I disgree. The Qur'an does, indeed say that Mary is a virgin and Muslims believe it. And firstly, do not imply that I am saying anything I am not. I am telling you that the Isaiah 7:14 is not a prophecy of Jesus(p).
Ahh a more interesting claim.
The church must hold this position because Matthew 1:22-23 translates alma in Isaiah 7:14 as “virgin.” The first Gospel quotes this well-known verse to provide the only “Old Testament” proof text for the supposed virgin birth of Jesus.
Well no. Christians would say it is not about proof but about facts.
Back to the Hebrew "Alma."
If the Hebrew word alma means virgin, then each usage in the Bible must be either a clear reference to a virgin or at least be ambiguous. The word alma appears in the Jewish scriptures seven times.
Which it is. Notice that the Jews translated the term in Greek as parthenos which also means virgin - before Jesus was born. Several hundred years before Jesus was born.
If even one reference clearly refers to a woman who is not a virgin, then Matthew’s rendition of Isaiah 7:14 becomes untenable. Sorry to say.
I am unconvinced of that but let's move a long.
One of the places where the uncommon Hebrew word alma appears in the Bible is in Proverbs 30:18-20 which reads,
There are three things which are too wonderful for me, four which I do not understand: the way of an eagle in the sky, the way of a serpent on a rock, the way of a ship in the middle of the sea, and the way of a man with a young woman [b’alma]. This is the way of an adulterous woman: she eats and wipes her mouth, and says, “I have done no wrong.”
Now, Heigou, what is that verse saying? In the above three verses, King Solomon compares a man with an alma to three other things: an eagle in the sky, a serpent on a rock, and a ship in the sea. What do these three things all have in common? They leave no trace. After the eagle has flown across the sky, determining that the eagle had ever flown there is impossible. Once a snake has slithered over a rock, there is no way to discern that the snake had ever crossed there (as opposed to a snake slithering over sand or grass, where it leaves a trail). After a ship has moved across the sea, the water comes together behind it and there is no way to tell that a ship had ever passed through there. Similarly, King Solomon informs us that once a man has been with an alma there is also no trace of the fornication that had occurred between them. Therefore, in the following verse (verse 20) King Solomon explains that once this adulterous woman has eaten (a metaphor for her fornication), she removes the trace of her sexual activity by exclaiming, “I have done no wrong.”
First of all Proverbs is a collection of short sayings with no relation to each other. Compare with a fuller version
[17] The eye that mocketh at his father, and despiseth to obey his mother, the ravens of the valley shall pick it out, and the young eagles shall eat it.
[18] There be three things which are too wonderful for me, yea, four which I know not:
[19] The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid.
[20] Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness.
[21] For three things the earth is disquieted, and for four which it cannot bear:
[18] There be three things which are too wonderful for me, yea, four which I know not:
[19] The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid.
[20] Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness.
[21] For three things the earth is disquieted, and for four which it cannot bear:
Clearly 17 is not related to 18 which is related to 19 and 20 is not related to 21. Now the question is, is 19 related to 20. I think not. As neither 18 nor 19 refer to an adulterous woman. Solomon is not comparing a man's way with a maid to any of these. He says four things perplex him - how on Earth an Eagle stays up in the air, how a ship floats on the ocean, how a snake does not slip off a rock and what moves between a man and a woman. You notice they all seem precarious and unsupported. They all seem dangerous and exciting. Now a ship clearly does leave a wake. And clearly if a man has his wicked way with a maid he too leaves a trace, and perhaps a pregnancy. So "your" interpretation cannot be true. And clearly 20 does not relate to 18 and 19 at all.
The point that there are "anti-Catholic" Bibles has nothig to do with the wording of the verse. It clearly has two meanings, however, the Jewish Bible uses the correct one.
Yes. Parthenos. A virgin. The title of Athena. Actually it has a lot to do with it. Until the modern period no one thought that this did not refer to a virgin. Suddenly they do? uh huh.
In Genesis 28:19 we read "And he called the name of that place Bethel (house of God)". Since the place was named "house of God," does this mean that God lived inside this house?
No, it means it is a house dedicated to God. House of God.
Self-evidently there is a difference between The House of God and God is With Us. In one God is the active party, in the other He is not. The house is merely dedicated to him. Same with God Hears. Not God's hearing.
There is a difference, however, the point is because the name Immanuel means, "God with us." Does it automatically refer to Jesus(p)?
Not automatically. At least not to me.