Being an atheist.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tornado
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 231
  • Views Views 45K
Status
Not open for further replies.
well well, the same argument of "Gods too cruel" comes out


The "or" contains an unjustifiable (as far as I can see) implicit assumption of mutual exclusivity. Cruelty requires an agent to be cruel. In the case of "life" there is only one potential candidate, which is the principal reason I do not believe there is a God.


well then, allow me explain what you already heard yet refuse

strange, thats one of the greatest reasons we believe there is a God. and of course with God comes the belief of the Day of Judgement.


Intercession has a time and place, just because God isnt saving the orphans and raped victims in the instance they are oppressed doesnt mean he wont deal out justice on the day of judgement. In order to justify a sentence the crime is to be carried out.

it seems the topmost reason for people disbelieving in our modern world is a lack of harmony and peace yet people dont realise they contribute greatly to that exact lack of harmony and peace by refusing to obey the laws of God !!
 
False.

No Atheist necessarily has to believe this.

But, if they do not believe that matter formed spontaneously, would that not mean it was created and such a person would believe in a creator, elimenating them from being an atheist?


Evolution is a theory which explains the diversity of life that we see here today on earth. It has nothing to do with the origins of the universe, formation of life or anything else.

I agree with that. Does there not have to be a universe for evolution to even be a posibility? Therefore the origin of the universe plays a very integral role for there to even be a theory of evolution.

Please, I ask you to scan the basics of the theory before asking questions about it like this.

Actually having somewhat of a medical background and more than a few university level biology courses, I am somewhat familiar with several theories of evolution, but on a personal level I lean towards the concept of Intelligent Design. I do have a somewat working knowledge of Darwinism and even agree with much of his findings, It is not evolution I have a problem with and I do know that most current theories of evolution deal only with the development of life and not with the creation of matter. But, I can not understand how it can be said evolution supports atheism, when it does not explain how evlion can occur without having the formation of matter as a starting point. It is like explaining that trafic lights cause cars to stop and go, without explaining the legal implications of traffic laws.


Why do you say that? What are you basing that on and why do the deeds of a good person automatically have more value if God exists and Islam is true?

The deeds themself have no more nor no less value. However, the existence of God(swt) gives permenace to the deeds and helps establish standards for the deeds to be of absolute value and indepenent of culture. In a non-go universe, the concept of good or bad deeds will tend to be based upon the thoughts and desires of society
 
But, if they do not believe that matter formed spontaneously, would that not mean it was created and such a person would believe in a creator, elimenating them from being an atheist?
Perhaps an advanced civilisation created our universe, then we would have a creator who was not God.

On another note, to the best of our understanding the origin of the universe and all matter within it is also the beginning of space-time, events and such do not make any sense outside the universe, or before the universe (if that can even mean anything in a state where time does not exist).
You can not have evolution without matter, What was the evolutinary process that caused matter to be?
--
Does there not have to be a universe for evolution to even be a posibility? Therefore the origin of the universe plays a very integral role for there to even be a theory of evolution.
There has to be a universe for almost anything we know to make sense, why burden Evolution with this problem?
You might as well say:
Ohm's law for electrical circuits requires a universe and matter, so what was the electrical process that caused matter to be?
I can not understand how it can be said evolution supports atheism, when it does not explain how evlion can occur without having the formation of matter as a starting point. It is like explaining that trafic lights cause cars to stop and go, without explaining the legal implications of traffic laws.
You seem to be of the opinion that Atheism (with a capital 'a') is some kind of organised, all encompassing theory of the universe and everything. It is not, atheism is simply the lack of a god belief. It is not even a definite 'God does not exist' belief (though there are some atheists out there that think that), so faith does not come into it at all.

