Creation from Clay

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arwa
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 63
  • Views Views 20K
Re: One Hundred Christian Proofs Of Islamic Falsehood

Steve,

Many things that happened in the past are not found in one source but in several. The pharaohs of Egypt are mentioned in Egyptians annals and inscriptions and in the Bible. The Hittites are mentioned by their own inscriptions and in Egyptian annals.

Don't make me believe that God wouldn't have been powerful enough to preserve the memories of Adam, Noah and Abraham in more than one source, if they had existed. Were the pagans gods more important to Him that we find their traces all over the world ?

By the way, if you believe Adam existed, tell me when he lived.
 
Re: One Hundred Christian Proofs Of Islamic Falsehood

Ah nice question. I can't answer it cus i wasn't born at the time. However, i can counter the question to you: You had a great grandfather who's great grandfather had a great grandfather but you don't know when he lived. One can make an estimate of the time of that. one can also make an estiamte of the time of Adam. My estimation is a several thousand years ago. however, i cannot pin pointy it because i dont know how long man has been on earth as the method of calculating years have changed (e.g. B.C and A.C). Thus, i cannot answer your question because i don't really know what year he was born.

God is all powerful but He doesn't perform Human actions for He is God - not a human. He works differently and so His method of preserving the memories of Adam etc are different to what an average human's.

There is also another reason why Adam isn't remebered by a material item. This is because people would start to worship the idol/item and forget about the true person Adam was. it is called idol worshipping. this is also one of the reasons there are no pictures of Allah and why we as muslims are forbidden to idol worship.
 
Re: One Hundred Christian Proofs Of Islamic Falsehood

mansio said:
Everywhere archaeologists dig they find remnants of pagan gods.

They have never found a trace of Adam, Noah and Abraham.
mansio

If something is not found that does not constitutes it never existed. Beside that, a corpse in a decade is usually reduced to skull and few bones. So how would you think your so-called archaeologists would conclude that these bones belongs to or are of, Adam, Noah Abraham? I wasn't aware that your so-called archaeologists are that advance who can identify thousands years old bones and can tell with precision accuracy that it was/is "John Doe" who lived 6000 years ago?

Your statement is also very generalized and biased, because remnanats of pagan gods are not the only things that have been found, however, other things are not an issue here. Nevertheless, Adam (as) built the Ka'ba, but again you don't believe in that. Ka'ba is still standing, also, we have some information in traditions about things your archaeologists and you don't know. Needless to mention that some of your Biblical Prophets have come to Ka'ba and performed Hajj, I wonder why? Here is one proof out of many from your Bible, which is pretty detailed and comprehensive..

Prophet Ezekiel’s account of Performing Hajj
 
Last edited:
Re: One Hundred Christian Proofs Of Islamic Falsehood

:sl:
mansio said:
Man molded from clay by a god is an age-old pagan myth.
The fact that some idea/theology is old does not make it any less valid. That's a logical fallacy. Remember, islam claims to be the original teachings since the beginning of time. Wouldn't it seem reasonable that the early Prophets of Islam spoke of creation from clay?

Secondly, you called the notion a 'pagan myth', both of which are unsubstatiated claims. Can you show me conclusive evidence that the theory of creation from clay has pagan origins? Can you show me how it is a myth?

I already discussed the creation from clay, with forum member root (atheist), and I've added that to the beginning of this discussion. Perhaps you should scroll back and read wrote.

:w:
 
Last edited:
Re: Creation from clay

Sometimes I wonder if I am not discussing with children.
The idea of man molded from clay doesn't need to come from God. God is so much smarter than that. Anybody can watch a potter molding a statue. By analogy, in the pagan cultures, that fact gave the idea of a god creating a human being that way.
Man created from clay is a pagan myth borrowed by the Bible and then by the Quran.
It's as simple as that.

Most Christians know it's a pagan myth but they take it in a figurative meaning, symbolically. So they are not in the least embarrassed in their faith by the discoveries of science.
Some on this forum believe Adam actually existed, not by their own discoveries, but because they are told so by the Quran. So that obliges them to distort reality to make it match with the Quran.

As man emerged about two millions years ago when did Adam live ? If you want to narrow the question down to Homo Sapiens, who emerged between half a million and a quarter million years, do it.
 
Re: Creation from clay

Some on this forum believe Adam actually existed, not by their own discoveries, but because they are told so by the Quran. So that obliges them to distort reality to make it match with the Quran.

I noticed too how quickly the thread was detroyed when we got to specifics regarding Adam.

Some on this forum believe Adam actually existed, not by their own discoveries, but because they are told so by the Quran. So that obliges them to distort reality to make it match with the Quran.

