Please explain how trump is deep state. I live in the US and I have never seen a press , fbi, or CIA as openly hostile towards a president as I have seen them be towards trump. If he was as deep state as you say he would have total support. Even the worthless neocon Republican Congress members hate him.
CIA Agent Whistleblower Risks All To Expose The Shadow Government
- Thread starter سيف الله
- Start date
- Replies 38
- Views 7K
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Halal Food Gastronomy | PHP 8.4 patch for vBulletin 4.2.5
beleiver
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 224
- Reaction score
- 5
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Jedi
Trump is a Jesuit educated billionaire whose persona was created by corporate media, he ran with Pence who is as deep state as republicans go, he assembled the most hardcore neocon government in history and has more representation at Builderberg in history, his whole team is riddled with CFR, Builderbergs, Trillateralists, billionaires and corporate bigwigs..
Look at how wall st and the global casino markets reacted, look at the reaction of the CIA when he adressed them, they gave him a standing ovation..
All the bad press is a smoke screen to make him look good, the deep state knew confidence in the system is crumbling so they get their man to look the genuine outsider that opposes the corrupt system.
Trump is a part of the corrupt system.
Look at how wall st and the global casino markets reacted, look at the reaction of the CIA when he adressed them, they gave him a standing ovation..
All the bad press is a smoke screen to make him look good, the deep state knew confidence in the system is crumbling so they get their man to look the genuine outsider that opposes the corrupt system.
Trump is a part of the corrupt system.
Mahir Adnan
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
stupid Americans have realized it just now!!! my people knew it clearly that, jews are controlling America.
-
man, it's the hardest thread ever. I need to open a dictionary to understand all of the posts.
-
man, it's the hardest thread ever. I need to open a dictionary to understand all of the posts.
What is happening right now in Syria is a good example of the Deep State operating.
I would estimate that 90% of Americans want the US forces out of the Middle-East, want nothing to do with the Syrian conflict, etc. Nevertheless, a shadowy group of oligarchs, banking interests, and globalists are dictating American foreign policy, as they have been for decades.
I would estimate that 90% of Americans want the US forces out of the Middle-East, want nothing to do with the Syrian conflict, etc. Nevertheless, a shadowy group of oligarchs, banking interests, and globalists are dictating American foreign policy, as they have been for decades.
beleiver
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 224
- Reaction score
- 5
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Jedi
LOL Infowars is an inside job, so is alex jones, he is from cia stock, straffor the leading private intelligence firm set up shop in Austin texas same year as Alex Jones, the editor at infowars worked for stratfor , stratfor attend builderberg.
They infiltrated the internet revolutionary truth movent that they knew was comming by becoming the biggest voice in that movement, before it went live..
Back in the day they were exposing some real truth about the cia like many others were online, had me foolled for a few years..
Salaam
Even advocates of the Deep State think they might be going too far.
The 'deep state' is real. But are its leaks against Trump justified?
America doesn’t have coups or tanks in the street. But a deep state of sorts exists here and it includes national security bureaucrats who use secretly collected information to shape or curb the actions of elected officials.
Some see these American bureaucrats as a vital check on the law-breaking or authoritarian or otherwise illegitimate tendencies of democratically elected officials. Others decry them as a self-serving authoritarian cabal that illegally and illegitimately undermines democratically elected officials and the policies they were elected to implement.
The truth is that the deep state, which is a real phenomenon, has long been both a threat to democratic politics and a savior of it. The problem is that it is hard to maintain its savior role without also accepting its threatening role. The two go hand in hand, and are difficult to untangle.
The deep state has been blamed for many things since Donald Trump became president, including by the president himself. Trump defenders have used the term promiscuously to include not just intelligence bureaucrats but a broader array of connected players in other administrative bureaucracies, in private industry, and in the media.
But even if we focus narrowly on the intelligence bureaucracies that conduct and use information collected secretly in the homeland, including the FBI, National Security Agency (NSA), and National Security Council, there is significant evidence that the deep state has used secretly collected information opportunistically and illegally to sabotage the president and his senior officials – either as part of a concerted movement or via individuals acting more or less independently.
