^^Bro this isn't the thread for it. Stop going off topic everyone. If you want to ask him that, do so in a new thread or PM him.
Salaam/peace;
---I read elsewhere that hhread. e visited Holy Kaaba. It seems impossible as only Muslims are allowed to enter the holy mosque. Can u describe the matter ,pl ? Thanks
Pl. dont' just say that Kaaba came to him ....i was told that in other forum....show some proof
chill man, I am following islam so thats how it is.
From East to the West, all nine divisions of the earth bowed to him (Nanak).
He reached Mecca in due course….. he didn't lie or decieve to get into Mecca at all.
He saw the Kaaba standing in the direction of the Guru’s feet. He turned the Guru’s feet in another direction. The Kaaba was seen standing in that direction…… ….The Guru gave him his pair of sandals. They were respectfully kept in the Kaaba for some time
That Muslim fakir then returned to India. He brought the sandals with him. He kept them in his temple at Uch in Bahawalpur, now in Pakistan
Just because you don't believe, does not mean he was not a Prophet. - He's known as Hindu Ka Guru Musulman ka Pir –
No other Prophet from ANY other religion was revved by other faiths.
They asked Baba Nanak to open and search in his book and tell them as to who is better, Hindu or Muslim.
....I am a Christian. Part of my family is Muslim.
Note the pattern of the Christian deacon you lifted up as an example. He took time to learn the prayers, to pray in line with you
Nobody can say for sure. So, it simply makes sense not to have blind faith and believe what makese the most sense...
Sikhi rejects blind rituals. Show me where it states that praying (ritual) is forbidden n Sikhi?
There are at least 6/7 threads about Sikhism on this forum. Go and read up on it!
I'd lvoe to have a face to face debate.
i agree entirely,
appeals to reason though dont always work because people see following a book as reasonable. for example i believe the Quran and sunnah to be true so therefore use them as additional sources of evidence to base logical decisions upon.
i assume the sikhs see the Guru Granth Sahib as the same and hence why i am studying it.
So if i can show you flaws in the Guru Granth Sahib would you agree that using reason and sense that you religion is also flawed and untrue?
Abu Abdullah
As I have said before, Guru Granth Sahib is perfect. Any personal or religious aspect that doesn't agree with Guru Granth Sahib is flawed in itself. Even if something from Guru Granth Sahib doesn't make sense to you, it doesn't mean it's flawed. All it means that you aren't capable of understanding where gurus and saint coming from.
There are reasons why you are Muslim and I consider myself a Sikh. Main reason is that there is difference in how our minds work. So what makes sense to you might not make sense to me. You may look at religion differently than I do. For you, religion could mean whatever the book says and for me, what logically and ethically makes sense.
therefore if i can show you a flaws and contradictions it means it is false, you cannot deny that logical position.
Salaam/peace;
---that’s interesting![]()
--- I did not understand it . Is it allowed for a Christian to declare ( falsely ) that he is a Muslim ?
Just to know how Muslim pray or fast , one does not need to do so . Anybody can come to mosque & watch how Muslims pray without giving them the wrong info that I m a Muslim.
If bro Dawud visits Sikhs holy place , he does not need them to give any false impression that he is interested to be a Sikh . Anyway , i m not expert .....it's just my opinion.
If something appears to be a flaw or contradiction to you, all it means is that you don't understand and you are not able to comprehend the logic... That's all. It doesn't mean it's flaw or contradiction.
True, you did not understand. The Anglican deacon that Dawud speaks of did NOT declare that he was Muslim. He merely came alongside others who were Muslim to enter into prayer. I have done this myself when attending Mosque with my daughter. The Imam and all of the other brothers and sisters knew that I was not Muslim. Indeed they knew that I am a Christian pastor, and nonetheless they invited me to join them in prayers, which I did. I assume that something similar happened with regard to this Anglican deacon that Dawud speaks of.
My point regarding the Anglican deacon is that Dawud seems to be very open to him. And also Dawud thinks, or at least hopes, that perhaps he would receive the same reception in visiting with the Sikhs. And indeed he might. But I was cautioning him with regard to the manner of approach that he chose.
Dawud, in his opening posts, suggests that he might go to show others how they were in error and have a false religion. That is not how he described the Anglican deacon coming to the mosque that he attends. Rather that man came respectful of Muslim faith. I am suggesting to Dawud, that while he may old the religion of the Sikhs to be in error and false, that if he wants to be well received he should still approach them in a resepctful way. I also suggested to him that if this Anglican deacon had entered the mosque in a manner similar to how he has suggested that he might go and visit the Sikhs, that the Anglican deacon may not have found the same cordial reception that he has.
To put it in colloquial speach, "you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar."
this is what i mean, you are not using reason, that is blind acceptence of a concept of the Guru Granth Sahib to be true without questioning.
i also accept the Quran to be true absolutely as you trust your book but my reason meant i tested it to see if it was true before i became muslim as i couldnt accept christianity blindly so nor could i accept islam blindly and nor should you accept sikhi blindly.
if blind ritual is so dangerous in your faith surely blind faith without questioning is far worse?
Abu Abdullah
That's all I was saying. Glad you understood.i agree i would try to approach respectfully but i would be open and honest with my intentions also as i cannot lie in normal life, nor when trying to talk to others about my faith.
Yes, that is strange. Has he always said that, or only after attending the mosque for a period of time?and the christian deacon does indeed state he is muslim and christian at the same time, strange as that is!
i agree entirely,
appeals to reason though dont always work because people see following a book as reasonable. for example i believe the Quran and sunnah to be true so therefore use them as additional sources of evidence to base logical decisions upon.
i assume the sikhs see the Guru Granth Sahib as the same and hence why i am studying it.
So if i can show you flaws in the Guru Granth Sahib would you agree that using reason and sense that you religion is also flawed and untrue?
Abu Abdullah
that is what i thought,
i kept reading though that sikhs reject rituals but yet they are doing rituals and hence my confusion.
can you pm me any articles on the difference in feeling here between ritual and blind ritual? others have contradicted you that is all.
but i would say all would say they are against blind ritual without understanding the reasons for it etc. this isnt something particular to sikhi.
Abu Abdullah
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.