Rohingya are stateless people since 1982 after Burmese (Myanmar) govt refused to give citizenship to Rohingya because classified them as Bangladeshi. But Bangladesh govt does not accept Rohingya as their people because they left the land that now known as Bangladesh long time ago, before the establishment of Bangladesh as a country.
So the displaced peoples who have no home to call their own, in land that Allah created without boundaries, which got carved up by imperial standards - now justifies why Bangladeshi officials in govt. refuse to let them in?
Also, refuse aid from international aid organisations that have promised to help the Bangladeshi govt. to help care for these lost people if they let them in?
I know Bangladesh is poverty stricken. Most of the world is. but you cannot deny that the elites of those countries have wealth ... a lot of it, and thos ea re the same decision makers who have refused to grant solace to the Rohinghya.
As for Bangladeshi people, I love them to bits... but you know me? I would speak out against anyone if they are doing something wrong... including my own family.
I understand the point you raise bro Ardianto, and to some extent I understand your intention too. But the reality is that they are not helping, and are now even refusing to give water to those who are stuck on the boats if the media come onto the scene...
...So basically what the Bangladeshi govt. is doing is stopping the Rohinghya from getting much needed media attention because the Bagladeshi govt. fears it will look bad.
How does this help? You tell me
If Bangladesh let them in, at least the Rohinghya can die on their own terms, and not those of the Burmese... at least they can live without fear of oppression, at least they can have hope...
Scimi