Basics In Christianity

[jd7]

Jayda you raised a point in post #1 concerning what one might assume something as true and reject something as false.

Would you agree that, above all, any writings, Islamic or Christian, to be considered true, they MUST conform to earlier true scripture, or at the very least to not deny other true scripture?

Grace Seeker, just to nit pick a bit, Jesus wrote words in the dust when he was asked to stone the adulteress woman.

MustafaMc “The NT clearly is not an accurate [verbatim] record of words spoken directly by Jesus”, I have never seen this disputed by anyone. That leaves me wanting to reply to your point with…. So?

Just reading along

 

[MustafaMc]

MustafaMc “The NT clearly is not an accurate [verbatim] record of words spoken directly by Jesus”, I have never seen this disputed by anyone. That leaves me wanting to reply to your point with…. So?

The point is that “The Quran clearly is an accurate [verbatim] record of words spoken directly by Muhammad.” We accept Jesus (as) as a Messenger of Allah and accept the message that he brought as True; however, the fact that we don't have an accurate and comprehensive record of his words and actions casts doubts on the Divine authenticity of the NT.

 

[jd7]

MustafaMC, I think you may have missed my point. Court records are full of accurate verbatim testimony. The testimony itself may be true or it maybe false. The fact it was recorded accurately is not a determination of truthfulness of it.

A comparison of any given testimony to other testimony or known facts is what is needed. Even then there may be a lot of dispute as to what the truth is. (I seem to recall such a dispute being recently in the news. It concerned the Armenians and the Turks killing each other.)

Then we have a whole other category of subjects, such as this thread was start over. Religion and pre-modern history is one of these categories. More times than not the “truthfulness” is in the eye of the beholder.

Objectivity is of the utmost importance when trying to determine the probability of truthfulness of recorded events. An example might be seen in examining records of Jesus being in Heaven laughing over the fact that another was crucified in his place and everyone had been fooled (I believe it was recorded in the Book of Barnabas, I will have to go back and review it to be sure.). I can objectively reject the record of Jesus being in Heaven laughing over the crucifixion because Jesus doing such a thing is so out of character when compared to any other records of Jesus. The simple fact that the Book of Barnabas may still exist in its original form/text (not saying that it does) would be a poor basis for declaring it true or not.

Contrarily rejecting recorded events as likely to be false simply because of minor differences in the records is not very objective. An example can be seen in some of the records of Jesus healing the blind.

Some records of certain events record one blind man being healed and other records of the same event record two men being healed. We can now offer the argument that since there are recorded differences of the same event we can objectively reject Jesus healing the blind. That, to me, seems to be your argument. I reject the objectivity of that argument.

For me I find the records of boy-Jesus making clay birds come to life much more doubtful simply because there is no logical reason for that event to have not been recorded in the Christian records. It matters not that the original record of the clay birds being made alive may have been perfectly recorded and perfectly preserved or not.

My point “any writings, Islamic or Christian, to be considered true, they MUST conform to earlier true scripture” is seen in the following:

The instruction to remove hands and feet as a form of punishment for thievery, as divine, in my opinion, should be objectively rejected due to it being contrary to any Jewish or Christian writings.

It matters not that the instruction to remove hands and feet has been perfectly recorded and preserved, that doesn’t make it divine or even to have likely to been divinely inspired.

Peace

 

[MustafaMc]

MustafaMC, I think you may have missed my point. Court records are full of accurate verbatim testimony. The testimony itself may be true or it maybe false. The fact it was recorded accurately is not a determination of truthfulness of it.

I was not making a case for truth or falsehood. I was making a case for authenticity. There is no doubt whatsoever that the Qur'an is an authentic and accurate record of what the Companions heard Prophet Muhammad (saaws) recite as revelation. No one even claims that even the NT gospels are equivalent to the Qur'an in this sense. The 4 gospels have bits and pieces of what Jesus (as) is claimed to have said, but there is no doubt whatsoever that they are not accurate nor complete. Even the "Lord's Prayer" is not quoted identically between the gospels.

A comparison of any given testimony to other testimony or known facts is what is needed. Even then there may be a lot of dispute as to what the truth is. (I seem to recall such a dispute being recently in the news. It concerned the Armenians and the Turks killing each other.)