As deep state officials get a taste for the power that inheres in the selective revelation of such information, and if the leaks are not responded to with severe punishments, it is easy to imagine the tools that brought down Flynn being used in other contexts by national security bureaucrats with different commitments and interests.
Even the most severe critics of Trump should worry about this subtle form of anti-democratic abuse. The big loser in all this will probably be the national security bureaucracy itself and, to the extent it is weakened, the security of the American people.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/22/leaks-trump-deep-state-fbi-cia-michael-flynn
Even advocates of the Deep State think they might be going too far.
The 'deep state' is real. But are its leaks against Trump justified?
America doesn’t have coups or tanks in the street. But a deep state of sorts exists here and it includes national security bureaucrats who use secretly collected information to shape or curb the actions of elected officials.
Some see these American bureaucrats as a vital check on the law-breaking or authoritarian or otherwise illegitimate tendencies of democratically elected officials. Others decry them as a self-serving authoritarian cabal that illegally and illegitimately undermines democratically elected officials and the policies they were elected to implement.
The truth is that the deep state, which is a real phenomenon, has long been both a threat to democratic politics and a savior of it. The problem is that it is hard to maintain its savior role without also accepting its threatening role. The two go hand in hand, and are difficult to untangle.
The deep state has been blamed for many things since Donald Trump became president, including by the president himself. Trump defenders have used the term promiscuously to include not just intelligence bureaucrats but a broader array of connected players in other administrative bureaucracies, in private industry, and in the media.
But even if we focus narrowly on the intelligence bureaucracies that conduct and use information collected secretly in the homeland, including the FBI, National Security Agency (NSA), and National Security Council, there is significant evidence that the deep state has used secretly collected information opportunistically and illegally to sabotage the president and his senior officials – either as part of a concerted movement or via individuals acting more or less independently.
As deep state officials get a taste for the power that inheres in the selective revelation of such information, and if the leaks are not responded to with severe punishments, it is easy to imagine the tools that brought down Flynn being used in other contexts by national security bureaucrats with different commitments and interests.
Even the most severe critics of Trump should worry about this subtle form of anti-democratic abuse. The big loser in all this will probably be the national security bureaucracy itself and, to the extent it is weakened, the security of the American people.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/22/leaks-trump-deep-state-fbi-cia-michael-flynn
Salaam
Rumored for sometime but its pretty much confirmed now, Wikipedia is compromised.
Rumored for sometime but its pretty much confirmed now, Wikipedia is compromised.
Salaam
More in depth analysis on the deep state.
Blurb
You've heard the terms "Deep State" and "Shadow Government". This series will go into detail on what these entities are and how they function.
Blurb
You've heard the terms "Deep State" and "Shadow Government". This series will go into detail on what these entities are and how they function.
Blurb
This episode covers the 17 primary intelligence agencies and the top 10 defense contractor corporations.
More in depth analysis on the deep state.
Blurb
You've heard the terms "Deep State" and "Shadow Government". This series will go into detail on what these entities are and how they function.
Blurb
You've heard the terms "Deep State" and "Shadow Government". This series will go into detail on what these entities are and how they function.
Blurb
This episode covers the 17 primary intelligence agencies and the top 10 defense contractor corporations.
Abz2000
Abz Iz Back!!!
- Messages
- 5,358
- Reaction score
- 589
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
The fact that the karpen's pile device is kept out of sight with the false excuse that "nobody has the money to provide security to display it" (sounds more like a veiled threat) is evidence enough of a banking conspiracy to keep the people of the world in debt - with every governent in the world under thumb. And karpen's pile is simply a very basic device in comparson to others.
When they went after stan meyers and began discussing weaponizeability (like in iron man and the botanist - this time with magnets flying out of control simply due to a glitch where rpms aren't regulated) and tanks and national security and gag orders - whilst at the same time doing everything they could to discredit him via puppet scientists and shady investment partners bent on sabotage - those who have minds able to think realised that the matrix of slavery to the corrupt is international and has existed for quite a long time.
Genepax is still in investment limbo too......
