:You need at least a doctor of medicine and an expert of social behaviour at the same time to talk about such behaviours and their fatal consequence. Muhammad (Peace be upon him) was neither of them, but a Prophet of God who didn’t copy from the Bible and paste in the Quran and foretell the same fate of perverts of Sodom and Gomorrah for the future perverts, but a unique disease never heard or known by earlier people, AIDS! The medical scientists are unanimous that this disease is never recorded in the annals of history.
----- I read in the Riyad-us-Salihin Hadith book by Imam Nawawi that whoever judges by the Quran is fair, whoever argues by the Quran wins...and one other i can't remember. Well May Allah help you.post deleted
You obviously believe in infinite space right therefore creating infinite possibilities? Therefore i ask you how did existence itself come to be?
the red shift discovery meant that if we go back in time we will get to a single point with zero volume because of it's immense density, 'zero volume' is tantamount to saying 'nothing'. this means that the big bang came out of NOTHING! how is that logical? why did it happen? HOW did it happen?
the universe had a beginning, which means that it is CREATED SO IF IT'S CREATED THEN BY WHO?
I do not believe in infinite space or infinite possibilities. And I do not see how it affects the question of existence.
becoz that makes the chances of existence 0.00000000000000001! If you dont believe in infinite possibilities...
AIDS:
"It never happens that permissiveness overwhelms a people to the extent that they display their acts of sex shamelessly
I am here. You are there. The chances we exist are precisely one. What do you mean?
Your source (why did u just cut n paste):
http://www.alislam.org/library/articles/prophecies.html
Either engage in debate with your own thoughts & logic or read this:
(I will just provide the link instead of doing a cut n paste)
http://www.crystalinks.com/quatrainsinterpretations.html
Good Luck Refuting!
The big bang theory, the chances of that happening are close to NOTHING, it had to be planned and dun purposely! Thats what i mean!
My thoughts are wen such clear signs are shown how can people deny them
So you believe in the prophecies of nostradamus then?![]()
Can you provide a source please?
really interested.
The big bang theory, the chances of that happening are close to NOTHING, it had to be planned and dun purposely! Thats what i mean!
lol 3 aethiests bombarding,
lol inshaAllah i'll post up refutations in due time. :brother:
It was a disappointment to find out that you'd just copied that article from someone else.
I agree: where there is a lack of evidence, we cannot be sure. Yet when there is ample evidence, then confidence follows.I'm not so sure. It takes an awful lot of confidence to say that you know where the universe came from. I don't have that confidence, and neither do most scientists and philosophers. Where there is a lack of evidence, we should say that we simply don't know, rather than ruling out all other possibilities that don't fit with our hypothesis.
I doubt that such people would openly proclaim their intentions, since they are hiding something that is true. The pagan arabs in the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) were examples of people in denial: they recognised Allaah as their Creator, yet they disobeyed Him. The last verses of Chapter 29 are quite relevant:I suppose that's possible, if someone was raised in a strongly atheist family or something. I've not heard of such a case outside of Communist dicatatorships, though.
I am sorry to hear that is how you feel, yet on the other hand: you say that you will not become a Muslim because you will have to give up many things you enjoy. Here is an example of disbelief in God furthered by wordly pursuits rather than outright evidence, making it more desirable not to believe.In my own case, it would have been easier for me if I had believed in god - all those hours spent in church at my (Catholic) school wouldn't have seemed like such a monumental waste of time.
I think that was what I meant, sorry.That's not what I'm doing. I'm comparing them to the proof of Pythagoras' Theorem.
Yes, they have, yet I very much doubt that an exhaustive attempt has been made to explain them or that all of them have in fact been covered. If we take the Qur'anic miracles for example, we have not covered such aspects as its linguistic power and structure in sufficient depth as to prove its miraculous nature. I don't think there has been a thread detailing the exegesis and language of the Qur'an, although brief outlines pertaining to these subjects may have appeared in various places. If I was to relate this to Pythagoras' Theorem, the analogy would perhaps be that if a person does not understand algebra: the language of mathematics, then Pythagoras' concept would be poorly understood. Similarly, if we do not even have an understanding of Arabic, how are we able to really appreciate the nature of the Qur'an?Also, I think most of the standard arguments for god's existence have been covered on this and various other threads, haven't they?
I think it may be irrelevant in a way if we understand the concept of life being a test. If God's existence was so obvious that we saw Him day in day out, there wouldn't be a need to send down Prophets to remind us, nor would there remain much of a test by which good and bad are distinguished.I'm not saying it's necessary, but is it somehow unacceptable?
I was probably trying to explain the above, but worded it poorly. Anyway, thank you for your replyI'm afraid I'm not really sure what you're getting at here - would you mind elaborating?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.