No, this is not a dependable means of ascertaining Truth. For one thing, there is no doubt that the Bible is not "known facts". Since Christians don't even claim that the NT Bible is an accurate and complete record of Jesus' (as) teachings and actions, the Bible is not a dependable standard to judge against.

Contrarily rejecting recorded events as likely to be false simply because of minor differences in the records is not very objective. An example can be seen in some of the records of Jesus healing the blind.

Some records of certain events record one blind man being healed and other records of the same event record two men being healed. We can now offer the argument that since there are recorded differences of the same event we can objectively reject Jesus healing the blind. That, to me, seems to be your argument. I reject the objectivity of that argument.

No, your argument is not even logical. Just because there are differences between accounts does not mean that it didn't happen; however, it does clearly illustrate that the records are not accurate and complete.

For me I find the records of boy-Jesus making clay birds come to life much more doubtful simply because there is no logical reason for that event to have not been recorded in the Christian records. It matters not that the original record of the clay birds being made alive may have been perfectly recorded and perfectly preserved or not.

Just because an event is not recorded in the NT, does not mean that it didn't happen. There is nothing written in the gospels about Jesus' life between his family visiting the temple when he was 12 (I think) and when he started his public ministry with his baptism and calling of the disciples.

My point “any writings, Islamic or Christian, to be considered true, they MUST conform to earlier true scripture” is seen in the following:

The instruction to remove hands and feet as a form of punishment for thievery, as divine, in my opinion, should be objectively rejected due to it being contrary to any Jewish or Christian writings.

It matters not that the instruction to remove hands and feet has been perfectly recorded and preserved, that doesn’t make it divine or even to have likely to been divinely inspired.

Just because a law differs from what is known about previous revelations, it does not mean that the law is not Divine. Although Allah (swt) does not change, man's understanding definitely changes over time. Even the Bible tells us that the disciples were not ready for the full message that was to come latter with the coming of "the Spirit of truth" that we Muslims believe prophesied the coming of Prophet Muhammad (saaws). John 16:12-14 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he shall guide you into all the truth: for he shall not speak from himself; but what things soever he shall hear, [these] shall he speak: and he shall declare unto you the things that are to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall take of mine, and shall declare [it] unto you.

 

[Umar001]

As Salaam Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah,

I have not seen Grace Seeker or Jayda around, I had forgot about this thread, just wondering if yall still here?

Eesa

 

[Grace Seeker]

As Salaam Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah,

I have not seen Grace Seeker or Jayda around, I had forgot about this thread, just wondering if yall still here?

Eesa

I continue to receive notifications for old threads that I subscribed to, and sometimes I read them. But I haven't felt comfortable in participating in many weeks; hence my absence.

 

[Umar001]

I continue to receive notifications for old threads that I subscribed to, and sometimes I read them. But I haven't felt comfortable in participating in many weeks; hence my absence.

See, I noticed

How comes, why you aint felt comfortable?

 

[barney]

I continue to receive notifications for old threads that I subscribed to, and sometimes I read them. But I haven't felt comfortable in participating in many weeks; hence my absence.

Hugs and hugs and hugs and hugsHugs and hugs and hugs and hugsHugs and hugs and hugs and hugsHugs and hugs and hugs and hugsHugs and hugs and hugs and hugs Graceseeker. but in a manly way.

Hai dude. Miss ya on the boards

 

[snakelegs]

hey grace seeker - nice to see you're still Out There! :sunny:

 

[glo]

I continue to receive notifications for old threads that I subscribed to, and sometimes I read them. But I haven't felt comfortable in participating in many weeks; hence my absence.

Good to see you around, Grace Seeker.
I am missing your knowledgeable posts, but I understand what you mean.
Hope all is well in your neck of the woods.

 

[glo]

Hugs and hugs and hugs and hugsHugs and hugs and hugs and hugsHugs and hugs and hugs and hugsHugs and hugs and hugs and hugsHugs and hugs and hugs and hugs Graceseeker. but in a manly way.

Hai dude. Miss ya on the boards

You are a big softie, really ... aren't you, Barney?

 

[MustafaMc]

I continue to receive notifications for old threads that I subscribed to, and sometimes I read them. But I haven't felt comfortable in participating in many weeks; hence my absence.

Peace, GraceSeeker. I hope that all is well with you and your family.