christian wants to know why muslims can't have sex outside marriage

  • Thread starter Thread starter noahs_arc
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 44
  • Views Views 8K
NYCmuslim, thank you for your great commentary. I hope guyabano will read it and understand what YOU are trying to say to him, and what I also am trying to say to him!
 
Don't try to get out of your story now. I pinpoint out what kind of person you are. And stop playing the good boy-bad boy story.

I made my point, now take it or leave it. I will not repeat now 50x what I said.

I'm out of this thread.
 
guyabano said:
Don't try to get out of your story now. I pinpoint out what kind of person you are. And stop playing the good boy-bad boy story.

I made my point, now take it or leave it. I will not repeat now 50x what I said.

I'm out of this thread.
Click to expand...

look brother, I am in the story, and I will stay in the story. What kind of person I am , or what kind of person you are ... Allah will judge us.
I just want to remind you again to not put youre words on my commentary, don't say that I HAVE SAID SOMETHING which i DIDN'T!!
 
islamic said:
guyabano, you should controle your emotions. why you get so angry? Truth hurts or ..? easy man, easy, take it easy, not all at once!
You say divorce is shamefull, and having sex outside marriage (thing that you support) is not shamefull? With other words, to divorce someone is shamefull , and to have sex outside marriage is OK and there is nothing to shame about that? Look brother ... it's a first time in my life to read this kind of Nonsense!
You Massacred my comentary :) you took words from here, words from there ... you gived TEXT without CONTEXT and with that you have tried to ... support HAVING SEX outside marriage.
Anyway, I will not do that with youre commentary, but I must touch some interesting things you said, that are funny for me.
In my question: "how is called in your language a woman that had sex outside marriage with MANY man?",
YOU guyabano answered: "That is called 'She had a lot of fun and pleasure.' She doesn't take money for that, so she's certainly not a prostitute. But of course, if she has sex with other men but being married, then it is bad. I agree on this point."
:sunny: Did I asked you about the pleasure and fun the woman HAD having sex outside marriage with MANY man/woman? did I asked you that? NO, I didn't ask that, I wanted to know HOW do you call A WOMAN that had sex outside marriage with many man. That was what I wanted to know, HOW DO YOU CALL THE WOMAN, I didn't want to know does that woman had pleasure and fun. But, ANYWAY, thank you for answering me that. :) maybe you call that kind of woman "PROSTITUTE for FREE", and for me that is WORSE because, she GIVE SEX and man don't have to pay for that!!!!! she give her body, her chastity FOR FREE! ugly!
And, if I got your point guyabano, for you is OKAY if a woman have sex with MANY MAN before she got married, AM I RIGHT? before marriage, she can have sex , and sex, and sex, and sex and sex and sex and sex ... FOR FREE, but when she got married :) if she do that, it's wrong!!! well, HOW SHE WILL STOP doing her services for free? will she exchange that FUN AND PLEASURE? I don't think so!



WHERE DID I SAID THIS? don't put youre words in my mouth! PLEASE!
Click to expand...


Look Islamic, it is obvious that English isn't your native tongue. I supported your previous comments, but in attacking guyabano in this post you are trying to force him to say something in the same way he did that to you. Both are wrong.

It seems you want guyabano to say that a woman who has sex with many different men is a prostitute. But that IS NOT the definitiion of prostitute in the English language. The definition of a prostitute is someone who has sex for money. Doing so just one time would be prostitution. Having sex many times with many men is not prostitution unless done for money. If it is done because someone simply enjoyes it, that is in the vernacular called being "loose" or a "****", not a prostitute. But those words carry connotations that such activity is wrong, which I am not sure you will find guyanbano agreeing with. So, there is not word that guyanbano could give you for what you are asking. Though you and I may think it is wrong, he may think of it as normal behavior.
 
Christians and westerners (or their values) are not synonymous.

Loose women and promiscuous men are not a Western monopoly (Easterners may do in secret what westerns do in open)

in most cases cohabiting is in form of common law marriage, from what I have seen, it is practised so that in case of break-up neither of the partners go bankrupt at hands of lawyers and inept judges
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top