Britain is in 'moral decline'

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahsan28
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 98
  • Views Views 13K
So pre-60s europe was more moral eh? I guess World Wars, racism, not having equal rights for all makes a place happy and joyful.

No it wasnt good either. But for me things like abortion on demand, homosexual marriages, euthanasia etc are evil. Its a Babilon for me, Sodoma and Gomora. Of course you have right to disagree, but i will stay with my views.
 
The whole moral decilne in Europe began in late 60's. It is so called counter revolution, against traditional values, family values, religion, church etc. You know hippies, LSD, sex drugs and rock and roll, sexual revolution. All those things are like cancer for Europe and they will destroy this continent, unless the europeans change their attitudes.

As Isambard says, "Meh.." It's a myth as even a cursory study of, say, the practical (as opposed to theoretical) morality of 18th and 19th century Europe will show you. I doubt the centuries before were much different, either, although I know less about them. The 'traditional values' in question had far more to do with ostracising those outside the 'norm' who did no harm, and sweeping 'immoral' behaviour under the carpet, than an ocean of moral sweetness and light. Instead of "abortion on demand" for example you had shotgun weddings and back-street abortionists.
 
Last edited:
No it wasnt good either. But for me things like abortion on demand, homosexual marriages, euthanasia etc are evil. Its a Babilon for me, Sodoma and Gomora. Of course you have right to disagree, but i will stay with my views.

Please name me a "moral" decade
 
Greetings and peace be with you Isambard;

Please name me a "moral" decade

3010, That gives us a thousand years to practice getting it right.:D

Take care

Eric
 
:sl:

Some interesting points raise- perhaps the problem is that the word moral is too general..

While it is true that "slavery, feudalism, monopolistic and cold techocratic capitalism, religious wars, lack of sanitation, rampant disease, rebellions and revolts, threat of invasion, kings and nobles kicking you in the pills for fun, lack of rights for all, poor literacy, poor nutrishion for the masses, racism galore." has improved for the better in some parts of the word, sexual morality appears to have gone down, as does manners of dressing and the like.
 
:sl:

Some interesting points raise- perhaps the problem is that the word moral is too general..

While it is true that "slavery, feudalism, monopolistic and cold techocratic capitalism, religious wars, lack of sanitation, rampant disease, rebellions and revolts, threat of invasion, kings and nobles kicking you in the pills for fun, lack of rights for all, poor literacy, poor nutrishion for the masses, racism galore." has improved for the better in some parts of the word, sexual morality appears to have gone down, as does manners of dressing and the like.

Id say its a pretty far claim to equate 'imodest dressing' with any of the above.
 
IbnAbdulHakim said:
and i assume you take that in and understand that civilisation has indeed been going through a constant decline of morals and values and it is not just speculation !
Can you point to a better period of time in the United Kingdom?

Aaron85 said:
The whole moral decilne in Europe began in late 60's. It is so called counter revolution, against traditional values, family values, religion, church etc. You know hippies, LSD, sex drugs and rock and roll, sexual revolution. All those things are like cancer for Europe and they will destroy this continent, unless the europeans change their attitudes.
I would contest that there is anything inherently wrong with 'rock and roll' there.

And depending on what you mean by 'sexual liberation', that is not inherently wrong either.

Aaron85 said:
Did i say that i want theocracy? I just say that this moral relativism, atheism and decadence will destroy Europe.
Moral Relativism will perhaps cause disputes.

How will Atheism destroy anything?

Aaron85 said:
No it wasnt good either. But for me things like abortion on demand, homosexual marriages, euthanasia etc are evil.
Abortion is a tricky issue.

The other two are entirely consensual (or euthanasia ought to be) and there is nothing wrong with them.
 
Id say its a pretty far claim to equate 'imodest dressing' with any of the above.

Probably, but that is because a lot of the things you mentioned aren't moral issues. For example lack of sanitation is not a moral issue, not is the spread of disease.
 
Can you point to a better period of time in the United Kingdom?

if i had a trophy which i could award to the one who succeeds in the most repetition in a forum, sir you would win ! please dont oblige me
 
Many morals are not universal, they are mostly cultural.

It is no more valid to say a Westerner is immoral because he likes music that it is to say an Easterner is immoral for having more that one wife.
 
Probably, but that is because a lot of the things you mentioned aren't moral issues. For example lack of sanitation is not a moral issue, not is the spread of disease.

It would be if I pooped in your drinking water and said "Screw you!" which is essentially what used to happen between surfs and nobles and later with the textile mills and other industrial waste.
 
Greetings,
Whilst I am not disagreeing with your perception of the Daily Mail, I have to say in fairness that the poll was conducted by BBC One.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2007/09_september/07/questions.shtml

Ahem, good point! :embarrass

Skavau said:
I would contest that there is anything inherently wrong with 'rock and roll' there.

Didn't you know that rock groups recruit teenagers for Satan through subliminal messages and backmasking? :rolleyes:

Peace
 
if i had a trophy which i could award to the one who succeeds in the most repetition in a forum, sir you would win ! please dont oblige me

I think that's the first time I've asked that question on this forum.

I have though, not actually received an answer to it before.
 
I think that's the first time I've asked that question on this forum.

really lol? im embarassed now :embarrass


well i did answer it before :), i said forget UK as it was never truelly ruled by islam, but look at the caliphate of Umar ibn Al-Khattab, who ruled with 100% pure islamic teachings, and see how his times reigned justice across 3 quarters of the world :)


again i apologise if i offended you previously
 
It would be if I pooped in your drinking water and said "Screw you!" which is essentially what used to happen between surfs and nobles and later with the textile mills and other industrial waste.

Indeed that was the way of those without Religion and those following misguidance. Let's not forget who bought public sanitization to Europe, The Moors (African Muslims), and also introduced it to the Christians in Spain who slaughtered them during the crusades. They developed the use of public sanitation in the 9th and 10th centuries 700 years before Christian Europe realized it was important to take a bath.
 
Archbishop: Parents as bad as gangs in pressurising children


Martin Hodgson
Saturday September 15, 2007
The Guardian


Middle class children made by their parents to rack up academic and sporting achievements are under pressure similar to young people caught up in gang culture, the Archbishop of Canterbury has said.

Children were not given the opportunity to grow up at their own pace, said Dr Williams. "What is lacking in children's lives is space. They are pressed into a testing culture, or even into a gang culture; they are bullied and manipulated until they fit in, they never have any time to develop in their own space," he told the Daily Telegraph.

Describing Britain as a "broken" and polarised society, Dr Williams said "There is a level of desolation and dysfunctionality which many people have very little concept of. If you sense that the world you live in is absolutely closed, that for all sorts of reasons you are unable to move outside, if nothing gives you aspirations, there is an imprisonment in that, there is a kind of resentment that comes with that - and a frustration that can boil over in violence and street crime."



http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,,2169879,00.html
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top