When they went after stan meyers and began discussing weaponizeability (like in iron man and the botanist - this time with magnets flying out of control simply due to a glitch where rpms aren't regulated) and tanks and national security and gag orders - whilst at the same time doing everything they could to discredit him via puppet scientists and shady investment partners bent on sabotage - those who have minds able to think realised that the matrix of slavery to the corrupt is international and has existed for quite a long time.
Genepax is still in investment limbo too......
Last edited:
Salaam
This is related, the rise of corporations vis a vis the state.
Blurb
Who is more POWERFUL, CORPORATIONS OR STATES? Its undisputed that states and corporations are interdependent. Corporations rely on the state for the provision of security and the enforcement of property rights in order to be able to engage in business transactions. At the same time, states also depend on corporations for the employment of their citizens and as a basis for taxation. But the role of corporations in international politics is often overlooked. Just think about the private and public power of global giants like Google or Apple.
When Donald Trump met Apple’s chief executive Tim Cook in April 2018 to discuss how a trade sanctions with China would affect Apple’s interests, it demonstrated that the leading multinationals are political actors, not bystanders. It starts to become apparent that international relations are anything but a one-sided story of either state or corporate power. Globalisation has changed the rules of the game, empowering corporations but bringing back state power through new transnational state-corporate relations. International relations has become a giant three-dimensional chess game with states and corporations as intertwined actors.
States using corporations to achieve geopolitical goals in an increasingly hostile environment, and powerful corporations perhaps using more aggressive strategies to extract profits in response. If this is where we’re heading, it could have a lasting impact on the world order.
This is related, the rise of corporations vis a vis the state.
Blurb
Who is more POWERFUL, CORPORATIONS OR STATES? Its undisputed that states and corporations are interdependent. Corporations rely on the state for the provision of security and the enforcement of property rights in order to be able to engage in business transactions. At the same time, states also depend on corporations for the employment of their citizens and as a basis for taxation. But the role of corporations in international politics is often overlooked. Just think about the private and public power of global giants like Google or Apple.
When Donald Trump met Apple’s chief executive Tim Cook in April 2018 to discuss how a trade sanctions with China would affect Apple’s interests, it demonstrated that the leading multinationals are political actors, not bystanders. It starts to become apparent that international relations are anything but a one-sided story of either state or corporate power. Globalisation has changed the rules of the game, empowering corporations but bringing back state power through new transnational state-corporate relations. International relations has become a giant three-dimensional chess game with states and corporations as intertwined actors.
States using corporations to achieve geopolitical goals in an increasingly hostile environment, and powerful corporations perhaps using more aggressive strategies to extract profits in response. If this is where we’re heading, it could have a lasting impact on the world order.
Salaam
Another update
Blurb
The Rise of Digital Dictatorships Many people thought that the internet and the rise of social media would quickly usher in a wave of political reforms in countries that are ruled by dictators and authoritarianism. But Governments in authoritarian regimes have been remarkably successful at adapting to the perceived dangers posed to their political authority by the Internet. I’m Kasim, this is KJ Vids and in this video, we will look at how the internet has actually strengthened dictatorships.
Another update
Blurb
The Rise of Digital Dictatorships Many people thought that the internet and the rise of social media would quickly usher in a wave of political reforms in countries that are ruled by dictators and authoritarianism. But Governments in authoritarian regimes have been remarkably successful at adapting to the perceived dangers posed to their political authority by the Internet. I’m Kasim, this is KJ Vids and in this video, we will look at how the internet has actually strengthened dictatorships.
Salaam
Seems Google Execs are displeased with Trumps success.
LEAKED VIDEO: Google Leadership’s Dismayed Reaction to Trump Election
A video recorded by Google shortly after the 2016 presidential election reveals an atmosphere of panic and dismay amongst the tech giant’s leadership, coupled with a determination to thwart both the Trump agenda and the broader populist movement emerging around the globe.
The video is a full recording of Google’s first all-hands meeting following the 2016 election (these weekly meetings are known inside the company as “TGIF” or “Thank God It’s Friday” meetings). Sent to Breitbart News by an anonymous source, it features co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, VPs Kent Walker and Eileen Naughton, CFO Ruth Porat, and CEO Sundar Pichai. It can be watched in full above. It can and should be watched in full above in order to get the full context of the meeting and the statements made.
