Can Sufi Islam counter the Taleban?

[alcurad]

I agree with bother doorster-mostly- Al munajjid is one of the worst references one can make. he rarely if ever discusses other credible views, no, it's always what he says that's made to be THE words of Allah and his messenger.
just because it's easy to copy & paste doesn't make it correct,,

 

[north_malaysian]

These "sufis" look scary :skeleton::uuh:. they can pass for budhhists or hindus or something else, not Muslims.
They need Islam. Ya Allah guide them and us. Ameen

Thanks to God, that these "Sufis" are not the tombkeepers of our beloved prophet Muhammad...

Imagine people dancing in Masjidil Nabawi in Medina :uuh: Nauzubillah min zalik

 

[Caller الداعي]

inna lillah has islam been degraded to such a level!!! how can the moderators of this forum allow such threads!

 

[Ummu Sufyaan]

@ OPost
Weird...the only thing I seem to be seeing in that article is like an insult to jihad… I don’t understand this whole “sitting on your back side” whilst your enemy drives out your people and tries to destroy your religion …and turning around and saying that the only way to defeat the enemy is with things like this

hypnotic rhythms, the air thick with the smoke of incense, laced with dope.

with young men, smoking, swaying to the music, and working themselves into a state of ecstasy.

Devotional singing

Etc etc etc

*walks off bewildered*

EDIT: @ akhee dawud_uk could please post up the ibn taymiyyah book you are referring to here

i think many salafis forget that ibn taymiyyah actually wrote a book in defence of sufism, where as the sufis that do know this fate forget it was against the other sufis of his day who did many of the innovations we see today.

 

[north_malaysian]

@ O Post
Weird...the only thing I seem to be seeing in that article is more or less an insult to jihad… I don’t understand this whole “sitting on your back side” whilst your enemy drives out your people and tries to destroy your religion …and turning around and saying that the only way to defeat the enemy is with things like this





Etc etc etc

*walks off bewildered*

I think the only people who would respond to this kind of "Sufis" are hippies (if we still have them here)

 

[Pomak]

you mean war against Soviets was a love affair?

The war with the RUSSIANS was ended in 89, the Us invaded in 01.

Between those two there was no occupation, unless you count the Taliban as a Pakistani proxy.

 

[doorster]

The war with the RUSSIANS was ended in 89, the Us invaded in 01.

Between those two there was no occupation, unless you count the Taliban as a Pakistani proxy.

so according shiite maths, 1989 to 2001 makes 30 years thanx very much

Originally Posted by Pomak
Open a book or talk to an Afghan, there hasn't been peace in that country for the last 30 years. So it has little to do with the war.

 

[Pomak]

I am going to try once more, then your going to see my bad side.

RUS in Afghanistan- December 27, 1979 – February 15, 1989

Afghan civil war - 89 till 01

US occupation 01- today.

2009-1979= can you guess how much? oh yes thats right, 30.

As i said foreign occupation has nothing to do with the mess that the Afghans find themselves in.

PS. i am not a shia, my brother in humanity.

 

[doorster]

then your going to see my bad side

now do I have to go in to hiding (in-case a death sentence is pronounced)?

 

[Pomak]

now do I have to go in to hiding (in-case a death sentence is pronounced)?

Not man enough to even admit when your wrong, or to stop insulting people...

*yawn*

 

[alcurad]

RUS in Afghanistan- December 27, 1979 – February 15, 1989

Afghan civil war - 89 till 01

US occupation 01- today.

As i said foreign occupation has nothing to do with the mess that the Afghans find themselves in.

don't the calculation proves the opposite of what you say?
most of those 30 years were spent under foreign occupation, subsequent civil war occurred because of the occupation as well,,

 

[AntiKarateKid]

ON TOPIC:

Am I the only one who finds the topic question strange?

We should use a deviant sect of Islam to counter an extremist sect?


As I remember, evil does not counter evil.

 

[alcurad]

^it used to be standard colonial practice, corrupt the spirit of jihad against the occupation by introducing such elements, but as I said a few posts ago, it doesn't work anymore, we are not that unlearned anymore,,