I agree with this too, and it is called "primatephobia".
 
Re: Creation from clay

mansio said:
Man created from clay is a pagan myth borrowed by the Bible and then by the Quran.
It's as simple as that.

LOL, you do realise that the BIBLE and the QURAN both came from God. Thus, the QURAN didn'tt copy the BIBLE as the information is the same - not copied.

If you listen to an answer, you will have no question.
The deal with Adam is that he was the first human on this planet. We can estimate that he was on this earth several thousand years ago. Thus, there can be no "argument" about his existence.
The argument was "destroyed" before it began. You guys are on an Islamic forum and are tryin to disprove the existence of one of the most important figures in Islam. Anytime we try to explain something to you, you ask us more questions. You are never satisfied with any answer and you never will be. Perhaps there is something missing in you soul? Ah I know what it is: faith.
 
Last edited:
Re: Creation from clay

The deal with Adam is that he was the first human on this planet. We can estimate that he was on this earth several thousand years ago. Thus, there can be no "argument" about his existence.

How can you estimate that. Several thousand is not the same as 500,000......

The argument was "destroyed" before it began. You guys are on an Islamic forum and are tryin to disprove the existence of one of the most important figures in Islam. Anytime we try to explain something to you, you ask us more questions. You are never satisfied with any answer and you never will be. Perhaps there is something missing in you soul? Ah I know what it is: faith.

Ah, faith...... I agree you cannot argue faith. If someone has faith that the sky is actually black then nothing and no ammount of evidence will sway his mind even if that meant he could no longer see what was in front of his eyes
 
Re: Creation from clay

How can you estimate that. Several thousand is not the same as 500,000......

ok i meant many thousands. my bad.

Ah, faith...... I agree you cannot argue faith. If someone has faith that the sky is actually black then nothing and no ammount of evidence will sway his mind even if that meant he could no longer see what was in front of his eyes

Faith doesn't make one blind. It gives them hope. It allows them to do things that they might never be able to do had they not had faith. Faith doesn't make one wrong - nor does it make them right. Faith is Faith.
 
Last edited:
Re: Creation from clay

mansio said:
Sometimes I wonder if I am not discussing with children.
The idea of man molded from clay doesn't need to come from God. God is so much smarter than that. Anybody can watch a potter molding a statue. By analogy, in the pagan cultures, that fact gave the idea of a god creating a human being that way.
Man created from clay is a pagan myth borrowed by the Bible and then by the Quran.
It's as simple as that.


One might as well say that if God created mankind, why is there sickness? Why isn't eveything perfect? Why don't things happen according to what we perceive to be as 'common sense'? The fact is, one of the attributes of God is that He is the All-Wise. Therefore we often find things that might not make sense to us, but God, out of His great Wisdom and Knowledge, knows it to be for the best. Who are we to question why God chose a certain substance to create us out of?
You say the pagans got their ideas from watching a potter, please provide evidence.

You still have not answered the question as to how you know which existed first: monotheism or paganism. Therefore how do you KNOW that the Bible and the Quran "borrowed" ideas? Let's be fair about this and provide proof to backup our statements shall we, don't just throw statements blindly into the air and expect everyone to believe them. Its no wonder you don't take any answers when you can't even provide solid evidence yourself.


mansio said:
Most Christians know it's a pagan myth but they take it in a figurative meaning, symbolically. So they are not in the least embarrassed in their faith by the discoveries of science.

What exactly are you saying here, that most of the world's Christians don't believe that God made humans? That's a rather big assumption and if they don't, I doubt they can call themselves Christian. Maybe you could elaborate on this and possibly show some evidence.

mansio said:
Some on this forum believe Adam actually existed, not by their own discoveries, but because they are told so by the Quran. So that obliges them to distort reality to make it match with the Quran.


Since when has anyone distorted reality to make it match with the Quran?? Science and Islam do not contradict each other, so perhaps you could provide examples proving otherwise?

mansio said:
As man emerged about two millions years ago when did Adam live ? If you want to narrow the question down to Homo Sapiens, who emerged between half a million and a quarter million years, do it.
mansio said:


Muslims do not get too bogged down with unnecessary questions like the exact year in which the first man on earth lived. God has made it known that He created the first man, and this man came to earth, what more would you like to know? There are even descriptions about his height if you are that interested, and about his family etc etc. but you cannot expect modern day technology to reveal some remains from millions of years ago, and use that as an argument that Adam did not exist.
It has already been mentioned that:

Preacher said:
If something is not found that does not constitutes it never existed.


And please do remember to think about the following questions:
Ansar Al-'Adl said:
The fact that some idea/theology is old does not make it any less valid. That's a logical fallacy. Remember, islam claims to be the original teachings since the beginning of time. Wouldn't it seem reasonable that the early Prophets of Islam spoke of creation from clay?

Secondly, you called the notion a 'pagan myth', both of which are unsubstatiated claims. Can you show me conclusive evidence that the theory of creation from clay has pagan origins? Can you show me how it is a myth?
 
Last edited:
Re: Creation from clay

root said:
I noticed too how quickly the thread was detroyed when we got to specifics regarding Adam.

I agree with this too, and it is called "primatephobia".


I think what's happened here is that certain people were asked for evidence and they chose to ignore that. Then they asked the same questions as though nobody answered them. The thread is still going but people are just trying to make false accusations and choose to take and leave what they like.

I think there is also such a thing as 'faithophobia' though it might not be a registered word yet.

root said:
Ah, faith...... I agree you cannot argue faith. If someone has faith that the sky is actually black then nothing and no ammount of evidence will sway his mind even if that meant he could no longer see what was in front of his eyes



Strange you say that because it can go both ways... Some people claim they will only believe until they see God in front of their very eyes. I ask you, if He is the One to create our entire universe, the One whom mansio believes is so "smart" that making us out of clay seems unbelievable, why should He come down every century or so to prove His existence, when everything around us already points to His existence??
There is evidence everywhere around us yet some are blind to it, and God even mentions them in His Noble Book:

'Verily, those who disbelieve, it is the same to them whether you (O Muhammad (peace be upon him)) warn them or do not warn them, they will not believe.' [2:6]

God addresses the Children of Israel:
'And (remember) when you said: "O Musa (Moses)! We shall never believe in you until we see Allaah plainly." But you were seized with a thunderbolt (lightning) while you were looking.
Then we raised you up after your death, so that you might be grateful.' [2:55-56]

'And even if We had sent down to them the angels and the dead had spoken to them and We had brought together all things before them, they would not believe unless Allah pleases, but most of them are ignorant.' [6:111]

'And those who do not hope for Our meeting, say: Why have not angels been sent down upon us, or (why) do we not see our Lord? Now certainly they are too proud of themselves and have revolted in great revolt.' [25:21]

'And certainly We have explained for men in this Quran every kind of similitude, but most men do not consent to aught but denying.
And they say: We will by no means believe in you (O Muhammad (peace be upon him)) until you cause a fountain to gush forth from the earth for us.
Or you should have a garden of palms and grapes in the midst of which you should cause rivers to flow forth, gushing out.
Or you should cause the heaven to come down upon us in pieces as you think, or bring Allah and the angels face to face (with us).
Or you should have a house of gold, or you should ascend into heaven, and we will not believe in your ascending until you bring down to us a book which we may read. Say: Glory be to my Lord; am I aught but a mortal apostle?'
[17:89-93]
 
Last edited:
Re: Creation from clay

Thankz for the post...indeed was a long one but just read part 1 yet...
got answers of my questions..... :)
:applaud: :applaud: :applaud:
 
Re: Creation from clay

Faith by itself doesn't mean anything.
If it is faith in something real, then it is legitimate.
If it is faith in something unreal, that has never existed, then it's called gullibility.
 
Re: Creation from clay

Mansio,
Its interesting that you call certain beliefs "fairy tales" or "pagan myths", yet the Qur'an rsponded to such arguments 1400 years ago.

25:4-6 But the disbelievers say: "Naught is this but a lie which he has forged, and others have helped him at it." In truth it is they who have put forward an iniquity and a falsehood.
And they say: "Tales of the ancients, which he has caused to be written: and they are dictated before him morning and evening."
Say: "The (Qur'an) was sent down by Him who knows the mysteries in the heavens and the earth: verily He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."


And furthermore:
83:10-14. Woe, that Day, to those that deny-Those that deny the Day of Judgment. And none can deny it but the Transgressor beyond bounds the Sinner! When Our Signs are rehearsed to him, he says, "Tales of the ancients!" By no means! but on their hearts is the stain of the (ill) which they do!

16:24 When it is said to them, "What is it that your Lord has revealed?" they say, "Tales of the ancients!"


I find it miraculous that in whatever debate I have, the Qur'an explicity answers the claims of my opponents for me. SubhanAllah.

mansio said:
Sometimes I wonder if I am not discussing with children.
I asked you a question and you respond with condescending remarks. Let's try to have a productive dialogue, please.