More to the point it does not explain anything. Atheists can go around thinking the universe was created last week by pink aliens in floral skirts, but that has nothing to do with their atheism, since it is solely concerned with their lack of a god belief. To say "atheism does not explain how evolution can occur" then is pointless, just as it is to say "atheists believe in evolution" because while this may be true in a great number of cases it again is simply a matter of their personal opinion.
On top of that Evolution is not mutually exclusive with God, merely with certain religious doctrines, such as young-Earth creationism or the literal genesis of Adam and Eve from clay.
 
Last edited:
Osman said:
I don't think that's a logical statement to make. Just because there is no reason to believe that a soul exists doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't exist.
Absolutely.

But that wasn't my argument. My argument was that it is impossible for someone like me, who disbelieves in 'souls' (on the grounds of no evidence) to consider any hypothetical needs of 'souls'.

It is the equivalent of me asking you to consider the need of your thetans. It makes no sense to you.
 
Woodrow said:
But, if they do not believe that matter formed spontaneously, would that not mean it was created and such a person would believe in a creator, elimenating them from being an atheist?
No.

False dichotomy.

Woodrow said:
I agree with that. Does there not have to be a universe for evolution to even be a posibility?
Yes there does.

Woodrow said:
Therefore the origin of the universe plays a very integral role for there to even be a theory of evolution.
Going by this logic, the origin of the universe plays an integral role for there to be a theory, belief or hypothesis on everything. The existence of the universe is established. The origins of the universe whatever they may or may not be is completely irrelevant to our understanding on evolution. Evolution explains the diversity of life that we see here today on earth.

Woodrow said:
Actually having somewhat of a medical background and more than a few university level biology courses, I am somewhat familiar with several theories of evolution, but on a personal level I lean towards the concept of Intelligent Design.
Intelligent Design, contrary to popular opinion is not an opposite or an alternative to evolution. It has nothing to do with it.

Woodrow said:
I do have a somewat working knowledge of Darwinism and even agree with much of his findings, It is not evolution I have a problem with and I do know that most current theories of evolution deal only with the development of life and not with the creation of matter.
Call me pedantic, but there is no such thing as 'Darwinism' anymore than there is such a thing as 'Einsteinism' or 'Newtonianism'.

Woodrow said:
But, I can not understand how it can be said evolution supports atheism, when it does not explain how evlion can occur without having the formation of matter as a starting point.
Exactly.

Evolution does not support atheism. Atheists that claim it does (including Richard Dawkins) either argue that evolution negates the existence of a God that created us as human or they don't understand evolution.

Woodrow said:
The deeds themself have no more nor no less value. However, the existence of God(swt) gives permenace to the deeds and helps establish standards for the deeds to be of absolute value and indepenent of culture. In a non-go universe, the concept of good or bad deeds will tend to be based upon the thoughts and desires of society
What standards precisely does the existence of God establish? Why are standards less relevant in an atheistic universe?
 
Absolutely.

But that wasn't my argument. My argument was that it is impossible for someone like me, who disbelieves in 'souls' (on the grounds of no evidence) to consider any hypothetical needs of 'souls'.

It is the equivalent of me asking you to consider the need of your thetans. It makes no sense to you.

Sure. :)
 
Yet an atheist has to believe that matter came ito existence spontaneously. I have yet to see one bit of empiracal evidence that matter can come into being from nothing. You can not have evolution without matter, What was the evolutinary process that caused matter to be?


The evidence of abcence isnt abcence of evidence! Sure their is no evidence at present for how matter came into being. There is theorys. One day there may be or will be accepted theory or theorys tested to fact. There is work being done right now. This month CERN will start attempting to create dark matter in their atom smasher. Bingo , then we have created matter and only 5000 years after creating the wheel. Would that make us God?

On the flip side, there is not a shred of empirical evidence for God, and based on the only evidences we have,(scriptures that are provably full of holes), it's simply a case of choosing the ockhims razor
.


I have no doubt you are an altruistic caring person and that you do derive joy by doing good. But, the reality is that without the existence of a god, the deeds of the best man have no more value then the deeds of the most evil man. Both will leave the exact same size hole in a bucket of water, if they poke their finger into it and remove it.

