyone who helped me :thumbs_up
Click to expand...

You're very welcome! It was fun and I learned a few new things. Hopefully you feel better about the way Wikipedia accommodated both sides.

Anwarica said:
Also suggest having a new thread about the debunked Islamic topics that Isambard referred to .. what do you think? :)
Click to expand...

I might read how the debate is going but don't think I would participate. What PurestAmbrosia said about it being a rehash of the usual claims might unfortunately be true.

I would be more interested in a thread that looks into the possibility that prophet Muhammad was an early scientist or at least interested in the science that was around at the time. From what I know, he was a wealthy merchant that did an above average amount of traveling. May have very well been in contact with the scientists of that era. What he learned would then show up in his "vision".

There might not be enough information on the internet to piece together a clear picture of what he knew and where it learned it from, but it would be interesting to read about.
 
for a 'wealthy merchant', it is a shame he worked for his first wife.. slept on harsh palm leaves and hungry!
Perhaps you speak of a different Prophet Mohammed (p) than the one authenticated by history?

peace!
 
PurestAmbrosia said:
I suppose the only licit thing left to do, is go to wiki and let it define the 'truth' for us!


peace!
Click to expand...

cause you asked.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

The meaning of the word truth extends from honesty, good faith, and sincerity in general, to agreement with fact or reality in particular.[1] The term has no single definition about which the majority of professional philosophers and scholars agree. Various theories of truth, usually involving different definitions, continue to be debated. There are differing claims on such questions as what constitutes truth; how to define and identify truth; what roles do revealed and acquired knowledge play; and whether truth is subjective, relative, objective, or absolute. This article introduces the various perspectives and claims, both today and throughout history.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top