Debate: Why do some people completely reject hadith?

Status
Not open for further replies.
A very well written and informative post i must say.

jazak allah for that brother..

i have a question on the hadeeth as i do follow certain hadeeth but am worried for our religon when it comes to some as they seem to clash at times i had a question as i stated...

i understand that u state that it was said by our prophet pbuh to not write things down and at a later date it was stated that things may be written down...now i can see the sense in that as perhaps this was as you said not to mix up the wordings of allah however what im intrested in is are there any dates to show which hadeeth was said first and which after? as so to work out how we can come to the conclusion that this was indeed the case as in what proof do we have that after the quran the prophet pbuh stated that we can write things down?

i have seen the hadith however i mean is there any type of dating or proof that they were stated after the quran was finished?

how did we come to the conclusion that the prophet pbuh had finished the quran before he stated that comment about writing things down now is allowed?

for i have seen even a hadeeth that states clearly that write nothing but the quran yet i have seen no clear hadeeth on the fact that hadeeth or books of these sort should b kept?

as in the prophet pbuh states quite clearly in the hadeeth that we may reiterate his ways from memory but he never stated clearly that we should write other books or take advice from third parties...

im not intrested in what this person or that person beleives im intrested in the truth..

:w:
 
Last edited:
just 1 last thing..if everything the Prophet did and said is to be considered divinely inspired..then doesnt that mean that Prophet Muhammed pbuh is 100% perfect and cannot make errors of judgement, proof of which is in the Qur'an itself when Prophet Muhammed pbuh forbade honey to himself and then Allah told him it was wrong of him to do so? and that it is only Allah who makes things haraam and halaal? Also what about that hadeeth where Prophet Muhammed pbuh gives a man bad agricultural advice and the man's crops become bad? and then Prophet Muhammed told the man that he is only a man who can make mistakes?

Salam. i have heard this is a fabricated hadith, Allah Knows Best. Maybe somebody else can shed more light on this hadith
 
just 1 last thing..if everything the Prophet did and said is to be considered divinely inspired..then doesnt that mean that Prophet Muhammed pbuh is 100% perfect and cannot make errors of judgement, proof of which is in the Qur'an itself when Prophet Muhammed pbuh forbade honey to himself and then Allah told him it was wrong of him to do so? and that it is only Allah who makes things haraam and halaal? Also what about that hadeeth where Prophet Muhammed pbuh gives a man bad agricultural advice and the man's crops become bad? and then Prophet Muhammed told the man that he is only a man who can make mistakes?

hmm an intresting question are these hadith fact!? if so then indeed they raise a question on the hadeeth...

as for wether he could have made a mistake on the quran the quran was given by allah and what is within it was stated to the prophet pbuh from allah and the prophet pbuh would adhere to all that allah had said but if these hadeeth are correct then its is clear that we should follow only the quran that was gifted from allah to the mouth of our prophet pbuh.
 
Last edited:
Salam. i have heard this is a fabricated hadith, Allah Knows Best. Maybe somebody else can shed more light on this hadith

I found the hadeeth in refrence here it seems to exist not a fake but allah knows best -

Book 009, Number 3496:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) narrated that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) used to spend time with Zainab daughter of Jahsh and drank honey at her house. She ('A'isha further) said: I and Hafsa agreed that one whom Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) would visit first should say: I notice that you have an odour of the Maghafir (gum of mimosa). He (the Holy Prophet) visited one of them and she said to him like this, whereupon he said: I have taken honey in the house of Zainab bint Jabsh and I will never do it again. It was at this (that the following verse was revealed): 'Why do you hold to be forbidden what Allah has made lawful for you... (up to). If you both ('A'isha and Hafsa) turn to Allah" up to:" And when the Holy Prophet confided an information to one of his wives" (lxvi. 3). This refers to his saying: But I have taken honey.

As for the prophet being 100% perfect...there was never a man like him nor will there be the likes of him again.

he is as close to perfect as you can get but no man has been perfect...and never will be...we can but try to be even but a shadow of our great prophet pbuh.
 
Brother Rou i was talking about the following hadith, i didnt quote properly sorry, my fault

Also what about that hadeeth where Prophet Muhammed pbuh gives a man bad agricultural advice and the man's crops become bad? and then Prophet Muhammed told the man that he is only a man who can make mistakes?

I heard it is fabricated as the brother who claimed this argued the prophet could not give bad advice, as his speech was an indirect form of revelation
 
Brother Rou i was talking about the following hadith, i didnt quote properly sorry, my fault



I heard it is fabricated as the brother who claimed this argued the prophet could not give bad advice, as his speech was an indirect form of revelation

hmmm...i did search for such a hadeeth through out many haddets but unfortunatly have found nothing that relates to this..anyone else have any idea where this has arisen from? or any answer to my earlier post about the hadeeths being dated ?
 
:sl:
Regarding the narrations on the prohibition of writing other than the Qur'an, then Br. Kadafi's article has a large quotation from Imam An-Nawawi which explains that this was an early stage command when the number of followers of Islam as still few, but later once Islam has expanded and there were many many knowledgeable companions, then the risk of mixing things up was no longer there. It doesn't necessarily mean that the revelation of the entire Qur'an was already complete at that point, just that the risks were gone. An-Nawawi also cites two other views and that is that the prohibition was for writing both on the same page, or that the prohibition was for writing the hadith during those moments when Qur'an was being revealed. But the main view is said to be the most likely.

Regarding the infallibility of the prophets. Yes, Prophets made minor mistakes relating to their human judgement, but NOT any mistakes in their transmission of the religion, their religious verdicts or commitment to Allah swt.
:w:
 
:sl:
Regarding the narrations on the prohibition of writing other than the Qur'an, then Br. Kadafi's article has a large quotation from Imam An-Nawawi which explains that this was an early stage command when the number of followers of Islam as still few, but later once Islam has expanded and there were many many knowledgeable companions, then the risk of mixing things up was no longer there. It doesn't necessarily mean that the revelation of the entire Qur'an was already complete at that point, just that the risks were gone. An-Nawawi also cites two other views and that is that the prohibition was for writing both on the same page, or that the prohibition was for writing the hadith during those moments when Qur'an was being revealed. But the main view is said to be the most likely.

Regarding the infallibility of the prophets. Yes, Prophets made minor mistakes relating to their human judgement, but NOT any mistakes in their transmission of the religion, their religious verdicts or commitment to Allah swt.
:w:

Indeed i agree that the prophet pbuh had no mistake in transmitting the quran to his followers or narrating it, and understand that thats why the hadith at that time may have been stated not to be written but i am asking if the hadith are dated is that why we know that there was a diffrence in time or was there a mention of the time span in which these statments were made? so that one can judge the authenticty of that particular statment.
 
I know it's totally crazy and stupid! I know someone who totally rejects believing in hadiths too...the worlds gone mad!

the worlds gone mad beacuse we question the hadith??? there are many hadith that have been stated as untrue heance why certain ones are beleived in example bukhari etc but why would it seem strange that people question it or dont beleive?

the fact that certain ones were proven to be untrue shows that we must be careful though bikhari has been shown that it has truth it does not mean that translaters or mistakes were not made we must becareful not to follow blindly that would but only insult our religon...not safe gaurd it...

if hadith are indeed exact then why are majority of muslims not wearing henna in there hair?

its just confusing heance the questions to get to the bottom of it..
 
Assalamu Aleykum,

The Qur'an doesnt contradict itself..whats more Allah throws in a challenge too..'that if it was from other than God it would have many discrepancies' is there any such challenge in the hadeeth literature..is not scholars who seperate the wheat from the chalf?..The one who revealed the Qur'an is Allah subhanahu wata'ala..it is He who is addressing us directly in the Qur'an and He has promised us that he will protect it from corruption..1400 years and its still the same pure text Allahu Akbar!


You still don't have seem to have answered my question sister, all you have said is that the Qu'ran does not contradict itself and that Allah put a challange in the Qu'ran, and that the text is still pure. Let me reput my question to you, please read it carefully:

"How do you know someone didn't put that in there? How do you know it has no been changed? that is like a Christian says the Bible hasnt been changed because the Bible says so."

All you have said, is that Allah has put a challange in the Qu'ran and so on, look this is as futile an explanation as the Christians, their Bible says "God's words will never perish' and "God is not the author of confusion" Let me ask you, do you believe because of what the bible says about itself that it is still the same?

So please if yuo are going to reply answer the question.

Now are you saying the pure unadulterated Qur'an is equal to the hadeeth books? in that case we have more than 1 perfect book..more than 1 holy book..astaghfirrulah..even the arabic of the Qur'an is much superior to the hadeeths..they cannot be compared at all.

I don't believe that the Qu'ran is the same, who said that, please read carefully, think about things, what have I been asking you about? The preservation through humans, in that way it is the same, you still havent answerd on how the Qu'ran has been preserved, tell me, how? How has it physically been preserved?




brother Sahih Bukhari is considered by many to be the most authentic collection of hadeeths..yet even within it you find hadeeths that contradict each other! I know this because i'vce seen it..its not something unusual..since its a purely human document and humans err

See this is where, you amaze me, because, sister, there are some people that say the Qu'ran has contradiction, why do they say this? Because they read some places, and they see that something "seems" to be contradictory, so based on their little knowledge of Qu'ran they say "it's a contradiction" but then when you show them, no look at this surah it explains this and that then they realise it is not a contradiction, similarly, with hadeeth, people like yourself, see one hadeeth then see anther and say "look itsa contradiction" because of the limited knowledge of hadeeth, but then if a scholar of hadeeth was to sit with you, he'd explain it to you becuse he has a wider knowledge of hadeeth, just as one ayah can explain another one hadeeth can explain another.

the explanation/eloboration of the deen of Allah is preserved..donot confuse hadeeth with Sunnah it isnt the same thing ..Imam Bukhari wrote his book 200 years after the demise of Prophet Muhammed pbuh..do you think before that time people didnt know how to pray..pay zakat etc?..these traditions live on in the Ummah Alhamdullilah..I am not a hadeeth rejector donot confuse me for one but then I'm against many hadeeths that seem to contradict the Qur'anic verses..and also many hadeeths that seem extremely unnecessarily and place hardships on people...e.g look to the bottom of my post.

Sister, you have proven your lack of understanding in the works of Hadeeth, Imam Bukhari didn't write hadeeth! He compiled them, as you have said, the Sunnah has been preserved, all Imam Bukhari did, was take from the people the Sunnah and then put it into a book, compilation! Did he take everything people told him? No, he left some out because some of it was lies, or mistakes .


Brother I am not against learned people..in deed Allah tells us that if we donot know a thing to ask the people who have knowledge..this is a command from Allah to be found in the Qur'an..but then again go to any muslim site or even an Islamic channel..and see for yourself what sort of knowledge muslims are recieving..

Dogs are impure and no angels will grace your home if you have a dog, your salaat will not be accepted if you pray with nail varnish (a new muslim sister was told this in the masjid..you can imagine how she felt..very offended)

Shaping of the eyebrows is haraam, muslim men should wear the thawb and any clothing they wear must be above the ankles, they must have a fist length beard otherwise they are not considered to be 'good muslims',

Your prayer cannot be accepted if you don't cut your nails for 40 days .I remember fretting for days when i had forgotten to cut my nails..thinking my salaah wouldnt be accepted ..since then i have become more knowledgable..now i don't bother to worry since Allah doesnt care about such things but I do cut my nails for cleanliness reasons since our religion encourages us to be clean.

You must not use any soap, mouthwash shampoo which has alcohol , images are haraam , guitars, pianos are haraam, your hands have be on your chest for your salaah to be 'correct..hands by the side like those following Maliki and Ja'fari schools of thoughts is wrong etc etc..the list goes on..all this is found in the hadeeth books.

I would love, I would have loved to see someone genuinly use this type of logic, for the Qu'ran. This is what people do, 'oh this part sounds wrong' lets leave it, this sounds wrong to, how can this be or this is not true. For example you say:

Dogs are impure, or that angels wont enter the house or something like that, what is harder to believe, that Dogs are impure or that ants spoke to a man?

I think you should use this logic with the Qu'ran, and any verse which anyone doesn't agree with should be thrown away, dont you agree? I mean you say, Your prayer cannot be accepted if you don't cut your nails for 40 days, I dont know if thats true, please show us the hadeeth!! but even so, do you make wudu sister? the Qu'ran does talk about it right? But I mean, that must be wrong, I mean what does Allah care if your clean or not, your only praying. Or why does Allah say dont eat the pig, that part of the Qu'ran must be wrong aswell, jee, this logic sure does make the right and wrong clear.

COme on, give me a break, you wanna say something is not right because it doesnt sound 'right' to some, did you know to some people Jesus not dyin doesn't sound right, so I assume just as those who dont like parts of hadeeth say 'it must be forged' those people can say 'that ayah was forged' and take it out lol.

You said: (a new muslim sister was told this in the masjid..you can imagine how she felt..very offended), Jee, look at how many people are upset that you cant ask Jesus for stuff, they must be offended too, does that mean its not right? Come sister.


I hope you get my point..again i apologise if i have offended any body..i am not a hadeeth rejector..there is only 1 Holy book the perfect Qur'an..the Criterion and i only accept hadeeths if they don't contradict with any Qur'anic verses keeping in mind that the only 100% fool proof way to establish the authenticity of many hadeeths is to actually go back in time which is an impossibility.

No need to apologise sister, this is just a discussion between brothers and sisters, inshaAllah.

The above is why I asked you to show me how the Qu'ran has been preserved, anyhow if you answer how then maybe we can see how the Sunnah has been preserved.

You say you only accept hadeeth if they dont contradict Qu'ran, thats what any Muslim says, the Hadeeth SCHOLARS hold this to be a way of seeing if a hadeeth is authentic, I trust the scholars.

Who tells you if a hadeeth contradicts Qu'ran? If you tell me you do your own research and so forth, then I will tell you that alot of people reject the Qu'ran becuse they do their own research but dont have enough knowledge to understand each 'supposed' contradiction, just as I can garantee you, that neither you and i have enough knowledge to understand each 'supposed' hadeeth that contradicts Qu'ran.

just 1 last thing..if everything the Prophet did and said is to be considered divinely inspired..then doesnt that mean that Prophet Muhammed pbuh is 100% perfect and cannot make errors of judgement, proof of which is in the Qur'an itself when Prophet Muhammed pbuh forbade honey to himself and then Allah told him it was wrong of him to do so? and that it is only Allah who makes things haraam and halaal? Also what about that hadeeth where Prophet Muhammed pbuh gives a man bad agricultural advice and the man's crops become bad? and then Prophet Muhammed told the man that he is only a man who can make mistakes?

It amazes me, I don't know how many times the topic of prophets peace be upon them and mistakes has been adressed, it seems you have not raed it.

The prophet, peace be upon him, was not left in any mistake, if he did make a mistake in conveying the religion, he was immideitly corrected by Allah, but he didnt just speak randomly.
 
Rou, so you think that rejecting every single hadith will save a person? If something is questionable, then you ask those who have knowledge as its mentioned within the Qur'an.

Again, the issues of salaah,zakaah, hajj and sawm are always questionable if one was to reject the Authentic ahadith. If that path is true, then why does everyone who only accepts Qur'an not explain that?
 
Rou, so you think that rejecting every single hadith will save a person? If something is questionable, then you ask those who have knowledge as its mentioned within the Qur'an.

Again, the issues of salaah,zakaah, hajj and sawm are always questionable if one was to reject the Authentic ahadith. If that path is true, then why does everyone who only accepts Qur'an not explain that?

As i stated i would advise to be careful when following hadeeth and that is all not to reject it..for i am sure there are many hadeeth that are true but that is not the point here the point is IF we were meant to listen to anything BUT the quran now as stated there are many things we were told to follow of the prophet pbuh and through following his acts indeed but wether to follow such things through written form as the hadeeth that is all i wish to look at...
as i stated many dont wear henna in there hair why is that is that beacuse many reject hadith!? many in medina or mecca dont have beards or henna that is my question but it seems when asking such questions people get riled up this is not one mans religon nor one mans rules that one should be offended no one is insulting here they are questions and the answers can be found by questions...

heance the question about dates on hadith or details in the hadith that prove when they were said and if these dates are not present then there is a doubt on the "we were first forbidden but now are allowed to write hadith"

as stated we must be careful to preserve our religon not self destruct it by following blindly...

i have not once stated the hadiths to be a lie no..if i have stated anything that is that third parties that gatherd information were human and humans unlike allah cannot provide pure untamperd information of what was said by our prophet and that by logic is fact heance we should be careful and that is all...
 
i am asking if the hadith are dated is that why we know that there was a diffrence in time or was there a mention of the time span in which these statments were made? so that one can judge the authenticty of that particular statment.
We know there is a difference it time because we see that many of the companions recorded the Ahadith in writing after Islam began to spread as I mentioned. This was a well known fact amongst the early generations it is not something obscure for which we have to do some kind of radiocarbon dating and analyse values to see which came first and so on. Just like we know certain verses of the Qur'an were revealed earlier than others, we know this about many of the Ahadith.

:w:
 
We know there is a difference it time because we see that many of the companions recorded the Ahadith in writing after Islam began to spread as I mentioned. This was a well known fact amongst the early generations it is not something obscure for which we have to do some kind of radiocarbon dating and analyse values to see which came first and so on. Just like we know certain verses of the Qur'an were revealed earlier than others, we know this about many of the Ahadith.

:w:

ok so there are no dates again we are going on heresay? and fairenough...

but the importance of date on this matter determines wether we should follow hadith at all!?? and that hadith is the single proof that we have that we should? so of course the date is of importance and it should not be based on what one thinks, it should be fact!? otherwise there are many hadith that point to the fact that state we should not follow hadith, and one that says at one point our prophet pbuh stated that we can write things down? and he reffered it to one person in that instance? where as he has pointed out in a much clearer hadith that his words apart from the quran should not be written down?

no one has no date and nor is there clairty of the permisson to write things down?

where as there has been a clear statment not to write things?

and also that the quran is the full message for muslims??

without confirmation of date of that single hadith there is no real way of telling that our prophet pbuh ever wanted us to write such a thing as the hadith?

he clearly stated not to worship him or his image only allah and to follow allahs path that is stated in the quran!?

yet many talk of what the prophet pbuh did and how we should follow the hadith!?

the prophet pbuh was the best example of man indeed and he followed that which allah had shown him within the quran and he himself stated for those who beleive in the hadith that write nothing but the quran...

by stating that one thing be written down for one man that is not a proclamation to write all hadith!?? the lack of dating on this hadith is one thing the fact that other hadith are so clearly stated and others are said to be a statment that means we can write all things from now on sheds doubt on the matter...

i state again we must protect our religon for that is what is expected of us so we should be careful when following hadith...
 
Last edited:
hmm an intresting question are these hadith fact!? if so then indeed they raise a question on the hadeeth...

as for wether he could have made a mistake on the quran the quran was given by allah and what is within it was stated to the prophet pbuh from allah and the prophet pbuh would adhere to all that allah had said but if these hadeeth are correct then its is clear that we should follow only the quran that was gifted from allah to the mouth of our prophet pbuh.

:sl: brother

The Prophet is infallible when it comes to the Qur'an..he doesnt forget it..or mix it up ..but what I'm talking about is..if people say EVERYTHING the Prophet DID and SAID is divnely inspired..then that means Prophet Muhammed also doesnt make errors in judgement..( not in the Qur'an ofcourse but other normal things..you get me? an example is the honey incident..where Prophet Muhammed peace be upon him made a wrong judgement in that he forbade honey for himself..he swore not to touch it again..then Allah revealed the verses that said Prophet Muhammed shouldnt have forbde honey for himself that honey is a cure for many ailments and that it is only Allah that decides whats haraam and halaal for us..

i hope i made myself clear..Prophets are infallible when it comes to transmitting the message of Allah to us..in other things they can make errors like all humans..another example is Porphet Younus peace be upon him who became impatient with his stubborn people and then walked away..as a result he was in the belly of whale for three days and three nights.

:w: and take care.
 
where as he has pointed out in a much clearer hadith that his words apart from the quran should not be written down?

no one has no date and nor is there clairty of the permisson to write things down?

where as there has been a clear statment not to write things?

i have also seen those hadeeths..where Prophet Muhammed pbuh is reported to have said ' donot write anything of what i say down the Qur'an is enough for you'

this however didnt stop the people and its estimated Imam Bukhari collected half a million hadeeths and even comitted ALL of them to memory...how that possible Allah alone knows.
 
i have also seen those hadeeths..where Prophet Muhammed pbuh is reported to have said ' donot write anything of what i say down the Qur'an is enough for you'

this however didnt stop the people and its estimated Imam Bukhari collected half a million hadeeths and even comitted ALL of them to memory...how that possible Allah alone knows.

indeed..i bekleive when it comes to the hadith it iw always best to tred carefully for men have a way of twisting the words of the quran to fit there needs and it seems if they can do this with the noble quran then what can they do of the hadith heance why as muslims we should be careful of what we hear ad what we follow when in regards to the hadith as they are from a third party and not allahs words in clarity such as the quran...
 
ok so there are no dates again we are going on heresay? and fairenough...
Thank you for complete ignoring my comments and repeating the same incoherent argument founded upon your own conjecture. I thought you were actually sincere about learning but your comments indicate otherwise. I hate to repeat myself, but here goes: YES we DO know which hadiths precede other hadiths just like we know which verses precede other verses from what we call contextual or circumstantial evidence - you know, the stuff they use in court to determine the guilt of the accused! Perhaps if you studied the sciences relating to An-Nâsikh wal Mansûkh or Asbâb an-Nuzûl then you would realize it is the exact same process in determining the order of revelation when it comes to the Qur'an. The fallacy in your argument is that you want specific dates but you are forced to appeal to the same arbitrary historical periods when it comes to defending the verses of the Qur'an against anti-islamic allegations. I know because of the articles I've written on the subject. Study Usûl al-Fiqh, or the logic behind the deductions of jurisprudential rulings, and you will learn about how apparently conflicting texts are resolved, one way being through the examination of the historical contexts. This understanding of the texts transmitted through the companions elucidates for the historical context involved. For instance, the hadith of Abu Shah shows how the writing of hadith was permissable by the time of the conquest of Makkah. So there are numerous evidences pertaining to the historical context of the hadith which place one earlier on the timeline than the other.

Your reference to "hearsay" is only a reflection of your own uncertainty about the sciences behind the historical documentation of the early history of Islam, which has the greatest amount of information transmitted to us through authentic chains and written records in stark contrast to what you ignorantly labelled "hearsay".
but the importance of date on this matter determines wether we should follow hadith at all!?
No it is not; your looking for excuses to misquote an earlier hadith and deny its place on a greater historical timeline. I've provided you with the answer to your objection, the fact that you cling to it only represents a stubborn unwillingness on your part to adapt your views in accordance with that which is most logically coherent and stubstantiated.
and one that says at one point our prophet pbuh stated that we can write things down? and he reffered it to one person in that instance?
Thank you for proving that you have failed to read even the most significant points in the article; Imam Nawawi said:
There are countless instructions from the Prophet instructing his companions to write down some ahadeeth.
And the article proceeded to list several explicit unequivocal examples.
and also that the quran is the full message for muslims??
Why don't you answer the challenges that our earlier hadith-rejectors have failed to answer one after another? Why do you celebrate Eid? Why do you pray the number of raka'ah that you do? What argument do you have against someone who claims that "salah" in the Qur'an just means to meditate? And the countless other arguments that our previous ahadith-rejectors have left UNANSWERED throughout this thread. Hadith-rejectors thrive on self-imposed ignorance and irrational obstinacy.
i state again we must protect our religon for that is what is expected of us so we should be careful when following hadith...
You have clearly proven that you are uninterested in objective debate on this topic but are only looking for excuses to justify your own misguided ill-informed understanding of Islam.

:w:
 
:sl:
if people say EVERYTHING the Prophet DID and SAID is divnely inspired..then that means Prophet Muhammed also doesnt make errors in judgement..

Had you studied Usûl al-Fiqh you would have known the rules for WHEN and HOW the Prophet's deeds are taken as part of the religion. For instance, when the Prophet Muhammad pbuh warns of hell for anyone who does a certain action, this is not some lapse in human judgement this is a religious directive which is taken as proof for the impermissibility of an action. God does not allow His Prophet to misguide people, because the function of the Prophet is to guide! Thus, when the Prophet pbuh made a mistake pertaining to his judgement he would be corrected explicitly by God, but he was divinely protected from errors in regards to religious affairs. You were forced to admit this distinction yourself when
you asserted that he was infallible in trasmitting the Qur'an. Logic necessitates that he was also infallible in providing religious guidance for the believers as well in all affairs. He wouldn't command every believer to abstain from X and to perform Y just on the basis of his own conjecture. Na'ûdhubillah, we see refuge in Him from such blatant misguidance.
In terms of his personal relations with people and his social dealings, then yes he could make minor mistakes like how he dealt with Ibn Umm Maktum, his wives, etc. But in conveying the religion? Never.

:w:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top