Have to disagree again woody. Hitler and Bin laden are clearly evil. With or without their beleif in God they leave scars on humanity that last, perhaps forever. Me in my job may only benifit a few people. Thats a few drops less in the bucket.
Dieseases used to come from God as punishment for sin. One atheist, Curie devoted her life to doing good. She found penaccilin and tipped that particular bucket over. I needent repeat examples, you will understand my point. If however we rely on a supposed God or even on a supposed Gods rather bizzare and often cruel instructions, we are sitting in a bucket waiting for someone to empty it when we have perfectly good hands ourselves and 1400 years or 2000 or 4000 years pass by with nobody outside the bucket emptying a drop.
In somalia Beleivers and atheists alike gave millions in food aid to help the starving. Those who professed faith turned the money into bullets.
I propose we bear personal responsibility to mankind for our actions, not to a deity who by the very starvation of those people shows an absence.


Your intention may be to do good in this life, but it takes faith to believe you actually did. You will never know if the best thing you ever did, will not turn out to be detrimental to all you love sometime in the future. It is by faith you believe that your good deeds will result in lasting good.

I could have faith that God wanted me flog myself, fast or for my kids to not receive a blood transfusion to save their lives. This will not stop any detrimental effects happening. I also cant take responsibilitys for everything that happens in the world, simply do my share. Most of the time I can see the results of any Good i do, as a patient of mine recovers. Sometimes i cant. I fixed the old guys tyre on a dark night. He may have crashed three minuites later and died. Would i not fix his tyre in future? God isnt going to fix it for him.

Unless you have some quantifiable, qualifiable data to prove that is true, you are operating under the belief it is and that requires faith.

But I do understand what you mean. I can have trust in my own actions however without having a God. There are billions of theists around, all having faith that they are doing good. Circumsising babies and blowing Trainloads of shoppers to a supposed hell. I Quantify my data based on the results I see, which is i feel better than quantifying it to something unquantifyable



and peace to you also. We may not agree, but it is good to kow that disagreement does not need to result in anger or lack of respect for each others views.

Best wishes :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: glo
Greetings,
it seems the topmost reason for people disbelieving in our modern world is a lack of harmony and peace yet people dont realise they contribute greatly to that exact lack of harmony and peace by refusing to obey the laws of God !!

I don't think that reason would even feature on a list of Top 10 reasons to be an atheist.

Lack of evidence would surely be number one.

Peace
 
^ i agree lack of proof would be one of the greatest reasons. but surely the corruption is a close second?
 
Greetings,
^ i agree lack of proof would be one of the greatest reasons.

Whoa there! That's something different. I don't think anybody expects any proof on the matter to be forthcoming any time soon. Plus, of course, if we did have proof that god existed, faith would be meaningless and unnecessary. You wouldn't have to believe god existed, you would simply know it to be true, which is a very different thing.

What I mean is a sheer lack of evidence of any sort to suggest that the entire theistic religious edifice wasn't simply created by primitive humans as a way of explaining misfortune, adversity and disease on the basis of hopelessly limited knowledge, and as a moral regulator to prevent society from falling apart.

but surely the corruption is a close second?

It depends what you mean by corruption, but if you're referring to the problem of evil, then yes, that is a very prominent reason why many people do not believe in god.

Peace
 
it seems the topmost reason for people disbelieving in our modern world is a lack of harmony and peace yet people dont realise they contribute greatly to that exact lack of harmony and peace by refusing to obey the laws of God !!
To be honest I don't think the majority of people have really thought this through (in the general public).
People who follow the wrong religious rules or no religious rules do so in the main part because that's how things were when they got here, not really through a conscious refusal. How many people honestly weighed up all the options when making a decision about religion? How many people actually made a decision rather than being simply led into it by their family or friends from a young age?

