glo
IB Legend
- Messages
- 8,472
- Reaction score
- 1,785
- Gender
- Female
- Religion
- Christianity
A really-quite-nice-atheist-friend of mine once commented that whilst he thought religions were pointless or even dangerous in how they influence people, he had to admit that people of faith were more likely to 'get things done' where injustice, poverty and human rights were concerned.
Of course there are many secular organisations, I am not saying there aren't ... but my friend felt that people of faith often seemed to take a more personal and active role - investing time regularly to help people, often voluntarily and without pay. Many charitable causes rely on people like that.
My atheist friend thought that non-believers (on the whole) did not seem to have the same enthusiasm, energy and focus in such matters than their believeing counterparts.
What are your thoughts? Is my friend right?
If so, why?
Peace
Of course there are many secular organisations, I am not saying there aren't ... but my friend felt that people of faith often seemed to take a more personal and active role - investing time regularly to help people, often voluntarily and without pay. Many charitable causes rely on people like that.
My atheist friend thought that non-believers (on the whole) did not seem to have the same enthusiasm, energy and focus in such matters than their believeing counterparts.
What are your thoughts? Is my friend right?
If so, why?
Peace
