Author Rushdie: Muslim Veils 'Suck'

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isma'el
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 71
  • Views Views 9K
Status
Not open for further replies.
Kamilah said:
I read the excerpts, and I also work in a library I know how UNpopular they are!:okay:
with a click of a button i can see the loan history of every book
Click to expand...



do true sister. his books are UNPOPULAR. i agree with u.
 
Salaam,

Perhaps if any reporter can ask Salman rushidie if he pray and fast and pays the zakat.

We already know he cant enter Mecca.LOL
 
who cares what that loser says anyways lol

he will live in fear and hiding in this dunya

and some really hot treats await him in the next insha'allah

if u get what i mean ;)
 
wilberhum said:
There are surly a million writers that wish they were that UNpopular.
Click to expand...


he sure has sold himself short!!!

This world is nothing but a mirage!

please refer to brother Ahmed's post...

Only Allah knows what is in store for this loser.
 
:sl:

Last thing you guys want is him to come on the Day of Resurection and take your good deeds because of your backbiting and what a waste will it be on him too because they wont avail him in the least anyway.
Just leave him, he isnt even worth mentioning. This is what he wants, more publicity. Remember Allah is aware of him and what he's doing and done. Its not like he wont be payed back for what he has done. Look at the wisdom of Allah! He is letting him live a comfortable life here in this dunya, and after death and in the Aakhirah he is going to meet Allah with no good deeds but all of his evil deeds and the Curse and Anger of Allah Inshallah. Then he will wish that he never did what he has done.

2: 161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allah and of the angels and of mankind, combined.

162. They will abide therein (under the curse in Hell), their punishment will neither be lightened, nor will they be reprieved.

:w:
 
Hi

Now the fatwa for killing Rushdie was made just because he criticized Islam !! criticism = murder !! oh... For some people criticism is an insult, but a again I don't think insult = murder
 
Malaikah said:
its not murder, its a punishment. The punishment for apostatcy is death. and i think this situation highlights nicely the wisdom behind the ruling. See how the apostate propagates anti-islamic attitudes... thus turning people away from the true religion...
Click to expand...
I think we need to better clarify this because I noticed some non-Muslim members of this forum might be getting confused.

I started a thread on apostasy a while back and it came to a conclusion that I think everyone was OK with.

Not all apostates from Islam are eligable to be killed. In fact very few are. The ones that are are those who by leaving Islam make themselves enemies of Islam. For example, if a Muslim becomes a Christian, and the only difference in his life is that he goes to a church instead of a Mosque, yet makes no comments about how "bad" Islam is, then he's ok. There's no compulsion in religion.

However, if a person leaves Islam and then goes on in the newspapers claiming that Islam is from the devil or even taking physical action against Muslims just for their religion, he makes himself an enemy of Islam and becomes eligable for capital punishment.

However, it's even more complex that that. This has to be within the boudaries of a Islamic country, one that is ruled by Sharia law. If he does this outside of the boudaries of such a state, I think but I don't know, that it would not be halal to kill him. Allah knows best.

Lastly, u should all listen to <--> (did I spell that correctly?), and not indulge yourselves in talking about this guy too much. We can discuss the things he says in order to have an idea about who he is, but to start insulting him talking trash about him is not Islamic. We're better than that brothers and sisters, let's not forget that.

:w:
 
The link is broken. If he really said that, in addition to aposty, he is also guilty of banality. It seems like soemthing a teenager would say.
 
Janissary said:
The guy had to go into permanent hiding for writing the Satanic Verses, and he didn't learn?
Click to expand...
:sl:

The goal that was set for him, was to push the wrong buttons and be as Crude & offensive as possible.

He has no reason to learn, because his atrocious behavior wasn't accidental nor a mistake. They were calculated acts of provocation.

This was his masters plan, from the beginning.

He is Just merely a deaf/dumb/blind, puppet in their hands...
 
Kamilah said:
I read the excerpts, and I also work in a library I know how UNpopular they are!:okay:
with a click of a button i can see the loan history of every book
Click to expand...

Hmmmmmm? Sholuld you really be doing that without a valid institutional reason?

I sure hope nobody with a name suggesting they are Muslim checked it out. Are you part of the undercover Aposty police? :sunny:
 
Now the fatwa for killing Rushdie was made just because he criticized Islam !! criticism = murder !! oh... For some people criticism is an insult, but a again I don't think insult = murder
Click to expand...
okay did he criticize Islam in the Satanic Verses?have you read the book?I haven't so want to tell me what he wrote?
AFAIK he didn't exactly criticize.he said he wrote something fiction ,which angered all the Muslim hardliners across the world.
 
Last edited:
in the satanic verses rushdie insults all mothers, white people, margaret thatcher and many many others. He greatly insults islam, and the language used is beyond vulgar. He also attacks the dieties of the hindu's,

for more information check out ahmed deedat - how rushdie fooled the west
 
:salamext:

The link in the first post of this therad is not working, however, Rushdie? Puh-lease. After 'Satanic Verses', he should have a lot more sense. But NO. He insists on provoking Muslims. :-\
 
So far for the tolerance of Islam?
Click to expand...
[off-topic]
there are certain conditions;like the final decision rests on the head of state to determine whether he/she is a threat to the Islamic way of life/Islamic practice.
the law was based owing to such incidents back in the time of the Prophet(PBUH).People would accept and then leave the religion sometimes for causing confusion and trouble and disbelief.
personally I don't care about people leaving the religion.But generally those who have left the religion and the liberal Muslims ,they tend to be hostile towards its most strict practitioners and its principles.[off-topic]
 
Muj4h1d4 said:
:salamext:

The link in the first post of this therad is not working, however, Rushdie? Puh-lease. After 'Satanic Verses', he should have a lot more sense. But NO. He insists on provoking Muslims. :-\
Click to expand...
He didn't provoke Muslims. He wrote a novel. Muslims provoked themselves.
Like the post above quotes.
So far for the tolerance of Islam?
Click to expand...
 
Aziz said:
[off-topic]
there are certain conditions;like the final decision rests on the head of state to determine whether he/she is a threat to the Islamic way of life/Islamic practice.
the law was based owing to such incidents back in the time of the Prophet(PBUH).People would accept and then leave the religion sometimes for causing confusion and trouble and disbelief.
personally I don't care about people leaving the religion.But generally those who have left the religion and the liberal Muslims ,they tend to be hostile towards its most strict practitioners and its principles.[off-topic]
Click to expand...

So essentially you are saying Islam is against freedom of speech and against criticism or "exposees" from those who have been within it and thus know about it and wish to warn the rest of us about its negative aspects. That seems awfully insecure for a group of people claiming to be backed up by the devine.
 
Muj4h1d4 said:
:salamext:

The link in the first post of this therad is not working, however, Rushdie? Puh-lease. After 'Satanic Verses', he should have a lot more sense. But NO. He insists on provoking Muslims. :-\
Click to expand...

Thinking Muslim veils 'suck' is not a provocation, it is a perfectly reasonable opinion for a non-Muslim. Did he also call for a prohibition on wearing a veil? If not, I don't really see what is so shocking about it. Most non-Muslim Westeners would think the principle behind the veil 'sucks' I think. Thats why they don't wear them!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top