I would also contend that a lack of peace and harmony tends to exist wherever people cannot or will not reconcile their differences, whether they are religious or otherwise. Why after thousands of years has the Word of God, a spiritual peaceful message, not brought love between every man and his brother?
Probably because the scriptures tend to divide people into groups of 'them' and 'us', creating differences and implications of inferiority.
 
Last edited:
IbnAbdulHakim said:
it seems the topmost reason for people disbelieving in our modern world is a lack of harmony and peace yet people dont realise they contribute greatly to that exact lack of harmony and peace by refusing to obey the laws of God !!
This makes no sense.

How is "refusing to obey the laws of God" a contribution to a lack of harmony and peace?
 
Last edited:
I think that the provability of falsehoods within scripture is very high on the list. How can people be expected to beleive something thats demonstrated to be, not just untrue, but the complete opposite, in a measurable way that anyone, if they chose to investigate, could see.

The other main reason to be atheist is the Gods of Monotheism are so horrific that it needs either a used car salesman or a Labour spin docter to sell them to an adult.
 
^ thats very untrue barney but it does reflect your experiences.

The message of God is received without ANY exhortation countless times, just looking at the lives of previous believers or even modern believers is a testimony to that. I mean who sold islam to cat stephens, or jermaine jackson or many many other reverts? they all accept through experience..
 
I think that the provability of falsehoods within scripture is very high on the list. How can people be expected to beleive something thats demonstrated to be, not just untrue, but the complete opposite, in a measurable way that anyone, if they chose to investigate, could see.

The other main reason to be atheist is the Gods of Monotheism are so horrific that it needs either a used car salesman or a Labour spin docter to sell them to an adult.[/QUOTE]

I would say, atheism needs a care salesman/labour spin doctor - if we talk statistically - of the makeup of the world - I mean that is more accurate than subjective feelings to make such a statement, right? Unless, you feel that you are politically correct, as you put yourself on an intellectual highhorse, making your opinions somewhat overshadow in ratios well over 1:1000000.
 
^ i agree lack of proof would be one of the greatest reasons. but surely the corruption is a close second?

In this world signs are most important than simply facts and figures. Anyone who had experience with investment would know what I'm taking about. We live for the future by looking at signs in the past and present.

“The keys of the Unseen are five: “Verily, Allah! With Him (Alone) is the knowledge of the Hour, He sends down the rain, and knows that which is in the wombs. No person knows what he will earn tomorrow, and no person knows in what land he will die. Verily Allah is All-Knower, All-Aware (of things)’ [31:34].” (Bukhari)
 
In this world signs are most important than simply facts and figures. Anyone who had experience with investment would know what I'm taking about. We live for the future by looking at signs in the past and present.
You might have to elaborate on that one, it's pretty much common sense that can be applied to almost any area of life. What sort of signs are we talking about and in what way do they relate to (dis)belief?
 
Sixten and all.

My veiws are not based on experience. I have no experience of God, as , i would argue, nobody else has.
My veiws are based on people who lived 1-4 thousand years ago's perceived experience of God which they decided to Jot down, decided by them to be unchangable by us, even though it has been multipley, to the doom of us all.
 
^ when i said experience i didnt mean experience of God. I meant your life experiences have lead you to think this way
 
You might have to elaborate on that one, it's pretty much common sense that can be applied to almost any area of life. What sort of signs are we talking about and in what way do they relate to (dis)belief?
Exactly, it is common sense, so my objection why demand factual proof of God. God can give non-arguable proof for every generation, but in that case, believing won't be a matter of choice. As in the Quran God said:
Yet if God had so willed, they would not have ascribed Divinity to aught besides him; hence, We have not made you their keeper, nor are you (of your own choice) a guardian over them. (6:107)

As for the signs there are many: quran, way of life (which some people argue as predisposition to belief), importance of investment (a rational person would strike a right balance between this life and next life rather than take extremes and risk losing one over the other)... but this is whole another topic.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top