h-n
IB Veteran
- Messages
- 627
- Reaction score
- 47
- Gender
- Female
- Religion
- Islam
They ask to see proof that Allah exists (when already explained about test in Show me, show me, but we're humans-now in h-n reflection thread) BUT they have shown that when they have seen something, they are biased and still being ignorant.
For example
1. Crop Circles
They have seen crop circles and cannot still agree to what caused them.
2. UFOs
Also there are plenty of UFO sightings, BUT they claim that the photos of some are something else, so they refuse to accept what is in the photograph which they agree some are genuine, but still have not agreed to what the photograph is of, whether it be a UFO or not. Calling people liars, when people have not considered the evidence, of course not all people who claim to have seen UFOs are uneducated etc, there is no need to call people liars, and if they have seen something else, then you should be able to confirm by now what those are.
SO why don't the Atheists tell us here of what they have done with the above two issues, on 100% tell us of what is going on (not 60% on one sided argument and 40% on the other, but what has been really going on 100% of the above two) in both of those issues.
Of course surely after what you have seen, you should be able to tell us what are behind those two issues. IF YOU CANNOT SAY 100% OF WHAT CAUSES THEM, DO YOU NEED TO SEE ANOTHER CROP CIRCLE/UFO? Of course not as they have received so many.
As we only live here for a short amount of time, and they certainly have had plenty of time to look at the issues. You say you only believe what you see, then surely you should be able to tell us 100% what they are (when we believe that Devils are accountable as per the "Devils" thread).
So instead of wasting time asking to see something else, show us what you have already done with what you have already seen (what is the point of asking for something else, when you have already ignored what you have already seen, including signs everyday of rainfall etc).
I believe that Scientists have proven they are biased, for example in their hypothesis they choose to ignore that Devils are involved, now they show an image of being imparitial, but they already choose to ignore the issue of Devils existing.
Even look at what happened with Stephen Hawking incident, he recently said that the Universe had always existed. Where other Atheists had rejected, but why did they reject this? They claim that Stephen Hawking is intelligent (when intelligent is about saving yourselves from Hell), but what is there problem with him now, are they going to say find another Scientist to say he is more intelligent then Stephen Hawking to counteract an argument that the Universe had not always existed?? They have proven that they don't read on Science (and as per "No such things as Atheism"), they choose to side with anyone and anything that rejects the truth of Islam. They have shown how biased they are. Yes, they don't have to listen to anyone, but they chose to go against him because they did not have the desired conclusion so already being biased on what they are after and not the truth.
DO NOT DERAIL BY TALKING ABOUT HOW SCIENCE WORKS ETC, JUST ANSWER WHAT 100% CONCLUSION YOU HAVE COME TO WITH THE ABOVE TWO EXAMPLES.
opcorn:
For example
1. Crop Circles
They have seen crop circles and cannot still agree to what caused them.
2. UFOs
Also there are plenty of UFO sightings, BUT they claim that the photos of some are something else, so they refuse to accept what is in the photograph which they agree some are genuine, but still have not agreed to what the photograph is of, whether it be a UFO or not. Calling people liars, when people have not considered the evidence, of course not all people who claim to have seen UFOs are uneducated etc, there is no need to call people liars, and if they have seen something else, then you should be able to confirm by now what those are.
SO why don't the Atheists tell us here of what they have done with the above two issues, on 100% tell us of what is going on (not 60% on one sided argument and 40% on the other, but what has been really going on 100% of the above two) in both of those issues.
Of course surely after what you have seen, you should be able to tell us what are behind those two issues. IF YOU CANNOT SAY 100% OF WHAT CAUSES THEM, DO YOU NEED TO SEE ANOTHER CROP CIRCLE/UFO? Of course not as they have received so many.
As we only live here for a short amount of time, and they certainly have had plenty of time to look at the issues. You say you only believe what you see, then surely you should be able to tell us 100% what they are (when we believe that Devils are accountable as per the "Devils" thread).
So instead of wasting time asking to see something else, show us what you have already done with what you have already seen (what is the point of asking for something else, when you have already ignored what you have already seen, including signs everyday of rainfall etc).

Even look at what happened with Stephen Hawking incident, he recently said that the Universe had always existed. Where other Atheists had rejected, but why did they reject this? They claim that Stephen Hawking is intelligent (when intelligent is about saving yourselves from Hell), but what is there problem with him now, are they going to say find another Scientist to say he is more intelligent then Stephen Hawking to counteract an argument that the Universe had not always existed?? They have proven that they don't read on Science (and as per "No such things as Atheism"), they choose to side with anyone and anything that rejects the truth of Islam. They have shown how biased they are. Yes, they don't have to listen to anyone, but they chose to go against him because they did not have the desired conclusion so already being biased on what they are after and not the truth.
DO NOT DERAIL BY TALKING ABOUT HOW SCIENCE WORKS ETC, JUST ANSWER WHAT 100% CONCLUSION YOU HAVE COME TO WITH THE ABOVE TWO EXAMPLES.

Last edited: