DID YOU KNOW that the bible curses those who remove and add!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter abdul Majid
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 31
  • Views Views 5K
Since the Quran was written in Arabic, we would need to learn Arabic before we could actually understand the meaning correctly.

I'm getting a lot of different answers to the various questions I'm asking. I've been told that the such and such quote from the Quran was mistranslated...so I should not believe it. Therefore, it is seems to me that due to translation, the Quran has been corrupted. Does this make sense?

I would imagine that many of the corrupted verses in the bible are also due to mistranslation. The early church leaders were working with Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek (perhaps other languages). It would be a difficult task.

Thanks, Renak. You picked up on where I was leading with my questions. To read the original Quran, I would need to be able to read Arabic quite fluently, and I can't.
 
you cant compare the corruption of the bible to a quran!!

the quran is not corrupt, its ORIGINAL!!!

THIS CLAIM OF YOURS IS NONSENSE
 
Thanks, Renak. You picked up on where I was leading with my questions. To read the original Quran, I would need to be able to read Arabic quite fluently, and I can't.

Peace Michael:

The point you're failing to miss is that we can go back to the original source to confirm or clarify translations to other languages. I have an option of learning Arabic to read the Qur'an in it's original language.

On the other hand, Christians can try to learn Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, etc., and it would be useless because no original exists. You don't have the originating source to go back to.

Peace,
Hana
 
Peace Michael:

The point you're failing to miss is that we can go back to the original source to confirm or clarify translations to other languages. I have an option of learning Arabic to read the Qur'an in it's original language.

On the other hand, Christians can try to learn Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, etc., and it would be useless because no original exists. You don't have the originating source to go back to.

Peace,
Hana
Who told you that no original texts exist? Do you no this to be true, or is this just what you've been told?
 
Who told you that no original texts exist? Do you no this to be true, or is this just what you've been told?

This is true. Any originals were destroyed or disappeared. There's not a Christian or Biblical Scholar worth anything that would even attempt to tell you different. Why do you think there are so many changes that have taken place throughout history and why there are so many versions today (I'm not referring to translations as that is completely different.) Can you produce the original Torah? The original Zabor or Gospel? Nope, you can't.

Peace,
Hana
 
This is true. Any originals were destroyed or disappeared. There's not a Christian or Biblical Scholar worth anything that would even attempt to tell you different. Why do you think there are so many changes that have taken place throughout history and why there are so many versions today (I'm not referring to translations as that is completely different.) Can you produce the original Torah? The original Zabor or Gospel? Nope, you can't.

Peace,
Hana
The Holy Bible is a compilation of various articles, and yes, some do still exist.

Some respectable scholors would even argue that the Quran has been changed. Noone will be able to prove or disprove the authenticity of the Quran.
 
The Holy Bible is a compilation of various articles, and yes, some do still exist.

Some respectable scholors would even argue that the Quran has been changed. Noone will be able to prove or disprove the authenticity of the Quran.

Oh, ok. The Bible is not inspired by God then, and that would certainly explain all the changes over years.

We have the original Qur'an and there's never been any proof by anyone that it has been altered. In order for them to show it's been altered, they would have to come up with another, older Qur'an to show inconsistencies....that's never been done. The Bible, however, contradicts itself and scribes have taken many liberties with its texts over the years. But, as you have just said, it's more of a history book with articles, rather than Divine Inspiration, so it makes sense it would contradict as many people have differing opinions on a similar event or follow tradition and folklore believing them to be factual.

Peace,
Hana
 
How do you know it's free from corruption?
Were you there when it was written?
The same faith that I must have to believe the Bible is inerrant also applies to the Quran, my friend. I acknowledge that the Bible was written by multiple authors over a long period of time. The Bible has been translated multiple times so that I and others may read and understand it.
What is important, however, is that the Bible is the Word of God, and He has carefully prevented the intent of His Word from ever being lost or altered.

And please don't speak to me about blind faith. You are insulting me and you don't know a thing about me other than the fact that I am Christian. You don't know how my faith has been tested. That is between my Savior and I.

Whats funny is in Islam its a duty as a muslim to believe Jesus is the Messiah and the savior.
 
The Holy Bible is a compilation of various articles, and yes, some do still exist.

Some respectable scholors would even argue that the Quran has been changed. Noone will be able to prove or disprove the authenticity of the Quran.


THAT IS A LIE !!! NO PROVE, ITS SAD THAT YOU WOULD HAVE TO LIE !!
 
?? offensive??? i wouldnt try to offend you even if you cursed my out, lol !!!

quote," Some respectable scholors would even argue that the Quran has been changed. No one will be able to prove or disprove the authenticity of the Quran"" .unquote

ummm that is a lie !!! we can prove it, we been proving it no one wants to listen !!

it says,"that they would ARGUEEEE" !~!!! ofcorse they would, becuase its a lie and there trying to prove a lie !!
 
Last edited:
Dont bother debating with some of the people on this board seriously. Whenever you prove them the information, they google somethign else to refute it. Then when they dont find anything they run and chase another thread. I noticed that among a few people. Only Gibson actually reattracts with something but not an arguement more like a comment trying to make it an arguement. But i like gibson very nice guy learning about Islam. But others on this board? whats your deal? Muhammad pbuh, Islam both mentioned in the bible and you still dont believe? Jesus pbuh and the virgin mary pubher are mentioned in the Quran and you still dont believe? We believe in the same messangers and you still dont believe? What kind of logic is this seriously?
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top