The idea of man molded from clay doesn't need to come from God. God is so much smarter than that.
The logic doesn't follow here. God informs us that He has created human beings from clay, yet you dismiss God's words on the basis of what? Creation from clay is a sign for human beings, since to us clay seems so lifeless and inconceivable that we could be created from it, yet God has truly designed us in the best form from this substance, a testimony to His power and wisdom.
http://www.islamonline.net/fatwa/english/FatwaDisplay.asp?hFatwaID=104053

Besides, I don't even know how you can remotely use this as an argument against Islam, since the nature of this clay was unknown to you.

This is what we know of earthly clay:
Clay is a generic term for an aggregate of hydrous silicate particles less than 4 ?m (micrometres) in diameter. Clay consists of a variety of phyllosilicate minerals rich in silicon and aluminium oxides and hydroxides which include variable amounts of structural water. Clays are generally formed by the chemical weathering of silicate-bearing rocks by carbonic acid, but some are formed by hydrothermal activity. Clays are distinguished from other small particles present in soils such as silt by their small size, flake or layered shape, affinity for water and high plasticity index.
There are three main groups of clays: kaolinite-serpentine, illite, and smectite. Altogether, there are about thirty different types of "pure" clays in these categories, but most natural clays are mixtures of these different types, as well as other weathered minerals.
Montmorillonite, with a chemical formula of (Na,Ca)0.33(Al,Mg)2Si4O10(OH)2·nH2O, is typically formed as a weathering product of low silica rocks. Montmorillonite is a member of the smectite group and a major component of bentonite.
Clays sintered in fire were the first ceramic, and remain one of the cheapest to produce and most widely used materials even in the present day. Bricks, cooking pots, art objects, dishware, spark plug tips, and even musical instruments such as the ocarina are all made with clay. Clay is also used in many industrial processes, such as paper making, concrete production, and chemical filtering.
Varve (or varved clay) is clay with visible annual layers, formed by seasonal differences in erosion and organic content. This type of deposit is common in former glacial lakes from the ice age.
Quick clay is a unique type of marine clay, indigenous to the glaciated terrains of Norway, Canada, and Sweden. It is a highly sensitive clay, prone to liquefaction which has been involved in several deadly landslides.

Anybody can watch a potter molding a statue. By analogy, in the pagan cultures, that fact gave the idea of a god creating a human being that way.
What you say is not historically correct, because in ancient cultures, the creation of clay was not accepted as the true account of man's creation.

In Norse Mythology, the first humans were created from logs by Odin and his brothers.

In the Ancient Aryan myths, we find the belief that the first man and woman grew out of plants and bushes.

In the Babylonian myths, Marduk uses the blood of Kingu to create man.

In the Inca mythology, Con Tiqui fashoned human beings out of giant rocks.

In the Mayan mythology, human beings are created by the Heart-of-sky from Maize-corn dough.

In the Navajo nation, humans were believed to be created from the ears of corn.

In the Celtic mythology, human beings are the descendents of the gods.

Amonst Egyptian Mythology, we find the belief that men and women formed from the tears of the god, Khepera.

Is this enough evidence? Quite clearly, your claim that ancient civilizations naturally believed in creation from clay as they saw pottery is comnpletely unjustified. The account of creation from clay spread under the Abrahamic faiths. Therefore, your claim that it is a "pagan myth" is refuted.

I agree that you will find some ancient cultures that believed in creation from clay, but this is clearly the result of divine revelation, and not analogies from pottery.

Man created from clay is a pagan myth borrowed by the Bible and then by the Quran.
It's as simple as that.
You can keep repeating the same claims, but that doesn't make them anymore credible.

Most Christians know it's a pagan myth but they take it in a figurative meaning, symbolically. So they are not in the least embarrassed in their faith by the discoveries of science.
It would seem to me that they are embarassed, and that's why they need to take the account "symbolically".

Some on this forum believe Adam actually existed, not by their own discoveries, but because they are told so by the Quran.
The sources for knowledge amongst human beings are many, but the most authoritative source is divine revelation. Once a scripture has been accepted as divine revelation, it holds the most weight as evidence.

So that obliges them to distort reality to make it match with the Quran.
Which reality has been distorted?

As man emerged about two millions years ago when did Adam live ? If you want to narrow the question down to Homo Sapiens, who emerged between half a million and a quarter million years, do it.
You can set a date for Adam whenever you wish, in light of scientific discoveries. It doesn't amke a difference.

According to our current understanding of evolution, there were several "bottle-necks" in the history of our species, where scientists have identified an extremely low number of individuals in the population. They suggest that at these points in our timeline, a great number of species died out, and the species procreated from these indivduals. Adam (pbuh) may have been aty any of those bottle-necks.