It was reported earlier this week that Google tried to boost turnout among the Latino population to help Hillary Clinton, only to be dismayed as the usually solid Democratic voting bloc switched to the GOP in record numbers. This video shows a similar level of dismay among Google’s most high-profile figures.
These individuals, who preside over a company with unrivaled influence over the flow of information, can be seen disparaging the motivations of Trump voters and plotting ways to use their vast resources to thwart the Trump agenda.
Co-founder Sergey Brin can be heard comparing Trump supporters to fascists and extremists. Brin argues that like other extremists, Trump voters were motivated by “boredom,” which he says in the past led to fascism and communism.
The Google co-founder then asks his company to consider what it can do to ensure a “better quality of governance and decision-making.”
VP for Global Affairs Kent Walker argues that supporters of populist causes like the Trump campaign are motivated by “fear, xenophobia, hatred, and a desire for answers that may or may not be there.”
Later, Walker says that Google should fight to ensure the populist movement – not just in the U.S. but around the world – is merely a “blip” and a “hiccup” in a historical arc that “bends toward progress.”
CEO Sundar Pichai states that the company will develop machine learning and A.I. to combat what an employee described as “misinformation” shared by “low-information voters.”
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/12/leaked-video-google-leaderships-dismayed-reaction-to-trump-election/
Seems Google Execs are displeased with Trumps success.
LEAKED VIDEO: Google Leadership’s Dismayed Reaction to Trump Election
A video recorded by Google shortly after the 2016 presidential election reveals an atmosphere of panic and dismay amongst the tech giant’s leadership, coupled with a determination to thwart both the Trump agenda and the broader populist movement emerging around the globe.
The video is a full recording of Google’s first all-hands meeting following the 2016 election (these weekly meetings are known inside the company as “TGIF” or “Thank God It’s Friday” meetings). Sent to Breitbart News by an anonymous source, it features co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, VPs Kent Walker and Eileen Naughton, CFO Ruth Porat, and CEO Sundar Pichai. It can be watched in full above. It can and should be watched in full above in order to get the full context of the meeting and the statements made.
It was reported earlier this week that Google tried to boost turnout among the Latino population to help Hillary Clinton, only to be dismayed as the usually solid Democratic voting bloc switched to the GOP in record numbers. This video shows a similar level of dismay among Google’s most high-profile figures.
These individuals, who preside over a company with unrivaled influence over the flow of information, can be seen disparaging the motivations of Trump voters and plotting ways to use their vast resources to thwart the Trump agenda.
Co-founder Sergey Brin can be heard comparing Trump supporters to fascists and extremists. Brin argues that like other extremists, Trump voters were motivated by “boredom,” which he says in the past led to fascism and communism.
The Google co-founder then asks his company to consider what it can do to ensure a “better quality of governance and decision-making.”
VP for Global Affairs Kent Walker argues that supporters of populist causes like the Trump campaign are motivated by “fear, xenophobia, hatred, and a desire for answers that may or may not be there.”
Later, Walker says that Google should fight to ensure the populist movement – not just in the U.S. but around the world – is merely a “blip” and a “hiccup” in a historical arc that “bends toward progress.”
CEO Sundar Pichai states that the company will develop machine learning and A.I. to combat what an employee described as “misinformation” shared by “low-information voters.”
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/12/leaked-video-google-leaderships-dismayed-reaction-to-trump-election/
Salaam
Another update
Blurb
This 30 minute video is a good primer to share with friends and family who think YOU are a crazy "conspiracy theorist". The information in this video is detailed and methodical. It explains what the "deep state" is and how it operates - including real examples from known US politicians who are part of the Deep State. Share this video with your friends and family.
Another update
Blurb
This 30 minute video is a good primer to share with friends and family who think YOU are a crazy "conspiracy theorist". The information in this video is detailed and methodical. It explains what the "deep state" is and how it operates - including real examples from known US politicians who are part of the Deep State. Share this video with your friends and family.