:w:
 
Re: Creation from clay

mansio said:
Faith by itself doesn't mean anything.
If it is faith in something real, then it is legitimate.
If it is faith in something unreal, that has never existed, then it's called gullibility.
Define reality and existence after reading the works of Baudrillard. Reality is only what our conciousness makes it - and we don't even know what that really is yet.
 
Last edited:
Re: Creation from clay

And last but most certainly not least; a topping to finish off our response:

mansio said:
I come to the crux of the matter : do you believe that Adam was an ape-like biped that slowly became intelligent, slowly acquired speech and slowly became religious ? "Slowly" can mean several thousand years.
Many times in the Qur'an can a person find the story of Adam. One only has to pick up the book and read.

[2.29]He it is Who created for you all that is in the earth, and He directed Himself to the heaven, so He made them complete seven heavens, and He knows all things.

[2.30] And when your Lord said to the angels, I am going to place in the earth a khalif, they said: What! wilt Thou place in it such as shall make mischief in it and shed blood, and we celebrate Thy praise and extol Thy holiness? He said: Surely I know what you do not know.

[2.31] And He taught Adam all the names, then presented them to the angels; then He said: Tell me the names of those if you are right.
[2.32] They said: Glory be to Thee! we have no knowledge but that which Thou hast taught us; surely Thou art the Knowing, the Wise.

[2.33] He said: O Adam! inform them of their names. Then when he had informed them of their names, He said: Did I not say to you that I surely know what is ghaib in the heavens and the earth and (that) I know what you manifest and what you hide?

[2.34] And when We said to the angels: Make obeisance to Adam they did obeisance, but Iblis (did it not). He refused and he was proud, and he was one of the unbelievers.

[2.35] And We said: O Adam! Dwell you and your wife in the garden and eat from it a plenteous (food) wherever you wish and do not approach this tree, for then you will be of the unjust.

[2.36] But the Shaitan made them both fall from it, and caused them to depart from that (state) in which they were; and We said: Get forth, some of you being the enemies of others, and there is for you in the earth an abode and a provision for a time.

[2.37] Then Adam received (some) words from his Lord, so He turned to him mercifully; surely He is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.
[2.38] We said: Go forth from this (state) all; so surely there will come to you a guidance from Me, then whoever follows My guidance, no fear shall come upon them, nor shall they grieve.

[2.39] And (as to) those who disbelieve in and reject My communications, they are the inmates of the fire, in it they shall abide.


Please note:
Allaah taught Adam the names of everything, which answers your question as to how Adam acquired intelligence.
 
Re: Creation from clay

:sl:
Threads split.

Some of my points were being left unanswered. We will deal with the origins of the story of creation from clay, as well as it's scientific authenticity, in this thread.

:w:
 
Some of my points were being left unanswered. We will deal with the origins of the story of creation from clay, as well as it's scientific authenticity, in this thread.

I can accept this, for I too have lost my way when the thread split. "creation from clay" or "evolution from clay". which is it to be............... for the point of the discussion.
 
:sl:

I am not sure why some people; especially "atheists and evolutionists" parrot too much of science, scientific and scientific evidence for everything, like science is the panacea of every question and human problems.

If that is true than, why there is a term in scientific vocabulary as "Paranormal" and why it has often used as an answer or conclusion by the scientists and experts etc?


Let us look in the American Heritage Dictionary what is the meaning of the word "Paranormal?"

par·a·nor·mal (p²r”…-nôr“m…l) adj. Beyond the range of normal experience or scientific explanation: such paranormal phenomena as telepathy; a medium's paranormal powers. --par”a·nor·mal“i·ty (-nôr-m²l“¹-t¶) n. --par”a·nor“mal·ly adv.

Now we are often bombard with the non-sense that science has found the cure of this and that, true; but what is the relevance of finding the cure of TB or any other disease with belief, in unknown and unseen or existence of God?

What about all those failures where science or scientific community conceded the defeat by concluding an issue or question as "Paranormal?" Doesn't it prove something, hello?

Despite of all its success (that no one is denying) science or scientific community have hopelessly failed to tell us what is the origin/s of life or how the life began?

The irony of the issue of evolution is that, it has two such distinct aspects to it. One is its theory, and the other one is its cause. The theory of evolution is said to be a certainty, whereas the cause of evolution is as yet unknown.

How it is possible for a concept to be believed with such forceful certainty when the causes are unknown?

It is like evolutionists are saying that, the concept of evolution is a theory for which arguments have yet to be discovered.

Can you see the obvious absurdity, here?

Regards
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top